04.05.2014 Views

Strategy Survival Guide

Strategy Survival Guide

Strategy Survival Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

End Result<br />

Transformation<br />

Realignment<br />

Incremental<br />

Evolution<br />

Adaptation<br />

Nature<br />

Big bang<br />

Revolution<br />

Reconstruction<br />

The resulting types of change vary in scope. Adaptation and reconstruction do not fundamentally challenge<br />

an organisation’s beliefs, and so are often easier to achieve. Evolution can take a long period of time, but<br />

results in a fundamentally different organisation once completed. Revolution is likely to be a forced, reactive<br />

transformation using simultaneous initiatives on many fronts, and often in a relatively short space of time.<br />

It is essential that those responsible for creating the change are aware of the implications of the type of<br />

change they are trying to achieve. This can only be done by carrying out a detailed analysis of the context<br />

within which change will sit. Useful features to assess when determining context include:<br />

• Time scale: how quickly is change needed?<br />

• Scope: what degree of change is needed?<br />

• Preservation: what organisational resources and characteristics need to be maintained?<br />

• Diversity: how homogeneous are the staff groups and divisions within the organisation?<br />

• Capability: What is the managerial and personal capability to implement change?<br />

• Capacity: what is the degree of change resource available?<br />

• Readiness: how ready for change are the staff?<br />

• Power: what power does the change leader have to impose change?<br />

Some of these dimensions can be assessed relatively easily, e.g. time and scope. Others are likely to<br />

require more direct consultation with front-line staff and other stakeholders, for example assessing<br />

organisational readiness for change. The organisational analysis already undertaken in the Research and<br />

Analysis phase should have laid the groundwork for this task.<br />

If the organisation has a low capacity or readiness for change, this could negatively impact the success of<br />

the new strategy. Depending on what is hampering change, the first approach should be to assess whether it<br />

is practical to change the organisation to deliver the new strategy e.g. through additional training and reorganisation<br />

or through recruitment of staff with suitable skills. Only if this is impractical or excessively costly,<br />

should the project team consider changing the policy objectives. This situation should not arise if the<br />

organisational analysis was adequately considered during the policy development phase.<br />

Key Success Factors<br />

At all stages of the organisational change flow chart there are some "Golden Rules" which should be<br />

followed in order to create successful change:<br />

• Compelling vision for action<br />

• Committed leadership<br />

• Rigorous project management<br />

• Securing stakeholder support<br />

• Effective communications<br />

• Infrastructure alignment.<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>Survival</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> – <strong>Strategy</strong> Skills<br />

Page 183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!