02.05.2014 Views

January/February 2009 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

January/February 2009 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

January/February 2009 - Ontario College of Pharmacists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pharmacy technician Q&A<br />

Susan James<br />

Project Director, Pharmacy Technician Regulation<br />

QI understand that when I register with the <strong>College</strong><br />

there is an annual fee that I will have to pay. Can<br />

you tell me what the fee is, what it is for, and what<br />

benefit I will receive in return for this fee?<br />

Yes, there is an annual registration fee that all members <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>College</strong> must pay. The current proposal is that Pharmacy<br />

Technicians should pay a fee that is two thirds <strong>of</strong> what<br />

pharmacists pay. Based on the current fee structure, the<br />

amount would be $358.57.<br />

This fee is not set in relation to the pr<strong>of</strong>ession’s earning<br />

potential, but is based on the costs associated with self-regulation.<br />

These costs include activities such as registering new<br />

members, maintaining a continuing competency program,<br />

ensuring there are standards <strong>of</strong> practice, and investigating<br />

and resolving any practice concerns that are brought forward.<br />

In fact, there is an argument to be made that the fee<br />

should be consistent for all members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong>. In setting<br />

the fee, however, the Council considered that the scope<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice for pharmacy technicians is not as broad as that<br />

<strong>of</strong> a pharmacist in Part A <strong>of</strong> the register.<br />

It is difficult to describe the benefit <strong>of</strong> paying these fees.<br />

To be a regulated pr<strong>of</strong>essional means one has an exclusive<br />

right and privilege to use the title <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession and to<br />

perform a function for society that others are not permitted<br />

to do. A registered pharmacy technician will have the authority<br />

and independent accountability to perform the technical<br />

functions related to dispensing and compounding <strong>of</strong><br />

drugs. As a member <strong>of</strong> a self-regulated pr<strong>of</strong>ession, you have<br />

the added privilege <strong>of</strong> being held to account by a body <strong>of</strong><br />

your peers, as opposed to others who may not be familiar<br />

with the realities <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional practice.<br />

QWhen I become registered with the <strong>College</strong>, will<br />

I also have to purchase pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability<br />

insurance, as pharmacists do?<br />

It has not been proposed that pharmacy technicians be required<br />

to maintain personal pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability insurance<br />

(as is now required for pharmacists and interns). Up until<br />

last year, pharmacists were not required to have personal<br />

coverage, because they were covered under the policies at<br />

their place <strong>of</strong> employment. The new requirement for pharmacists<br />

and interns to have their own policy relates to the<br />

expanding roles and new environments that pharmacists are<br />

working in, and their need for coverage to be more mobile.<br />

At this time, it is expected that pharmacy technicians will be<br />

covered within their place <strong>of</strong> employment, just as pharmacists<br />

were in the past. The <strong>College</strong> will continue to monitor<br />

this expectation and make adjustments if needed.<br />

Although it is not required, the <strong>College</strong> strongly recommends<br />

personal pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability insurance for all members.<br />

At a minimum, pharmacy technicians should confirm<br />

that they are covered by their employer.<br />

QI passed the certification exam several years ago.<br />

What benefit has that actually given me since I<br />

am still required to complete the bridging education<br />

program and entry-to-practice and jurisprudence<br />

exams to become registered with the <strong>College</strong>?<br />

The certification exam was put into place to address a concern<br />

that pharmacists expressed regarding the diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

training programs for pharmacy technicians. With applicants<br />

for pharmacy technician positions having trained on<br />

the job, at a private career college, or at a community college,<br />

employers were unsure how to compare among them.<br />

Pharmacy technicians who achieved certification demonstrated<br />

they had at least the consistent level <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

required to pass the exam. Over time, many employers<br />

came to rely on the certification as a requirement to demonstrate<br />

an applicant was qualified for the job. Individuals<br />

who maintained their certification also demonstrated a<br />

12 pharmacyconnection • <strong>January</strong>/<strong>February</strong> <strong>2009</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!