01.05.2014 Views

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

Preemption Analysis of Texas Laws Relating to the Privacy of Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Texas</strong> Family Code<br />

Section<br />

Related/<br />

Contrary<br />

Explanation<br />

Requires pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> identity from an<br />

applicant for information from an<br />

adoption registry.<br />

<strong>Preemption</strong><br />

Exception<br />

Is State Law<br />

Preempted?<br />

Recommendation<br />

§ 162.408<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Identity<br />

Not Related<br />

Even if related, it is not inconsistent with<br />

HIPAA because <strong>the</strong> stated purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> statute is <strong>to</strong> protect <strong>the</strong> privacy rights<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties <strong>to</strong> an adoption, as<br />

opposed <strong>to</strong> protecting PHI.<br />

No<br />

Lists <strong>the</strong> required information that must<br />

be provided by a person applying <strong>to</strong><br />

register <strong>to</strong> a registry.<br />

§ 162.409<br />

Application<br />

Not Related<br />

Even if related: (1) The disclosing entity<br />

is not a covered entity; and (2) The<br />

statute does not address ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

confidentiality or disclosure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

application.<br />

No<br />

§ 162.414<br />

Matching<br />

Procedures<br />

Related/ Contrary<br />

State law would permit disclosure <strong>of</strong> PHI<br />

(confirmation/denial <strong>of</strong> a biological<br />

relationship between two people) that is<br />

prohibited by HIPAA.<br />

A covered entity would find it impossible<br />

<strong>to</strong> comply with both this state law and<br />

HIPAA.<br />

None<br />

Yes<br />

Amend <strong>the</strong> last sentence <strong>of</strong> §<br />

162.414(d) <strong>to</strong> read: "The agency,<br />

court, hospital, physician, or person<br />

with knowledge may confirm or<br />

deny <strong>the</strong> match without breaching<br />

any duty <strong>of</strong> confidentiality <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

adoptee, adoptive parents, birth<br />

parents, or biological siblings,<br />

which arises from state law. This<br />

provision does not relieve a<br />

Covered Entity, as that term is<br />

defined by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Insurance<br />

Portability and Accountability Act <strong>of</strong><br />

1996 (HIPAA), from any obligations<br />

it has pursuant <strong>to</strong> HIPAA."<br />

§ 162.416<br />

Disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

Identifying<br />

Information<br />

Related/<br />

Not Contrary<br />

(1) No covered entity.<br />

(2) HIPAA permits appropriately limited<br />

disclosure <strong>of</strong> PHI that is required by law.<br />

45 C.F.R. § 164.512(a)(1).<br />

No<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!