31.10.2012 Views

Surface Modification of Cellulose Acetate with Cutinase and ...

Surface Modification of Cellulose Acetate with Cutinase and ...

Surface Modification of Cellulose Acetate with Cutinase and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Subchapter 2.5<br />

spacers was studied by several authors mainly through deletion studies. It was<br />

demonstrated that linker peptides, connecting the catalytic domains <strong>of</strong> carbohydrate-<br />

active enzymes <strong>and</strong> the CBMs, are necessary for the synergistic activity between the<br />

two domains (Srisodsuk et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1991). The wild-type linker <strong>of</strong> CBHI<br />

was included in the fusion protein <strong>with</strong> the CBM from the same enzyme. A smaller<br />

linker was also used to connect cutinase to the fungal CBM (figure. 1). The initial<br />

purpose was to increase the levels <strong>of</strong> expression in E. coli <strong>of</strong> the soluble cutinase fused<br />

to CBMCBHI, by removing from the wild-type linker a sequence <strong>of</strong> residues that<br />

constitute possible sites for O-glycosylation. Since E. coli does not possess the<br />

machinery necessary for this post-translation eukaryotic modification, removing those<br />

residues could promote correct folding <strong>of</strong> the fusion protein. The expression levels were<br />

very low for soluble cutinase-wtCBMCBHI <strong>and</strong> were not significantly improved in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> cutinase-sCBMCBHI. The bacterial linker used was the proline-threonine box<br />

(PT)4T(PT)7 present on the CenA from C. fimi (Shen et al., 1991). This type <strong>of</strong> PT<br />

linker is also naturally glycosylated, but when it is not, the conformations <strong>of</strong> catalytic<br />

domain <strong>and</strong> CBM are preserved, since only a partial increase in the linker flexibility<br />

seems to occur (Poon et al., 2007).<br />

In the treatment <strong>of</strong> CDA <strong>and</strong> CTA <strong>with</strong> cutinase <strong>and</strong> its fusion proteins, it was not<br />

possible to detect acetic acid as previously. For longer treatments, the quantification <strong>of</strong><br />

acetic acid was somehow impaired. The reasons could be some volatility,<br />

microbiological contamination (in spite <strong>of</strong> the sodium azide) <strong>and</strong>/or different<br />

efficiencies <strong>of</strong> cutinase from different batches.<br />

Protein quantification after treatment <strong>with</strong> cutinase-CBMN1 <strong>and</strong> cutinase-PTboxCBMN1<br />

was unviable due to the turbidity <strong>of</strong> solutions. This turbidity happened only for the<br />

referred assays, where protein adsorption might be underestimated. The turbidity could<br />

be precipitated protein or due to non-hydrolytic disruption <strong>of</strong> cellulose acetate fibres, in<br />

particular, <strong>of</strong> CDA for which this phenomenon was most visible. This mechanical<br />

disruption was already described for cellulose <strong>and</strong> cotton in the presence <strong>of</strong> CenA, Cex<br />

<strong>and</strong> isolated CBMs (Din et al., 1991 <strong>and</strong> 1994, Cavaco-Paulo et al., 1999). Comparing<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> protein adsorbed <strong>and</strong> relative K/S between chimeric proteins <strong>and</strong><br />

cutinase, there was a clear difference between the two cellulose acetates studied (figure.<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!