05.05.2014 Views

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

Paper Conservation: Decisions & Compromises

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Microflora Inhabiting Leonardo da Vinci’s Self Portrait:<br />

a Fungal Role in Foxing Spots<br />

Guadalupe Piñar | Katja Sterflinger | Flavia Pinzari<br />

Department of Biotechnology, Vienna Institute of Bio Technology (VIBT)<br />

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria<br />

ICRCPAL-Istituto Centrale per il Restauro e la Conservazione del Patrimonio Archivistico e Librario,<br />

Laboratorio di Biologia, Rome, Italy<br />

Introduction<br />

Leonardo da Vinci’s famous self portrait is made<br />

in red chalk on paper. It is housed at the Royal<br />

Library in Turin, Italy. The drawing is strongly<br />

affected by foxing spots. The damage presumably<br />

occurred between 1890 and 1950. The portrait<br />

has been recently brought to ICRCPAL (Rome) for<br />

scientific analyses.<br />

According to Corte et al. (2003) foxing is a<br />

modification of paper occurring in the form of<br />

brown, brown-reddish or yellowish spots, the origin<br />

of which has not yet been clearly explained.<br />

In fact, despite the extensive research that has<br />

been done in this field, no conclusive results exist<br />

to the cause of foxing. There are two different<br />

theories concerning its development: the biotic<br />

theory, according to which the stains are the<br />

result of the activity of micro-organisms (Choi<br />

2007, and references therein) and the abiotic<br />

theory, entailing chemical phenomena such as<br />

oxidizing and/or heavy metals deposits (Cain and<br />

Miller 1982). In particular, the deterioration of<br />

paper has been linked to the presence of metals<br />

in the pulp, and paper yellowing/browning is<br />

supposed to be caused by cellulose oxidation catalysed<br />

by metals. There is moreover a quite clear<br />

relationship between the occurrence of these<br />

modifications and environmental conditions<br />

(Gallo and Pasquariello 1989).<br />

Recent investigations have studied the role of<br />

fungi in foxing by light and electron microscopy<br />

(Florian and Manning 2000). These studies found<br />

that in some cases the initial cause of foxing was<br />

a group of spores of conidia that had been deposited<br />

on the surface of the paper prior to printing<br />

and had germinated in situ during the slow drying<br />

of the paper.<br />

Arai et al. (1990) proposed the following process<br />

for the formation of foxing: absolute tonophilic<br />

fungi conidia and or ascospores attach to<br />

paper, germinate and grow their hyphae. The<br />

hyphae form colonies around dust particles.<br />

These fungi metabolize mainly malic acid, cellooligosaccharides<br />

and aminobutyric acid in the<br />

colonies. These components react chemically<br />

together on the materials at Aw 0.80 and 20-35°C<br />

forming brown products and oxidative reactions<br />

on paper that result in localised foxing spots.<br />

From old books and manuscripts showing the<br />

characteristic foxing discoloration more than 60<br />

fungus cultures were identified by ordinary light<br />

microscopy and the most common encountered<br />

species are Eurotium, Aspergillus and Penicillium<br />

species.<br />

The brown-rusty spots that deface Leonardo<br />

da Vinci’s portrait have all the characteristics<br />

of foxing, and some of them show a blue-yellow<br />

fluorescence that is also typical of both biological<br />

and chemical foxing (Choi 2007).<br />

The knowledge of the nature of the stains is<br />

a question of great concern because future conservation<br />

treatments and actions towards the<br />

famous object would better be based on scientific<br />

data. Furthermore, the delicate object has been<br />

poorly studied from the “biological” point of<br />

view: only a couple of swab sampling undergoing<br />

culture-dependent techniques was performed between<br />

1960 and 2000, and no significant results<br />

were obtained at that time.<br />

With the aim to address the problem and assess<br />

the current microbiological risk of the drawing,<br />

we performed a study on Leonardo da Vinci’s<br />

self portrait based on non-invasive sampling<br />

using diverse membrane filters and swabs, and a<br />

combination of SEM-EDS imaging culturing and<br />

molecular techniques.<br />

Methods<br />

Sampling<br />

One of the main problems encountered in the<br />

study of Leonardo da Vinci’s self portrait was<br />

the execution of the sampling. Clearly no micro<br />

fragments could be removed since this action<br />

may have caused further damage to the object or<br />

ICOM-CC Graphic Documents Working Group Interim Meeting | Vienna 17 – 19 April 2013<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!