Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency

6.14 Shared path
Description
A shared path is shared with
pedestrians and possibly others (for
example horse riders).
Advantages
This facility is useful to cyclists as
well as pedestrians, and therefore
maximises the benefit of the path to
the general community.
It is beneficial to vulnerable cyclists
where an existing footpath can be
adapted or widened.
Shared path, Wairere Drive, Hamilton, New Zealand. (Photo: Paul Ryan)
Disadvantages
Conflict between cyclists and
pedestrians is common where, for
instance, there is a significant volume
of cyclists and pedestrians or a mix
of recreational walkers and
commuting cyclists.
The LOS for cyclists can be poor where
interference by other path users
results in slower speeds.
See also 6.16 Cycle path next to road.
Recommendations
Shared paths are beneficial to a range of path users but need to be managed
effectively. They are appropriate where both cyclists and pedestrians need a path, but
their numbers are modest.
It is important that:
• the path’s design is suitable for its use and demand
• authorities adequately monitor users’ behaviour on the path.
• the connections between path, road and driveways are carefully considered.
6.15 Separated path
Description
This is a path with separate sections for cyclists and pedestrians.
Advantages
Separated paths may help to avoid the
conflict between pedestrians and cyclists
that is common on shared paths.
Cyclists can ride without the delays
possible on paths shared with walkers.
Disadvantages
Higher cyclist speeds are possible,
but having a cycle path close to
pedestrians means they can stray into
the cycling space.
Separated paths are wider than other
paths, so they cost more.
Separated path with barrier rail, Bielefeld, Germany. (Photo: Tim Hughes)
Recommendations
Separated paths are appropriate if large
numbers of cyclists and pedestrians will
use them.
There should be adequate separation
(such as different path levels) between
cyclists and pedestrians.
41