02.05.2014 Views

Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...

Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...

Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

the overall efficiency <strong>of</strong> a HTGR-IS system from about 50% to 55% to justify the use <strong>of</strong> nuclear heat to<br />

produce hydrogen instead <strong>of</strong> electricity. Zr-V-F alloys were chosen because they have among the<br />

largest enthalpy changes <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen-absorbing alloys. The heat pump is incorporated into the<br />

three decomposition reactions in the cycle (H 2 SO 4 , HI and SO 3 ), in essence converting the enthalpy<br />

change <strong>of</strong> the He coolant into enthalpy changes in hydrogen production thus leading to the higher<br />

overall utilisation <strong>of</strong> the reactor heat.<br />

Richard Vilam (DOE/ANL) presented a series <strong>of</strong> papers towards mitigating structural and<br />

component failures in the heat transfer system and tritium migration between the nuclear reactor<br />

and a high-temperature electrolysis (HTE) plant for producing hydrogen through the use <strong>of</strong> control<br />

systems designed to minimise temperature differentials and more efficiently manage heat transfer<br />

and the use <strong>of</strong> ceramic materials in place <strong>of</strong> metals. In his paper titled “Heat exchanger temperature<br />

responses for duty-cycle transients in the NGNP/THE”, Vilam presented a control system for<br />

moderating the differential temperature spatial distribution in the (IHX) during duty-cycle transients.<br />

A dynamic systems simulation code was used to predict the plant response to transients such as<br />

changes in the electric generator load during normal operation and loss <strong>of</strong> load when the electrolysis<br />

plant goes <strong>of</strong>f line. The study concluded that the plant load schedule could be managed to maintain<br />

near-constant temperatures over the load ranges anticipated for both the nuclear and chemical plant<br />

by use <strong>of</strong> a primary flow controller that forces flow tracked flow in the power conversion unit and a<br />

turbine bypass control for responding to step changes in the generator load. The proposed control<br />

scheme was shown to be effective in limiting temperature variations in the IHX during transients;<br />

however, it was determined that more stable operation meant operating at points on the operating<br />

curve that resulted in lower overall cycle efficiencies. In his paper titled “Alternate VHRT/THE<br />

interfaces for mitigating tritium transport and structure creep”, Vilam noted that about 90% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

heat transferred to the chemical plant is used at temperatures <strong>of</strong> below 250°C and described an<br />

alternative interface between the nuclear and chemical plants which operated at temperatures<br />

around 250°C. The small amount <strong>of</strong> high-temperature heat required by the HTE plant is obtained by<br />

using either electric heaters or hydrogen combustion. By lowering the interface operating temperature,<br />

both creep <strong>of</strong> structures and tritium migration were significantly reduced as well as structural<br />

materials and maintenance costs. Overall plant efficiency for the alternative interface design was by<br />

about 1.5% greater than that <strong>of</strong> a plant based on the conventional high-temperature interface design.<br />

Closing session<br />

Co-chairs: Yoshiyuki Nemoto (OECD/NEA), Theodore Krause (ANL)<br />

The two co-chairmen expressed their great appreciation on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Organising Committee for<br />

the interest and co-operation received from the authors, session chairman, panellists and audience.<br />

It was unfortunate that some authors were unable to participate because their request for a visa for<br />

entry into the USA could not be processed in time.<br />

David Wade (ANL) briefly described the history <strong>of</strong> this series <strong>of</strong> OECD-NEA meetings. The<br />

increasing number <strong>of</strong> papers submitted indicates a growing interest and greater awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the topic. The first meeting held on 2-3 October 2000 in Paris, France, had a total <strong>of</strong><br />

20 papers. The second meeting held on 2-3 October 2003 at Argonne, IL, USA, had 22 papers. The third<br />

meeting held on 5-7 October 2005 at Oarai, Japan, had 35 papers and the fourth meeting held on<br />

14-16 April 2009 at Oakbrook, IL, USA, had 50 (46 oral + 4 poster) papers.<br />

It was noted that the OECD/NEA has a long history <strong>of</strong> sponsoring joint projects <strong>of</strong> many types in<br />

addition to information exchange meetings. Such projects have produced peer-reviewed databases,<br />

calculational benchmarks, and special studies – many <strong>of</strong> which were very influential. The primary<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> such joint projects is to share the costs <strong>of</strong> expensive projects and to provide access to the<br />

information gained for the participating parties. Certain areas <strong>of</strong> the research and development for<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> hydrogen from nuclear energy could be considered for such joint projects, and the<br />

participants were encouraged to contact their national representative to the NEA Science Committee<br />

if they wished to propose a project.<br />

The audience indicated that the meeting had been found to be very useful. It was suggested that<br />

in the future greater emphasis should be placed on the use <strong>of</strong> hydrogen, e.g. in the oil and chemical<br />

industries.<br />

18 NUCLEAR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN – © OECD/NEA 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!