05.05.2014 Views

Richard [Nicholls] Harison / Harrison - Onondaga and Oswego ...

Richard [Nicholls] Harison / Harrison - Onondaga and Oswego ...

Richard [Nicholls] Harison / Harrison - Onondaga and Oswego ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ox6BqzSO0zQJ:famousamericans.net/leonardlispenard/+%22leonard+lis<br />

penard%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us<br />

Leonard Lispenard, merchant, born in New York city in 1716; died there, 15 February, 1790. He was the gr<strong>and</strong>son of Anthony<br />

Lispenard, a Huguenot refugee, who came to New York about the middle of the 17th century <strong>and</strong> became a merchant there. In 1741<br />

he married Alice, daughter of Anthony Rutgers, who inherited one third of the extensive grant that was made by George II. to her<br />

father, <strong>and</strong> subsequently Mr. Lispenard acquired by purchase the remainder of the l<strong>and</strong>, which has since been known as the<br />

Lispenard meadows. His country mansion was on Lispenard hill, an elevation overlooking what later was called St. John's park. Mr.<br />

Lispenard was assistant alderman from the north ward in 1750-'5, <strong>and</strong> alderman in 1756-'62, <strong>and</strong> member of the provincial<br />

assembly in 1765-'7. He was an active member of the Stamp-act congress in New York in 1765, of the committee of one hundred<br />

that was elected to control all general affairs in May, 1775, <strong>and</strong> of the first provincial congress in May, 1775. He was also treasurer<br />

of King's (now Columbia) college, one of the original members of the Society of the New York hospital, <strong>and</strong> one of its governors in<br />

1770-'7.--His two Sons, LEONARD <strong>and</strong> ANTHONY, were well-known men at, that time. The three streets, Leonard, Anthony (now<br />

Worth), <strong>and</strong> Thomas, were named after the sons of Anthony, <strong>and</strong> Bathe street (now spelled Beach) after his son-in-law, Paul Bathe,<br />

while Lispenard street was named in honor of the family, <strong>and</strong> Barclay street after Reverend Thomas Barclay who married his wife's<br />

sister.<br />

------<br />

Selections from the correspondence of Thomas Barclay: formerly British ...,” by Thomas Barclay, page 109.<br />

http://books.google.com/books?id=In8BAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA13&dq=%22leonard+lispenard%22+%22harison%22&hl=en&ei=RWrJT<br />

IWoAsHflgfC642NAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22harison%22&f=false<br />

TO MRS. MARGARET DE LANCEY, BATH, ENGLAND.<br />

New York 8th Novr 1800. MY DEAR MADAM:<br />

I wrote you a hasty line by the Lady Arabella Packet, being at that time very unwell with an intermitting fever, from which I am now<br />

happily recovered, though much reduced. In that letter I acknowledged the receipt of your favor covering the letter of Attorney, <strong>and</strong><br />

my readiness to render you any Service in my power. I at the same time Stated to you my having retained Mr <strong>Harison</strong> 2 as your<br />

Council, <strong>and</strong> acquainted you that Mr Hoffman being the Attorney General of this State rendered it improper for him to act for you. I<br />

took the liberty at the same time to give you my opinion respecting the mode of obtaining your dower or compensation in lieu of it;<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mr <strong>Harison</strong>s opinion on the same subject. I shall repeat these, least by an accident to the Lady Arabella you may be deprived of<br />

my former letter.<br />

1 Margaret De Lancey was the widow of the James De Lancey who was Agent of the American Loyalists in Engl<strong>and</strong>. She was the<br />

daughter of Chief Justice William Allen of Pennsylvania, the friend of Benjamin West <strong>and</strong> Benjamin Franklin. James De Lancey<br />

died at Bath, 1799. He had been attainted by the Act of 1779, <strong>and</strong> his property in the city of New-York had been sold at various<br />

times prior to February, 1787. A full account of these sales will be found in Mr. E. F. De Lancey's notes to Jones's Hist. of NY,<br />

Vol. II, pp. 540-559. His widow of course, became entitled to dower was in all the l<strong>and</strong>s sold.<br />

2 <strong>Richard</strong> <strong>Harison</strong> was born in New-York, January 23, 1748, <strong>and</strong> died in the same city, December 7, 1829. He was graduated<br />

from Kings College in 1764. He married first, Catharine, daughter of Dr. Jones of Long Isl<strong>and</strong>; second, Frances, daughter of<br />

George Duncan Ludlow, one of the Judges of the Supreme Court of the Province of New-York, <strong>and</strong> afterward the first Chief<br />

Justice of New Brunswick. <strong>Harison</strong> was inclined to the Tory side, but in 1789 he was chosen one of the delegates from the city of<br />

New-York to the Poughkeepsie Convention that ratified the Federal Constitution, his colleagues being John Jay, <strong>Richard</strong> Morris,<br />

John Sloss Hobart, Alex<strong>and</strong>er Hamilton, Robert R. Livingston, Isaac Roosevelt, James Duane, <strong>and</strong> Nicholas Low. He was for<br />

many years one of the leaders of the New-York bar, <strong>and</strong> counsel in a large proportion of the more important cases, reported in<br />

the early New-York reports. Upon the organization of the Federal Government he was appointed by General Washington U. S.<br />

District Attorney. From 1798 to 1799 he was Recorder of the city. For forty-one years —1788 to 1829 — he was one of the<br />

Trustees of Columbia College, <strong>and</strong> in 1823 was Chairman of the Board. He also held the office of Comptroller of the Trinity<br />

Church Corporation.<br />

Having fully considered your claim of dower,—the very great number of Tenants of the freehold who must be sued— the probable<br />

delay before you will be put in possession. The forcible reasons why the Major part of the Proprietors will prefer your having the<br />

actual possession of one third of the Lots <strong>and</strong> houses. The enormous expense attending a litigation, where there will probably be<br />

not less than three or four hundred Suits, your own costs of which, you must defray. The immense number of vacant lots, which<br />

altho' they are valued at about £100 this Currency each, do not, nor would they at any future period in your h<strong>and</strong>s, produce any<br />

annual rent. The precarious tenor of life—The loss your Children would sustain by your dying at the earliest within fifteen years. The<br />

length of time it would require to make the rents issues <strong>and</strong> profits of your third part of this Estate, after deducting six hundred per<br />

annum as Interest for the Capital, net you a clear principal of £10,000 this Currency. The impossibility of your renting unimproved<br />

lots <strong>and</strong> parts of Lots, from the uncertainty of your Life — The difficulty of obtaining tenants, to occupy a third part of a house,<br />

containing not more than two small rooms on each floor <strong>and</strong> those houses generally not more than two Stories. The defalcations in<br />

rents, where Tenants are poor <strong>and</strong> the expense of employing an Agent to take care of the Property <strong>and</strong> receive the rents— With<br />

numberless other serious objections; I say after having maturely weighed all these, it was my decided opinion that you had better<br />

take up with a compensation from the State of New York, attended with but little expense <strong>and</strong> which you would almost immediately<br />

receive, than to involve yourself in Litigation, <strong>and</strong> place a very h<strong>and</strong>some Sum on the casual Event of your Life admitting, as I<br />

consider it, to be, equal to that of any other person for fifteen years to come. It would take up too much time, <strong>and</strong> tire your patience<br />

was I to give you at length my reasons, on each of the objections mentioned. I shall therefore only say they are admitted as natural<br />

by Mr. <strong>Harison</strong>.<br />

A combination or conspiracy very probably may also be entered into by the Proprietors to dissuade persons from becoming your<br />

Tenants, <strong>and</strong> to threaten them with innumerable unpleasant incidents in case they do it. Their side of the Question, however<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!