04.05.2014 Views

Development of Tagore Cultural Centre ... - Old.kerala.gov.in

Development of Tagore Cultural Centre ... - Old.kerala.gov.in

Development of Tagore Cultural Centre ... - Old.kerala.gov.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tagore</strong> <strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Centre</strong>, Thiruvananthapuram<br />

Responses/clarifications to Queries on the RFP Document<br />

Sn. Query Clarification<br />

1. Can the construction materials and equipments be No project specific special exemptions are<br />

imported duty free?<br />

available for this project<br />

2. Should the design/upgradation and remodel<strong>in</strong>g by Bidders should follow the overall architectural<br />

the bidder be strictly <strong>in</strong> accordance to the plan <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> location <strong>of</strong> new structures.<br />

requirements or can the bidder relocate the<br />

structures?<br />

3. Submission <strong>of</strong> detailed structural design should not<br />

be <strong>in</strong>sisted upon along with the proposal.<br />

4. 3D Model is to be prepared for the entire<br />

development or the build<strong>in</strong>gs only.<br />

5. 3D – Walk through – It is time consum<strong>in</strong>g, is this<br />

required now?<br />

As per details set out <strong>in</strong> Appendix 8 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RFP, the detailed structural design draw<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

mean the <strong>in</strong>itial detail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

identification and details <strong>of</strong> location <strong>of</strong> major<br />

civil structures, mechanical and electrical<br />

equipments and are required to be submitted as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the Technical Submissions.<br />

Physical 3D model would need to be prepared<br />

for the entire project area<br />

3D walk through would provide additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on the architectural concept for the


project, as planned by the bidder, and is to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded as part <strong>of</strong> the Technical Submissions.<br />

6. Section through balcony is not shown <strong>in</strong> the For conversion to a m<strong>in</strong>i auditorium the<br />

draw<strong>in</strong>gs. Would the balcony area need to be balcony would require an extension <strong>of</strong> the<br />

extended?<br />

floor. The bidders are expected to visit the<br />

To <strong>in</strong>form if the slope <strong>in</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g sitt<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>of</strong> project site and make their <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

the balcony would need to be changed and if so, how assessment on requirement and stability <strong>of</strong><br />

is it proposed to be done.<br />

such extension. <strong>Development</strong> <strong>of</strong> architectural<br />

To <strong>in</strong>form if any study has been conducted to check cross section <strong>of</strong> the balcony should be a part <strong>of</strong><br />

the<br />

stability/ the Technical Proposal <strong>of</strong> the bidders.<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> the exist<strong>in</strong>g balcony.<br />

There is no mandatory change <strong>in</strong> the structural<br />

slope <strong>of</strong> the balcony. The slope <strong>of</strong> the sitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

area would therefore be left to the bidders and<br />

would need to be clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Technical<br />

Proposal. 1<br />

No studies have been conducted to test the<br />

stability/strength <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g balcony. Bidders<br />

may make their own <strong>in</strong>dependent studies <strong>in</strong> this<br />

regard.<br />

7. Access to the Auditorium from north only – is it not No. However, Bidders may make their own<br />

<strong>in</strong> violation <strong>of</strong> Electrical Inspectorate Rules. <strong>in</strong>dependent studies <strong>in</strong> this regard.<br />

8. Is air-condition<strong>in</strong>g required for lobby, at lower and Lobby area is to air-conditioned. Pre-function


upper floor pre-function areas as well as side<br />

verandahs.<br />

9. Details <strong>of</strong> equipments <strong>in</strong> the control room <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Auditorium, stage and audience areas are provided<br />

<strong>in</strong> Schedule 6 – Where is Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> the NIT?<br />

10. ‘Ma<strong>in</strong>’ and ‘M<strong>in</strong>i’ Auditorium do they need to be<br />

used simultaneously – Also <strong>in</strong> any event is it<br />

required to convert the total capacity to 1245 seats?<br />

11. Conference facility cum exhibition centers – what is<br />

the size required?<br />

12. No. <strong>of</strong> seats for restaurant/Kitchen and handicraft<br />

shop area?<br />

13. Are the seats <strong>in</strong> Auditorium to be replaced? Yes<br />

14. Para 4.2(a) Page 18: What about areas where black<br />

top surfaces are already exist<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

area is not def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the RFP Document. The<br />

Proposed plan does not <strong>in</strong>dicate side<br />

verandahs. However, areas such as art<br />

gallery/exhibition space and green rooms<br />

would be need to air-conditioned.<br />

Schedule 6 is from Page No. 15 to 50 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Schedules enclosed with the Draft EPC<br />

Agreement.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> and M<strong>in</strong>i auditorium No. 1 may be used<br />

simultaneously for two different functions and<br />

should be developed keep<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

Please see Enclosure 11 to Schedule 2 <strong>of</strong> Draft<br />

EPC Agreement.<br />

Please see Enclosure 9 to Schedule 2 <strong>of</strong> Draft<br />

EPC Agreement, where total area is <strong>in</strong>dicated.<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g roads to the extent reta<strong>in</strong>ed would<br />

need to conform (at m<strong>in</strong>imum) to the<br />

specifications <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong> Para 4.2(a), Page 18<br />

on the Draft EPC Agreement.<br />

15. To provide specifications <strong>of</strong> False Ceil<strong>in</strong>g. Refer para 4.3(h) <strong>of</strong> Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> Draft EPC<br />

Agreement.


16. Door/W<strong>in</strong>dows Alum<strong>in</strong>um Doors are old fashioned,<br />

and need to be changed to different specifications<br />

17. Noise level <strong>of</strong> DG at 1Mt outside DG room to be 50-<br />

70DB should be allowed.<br />

18. Air-Condition<strong>in</strong>g, why only Chilled Water System is<br />

proposed?<br />

Bidder can propose alternatives as part to<br />

Technical Submissions. However, for<br />

doors/w<strong>in</strong>dows not specifically <strong>in</strong>dicated by<br />

the Bidder as part <strong>of</strong> Technical Submissions,<br />

the specifications shall be as per para 4.3(i) <strong>of</strong><br />

Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> Draft EP Agreement.<br />

Factory fabricated acoustic enclosure is<br />

required. Noise level at 1.0m distance shall be<br />

less than 70 dB (A).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce this is considered the best/most optimal<br />

method <strong>of</strong> air condition<strong>in</strong>g. Technically, this is<br />

the best method if air-condition<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Refer para 4.8 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> Draft EPC<br />

Agreement.<br />

Refer para 4.9.6 <strong>of</strong> Schedule 6 <strong>of</strong> Draft EPC<br />

19. Para 4.8 Page 39: Fire Alarm/Protection system – To<br />

be <strong>of</strong> quality so that TAC approval is obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

20. Para 4.9.6: Acoustics – Side wall panels & ceil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

specification.<br />

Agreement.<br />

21. In the suggested plan display/refreshment areas are Display and refreshment area are covered areas<br />

shown on either side do they mean built up area or as per Enclosure 7 and 8 to Schedule 2 <strong>of</strong> Draft<br />

open terrace with landscape and pavilions? EPC Agreement.<br />

22. Project Budget is low. There is no change <strong>in</strong> the Project Budget.<br />

23. Advance <strong>of</strong> 10% is <strong>in</strong>adequate. There is no change <strong>in</strong> the advance payment.


1 Suggestion – Bidder could consider chang<strong>in</strong>g the slope by metallic lightweight frames on which seats can<br />

be fitted. The depth <strong>of</strong> these frames can be adjusted to achieve the designed slope.<br />

Sd/-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!