Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...
Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ... Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Fourth Information Exchange ...
CAUSES OF DEGRADATION IN A SOLID OXIDE ELECTROLYSIS STACK On the steam/hydrogen side of the cell, a capping layer was observed to form over the surface of the electrode a few millimeters from the sealing edge (Figure 6). This capping layer was composed of mainly Si-O, although some Mn was also found in this layer. The capping layer disappeared within a centimeter from the seal. However, Si-O was found dispersed throughout the electrode as shown in Figure 6. We expect Si-O to increase degradation of the steam/hydrogen electrode by poisoning active steam reduction sites. Figure 6: Silicon EDS map (left) and SEM secondary image (right) of a cross-section of a steam/hydrogen electrode near the sealing edge of the cell Si Kα Electrolyte Electrode 10 μm Capping layer As mentioned before, we found no evidence of conductivity loss in the nickel bond layer or in the steam/hydrogen flow field. Moreover, the flow field was not corroded or discolored. The steam/hydrogen side of the interconnect, however, showed large resistances in the four-point mapping study. Figure 7 shows a composite of an SEM image and corresponding EDS maps for significant elements in the steam/hydrogen side of the interconnect/bond layer interface. Figure 7: SEM images and EDS maps of the interface between the interconnect and bond layer, which bonds the interconnect to the steam/hydrogen flow field Ni bond layer Interconnect 152 NUCLEAR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN – © OECD/NEA 2010
CAUSES OF DEGRADATION IN A SOLID OXIDE ELECTROLYSIS STACK Manganese and O have segregated to the surface and a thick (10 μm) Cr-O layer has also formed at the surface. Titanium and Si are identified in the interface between the metal and oxide. The effect of these elements has not yet been measured, however, we suspect that Ti and Si form oxides that are electrically insulating and will add to the degradation in stack performance. Conclusions Several probable causes of degradation have been identified through Argonne’s post-test analyses of SOEC stack components. In the present work, five causes of degradation were identified through SEM and EDS studies of selected regions of components from the ½ILS stack. The interconnect was found to be a source of foreign elements, such as Cr, Mn, Ti and possibly Si, that contribute to degradation by forming non-conductive interface layers. Chromium was observed to diffuse into the bond layer reducing its conductivity. A Si-Mn-O capping layer was found within millimeters of the sealing edge of the steam/hydrogen electrode, and Si-O was distributed throughout the electrode, both of which would decrease overall conductivity and the number of active sites for steam reduction. The oxygen electrode densified and delaminated during long-term operation. And, cracks were observed along the conductive bond layer/interconnect interface in the oxygen electrode compartment. These would cause serious degradation if they were formed during HTSE operation. Some additional experiments would help determine the degree of each effect in stack degradation. Long-term (1 000 h) studies on the conductivity of the coated interconnect plate under dual air and steam/hydrogen atmospheres on either side of the plate could determine the effect of degradation due to elemental diffusion out of the plate and segregation to various interfaces. During the same test, bond layer cracking at the interface could be examined. Finally, a thorough external examination of stacks upon cooling and a SEM examination of intact stack layers, may help determine when crack formation in the bond layer on the interconnect plate occurs. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Nathan Styx and Simon Murphy for their assistance in experimental measurements. This work is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative. The submitted manuscript has been created by UChicago Argonne, LLC as Operator of Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 with the US Department of Energy. The US government retains for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid-up, non-exclusive, irrevocable world-wide license in said article to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the government. References Baukal, W., H. Dobrich, W. Kuhn (1976), “High-temperature Electrolysis of Steam”, Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 132-133. Doenitz, W., R. Schmidberger (1982), “Concepts and Design for Scaling Up High Temperature Water Vapour Electrolysis”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 321-330. Hartvigsen, J.J., S. Elangovan, A. Nickens (2007), “Test of High Temperature Electrolysis ILS Half Module”, US DOE Hydrogen Program FY 2007 Annual Progress Report, pp. 234-237. NUCLEAR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN – © OECD/NEA 2010 153
- Page 103 and 104: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 105 and 106: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 107 and 108: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 109 and 110: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 111 and 112: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 113 and 114: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 115 and 116: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 117 and 118: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 119: STATUS OF THE INL HIGH-TEMPERATURE
- Page 122 and 123: HIGH-TEMPERATURE STEAM ELECTROLYSIS
- Page 124 and 125: HIGH-TEMPERATURE STEAM ELECTROLYSIS
- Page 126 and 127: HIGH-TEMPERATURE STEAM ELECTROLYSIS
- Page 128 and 129: HIGH-TEMPERATURE STEAM ELECTROLYSIS
- Page 131: MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT FOR SOEC Mate
- Page 134 and 135: A METALLIC SEAL FOR HIGH-TEMPERATUR
- Page 136 and 137: A METALLIC SEAL FOR HIGH-TEMPERATUR
- Page 138 and 139: A METALLIC SEAL FOR HIGH-TEMPERATUR
- Page 140 and 141: A METALLIC SEAL FOR HIGH-TEMPERATUR
- Page 142 and 143: DEGRADATION MECHANISMS IN SOLID OXI
- Page 144 and 145: DEGRADATION MECHANISMS IN SOLID OXI
- Page 146 and 147: DEGRADATION MECHANISMS IN SOLID OXI
- Page 149 and 150: CAUSES OF DEGRADATION IN A SOLID OX
- Page 151 and 152: 70 μm CAUSES OF DEGRADATION IN A S
- Page 153: CAUSES OF DEGRADATION IN A SOLID OX
- Page 157 and 158: NUCLEAR HYDROGEN USING HIGH TEMPERA
- Page 159 and 160: NUCLEAR HYDROGEN USING HIGH TEMPERA
- Page 161 and 162: NUCLEAR HYDROGEN USING HIGH TEMPERA
- Page 163 and 164: NUCLEAR HYDROGEN USING HIGH TEMPERA
- Page 165 and 166: NUCLEAR HYDROGEN USING HIGH TEMPERA
- Page 167: SESSION III: THERMOCHEMICAL SULPHUR
- Page 170 and 171: CEA ASSESSMENT OF THE SULPHUR-IODIN
- Page 172 and 173: CEA ASSESSMENT OF THE SULPHUR-IODIN
- Page 174 and 175: CEA ASSESSMENT OF THE SULPHUR-IODIN
- Page 176 and 177: CEA ASSESSMENT OF THE SULPHUR-IODIN
- Page 178 and 179: CEA ASSESSMENT OF THE SULPHUR-IODIN
- Page 181: STATUS OF THE INERI SULPHUR-IODINE
- Page 184 and 185: INFLUENCE OF HTR CORE INLET AND OUT
- Page 186 and 187: INFLUENCE OF HTR CORE INLET AND OUT
- Page 188 and 189: INFLUENCE OF HTR CORE INLET AND OUT
- Page 190 and 191: INFLUENCE OF HTR CORE INLET AND OUT
- Page 192 and 193: INFLUENCE OF HTR CORE INLET AND OUT
- Page 194 and 195: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE VAPOUR-LI
- Page 196 and 197: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE VAPOUR-LI
- Page 198 and 199: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE VAPOUR-LI
- Page 200 and 201: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE VAPOUR-LI
- Page 203: DEVELOPMENT OF HI DECOMPOSITION PRO
CAUSES OF DEGRADATION IN A SOLID OXIDE ELECTROLYSIS STACK<br />
Manganese and O have segregated to the surface and a thick (10 μm) Cr-O layer has also formed<br />
at the surface. Titanium and Si are identified in the interface between the metal and oxide. The effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> these elements has not yet been measured, however, we suspect that Ti and Si form oxides that are<br />
electrically insulating and will add to the degradation in stack performance.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Several probable causes <strong>of</strong> degradation have been identified through Argonne’s post-test analyses <strong>of</strong><br />
SOEC stack components. In the present work, five causes <strong>of</strong> degradation were identified through SEM<br />
and EDS studies <strong>of</strong> selected regions <strong>of</strong> components from the ½ILS stack. The interconnect was found<br />
to be a source <strong>of</strong> foreign elements, such as Cr, Mn, Ti and possibly Si, that contribute to degradation<br />
by forming non-conductive interface layers. Chromium was observed to diffuse into the bond layer<br />
reducing its conductivity. A Si-Mn-O capping layer was found within millimeters <strong>of</strong> the sealing edge <strong>of</strong><br />
the steam/hydrogen electrode, and Si-O was distributed throughout the electrode, both <strong>of</strong> which<br />
would decrease overall conductivity and the number <strong>of</strong> active sites for steam reduction. The oxygen<br />
electrode densified and delaminated during long-term operation. And, cracks were observed along the<br />
conductive bond layer/interconnect interface in the oxygen electrode compartment. These would<br />
cause serious degradation if they were formed during HTSE operation.<br />
Some additional experiments would help determine the degree <strong>of</strong> each effect in stack degradation.<br />
Long-term (1 000 h) studies on the conductivity <strong>of</strong> the coated interconnect plate under dual air and<br />
steam/hydrogen atmospheres on either side <strong>of</strong> the plate could determine the effect <strong>of</strong> degradation<br />
due to elemental diffusion out <strong>of</strong> the plate and segregation to various interfaces. During the same test,<br />
bond layer cracking at the interface could be examined. Finally, a thorough external examination <strong>of</strong><br />
stacks upon cooling and a SEM examination <strong>of</strong> intact stack layers, may help determine when crack<br />
formation in the bond layer on the interconnect plate occurs.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The authors would like to thank Nathan Styx and Simon Murphy for their assistance in experimental<br />
measurements.<br />
This work is supported by the US Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, Office <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> Energy, Science and<br />
Technology, <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Hydrogen</strong> Initiative. The submitted manuscript has been created by UChicago<br />
Argonne, LLC as Operator <strong>of</strong> Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357<br />
with the US Department <strong>of</strong> Energy. The US government retains for itself, and others acting on its<br />
behalf, a paid-up, non-exclusive, irrevocable world-wide license in said article to reproduce, prepare<br />
derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on<br />
behalf <strong>of</strong> the government.<br />
References<br />
Baukal, W., H. Dobrich, W. Kuhn (1976), “High-temperature Electrolysis <strong>of</strong> Steam”, Chemie Ingenieur<br />
Technik, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 132-133.<br />
Doenitz, W., R. Schmidberger (1982), “Concepts and Design for Scaling Up High Temperature Water<br />
Vapour Electrolysis”, International Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hydrogen</strong> Energy, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 321-330.<br />
Hartvigsen, J.J., S. Elangovan, A. Nickens (2007), “Test <strong>of</strong> High Temperature Electrolysis ILS Half<br />
Module”, US DOE <strong>Hydrogen</strong> Program FY 2007 Annual Progress Report, pp. 234-237.<br />
NUCLEAR PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN – © OECD/NEA 2010 153