02.05.2014 Views

July • August 2003 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

July • August 2003 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

July • August 2003 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DISCIPLINE<br />

DISCIPLINE<br />

regulations there under<br />

• Engaged in conduct or performed an act relevant to the<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> pharmacy that, having regard to all the circumstances<br />

would reasonably be regarded by members as<br />

disgraceful, dishonorable or unpr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

The following Agreed Statement <strong>of</strong> Fact formed the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> Mr. Nathwani’s admission <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional misconduct.<br />

Facts<br />

Mr. Nathwani was the owner, designated manager and<br />

dispensing pharmacist <strong>of</strong> Northfield Pharmacy. Through a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> random provider service audits, Green Shield<br />

discovered that claims were being submitted by Mr. Nathwani’s<br />

pharmacy, and paid by Green Shield, when no<br />

medication was actually provided to the patients. Green<br />

Shield provided subscriber confirmation letters from<br />

patients who denied receiving prescriptions related to<br />

claims made in their name by Northfield Pharmacy.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> contacted two <strong>of</strong> the eight patients in question<br />

who verified that they did not receive the medication as<br />

claimed by Northfield Pharmacy. The <strong>College</strong> also met with<br />

a physician who denied prescribing three prescriptions<br />

attributed to her by Northfield Pharmacy.<br />

Reasons<br />

The Committee considered the undisputed fact that Mr.<br />

Nathwani’s conduct was a deliberate attempt to defraud a<br />

third-party insurer and to create records to cover up the<br />

fraud. The misconduct occurred over a 10-month period <strong>of</strong><br />

time and involved 34 prescriptions, eight subscribers and a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> $1,438.83. Mr. Nathwani did not provide the<br />

Committee with any explanation for his conduct other than<br />

to express shame and regret.<br />

In concluding that the penalty is fair, reasonable and<br />

consistent, the Committee considered that Mr. Nathwani<br />

had no prior discipline record, as well as the fact<br />

that its penalty affirms the seriousness <strong>of</strong> Mr. Nathwani’s<br />

misconduct in a real and immediate sense. At the same<br />

time, the penalty provides Mr. Nathwani with an opportunity<br />

to rehabilitate while also providing necessary<br />

public protection.<br />

Order<br />

1. A reprimand<br />

2. Specified terms, conditions and limitations on Mr. Nathwani’s<br />

Certificate <strong>of</strong> Registration, and in particular, that<br />

Mr. Nathwani complete successfully, at his own expense,<br />

within 12 months <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> this order, the OCP<br />

Jurisprudence Seminar as well as remedial training in<br />

the following courses and evaluations from the Canadian<br />

Pharmacy Skills Program: “Law Lesson 2 – The<br />

Regulation <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy Practice”, “Law Lesson 4 – Standards<br />

<strong>of</strong> Practice”, and “Law Lesson 7 – Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Liability”<br />

3. A six-month suspension <strong>of</strong> Mr. Nathwani’s Certificate<br />

<strong>of</strong> Registration<br />

4. Additional specified terms, conditions and limitations<br />

on Mr. Nathwani’s Certificate <strong>of</strong> Registration, and in<br />

particular that, for a period <strong>of</strong> one year following the<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> his suspension, (December 01, <strong>2003</strong> –<br />

November 30, 2004):<br />

i) Mr. Nathwani is prohibited from having any proprietary<br />

interest in a pharmacy, in any capacity<br />

ii) Mr. Nathwani cannot act as a designated manager<br />

in any pharmacy<br />

iii) Mr. Nathwani must inform all employers in a pharmacy<br />

setting <strong>of</strong> the full details <strong>of</strong> the decision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Discipline Committee and ensure that they<br />

confirm their information with the <strong>College</strong> directly<br />

iv) Mr. Nathwani’s employment remuneration shall be<br />

based only on hourly or weekly rates and his<br />

employer(s) are to confirm this arrangement in<br />

writing with the <strong>College</strong><br />

5. Costs to the <strong>College</strong> in the amount <strong>of</strong> $3,000<br />

Pharmacy Connection <strong>July</strong> • <strong>August</strong> <strong>2003</strong> 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!