02.05.2014 Views

January/February 2009 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

January/February 2009 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

January/February 2009 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

focus on error prevention<br />

Pediatric dosages<br />

Ian Stewart, R.Ph., B.Sc.Phm<br />

Toronto Community Pharmacist<br />

When checking prescriptions, pharmacists must consider<br />

the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the dosage being prescribed.<br />

This can only be done if the pharmacist<br />

is aware <strong>of</strong>, or considers the indication for use or purpose <strong>of</strong> the<br />

medication being prescribed. For example, when codeine is<br />

prescribed for the treatment <strong>of</strong> acute pain, the reccommended<br />

adult dosage is 15 to 60 mg orally every four to six hours. 1 However,<br />

when used as a cough suppressant, the recommended<br />

dosage is 5 to 20 mg orally every four to eight hours.2 Yet, the<br />

indication for use or purpose <strong>of</strong> the medication is not usually<br />

included on prescriptions. This missing piece <strong>of</strong> information is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten a contributing factor to medication errors.<br />

Case:<br />

prescription, the pharmacist on this occasion observed that the<br />

dosage was not consistent with the usual dosage used in the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> herpes labialis or other common viral infections.<br />

The original prescription was therefore checked to confirm the<br />

prescriber’s intent. On checking the original prescription, the<br />

dosing error was identified. The correction was made, and<br />

the patient given eight Valtrex® 500 mg tablets with instructions<br />

to take four tablets (2000 mg) twice daily. The patient<br />

was very upset upon hearing <strong>of</strong> the error. She stated that she<br />

“thought something was wrong, and questioned the pharmacist.”<br />

Unfortunately, the pharmacist at that time read the prescription<br />

and reassured the patient that the physician did indeed<br />

prescribe two tablets twice daily.<br />

Possible Contributing Factors:<br />

• The pharmacy stocked the 500 mg strength <strong>of</strong> Valtrex® and<br />

not the 1000 mg.<br />

• The technician failed to adjust the directions for use to compensate<br />

for the change in strength.<br />

• The indication for use or purpose <strong>of</strong> the medication was not<br />

included on the prescription.<br />

• The initial pharmacist did not consider the possible indication<br />

for use to ensure appropiateness <strong>of</strong> the dose.<br />

• Despite concerns raised by the patient, the pharmacist<br />

failed to double check all components <strong>of</strong> the prescription for<br />

accuracy.<br />

The above prescription was written for a patient for the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> cold sores (herpes labialis). The prescription<br />

was taken to a local pharmacy for processing.<br />

On entering the prescription into the computer, the pharmacy<br />

technician entered Valtrex® 500 mg tablets. However,<br />

the directions for use was not adjusted and therefore entered<br />

as two tablets twice daily. When checking the prescription,<br />

the pharmacist did not detect the error. A total <strong>of</strong> four Valtrex®<br />

500 mg tablets were therefore dispensed instead <strong>of</strong> four<br />

1000 mg tablets or eight 500 mg tablets with the appropiate<br />

instructions for use.<br />

A few months later, the patient requested a refill <strong>of</strong> the Valtrex®<br />

tablets. A pharmacy technician processed the refill and<br />

gave it to the pharmacist for checking. On checking the refill<br />

Recommendations:<br />

• Whenever possible, dispense the same strength or concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the medication as prescribed. The directions for use<br />

would therefore be the same given to the patient by the prescriber.<br />

Clearly explain any changes to the patient.<br />

• Always consider the possible indication for use when checking<br />

prescriptions for appropiateness and accuracy.<br />

• Investigate thoroughly all concerns raised by the patient.<br />

• Appropiate steps should be taken by all stakeholders to ensure<br />

that the indication for use or purpose <strong>of</strong> the medication<br />

is included on all prescriptions. This is certainly a patient<br />

safety issue.<br />

References:<br />

1. Gray J, Therapeutic Choices, Canadian <strong>Pharmacists</strong><br />

Association Ottawa ON 2007;207<br />

2. Gray J, Therapeutic Choices, Canadian <strong>Pharmacists</strong><br />

Association Ottawa ON 2007;1535<br />

16 pharmacyconnection • <strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!