04.05.2014 Views

Strategy Survival Guide

Strategy Survival Guide

Strategy Survival Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Information failures. The effective operation of markets relies on the fact that all the participants in<br />

the market have complete and perfect information relevant to that market. When this information is<br />

not available to all participants, this is described as asymmetry of information, and market failure can<br />

arise. Information asymmetries lead to sub-optimal outcomes. For example, a buyer may not have<br />

full information on the characteristics of a product or service he/she wishes to buy – this is known as<br />

adverse selection.<br />

• Public goods. Markets work effectively to provide private goods and services, which are typically<br />

rival and excludable in nature – i.e. each specific item or service can only once be sold/bought, and<br />

once purchased, can be exclusively "enjoyed" by the purchaser. In contrast, public goods and<br />

services are non-rival and non-excludable – if one person purchases the good or service, that does<br />

not stop others from purchasing it; and there is generally no way to stop people from enjoying the<br />

good or service. True public goods and services are comparatively rare, but the provision of national<br />

defence and of law and order are typically used as illustrations.<br />

(II) Equity, which is to do with the delivery of social or distributional objectives. Even where markets are<br />

working efficiently, they may result in a distribution of income (or other benefits/costs) that is unacceptable to<br />

society. This will often arise through a lack of incentives to improve equity, or because the necessary<br />

information is available only to government.<br />

3. Identify what actions are available to government in order to deliver the desired outcomes:<br />

As well as providing a useful checklist for justifying government activity, the issues outlined above can also<br />

be helpful in pointing towards the type of activity that government might want to undertake – Stage Three of<br />

the process. Government intervention should typically be directed at tackling the particular market failure that<br />

is occurring, or at delivering the specific social objective in question. A wide range of interventions is<br />

available to government, and it will often be appropriate to consider several options. Examples include tax<br />

incentives, grants, loans, and information campaigns.<br />

4. Consider whether the costs of government intervention are justified:<br />

There are two separate aspects to this stage of the process:<br />

• The first stage is to identify the additional benefits that would arise as a result of government<br />

intervention. The concept of additionality is important – what should be measured is not the gross<br />

benefit, but the benefit net of what would have happened without intervention.<br />

• The second stage is to identify the negative impacts of the government intervention. These negative<br />

impacts may include the direct costs of the intervention, but they may also include further negative<br />

impacts arising as a result of "government failure" – i.e. it is possible that government will get its<br />

intervention wrong, or that the intervention will have unintended consequences.<br />

Only if the net benefit of intervention outweighs the costs of intervention is government action justified. In<br />

practice, this stage of the process may form part of the economic appraisal of the options for intervention,<br />

either through cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis or through multi-criteria analysis.<br />

Strengths<br />

Using this four stage process – and in particular the list of market failures – is a good way of checking<br />

whether or not government should be involved in an issue.<br />

Weaknesses<br />

If applied incorrectly, the approach does contain pitfalls. For example, it is important to be sure that the net<br />

benefits of government intervention justify the costs. And even if an individual intervention is justified, it is<br />

also necessary to consider the overall burden imposed by government intervention – there may be a case for<br />

focusing intervention only on priority policy areas, so as to avoid "micro-management".<br />

References<br />

Micro-economics or public economics text-books include chapters on the basic market failures and how they<br />

should be dealt with.<br />

HM Treasury Green Book and HMT micro-economics courses<br />

<strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>Survival</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> – <strong>Strategy</strong> Skills<br />

Page 179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!