Richard [Nicholls] Harison / Harrison - Onondaga and Oswego ...
Richard [Nicholls] Harison / Harrison - Onondaga and Oswego ...
Richard [Nicholls] Harison / Harrison - Onondaga and Oswego ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
http://books.google.com/books?id=IKoEAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA483&lpg=PA483&dq=%22rich+harison%22&source=bl&ots=oHktSVha<br />
W2&sig=AzLIOXCNNs59hoKre-<br />
SJX9ipGMg&hl=en&ei=Ur_KTP3qIYGBlAeD_Nn7AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepa<br />
ge&q=%22rich%20harison%22&f=false<br />
DEAR SIR:<br />
RICH. HARISON TO R. KING.<br />
NEW YORK, July 24, 1815.<br />
The case of Mettus Tuffetius, alluded to by Mr. Mason, is in the 27 & 28th Chapters of the first Book of Livy. It is a strong case, <strong>and</strong><br />
should be considered in connection with the Treaty stated in the 24th Chapter of the same Book. This Treaty proceeded the<br />
celebrated Battle between the Horatii <strong>and</strong> the Curiatii & contained the following Terms. "Cujus Populi Cives eo Certamine vicissent,<br />
is alteri Populo cum bona Pace imperitaret." The Inhabitants of Alba, therefore after the Victory of the Horatii, became Subjects of<br />
Rome: <strong>and</strong> the punishment of Mettus appears to be founded upon that basis—not upon the Principle of public Law, as between<br />
distinct Nations,—Mettus was considered & punished as a traitor & Livy himself treats of the Subject in that Light. How far the Case<br />
may be applicable to the existing Case of the great Criminal, is certainly a nice question. He once owed Allegiance to the French<br />
Monarchy—He had renounced all pretensions to the Crown, & he entered France with the avowed purpose of dethroning the<br />
Monarch—why then is he not a traitor & liable to ultimate punishment?<br />
Believe me, Dr. Sir, with the most sincere Respect your obed Servt. &c.<br />
RICH. HARISON.<br />
-----<br />
“The papers of Alex<strong>and</strong>er Hamilton, Volume 10,” by Alex<strong>and</strong>er Hamilton, Harold Coffin Syrett, page 416.<br />
http://books.google.com/books?id=uZPMs7jGhDgC&pg=PA416&lpg=PA416&dq=%22rich+harison%22&source=bl&ots=5l2oF3RQV<br />
m&sig=sTuxWb9eyiSVxaTeGQPxrEf2jvo&hl=en&ei=IMTKTJ26IIX7lwfu7uXzCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0<br />
CBgQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=%22rich%20harison%22&f=false<br />
New York 16th May 1794<br />
Dr Sir,<br />
. . . Our Friend Lawrance 1 appears very much pleased with his new Appointment. The Chancellor’s would have given great<br />
Satisfaction to many of his Well Wishers: <strong>and</strong> it would not be disagreeable if the Appointment should be transferred to some<br />
Character equally meritorious 2 . . .<br />
Hon. Alexr. Hamilton Esqr.<br />
1. On 7 May 1794 George Washington signed “a Commission for John Laurance as judge of the District of New York.”<br />
Rich: <strong>Harison</strong><br />
2. <strong>Harison</strong> is referring to the refusal of Robert R Livingston, Chancellor of New York, to accept the appointment as United States<br />
Minister to France to succeed Gouvernor Morris (see “List on Names From Whence to Take a Minister for France,” May 19, 1794)..<br />
On April 27 Secretary of State Edmund R<strong>and</strong>olph wrote to the President that he had “conversed with several Gentlemen, who are<br />
of the same politics” as Livingston <strong>and</strong> that “upon the whole, they think that his appointment would be satisfactory.”<br />
On April 29 the President offered the post to Livingston.<br />
On May 10 <strong>and</strong> 15 1794, Livingston replied, declining the position.<br />
In a letter to James Monroe, dated May 16 1794, Livingston stated that he had refused the offer partly because of the effect his<br />
resignation as chancellor might have on politics of New York, for he believed that the chancellorship would be “filled by a person of a<br />
very different political character. Besides that differing so much as I do from the . . . Administration I am satisfied that I should either<br />
be compelled to violate my own Principles by yielding to theirs or risk my reputation by incurring their resentment.<br />
Note: As may be seen by the below brief biographical sketch of Robert R Livingston, the wisdom <strong>and</strong> timing of his initial declination<br />
to serve as United States Minister to France is quite remarkable, considering what he actually did upon acceptance of this position<br />
in 1801. Note also that he served as Gr<strong>and</strong> Master of Masons from 1784 to 1801.<br />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Livingston_(1746%E2%80%931813)<br />
Robert R Livingston was appointed Recorder of New York City * in October 1773, but soon<br />
identified himself with the anti-colonial Whig Party <strong>and</strong> was replaced a few months later with<br />
John Watts, Jr. He was a member of the Committee of Five that drafted the Declaration of<br />
Independence, although he was recalled by his state before he could sign the final version of<br />
the document.<br />
* The office of Recorder of New York City was held by Francis <strong>Harison</strong> [1725-1735] <strong>and</strong> his<br />
gr<strong>and</strong>son <strong>Richard</strong> <strong>Harison</strong> [15 Feb 1798 to 25 Aug 1801].<br />
From 1777 to 1801, he was the first Chancellor of New York, then the highest judicial officer in<br />
the State. He became universally known as "The Chancellor", retaining the title as a nickname<br />
even after he left the office. Livingston was also U. S. Secretary of Foreign Affairs from 1781 to<br />
1783, under the Articles of Confederation. In 1789, as Chancellor of New York, he administered<br />
the presidential oath of office to George Washington at Federal Hall in New York City, then the<br />
capital of the United States.<br />
In 1789, Livingston joined the Jeffersonian Republicans (later known as the Democratic-<br />
Republicans), in opposition to his former colleagues John Jay <strong>and</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>er Hamilton who<br />
84