Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency
Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency
Cycle network and route planning guide - NZ Transport Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6 POSSIBLE CYCLE<br />
ROUTE COMPONENTS<br />
6.1 Introduction<br />
Planning cycle <strong>route</strong>s involves considering the most appropriate facility for any<br />
particular situation. This chapter identifies the available facility types <strong>and</strong> their<br />
advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages.<br />
6.2 Provision requirements<br />
The New Zeal<strong>and</strong> supplement to Austroads Guide to traffic engineering practice: Part 14:<br />
Bicycles (Transit New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, 2004) (CDS) is the main design guidance tool for cyclist facilities<br />
on roads <strong>and</strong> paths.<br />
Figure 6.1 is a <strong>guide</strong> to the desirable facilities in the road corridor for cyclists in relation to<br />
traffic volume <strong>and</strong> speed <strong>and</strong> is most useful when <strong>planning</strong> for new situations. In practice,<br />
constraints on space, presence of side roads <strong>and</strong> driveways, type of users <strong>and</strong> costs<br />
will also dictate the choice of facilities to retrofit to existing situations. These <strong>and</strong> other<br />
considerations are discussed below.<br />
The flow chart in Figure 6-15 of the <strong>Cycle</strong> design supplement is a <strong>guide</strong> to choosing the<br />
desirable path facilities for cyclists in different circumstances.<br />
6.3 Mid-block facilities<br />
<strong>Cycle</strong> facilities that can be provided between intersections include:<br />
• kerbside cycle lanes<br />
• cycle lanes next to parking<br />
• contra-flow cycle lanes<br />
• wide kerbside lanes<br />
• sealed shoulders<br />
• bus-bike lanes<br />
• transit lanes<br />
• mixed traffic<br />
• paths.<br />
Cyclists do not always need special or dedicated facilities. They do need provisions<br />
appropriate to their needs. For instance, wide kerbside lanes on arterial roads have similar<br />
benefits for cyclists as bicycle lanes (Hunter, 1998). However, cyclists prefer marked cycle lanes<br />
wherever possible.<br />
Depending on the circumstances, cyclists may find the following provision quite adequate,<br />
without dedicated facilities:<br />
• wide kerbside lanes<br />
• sealed shoulders<br />
• bus-cycle lanes<br />
• shared paths<br />
• slow, mixed traffic<br />
• lightly trafficked streets of adequate width<br />
• unsealed roads <strong>and</strong> paths<br />
• one-way streets where signs <strong>and</strong> markings permit two-way use by cyclists.<br />
However, it may be necessary to use special <strong>guide</strong> or <strong>route</strong> signs to ensure a cycle <strong>route</strong><br />
that includes such provision forms part of a coherent <strong>network</strong>.<br />
34