Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency
Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency
Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
13 MONITORING<br />
13.1 Introduction<br />
This section describes the monitoring required, particularly once the implementation of the<br />
cycle <strong>network</strong> plan has started.<br />
13.2 Features to<br />
monitor<br />
The following features should be monitored<br />
<strong>and</strong> included in an annual or biennial report<br />
on cycle <strong>network</strong> development:<br />
Physical works programmes.<br />
<strong>Cycle</strong> use <strong>and</strong> modal share.<br />
<strong>Cycle</strong> crashes.<br />
Satisfaction levels regarding cycle facilities.<br />
<strong>Cycle</strong> facilities’ condition.<br />
<strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>network</strong> implementation.<br />
LOS improvements.<br />
13.3 Pragmatic<br />
approach<br />
For efficiency purposes, monitoring <strong>and</strong><br />
surveys of cycling should be integrated<br />
with similar local authority or RCA activities<br />
where possible.<br />
13.4 Physical works<br />
programmes<br />
As discussed in section 12.2.1, physical<br />
works programmes should be monitored<br />
to identify opportunities to include<br />
provisions for implementing sections of the<br />
cycle <strong>network</strong>, or for otherwise satisfying<br />
cyclists’ needs.<br />
Planned general or reactive maintenance<br />
works (including storm damage repair)<br />
should be monitored on a monthly, or<br />
as appropriate, basis. Meanwhile, the<br />
infrastructure <strong>and</strong> maintenance works<br />
programme of Transit New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
adjacent local authorities should be<br />
monitored at least annually.<br />
13.5 <strong>Cycle</strong> use<br />
The number of cyclists using key<br />
sections of the <strong>network</strong> should be<br />
counted annually to:<br />
• detect any changes in cycle use<br />
that may affect cycle <strong>network</strong><br />
implementation priorities<br />
• collect data to support funding<br />
applications.<br />
Installing continuous automated counters<br />
on key <strong>route</strong>s provides some control data<br />
for monitoring cycle use on the <strong>network</strong>.<br />
This can also be used for scaling short-term<br />
or seasonally affected counts <strong>and</strong><br />
for calculating modal split.<br />
Individual locations do not need to be<br />
counted every year. A rolling five-year<br />
programme of cycle counts will be<br />
adequate for monitoring <strong>and</strong> design<br />
purposes.<br />
Cyclists’ trip patterns are important clues to<br />
the effectiveness of cycle <strong>network</strong> <strong>planning</strong>.<br />
If these differ significantly from those<br />
envisaged by <strong>network</strong> planners, it may<br />
indicate the need for a change of approach.<br />
13.6 <strong>Cycle</strong> crashes<br />
<strong>Cycle</strong> crash data should be monitored<br />
annually in order to detect:<br />
• any new or growing hazards that<br />
may require urgent attention, or an<br />
adjustment to the cycle <strong>network</strong><br />
implementation priorities<br />
• any problems associated with recently<br />
completed cycle facilities<br />
• whether cyclists’ safety is increasing or<br />
decreasing.<br />
13.7 Satisfaction<br />
levels<br />
A sample of all road users (including<br />
pedestrians) should be surveyed annually<br />
or biennially in order to identify the degree<br />
of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with<br />
provisions for cyclists in the study area.<br />
This survey is probably best included in a<br />
local authority’s residents’ survey, if it has<br />
one. A more specific survey of cyclists is<br />
also desirable.<br />
13.8 <strong>Cycle</strong> facilities’<br />
condition<br />
The condition of existing cycle facilities<br />
should be monitored <strong>and</strong> any necessary<br />
maintenance programmed <strong>and</strong> carried out.<br />
A system for cyclists to report hazards<br />
could be implemented, for example by<br />
freepost reply cards, email, the internet<br />
or phone hotlines.<br />
Some European towns pay cyclist<br />
advocacy groups to conduct regular<br />
condition surveys.<br />
76