03.05.2014 Views

Adaptation Tipping Points and Resilience

Adaptation Tipping Points and Resilience

Adaptation Tipping Points and Resilience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Adaptation</strong> <strong>Tipping</strong> <strong>Points</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Resilience</strong><br />

Saskia Werners (Wageningen UR, NL)<br />

Stefan Pfenninger (IIASA) & many other colleagues<br />

Main message:<br />

• Start assessment by asking how much change is acceptable<br />

• Assess: thresholds + when/how likely to occur (scenarios)


Experiment


Experiment


Today<br />

Illustrate challenge for climate impact <strong>and</strong> vulnerability<br />

assessment<br />

Propose for assessment: ‘adaptation tipping points’<br />

Link to resilience discussion & future work<br />

Work in progress: ! your feedback much appreciated !<br />

Amsterdam<br />

Januari 2008


Illustrations – Delta Programme (Long term (2100) water safety,<br />

fresh water supply. Capitalise on opportunities water offers)<br />

Deltacommissioner Wim Kuijken (29 Sept.2010):<br />

One of the biggest challenges is dealing with uncertainties in the<br />

future climate, but also in population, economy <strong>and</strong> society. This<br />

One requires of the a new biggest way challenges of planning, is dealing which we with call uncertainties adaptive delta in the<br />

future planning. climate, It seeks but also to maximise in population, economy <strong>and</strong> society. This<br />

requires flexibility; a keeping new way options of planning, open which we call adaptive delta<br />

planning. <strong>and</strong> avoiding It seeks lock-in. to maximise flexibility; keeping options open<br />

In <strong>and</strong> the avoiding meantime, lock-in. we prepare In the the meantime, we prepare the so-called<br />

so-called delta decisions delta decisions about the about measures to take if our current water<br />

the system measures reaches to its take limits. if our current<br />

water system reaches its limits.<br />

Base values:<br />

• Solidarity<br />

• Flexibility<br />

• Sustainability


Source: Deltares


Assessment of ‘adaptation tipping points’<br />

Why:<br />

Climate change becomes relevant to policy makers if it threatens current policy<br />

objectives or results in conditions that society perceives as undesirable.<br />

If such a situation is thinkable, next to knowing the extent of the threat, at<br />

least equally important is to know when <strong>and</strong> how likely it is.<br />

The question is how much longer current policies <strong>and</strong> management are<br />

expected to suffice <strong>and</strong> when adjustments will be required. In other words,<br />

when are tipping points in the socio-political system reached?<br />

<strong>Adaptation</strong> tipping points:<br />

a situation where a socio-political threshold is reached, due to<br />

climate change induced changes in the bio-physical system.<br />

Socio-political thresholds:<br />

• formal policy objectives<br />

• informal societal preferences, willingness to invest/protect cultural identity


<strong>Tipping</strong> points <strong>and</strong> adaptation<br />

Korte<br />

Short term<br />

termijn<br />

measures ingrepen<br />

Major Grote Major “Grote<br />

Ingrepen interv. Ingrepen”<br />

intervention<br />

Available robustness <strong>and</strong> flexibility<br />

Beschikbare robuustheid en flexib. (RO)<br />

Benodigde robuustheid en flexib. (KV)<br />

Robustness<br />

Robuustheid<br />

Flexibility Flexibiliteit<br />

Mitigatie<br />

Required robustness <strong>and</strong> flexibility<br />

<strong>Tipping</strong> Omslagpunt Point<br />

<strong>Tipping</strong> Omslagpunt Point<br />

Time Tijd


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

Ask: What are socio-political objectives (non-climate)?<br />

Select indicators <strong>and</strong> threshold values for impacts on sectors &<br />

regions: determine what situation is acceptable according to:<br />

• Analysis of policy objectives / st<strong>and</strong>ards / administrative<br />

arrangements<br />

• Public opinion, <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

• Statistics<br />

Danube Basin (ICPDR reports), e.g.:<br />

• Risk categories:<br />

Organic pollution, Hazardous substances, Nutrient pollution,<br />

Hydro-morphological alterations, Flood frequency<br />

• Loss of biodiversity / fish stock


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

Determine adaptation tipping points: how much change sectors can h<strong>and</strong>le,<br />

given the thresholds value (independent from time) Ask: What climate<br />

conditions are critical for objectives? What are threshold conditions<br />

for reaching objectives (beyond which current strategy fails)<br />

Methods: compare with design criteria; consult experts / representatives from<br />

different sectors; assess historical variation of boundary conditions. System<br />

analysis linking climate conditions to the thresholds. Modelling effect of<br />

stepwise increasing climate conditions.<br />

Nature goals not reached<br />

Inlet fresh water too often too salt (Gouda)<br />

Design criteria storm surge barrier exceeded<br />

Storm surge barrier closed too frequent for port<br />

S<strong>and</strong> suppletion fails to meet coastal erosion<br />

Energy supply fails due to limits cooling capacity<br />

Tulip Norms fields for flood affected levees by not salinity met groundwater<br />

Note: Alternative presentation e.g.<br />

traffic light bar<br />

<strong>Tipping</strong> points for Rijnmond region (red dots). Green line: no tipping point (Jeuken et al., 2010).


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

Translate tipping points to timescale: Use existing scenario (eg IPCC, or from<br />

national agencies) to assess when tipping points are likely to occur.<br />

Methods: use climate scenario’s, extreme/moderate (depends on sector);<br />

interpolate between projection year <strong>and</strong> now; express uncertainty earliest<br />

date/ latest date that climate change will have reached a certain value<br />

Nature goals not reached<br />

Inlet fresh water too often too salt (Gouda)<br />

Design criteria storm surge barrier exceeded<br />

Storm surge barrier closed too frequent for port<br />

S<strong>and</strong> suppletion fails to meet coastal erosion<br />

Energy supply fails due to limits cooling capacity<br />

Norms for flood levees not met


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

Determine decision tree & adaptation pathways: Repeat 4 & 5 for these<br />

alternatives + assess how easy it is to switch in time (flexibility/‘no regret’)


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

Determine alternative adaptation strategies: assess how to implement a<br />

different strategy or additional measures to postpone / resolve a tipping<br />

point (methods depend on scale, score these alternatives to policy targets)<br />

<strong>Adaptation</strong> pathways for the<br />

Theems estuary with<br />

increasing sea level<br />

The blue boxes are<br />

adaptation strategies<br />

(portfolios of option)<br />

The blue arrows show<br />

possibly transitions between<br />

strategies.<br />

In red the various scenarios<br />

(EnvironmentAgency, 2007)


Research objective<br />

The scientific objective is to gain a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

role of tipping points in adaptation to climate change <strong>and</strong> to<br />

elaborate the possibility <strong>and</strong> consequences of using adaptation<br />

tipping points for the identification of structural properties <strong>and</strong><br />

mechanisms that make socio-ecological systems robust <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

receptive to shocks to external shocks or internal perturbations<br />

The practical objective is to explore whether adaptation tipping<br />

points are a useful concept for assessing <strong>and</strong> communicating the<br />

implications of climate change, which can help decision makers<br />

in developing <strong>and</strong> prioritising adaptation strategies<br />

The adaptation tipping point perspective is chosen because it is<br />

appears a timely concept for bringing together concerns /<br />

insights about how much stress a system can absorb before<br />

losing its function <strong>and</strong> when this is likely to happen.


Central research questions<br />

Can adaptation tipping points be defined in such a way that they<br />

are an appropriate concept for assessing <strong>and</strong> communicating the<br />

implication of climate change & prioritise adaptation strategies?<br />

If so, how do these adaptation tipping points emerge? And<br />

(how) have the actions of agents contributed to adaptation<br />

tipping points?<br />

How to identify adaptation tipping points?<br />

What are possible responses to adaptation tipping points?<br />

What are consequences of working with adaptation tipping<br />

points for decision support?<br />

When do adaptation tipping points become decision tipping<br />

points, where management of socio-ecological systems shifts?


Conclusions / Experience<br />

Question: Can adaptation tipping points be defined in such a way that<br />

they are appropriate concept for assessing <strong>and</strong> communicating the<br />

implication of climate change & prioritise adaptation strategies?<br />

• Closer to the question of policy maker/manager/ stakeholder<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Allows for dialogue between scientific & policy community.<br />

Expressing uncertainty in time (when will a critical point be<br />

reached) is easier to underst<strong>and</strong> than % change in a certain<br />

projection year<br />

Some times far from trivial<br />

(not the silver bullet) because……


Our water<br />

system is<br />

very<br />

resilient!”


Thanks! & Discussion<br />

Contact: werners@mungo.nl saskia.werners@mungo.nl


Discussion: what you like / dislike about adaptation tipping points<br />

suggestions comments:<br />

- few governments have foresight to be concerned<br />

- real concern about long run problems<br />

- how to measure tipping points & deal with long horizon<br />

- nature of tipping point / threshold not very precise: scale <strong>and</strong><br />

- definition: conceptual background?<br />

- change / transformation in policy<br />

- physical / policy proces analysed? what tipping points<br />

- plurality different types of coupled systems. typing points are dynamic in time<br />

- developng country context? tipping points already reached?<br />

- note: tolerable risk community


Extras


<strong>Adaptation</strong> tipping points<br />

Assess:<br />

• What are socio-political objectives [e.g. in policy docs]?<br />

• Are objectives currently met?<br />

• Are What climate conditions are critical for objectives?<br />

• What are threshold conditions for reaching objectives (tipping<br />

points)<br />

• When are thresholds reached according to various climate<br />

scenarios?<br />

• What are adaptive responses / alternative measures<br />

(Kwadijk, 2010)


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

1. Scoping the assessment: make a long list of possible consequences of<br />

climate change for a region or sectors<br />

2. Prioritise climate change trends <strong>and</strong> impacts: From long list to short list.<br />

Select impacts based on potential severity <strong>and</strong> likeliness (e.g. build urgency<br />

matrix (use trends + extreme scenarios))<br />

3. Select indicators <strong>and</strong> threshold values: determine what effects are<br />

acceptable according to: Analysis of policy objectives / st<strong>and</strong>ards /<br />

administrative arrangements, Public opinion, <strong>and</strong>/or Statistics<br />

4. Determine adaptation tipping points: how much change sectors can<br />

h<strong>and</strong>le, given the thresholds value (independent from time) (e.g. by system<br />

analysis linking climate conditions to the thresholds)<br />

5. Translate tipping points to timescale: Use existing scenario (eg IPCC, or<br />

from national agencies) to assess when tipping points are likely to occur<br />

6. Determine alternative adaptation strategies: assess how to implement a<br />

different strategy or additional measures to postpone / resolve a tipping<br />

point (methods depend on scale, score these alternatives to policy targets)<br />

7. Determine decision tree & adaptation pathways: Repeat 4 & 5 for these<br />

alternatives + assess how easy it is to switch in time (flexibility/‘no regret’)


Assessment of vuln. / adaptation tipping points<br />

1. Scoping the assessment: make a long list of possible consequences of<br />

climate change for a region or sectors<br />

Rows: Effects of climate change + scores of likelihood<br />

Columns: Impacts (on flood safety, fresh water supply, economic activities<br />

(navigation, drinking water, power production)+ scores of severity)


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

2. Prioritise climate change trends <strong>and</strong> impacts: From long list to short list.<br />

Select impacts, sectors & regions based on potential severity <strong>and</strong> likeliness<br />

(e.g. build urgency matrix (use trends + extreme scenarios))<br />

When carried out with stakeholders provides commitment<br />

to those issues that need to be addressed


Assessment of adaptation tipping points<br />

6. Determine alternative adaptation strategies: assess how to implement a<br />

different strategy or additional measures to postpone / resolve a tipping<br />

point (methods depend on scale, score these alternatives to policy targets)


Many different approaches


Impact assessment / indicators / IPCC


Climate<strong>Adaptation</strong> Atlas: Maps, Traffic light


Storylines & development pathways (PBL)<br />

Semi-urban<br />

Multifunctional semi-urban agriculture Intensive agriculture<br />

Diversify Specialize /<br />

Multifunctional rural agriculture<br />

Large scale agriculture<br />

world market<br />

Rural


Integrale adaptatiestrategieën<br />

Urban<br />

Little competition /<br />

regional market<br />

Strong<br />

competition /<br />

world market<br />

Rural


<strong>Adaptation</strong> – addressing different drivers


Assessment questions<br />

What do we<br />

adapt to?<br />

How do we<br />

adapt?<br />

Enabling<br />

factors?<br />

Effectiveness<br />

of option?<br />

Climate<br />

adaptation<br />

What do we<br />

want to achieve?<br />

Who adapts?<br />

Whose goal?<br />

After: Preston (2010)


A combination…?


The vulnerability assessment approach<br />

Review of the suitability of existing typologies for<br />

ecosystems, based on:<br />

-EU Habitat <strong>and</strong> Birds Directives <strong>and</strong> Natura 2000 data base<br />

-Carpathian Biodiversity Information System<br />

-L<strong>and</strong> cover data for the Carpathian region<br />

-European <strong>and</strong> National Forest Inventories<br />

-Pan European Ecological Network (PEEN)<br />

-European Topic Center on Biological Diversity<br />

Selection of the suitable typology for ecosystems for input<br />

into the vulnerability assessment matrix<br />

Vulnerability assessment of the climate change threats for<br />

each ecosystem according to the selected typology

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!