02.05.2014 Views

Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...

Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...

Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHANGING THE WORLD WITH HYDROGEN AND NUCLEAR: FROM PAST SUCCESSES TO SHAPING THE FUTURE<br />

Technologies for nuclear hydrogen production<br />

Clean and sustainable ways <strong>of</strong> producing hydrogen rely on water splitting with electricity and heat<br />

generated by CO 2 -free energy sources (renewable energies and nuclear).<br />

As demonstrated by this NEA meeting, hydrogen production technologies are an area <strong>of</strong><br />

significant international activity and co-operation. Major research frameworks include the<br />

International Partnership for the <strong>Hydrogen</strong> Economy (IPHE), the Generation IV International Forum,<br />

Joint Technology Initiatives in Europe and leading research or industrial organisations represented at<br />

this NEA meeting such as DOE-INL and ANL (USA), JAEA (Japan), BARC (India), European Framework<br />

Programmes, CEA (France)…<br />

Alkaline electrolysis is a mature technology. It features a good efficiency (~66% LHV), an excellent<br />

lifetime <strong>of</strong> cell (above 20 years currently), and a production <strong>of</strong> 99.8% pure hydrogen at 30 bars. This<br />

leads to a global efficiency <strong>of</strong> ~24% (based on a heat/electricity conversion efficiency <strong>of</strong> ~35%). The<br />

main issue is the large fraction <strong>of</strong> the production cost (~80%) tied to the consumption <strong>of</strong> electricity<br />

(typically 2.6 out <strong>of</strong> EUR 3.2/kg H 2 at EUR 54/MWh) [3.4 out <strong>of</strong> USD 4.2/kg H 2 at USD 70/MWh]. Besides,<br />

progress is sought to reduce the investment cost.<br />

The steam electrolysis at high temperature (600-800°C) features a potential efficiency <strong>of</strong> ~100%<br />

LHV with extra heat available. Its technology benefits from current developments made <strong>of</strong> solid oxide<br />

fuel cells. However, many uncertainties and issues remain to achieve a commercial viability.<br />

Prominent issues include improving the reliability and the lifetime <strong>of</strong> electrolytic cells and stack <strong>of</strong><br />

cells and decreasing the investment and operating costs with a view to decreasing the currently<br />

estimated production cost from 4 to about EUR 2/kg H 2 [from 5.2 to about USD 2.6/kg H 2 ].<br />

The thermochemical cycles (S-I > 850°C) or hybrid cycles (S-electrolysis > 850°C) still feature<br />

many uncertainties in terms <strong>of</strong> feasibility and performances. Uncertainties still exist in parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flow sheet and technologies needed to provide high temperature heat whether from solar or nuclear<br />

nature. Potential assets <strong>of</strong> thermochemical cycles lie in a theoretical potential for a global efficiency<br />

above 35% and a scaling law <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen plant after the volume <strong>of</strong> reactants instead <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> electrolytic cells. In return, their practical feasibility and economic viability have to be<br />

entirely demonstrated. Especially, a global efficiency above 30% is to be demonstrated to compete<br />

with alkaline electrolysis. Moreover, the safety <strong>of</strong> co-located nuclear and chemical plants has to be<br />

demonstrated.<br />

All these processes will have to compete with steam methane reforming associated with carbon<br />

capture and storage that is currently developed with prospects <strong>of</strong> commercialisation around 2015.<br />

In Europe, the project “Cachet” for “Carbon capture via hydrogen energy technology” was launched in<br />

2006 to address this issue. The goal is to capture and store 90% <strong>of</strong> the 8 tonnes <strong>of</strong> CO 2 released per<br />

tonne <strong>of</strong> hydrogen produced, and to possibly reduce the production cost below the current cost <strong>of</strong><br />

EUR 1.8/kg H 2 [USD ~2.3/kg H 2 ]. Which leaves us with still about 1 tonne <strong>of</strong> CO 2 released per tonne <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrogen produced…<br />

Beyond assessing technical feasibility and performances <strong>of</strong> the various hydrogen production<br />

processes, the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the associated hydrogen generating cost and its breakdown into capital,<br />

operating and energy costs are other important criteria to determine about R&D priorities. The same<br />

holds for the capability <strong>of</strong> flexible operation that determines the potential for a variable or intermittent<br />

production using <strong>of</strong>f-peak electricity or the potential for use in systems co-generating electricity or<br />

process heat together with hydrogen.<br />

Furthermore, industrial prospects for high temperature electrochemical or thermochemical<br />

processes and the temperature involved, together with non-hydrogen related applications <strong>of</strong> process<br />

heat, will impact the development strategy <strong>of</strong> high or very high temperature reactors.<br />

Carbon taxes<br />

Clean hydrogen production processes, based on carbon-free energy sources and water splitting will<br />

definitely be encouraged by carbon taxes that may apply to steam methane reforming and utilisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural gas as an industrial heat source or reducing chemical agent.<br />

NUCLEAR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN – © OECD/NEA 2010 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!