01.05.2014 Views

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Health</strong> & Safety Code<br />

Section/<br />

Chapter<br />

Related/<br />

Contrary<br />

Explanation<br />

<strong>Preemption</strong><br />

Exception<br />

Is State Law<br />

Preempted?<br />

Recommendation<br />

§ 595.001<br />

Confidentiality <strong>of</strong><br />

Records<br />

§ 595.002<br />

Rules<br />

§ 595.003<br />

Consent <strong>to</strong><br />

Disclosure<br />

Title 7: Mental <strong>Health</strong> and Mental Retardation<br />

Chapter 595: Records<br />

Related/ Records are confidential except as authorized under §§<br />

Contrary <strong>to</strong> 595.003 and 595.004. If § 595.004 is contrary, <strong>the</strong>n that part<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> § <strong>of</strong> § 595.001 would also be contrary. See 40 TAC § 8.624,<br />

595.004. 40 TAC, chapter 4, Subchapter A for corresponding rules.<br />

Not Related<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

Pertains <strong>to</strong> rule making authority.<br />

Provides that confidential records may be disclosed under<br />

certain circumstances; exceptions are addressed in §<br />

595.005.<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

§ 595.004<br />

Right <strong>to</strong> Personal<br />

Record<br />

Related/<br />

Contrary<br />

Under Second<br />

Prong<br />

The HIPAA scheme and <strong>the</strong> Mental <strong>Health</strong> and Mental<br />

Retardation (MHMR) scheme for individual access are widely<br />

divergent. The right <strong>of</strong> access is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most thorough<br />

and detailed portions <strong>of</strong> HIPAA. Indeed, individual access is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> only two required disclosures in <strong>the</strong> entire <strong>Privacy</strong><br />

Rule. Any denial <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> must be well documented and<br />

justified. That <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> access has been afforded such<br />

importance in <strong>the</strong> HIPAA regs makes <strong>the</strong> discrepancies<br />

between it and state law more significant.<br />

In this instance, <strong>the</strong> discrepancies are as follows:<br />

(1) State law permits a provider <strong>to</strong> deny access without any<br />

documentation; HIPAA does not permit individual access <strong>to</strong><br />

psycho<strong>the</strong>rapy notes but this law would appear <strong>to</strong> do so<br />

inasmuch as MHMR records contain psycho<strong>the</strong>rapy notes.<br />

(2) Subsection (b) gives parents and guardians a nearly<br />

unfettered right <strong>of</strong> access, even if those parties are abusive<br />

or suspected <strong>of</strong> abuse.<br />

Yes<br />

A possible solution may<br />

be <strong>to</strong> incorporate <strong>the</strong><br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r law in<br />

determining whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

access will be provided<br />

or not.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> import afforded individual access <strong>to</strong> HIPAA, and<br />

given <strong>the</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> reconciling <strong>the</strong> two schemes, this<br />

section is arguably contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Privacy</strong> Rule under <strong>the</strong><br />

second prong <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> "contrary."<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!