01.05.2014 Views

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> & Safety Code<br />

Section/<br />

Chapter<br />

Related/<br />

Contrary<br />

Explanation<br />

<strong>Preemption</strong><br />

Exception<br />

Is State Law<br />

Preempted?<br />

Recommendation<br />

§ 771.061<br />

Confidentiality <strong>of</strong><br />

Information<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

No<br />

Title 9: Safety<br />

Chapter 773: Emergency Medical Services<br />

§ 773.0612<br />

Access <strong>to</strong><br />

Records<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

Not Contrary <strong>to</strong> HIPAA because:<br />

(1) HIPAA permits appropriately limited disclosure <strong>of</strong> PHI that<br />

is required by law. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(a)(1).<br />

(2) HIPAA permits disclosure for certain public health<br />

activities. 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(b).<br />

No<br />

See 25 TAC § 157.4 for corresponding rules.<br />

§ 773.0613<br />

Information<br />

Report <strong>to</strong><br />

Department<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

EMS providers must file an annual report with <strong>the</strong> Tex. Dept.<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> (TDH) on <strong>the</strong> number and types <strong>of</strong> runs <strong>the</strong> provider<br />

makes. TDH shall post <strong>the</strong> info on <strong>the</strong> website.<br />

No<br />

Subsection (g) is not contrary. There does not appear <strong>to</strong> be a<br />

corresponding provision in HIPAA.<br />

§ 773.091<br />

Confidential<br />

Information<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

The information at issue in <strong>the</strong> statute looks like direc<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

information but <strong>the</strong> elements are different; cannot be certain<br />

from text <strong>of</strong> statute <strong>to</strong> whom disclosure is made or what its<br />

purpose is. A covered entity would still have <strong>to</strong> follow HIPAA.<br />

No<br />

See 25 TAC § 157.11 (l)(6) for corresponding rule.<br />

§ 773.092<br />

Exceptions<br />

§ 773.093<br />

Consent<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

This provides for consent for release. It does not include end<br />

date, but can be reconciled by adding end date; consistent<br />

with authorization content except no end date. Solution: Add<br />

end date <strong>to</strong> consent. Such an addition is not precluded by<br />

<strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> this section.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

§ 773.095<br />

Records and<br />

Proceedings<br />

Confidential<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

No<br />

317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!