04-26-11

DON51612011
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
ERNEST J. HORNEY, JR, and ROSEMARY HORNEY,
Index No.:
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
%
Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Weitx & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney f or Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor
New York, New York 1000 Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
APR 2 6 2011

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
THOMAS CARROLL et al.,
-against-
Plaintiff,
Index No.:
119491
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &S. INC., et at. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
.
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs‘ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
Sedgwick, Detert, Maran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 1Zfh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
F\LED
SO ORDERED,
NJb41735vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
By:
Samuel Goldblatt, Es
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant,
180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Comp
New York, NY 10038 Key Towers at Fop *
(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plazais
Buffalo, NY 14202
(716) 853-8100
APT? 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
APRCf! ?O 11
NEW/ YQRK
NT~ CLERK'S OFFICE'
13381246. I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
..................................... -X NY CAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
____________________------------------
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 104095/98
Giovanni Petrone and Mary Petrone,
- against -
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
....................................... -X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Cod
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant
Giovanni Petrone and Mary
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Petrone
Inc.
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
(718) 855-9000
.: 10924-6456
So Ordered:

TMc:CCCjpk)
41111 1
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
York, Inc.
41rving~lace F I L E D
New York. NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:
Our File No
S-4986-98

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y OK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelle!
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, NY
+/jL. , 2011
By: &W
fllehd %WC/I,Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
Samuel mdblatt, E
Benjamin R. Dwyer
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Company
New York, NY 10038
Key Towers at Fountain
(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plaz Q
Buffalo, NY 1420
TUP
53-8100
APR 2 6 '20'
SO ORDERED,
13409973.1
APR 15 2011

----"_""___________________I____________------------------------"---"-"---
TMc:CCCjpk)
41111 1
a
----_"-____-____________________________------
WDEX NO.
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 110289/98 an 111058/98
ASSIGNED TO:
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Tnc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and RuIes Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
Edison Company of New
New York, NY 10003-3598
S-4986-98

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
_____----------__l_-______________l__l
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 112919/98
BRIAN J. MCGUIRE
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
__________----------___llll__
NYCAL
- against -
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &
S., INC., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar!,
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LaL\ 7
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ano I
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Brian J. McGuire
Burn ham L LC
700 Broadway, 6"h Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 1120 FI
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 11084-2112 ApR 2 6
23'11
D

-_l-_f----____________________l_ll____
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
_______l__lll________--___--_-----------
X
IN RE:
NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
This Document Relates to:
Ara Ne11 Murphy, Individually, and Jan
Marie Murphy as Executrix for the Estate
of James F. Murphy,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
A.C. & S.,
Inc., et al.,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 113121/98
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
__________________-__________________ -X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cost E#=
APR 2 6 2011
D
Cugen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant
Ara Ne11 Murphy, Individually Maxio & DiBono Plastering Co.
and Jan Marie Murphy as
Inc.
Executrix for the Estate of 177 Montague Street
James F. Murphy Brooklyn, New York 11201
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 5+:. a 00 0
New York, New York 1000 e NO.: 10924-1831
So Ordered:
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
CHARLES J. HENRY and MARILYN HENRY,
Index No.:
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &S. INC., et at. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz 8t Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plain tffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YQRK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE’
NU341752vl

I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
JOAN LEVESQUE as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH
LEVESQUE and JOAN LEVESQUE, Individually,
Index No.:
/\122034-1.
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODULTTS, et al, including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintvfs
700 Broadway
fi
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
r i ~ YORK \ ~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
_________________l__II_______________
-X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
-----l-------------____________f_f_l__
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 100050/99
Mary Jean Massaro, Individually and as
Administratrix for the Estate of Joseph
A. Massaro Jr.,
Plaintiff,
- against - NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A.C. .& S., Inc., et al.,
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
--_-_------I-------_________________
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being ncr
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co
i
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without CostsF I L E 4
Mary Jean Massaro, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
and as Administratrix for the Inc.
Estate of John A. Massaro Jr. 177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 10003
10924-6466
So Ordered:
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
ERNEST J. HORNEY, JR, and ROSEMARY HORNEY,
Index No.:
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
n-
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
SO ORDERED,
Dennis E. V e g w
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
NJ/34 I756v 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
LILLIAN P. CARPENTER, as Executrix for the
Estate of GERALD CLAYTON CARPENTER,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffls),
-against-
: NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler)
1 Index No.: 106083-99
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: 3 \3@\ \\
Newxork, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
Kirst
P
Alford Kneis, Esq.
K& GATESLLP
At rneys for Defendant
CRANE CO.
599 Lexington Ave
New York, NY 100

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
FREDERICK A. TOLI and DOLORES IOLI,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C, & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
* NYCAL
: I.A,S, Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heihzr)
: Index No: 10791 3-99
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
I
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
3\3a\\\
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avep e NEW \/ORK
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 1002bW CLERRS
(2 12) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
^ .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
KENNETH J. GARY, as Personal * hTX7I- ~r
1Y 1 LAL
Representative for the Estate of JOHN GARY, : Part 3o
and DEANNA GARY, Individually,
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
Index No: 117282-99
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \ 3r~3 \ \ \
New York. New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
Attorneys for Defendant
CRANE CO.
599 Lexington Avenue APR 2 6 2011
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030
- (212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFiCt

__________________II_________l_lr_______----------------------- X
m. * UPR RE ME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
________I_______________r_____r_________-----------"-----------
IN RE:NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
REGINA ACKERMAN, as Executrix of the
Estate of FRANK J. COPPOLA,
-against-
Plaintiff,
X
s= ?/
Index No. 99- 12 1 144
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
L
i
WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Marernont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
pfa- w-, 201 1
11% -
TJ&&/FZ. ,&OGC? I Esq. Peggy L. Pan, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES &
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FRIEDMAN LLP
700 Broadway AttorneysforDefindant 3 'C I E D
New York, NY 10003
1633 Broadway
(212) 558-5500
NewYork,New York 10019 APR
--"(212) 20,,
506-1700
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORH
COUNTY CLERK'$QFF@@
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 15 2011
I
I

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
COSMA LERUZIC, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER F.
LERUZIC and COSMA LERUZIC, Individually,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCE, et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
_____________""_rr______________________---------"-~--------------~--- X
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
- ...
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
k
Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Faster Wheeler,, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORPERED,
15 2011
NJD41757vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed
Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
Defendants.
I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No(s),: 112375-02;
&Z%
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \ 30 \ [\,
ork, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Aven
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
n

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
------________________________I______
-X
IN RE:
NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
______________________I______________
-X
This Document Relates to:
Janet W. Fitzgerald, as Executrix for
the Estate of Adolph V. Weber,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 125761/99
- against -
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
I______________________________I______
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6
DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and
Inc
cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
, be dismissed with prejudice and without cos D
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York
41 2 , 2011
3/yJ//
SamGe1 M. Mdirowitz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
len and D
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Janet W. Fitzgerald, as
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Executrix for the Estate of Inc.
Adolph V. Weber 177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 10003
So Ordered:
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
?'?q! 0924 - 6460

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
BY
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
1 SO Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
Patterson-Kelley
Key Towers at Fount
40 Fountain
Buffalo, NY 14202
(716) 853-8100
APR 2 6 ""
D
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
13381246 1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 100592/00
- against -
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
______________________
- -X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 6 Et
2 6 2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
William T. Franklin and Anne L. Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Frank1 in
Inc.
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
8) 855-9000
File No.: 10924-6462
So Ordered:
APR 15 2011

-------f-----l_____l-----------------
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
..................................... -X
This Document Relates to:
Charles A. Vitale, as Executor for the
Estate of Wesley A. Schwartz,
NY CAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 101760/00
- against -
A.C. & S. Inc. , et al. ,
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice- to all co-defendants, all claim:
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York
q(rr 2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Charles A. Vitale, as Executor Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
for the Estate of Wesley A. Inc.
Schwa rt z
177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 1000 18) 855-9000
r File No.: 10924-6458
So Ordered:

-."--I^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
_l_--_l____---------Ilf___________l___
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
X
This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 102783/00
THOMAS J. CRUGER, SR.
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDWNT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &
- against -
S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
X
I
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,
prejudice and without costs.
2 6 2011
FIE'
Weitz 6r Luxenberg,
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Thomas J, Cxuger, Sr.
Burn ham 1;LC
700 Broadway, 6'h Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 11084-2176
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
...................................... X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
-__llll______________--------------------
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 104471/00
DUANE BROUGHTON
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summarj7
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.

______f-llll---lll--l-----l-ll---------------
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
-_-____________________________-_--_--
This Document Relates to:
CARLO BRISCOLI
Plaintiff,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 104483/00
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC,
hereby requests summar
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and
there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice ta all co-defendants, all claims an
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Broqkbyn, New York
J
Frank Ortiz, Es
Weitz & Luxenbe
Attorneys for P
Carlo Bri scol i
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003
212-558-5500
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Bu xn ham L LC
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New YorkrA,l$2Q1
(718) 855-9000 kd
Our File No.: 11084-2327
SO ORDERED:
_e_-- "
Hon. Sherry I?: Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
IN RE:
NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Rosemary Schiano, Individually and as
Executrix for the Estate of Daniel
Schiano,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.C. &i S., Inc., et al.,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 105249/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
______-----________------------------
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 1
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimt
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without c0sts.F 1 1
APR 2 6 201'1
Qdniel P. hlouin, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Cuwen and Dykrnan LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
Rosemary Schiano, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.
of Daniel Schiano
177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 10003 18) 855-9000
r File No.: 10924-6305
So Ordered:
AfR 15 2811

~ .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
___ll--l---____-----____l______
X
This Document Relates to:
RONALD R. KENT
- against -
Plaintiff,
Index No.: 105342/00
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &
S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
w.v%,f?.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
\. '1
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. x*.?
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald R. Kent
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003
212-558-5500
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Busnham LLC
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York
(718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 11084-1
2 6 20''
SO ORDERED:
-
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

-
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCWmNT WLATES TO:
ALVIN E. EHL .
INDEX NO.
105849/00
ASSIGNED TO:
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defmdant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Xnc.
hereby requests immmary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and #ere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
- - - - I--_ - " - .. - - -
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
)UT File No
4316-00
€80 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038-4925
SO ORDERED:
Consolidakh'kdison Company of New
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New York, NY 10003-3598
FILED
APR 2 6 2011

__________--f--l----------------------
X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YQRK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
___ll----l---_-____-------------------
X
(Judge Heitler)
This Document Relates to:
EDWARD J. FERGUSON
Index No.: 105774/00
Plaintiff ,
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. &
S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar!,
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lai!
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit
prejudice and without costs.
n, New York
Weitz & Luxenberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Edward J. FeKguSOn
Bum h am L L C
700 Broadway, 6t'' Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New Yorj jlEIE
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 11 84-2 4
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Sherry KFHeitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed
Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
Defendants.
: I.A.S. Part 30
' (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No(s).$237iOZj
05977-00.
121985-99
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
' JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \30\ I\
Neuork, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(2 12) 558-5500
CRANE CO.
599 Lexington Aven
New York, NY 10022

I ’
~
__________---------__I________________
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-_-_-_-----________-------------------
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
X
This Document Relates to:
RONALD W. KLOPFER
Index No.: 106483/00
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGbENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
I
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
-_______-__________-------------------
WHEREFOREf defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
X
I
I
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED,
that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
rk
11
T
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald W. Klopfer
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003
212-558-5500
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Burnham LLC
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York 11201
(718) 855-9000
Our File No. :
APR 2 6 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
..................................... -X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
..................................... -X
This Document Relates to:
Barbara J. Klopfer, Individually and as
Executrix for the Estate of Ronald W.
Klopf er ,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 106483/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION 2WD ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBon
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without co
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York
, 2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Barbara J. Klopfer,
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Individually and as Executrix Inc.
for the Estate of Ronald W. 177 Montague Street
K1 opf er Brooklyn, New York 11201
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003 NO. : 10924-6464
So Ordered:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COlJNTY OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
f Index No.: 107449/00
ANTONIO MIGLXOZI AND MARIA M.
MIGLIOZI,
; NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-againstj
MOTION AND ORDER
~.---
A. C. & $., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Antonio Migliozzi and Maria M.
WElTZ & LWXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
N0040474-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
ANTONIO MIGLIOZZT and MARIA M.
MIGLIOZZI,
NYCAL
1 I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff( s),
: Index No(s).: 107449-00
A.C. & S., INC., et al,,
-against-
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
1 ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \3 o\ \\
New
ork, New York
FILED
Th
Kirste K&L ATESLLP Alford Kneis, Esq. APR MEW 2 YORK 6 2011
yWEITZ Frank Ortiz, & LUXENBERG,
Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Atto eys for DefendmUNfY CLERKS OFFICE
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,

-
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK I
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
/
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANTONIO MIGLIOZI AND MARIA M.
MIGLIOZI,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: I07449/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND O E R
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
).I
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & ~LUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York
APR 2 6 2t)"
10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
h1C-W YORK
SO ORDERED,
couNTy CLERKS OFF"'
Hon. SKdy Klein Heitler 1235-1 4382
NOQ40478-1
APR 15'2011

This Document Relates To:
PATRICIA PALADINO, as Administratrix for the
Estate of WILLIAM PHILIP ALLOCA,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
Defendants.
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No(s).: 108356-00
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \>e\ I\
New York, New York
n
Frank Ortiz, Esq. \
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
>
Kirsteq/Alford Kneis, Esq.
F! D
CRANE CO.
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500 NewYork,NY 10022 APR 2 6 20''
(212) 536-3900
p ::*rgj YORK
SO ORDERED, (-w i \ CLERKS OFFICE
%
Hon. Sherry Klely Heitler
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STA'TEQF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i 1.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
-i- 1-1 I s u oc u M EEREFEKS
TO :
0
j lndex No.: 1 15836/00, 08386/00
i
MARY ICOMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR TIHE ESTATE OF GIN0
KOMANO, \ NO OPPOSITION
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et d.,
Plaintiffs,
i
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
J
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being 'no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims agains#
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
700 Broadway
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NO040478- 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTIGATlON
: I.A.S. Part 30
(H ei t 1 er , J .)
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 115836/00,
MARY ROMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRTX FOR THE ESTATE OF GIN0
ROMANO,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Go., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yoxk -
Matthe!& bc Shrnpar, Esq.
Attorney fo>E&fendant Attorney for Plaintiffs f
Safeguard Industrial Equipment CO.
Estate of Gin0 Romano
I P.0
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003 A?fi 2 6 Zoll
*-+%*_ (212)
~ 558-5500
(212) 509-3456 CTA,/,//-
SO ORDERED,
I
Hon. S h h Klein 1 Ieitler
324-5095C
N0040478-1

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
FRANK 1. CAMARDELLA,
Index No.: 108846-2000
-against-
AX. &S. INC., et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitt & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plain tvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
clou@
NJ/341734vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
CAROL NICOLAIDIS, as Administratrix for the : NYCAL
Estate of JAMES NICOLAIDIS, and CAROL : I.A.S. Part 30
NICOLAIDIS, Individually,
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
A.C. & S., INC,, et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
: Index No. 109064-00
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: -3 \3 e\ \\
w
New York. New York
n'
Frank Ortiz. Esa.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG-?
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Kirstepf Alford Kneis, Esq.
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
+ . (212) 536-3900
YORK
CLERK'S OFF'='
SO ORDERED,
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 15 ?Ojf

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
_____________"_r__l_r___________________----------------"-"------
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_____________11_1_1____ll__l_l_lll___lr_-------------------------
X
This Document Relates To:
RUTH MCDADE, as Executrix for the Estate of : NYCAL
CORNELIUS FRANCIS MCDADE, and RUTH : I.A.S, Part 30
MCDADE, Individually,
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
X
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
: Index No(s).: 109413-00
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \,3 O\ \\-
New Yxk, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
Atdrneys for Defendant
CRANE CO.
NEW YORK
599 Lexington Avenue SOUNTY CERK'S OFFEE
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 15 2011

_I_l____llf_-_-____flll-----------------
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_________________II_II___________
-X
This Document Relates to:
Judith L. Mathis, Individually and as
Executrix for the Estate of John L.
Mathis,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 109431/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cost
$I
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
4lr-L , 2011
\\
PR 2 6 2011
Michael Fanklli, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
CLERKS OFF
Attorneys for Plaintiff
dtorneys for Defendant
Judith L. Mathis, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.
of John L. Mathis
177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 10003 18) 855-9000
r File No.: 10924-6467
So Ordered: AVR 15 2011
F

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
...................................... X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
--_-__---_---------------------------- X
This Document Relates to: Index No. : 109491/00
GEORGE P. MCGOFF
NO-OPPOSITION
- against -
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
-----__-lf--l_________________________
X
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains-:
defendant
BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
George P. McGoff
Burnham LLC
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street

SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 1
DOROTHY MELNYK, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL
A. MELNYK,
NO OPPOSlTION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
."-
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et a/.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
W! ,2011
m Z . 7 4 -
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Estate of Michael A. Melnyg
MCGIVNEY & kUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
&;I;
New
2 6 2011
New York, New York 10004
York, New York 10003
(212) . , 509-3456 n., (212) 558-5500
- 1 - ?' ,' i; 3 K
SO ORDElZED,
CQC;N-~ Y CLERK'S OFFICE]
1235-13909
N0040478-1
APR 15 2Q11

--_--_-I
SUPREME COT JKT OF THE Sl’ATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN re.: NEW Y ~ R K COUNTY
I NYCAJ,
ASBESTOS LI?‘IGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
*IWS DEUMENT
REFERS TO:
RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A. i
SCHWARTZ,
j lndex No.: 11 787310
I
A. C. & S., INC., et nl.,
P 1 aint i ffs, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
-
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and ’
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
91 I p 201 1
\
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIWEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
I *”-”.”- 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED, .
c -
Hon. Shew KleX Heitler 1 35-1$&$4 \(ORK
co&!R CLEff K‘S OFFICE‘
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
: (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
FRIEDRICH SCHEUERMANN,
Plaintiffs,
! NO OPPOSITION
-against-
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
I
!
I
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
q/1 ,2011
-
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Friedrich Scheuermann
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 ~1 (212) 558-5500
FILED
APR 2 6 20’11
I
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler -
2571-0790AR
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YO'RK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATZON
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, I.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 117873/0
RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A. i
SCHWARTZ,
-against-
A. C. &S., INC., etal.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
prejudice and without costs,
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
.................................................................
X
Index No(s).: 110564-00
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \30\ \\
Newxrk, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG=?
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
FILED
K&L~ATES LLP
Attorneys for Defendan
CRANE CO.
599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 2011
New York, NY 10022
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFnGk

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
' NYCAL
BETTY KING, Individually and as Executrix for the :
. I.A.S. Part 30
Estate of RONALD E. KING,
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaint iff( s),
: Index No(s).: 110960-00
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
BERNARD IAMMATEO
~ 9 l I W O 6
ASSIGNED TO:
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION STJMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New Yo& Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-cfaims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
- - - - - - - - - -
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
,"i" York
Dated: ne^^^
:B amin Darche, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New York, NY 10003-3598
ESQ.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_rl___r___-__-___-_______________r_____r-------------------------
X
This Document Relates To:
EDWARD GUNTRIPP and KATHLEEN ANN
GUNTRIPP,
: NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: '3 \.3 o\ \\
KirstedAlford Kneis, Esq.
K&@ATES LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Attorneys for Defenda
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue APR 2 6 2011
(2 12) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
(2 12) 536-3900 ~:EW YORK
~QUN iy CLERK'S OFFICE
I
SO ORJIEREiD,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
* NYCAL
LAURA FRACCALVIERI, as Administratrix for the :
Part 3o
Estate of FRANK FRACCALVIERI,
(Hon, Shew Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s),
: Index No(s).: 1 12444-00
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
-against-
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiff's
complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \ 3d\ {\
New York. New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
Attdneys for Defendant
CRANE CO. APH 2 6 201'
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 PiEw YORK
(212) 536-3900 mt4N CLERKS OFFICE
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
PATRICK C. VANCHIERI AND MARGARET
VANCHIERI,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
"against-
Defendants,
NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
(Hon. Sherry Kle-i Heitler)
1 Index No. 113196-00
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \3 a\ (\
New &rk, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
AFR 15 2011

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3\3 -\ \\
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
%
Kirst n Alford Kneis. Esa.
CRANE CO.
599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 2011
New York, NY 10022
(2 12) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
* NYCAL
MARY ANN PICINIC and SANDY PICINIC as Co- :
Part 3o
Executrices for the Estate of RAIMONDO PICINIC, :
, (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaint i ff( s) ,
-against-
Defendants.
Index No.: 113778-00
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \ 3 o \ \ \,
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
fiLED
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue
NewYork,NY 10022 APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED, ~9~~
r?ii:\)V YORK
1 y CLERK'S OFFICE
APR 1.5 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
___l_l____------l--l------------------
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler
-______-_--_-______-------------------
X
This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 114257/00
MICHAEL ZOGBY
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summa
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice L
and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint again
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice,
and there being
opposition thereto,
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims a
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,
be dismissed wi
prejudice and without costs.
T
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Michael Zogby
700 Broadway, 6'h Floor
New York, New York 10003
212-558-5500
Cullen and-Dykman- LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Burn ham L LC
177 Montague Stree
Brooklyn, New York
(718) 855-9000
Our File No. : 11084&j3W826 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIC
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
________________-_-_____II____________
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
.....................................
This Document Relates to:
Toni Zogby, Individually and as
Administratrix for the Estate of
Michael Zogby,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.C. & S.,
Inc., et al.,
-X
NY CAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 114257/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
..................................... -X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario t
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claim:
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co,
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
D
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Toni Zogby, Individually and as Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Administratrix fox the Estate Inc.
of Michael Zogby
177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 10003 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 10924-6461
So Ordered:
Hon. Sher'ry K. Heitler

TMc:CC(jpk)
4/29/09 SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES
WITJ3lN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
M RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
WILLIAM ANTON STOCKHAUSEN
INDEX NO.
114791/00
ASSIGNED TO:
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
I
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plainties complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, hc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defcendmts, dl claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edism Company of New York, h., be and -. the same are hereby
- . I--- - -
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N ~w yo,rk, New York
WEITZ & LUXEmERG, P.C
Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 M~den Lane
New York, NY 10038-4925
C. &:
4 Irving Place
New York, N Y$oQ~-#PE D
SO ORJIERED: APR 2 6 2011
)UT File No
NEV\J YWK
8-7732-00 CoCj~n
APR 1 'fs "rt
.' EWK'S OFFICE'

~~ COUNTY
I
SUPREME COURT OF TliE SThTBQF NEW YORK
OF NEW YORK -
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY‘
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
.
THIS DCICUMENT REFERS TO:
MARY ROMANO, INDIVJBUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR TIHE ESTATE OF GIN0
ROMANO,
-against-
i NYCAL
1 I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
j
i
a
Index No.: 15836/00 08386/00
[ NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OmER
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
I
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGlVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York I0004
(212) 509-3454
5
Estate of Gino Romano
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 2012
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Shew Klein Heitler
cnM3Y5’ss;
b;Ev,/ ‘(CIRK
L c R OFFICE’ ~ ~
N0040478-1
*’ >
I! 2 5 ~~~~

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MARY ROMANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRlX FOR THE ESTATE OF GIN0
ROMANO,
Plaintiffs,
! NYCAL
i X.A.S. Part 30
(HeitIer, J.)
a
j Index No. 15836/0 108386/00
!
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
... I
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. 1
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fi 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney fddfendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Safeguard Industrial Equipment CO.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Estate of Gino Romano
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
(212) 558-5500
NEW YOFiK
SO ORDERED,
couNm CLERK'S OF/=jc€
Hon. Sh& Klein Heitler 324-5095C

I-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STA1’E OF NEW YORK
-- COUNTY OF NEW YOKK - -. ..-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
A 5 BESTOS IdITIGATI ON
i I.A.S. Part 30
----
i (Heitler, J.)
‘THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 1 1 S972/0O
ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A
PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY
NO OPPOSITION
AGRJCOLA,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., TNC., et ul.,
--
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
McGIWY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Magdalena M
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
1122-19539
N0040478-1
APR 15 20111

SUPREME COURT OF IHE STAlE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
1 I.A.S. Part 30
(Hei tler, J .>
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A
PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY
AGRICOLA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 1 15972/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York. New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plaintiff;
Estate of Magdalena Mary A&d$al
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '
700 Broadway
York, New York 10003 ,A 1
q-5 58-5500
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 1235-19012
PIT' ,'2r
Grwyw d,
2 6 2QI1
VORK
'cL6RKs,€FFEE;
N0040478-1

SIJPREME couw OF THE vs"ffl*rF; OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
--_I_."
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANTOINETTE MARK0 KOELLER, A
PERSONAL REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF MAGDALENA MARY
AGRICOLA,
-against-
A. C. & S., XNC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1 15972/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFOEE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 'Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate of Magdalena Mary Agricola
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Kleih Heitler 2383-2960

SUPREME COURT OF THE STAlE OF NEW YORK
- COUNTY OF .I__- NEW YORK
IN N3: NEW YORK COUNI'Y-'='-
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'IIGATION
! I.A.S. Part 30
-I-.-I
! (Heitler, J,)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
.--I
j Index No.: 116672/00
!
i
CAROL D'AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD
J. D'AMORE, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, ! MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
Michele J. Mittlehan, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
700 Broadway
, New York 10003
@ 2 6 m'
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

SIJPREME couw OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NY CAI,
ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATION
1.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CAROL D’AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD
J. D’AMORE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 1 16672/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND OmER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate if Gerald J. D’Amore
FILE
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. D
700 Broadway
NewYork,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 2011
k”W YORK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFJ~
1235-2462
N0040478-1
APR 152018,

--_I-
SUPREME COURl' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK : I
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'I'Y
f NYCAL
ASBESTOS I,TTIGA?'ION i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
---1
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
CAROL D'AMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GERALD
i Index No.: I 16672/00
!
1
J. D'AMORE, i NO OPPOSITION I
-against-
Plaintiffs,
j
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND 0IU)ER
A. C. & S., INC., et al., I
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed wi
without costs.
Dated: New Ymk. New York
ApR 2 6 20''
I
MCGIVNEY & KLUG~R, P:C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadwav
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004 New York, N;'ew York 10003
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
2383-2970
N0040478-I

~ DJ
_I
SUPREME COIJK’T OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
----~
COUNTY OF NEW YON --
RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAI,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
‘THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 116927/00
WILLIAM J. DONNELLY AND MARIE
DONNELLY,
/ NO OPPOSITION
P1 ain ti ffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
-- Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ddgrnent in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
-La
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
William J. Donnelly and Marie Donnelly
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

----I--- -_-.---
STJPREME COlJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUN'I'Y OF NEW YOKK
-I_.
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
.-
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'T'IGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
WILLIAM J. DONNELLY AND MARIE
DONNELLY,
against-
Plaintiffs,
i Index No.: 116927/00
i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, 'Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yprk, New York
Michele J. Mittlegan, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Tnc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
William J. Donnelly and Marie Donnelr'y
WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
11 22-
apff 2 6 m'
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURI’ OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-I__-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
: NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j X.A.S. Part 30
; (Hcitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 117700/00
EDWARD GOlCHMAN AND PHYLLIS
GOICHM AN,
NO OPPOSlTION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ju,grnent in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New york, New York
u
2011
5Q2,w> 3
Carol M. Tempesta, gsq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Edward Goichman and Phyllis Goichrnak ’
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
.1
D
N0040478-1 APR 5 20114

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
.I_-.- COUNTY - OF NEW YON -
IN KE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
AS BE S'PO S L 1 TI G A 'r 1 ON
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS IIOCUMENII' REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 117846/00
CHARLES NEWMAN AND SHIRLEY
NEWMAN,
-against-
A+ C. & S., INC., et al.,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
; MOTION AND ORDER
-
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Treadwell Corporation
MCGI~Y & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Charles Newman and Shirley Newman
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
123 1
C&%"Y
FILED
.APR 2 6 2011
PEW YORM
CLERKS OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 110
FRIEDRICH SCHEUERMANN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
y//7 ,2011
J
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Ea.
dwk3 M.
F%.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Friedrich Scheuermann
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
ew York 10003
B
APR 2 6 Zo1’
D
I
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2571-0790AR
YORK
CC7UN~y CLERKS oFFie’
N0038955-1

~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RAYMOND J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A.
SCHWARTZ,
Index N o.~7~~110182/00
-against-
A. C, & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants. !
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
1
I
New York
-
2011
--...
Matth4w I). Sampar, Esq.
Attome-r Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIWEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (7 7 / i
A:
SO ORDERED,
Raymond J. Schwartz and Dorothy A. Schwartz
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COIJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -~
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
I NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI1'IGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J,)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
RAYMONJI J. SCHWARTZ AND DOROTHY A.
SCHWARTZ,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
-I
Plaintiffs, ! NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. '
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
f
Hon. Sherry K ld Heitler
700 Broadway
(212) 558-5500
2 6 2011
1 5-1hmW YORK
c o k CLERK'S OFFICE'
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN m: NEW YORK cowry
. ~ - -
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
DOROTHY MELNYK, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR 1'HE ESTATE OF MICHAEL j
A. MELNYK, / NO OPPOSITION
I SUMMARY .JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
ql! ,2011
A
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APZ 2 6 2011
pc 1 L' (,$! y 9RK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE]
123513909
N0040478-1

SlJPKEME COURT OF TEE STATE OF NEW YOKK
mumy OF NEW yorx
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTlGATlON
j I.A.S. Part 30
- i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENTREFERS TO:
j Index No.: 118460/00
SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVJDIJALLY AND
ADMWISTRATRIX FOR 'WE ESTATE OF
RICHARD L. HARVEY,
-against-
PI aintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
I
A. C. & S., INC., et a].,
Defendants. !
WHEREFOFE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Yor.k,,New York
-
Attorney fo7Defendant
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New Yoxk, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Richard L.
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York I 0003
APR 2 6 Zo1'
D
pq""-'s\J YORK
Ty CERKS OFF^
N0040478-1

SUPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-.-_-COUNTY OF NEW YORK --_--
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATlON
I.A.S. Part 30
.-
(Heitler, J .)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
RICHARD L. HARVEY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 1 18460/00
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND OFtDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishrnan Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yoyk, New York
Abrney for D f ndant
Tishman Liquiuing Corp.
MCG~VNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New Y ork, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDE
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New Y ork, New York 10003
2383-4059
FFICE’
N0040478-1
IAPR 15 2041

_I Defendants.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOKK. COIJN7'Y i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
_I .-
i (Heitler,
,
J.)
,
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 1 18502/00
TINA MARIE MCGOWENS, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
CONRAD LACHANCE,
i \ NO OPPOSITION
-against-
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yoxk
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate of Conrad Lachance
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,

SI IPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- C33IJN'I'Y _-- OF NEW YORK _____----
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
! NYCAL,
ASBESTOS LlTlGATlON j 1.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
-_____"___L__~-__I_
TkIE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
lndex No.: 11 S679/00
ELVIM M. DUBRITZ, EXECIJTRIX FOR THE
ESTATE OF MICHAEL DUBRITZ,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad ftreet-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Michael DuBritz
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10 3
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
454-1%FW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE]

~
SUPREME COlJKT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
--- COUNTY OF NEW YON
"-__--_I--
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITlGATXON j I.A.S. Part 30
L
-_- 1 (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ELVIM M. DU BRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
MICHAEL DU BRITZ,
Plaintiffs,
t Index No.: 11 8679/00
i
j
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
-
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Jnc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO OmERED,
Estate of Michael DuBritz
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 2011
3W938
NEW YORK
Nn CLERKS OFFICE)
N0040478-1

SLJYREME COIJR'P OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YON
IN-FNEW YOKK CZUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
- i (Heitler, 3.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ELVIRA M. DUBRITZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
MICHAEL DUBRITZ,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
j Index No.: 1 18679/00
!
[ NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Estate of Michael DuBritz
WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. F \ L E D
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) SO9-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 ZO'
SO ORDERED,
NEW WRK
z38eSeff.rru CLERKS OFFICE
N0040478-I

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
I_ COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAI,
ASBESTOS LITlGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.>
THIS DOCUMENTREFERS ‘ro:
E1,VIRA M. DU BRITZ, INDIVID‘IJALLY AND
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
MICHAEL DU BRITZ,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 1 18679/00
i
i
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway 6 ZQII
New York. New York 10004
New York, New York 10003 APR
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
1235-2461
OFF\=
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
couN'ry OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOU com-ry
--~__-.-
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
-~---- -.-A
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
BR1DGET JONES, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR !
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,
j
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., PIC+, et al.,
---- Defendants. j
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yoyk, New York
llih
- --
Michele J. Mittlekan, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGTVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
F a
Attorney fo
Estate of Charles E. Williams
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
D
APR 2 6 '"'
V g y J yQHK
CQUN-Ty CLERKS OFF'^'
1235-1508

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
' NYCAL
BRIDGET JONES, as Administratrix for the Estate of :
part 3o
CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s),
1 Index No.: 119159-00
-against-
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
: ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
3 \ >e\?
New York. New York
I .
Kirste
J
Alford Kneis, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
K& GATESLLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
At meys for Defendant APR 2 6 2011
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
$qJv YORM
pnlj(v r'q CLERK'S OFFICE,
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

__I-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-__I.- COUN'I'Y OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK couN'ry
! NYCAL
ASRESI'OS LITIGATION
j 1.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
-___ -A
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 119159/0
BRIDGET JONES, ADMINISTRATRIX FOR !
THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WILLIAMS,
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et UL,
! NO OPPOSITTON
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
; MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004 . New York, New York 10003

SUPREME CQTJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J . h
THlS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:
Index No/:J19376/09( 1070201/01
ELIZABETH WALTER, INDIVIDUALY AND
AS EXEC. FOR THE ESTATE OF THEODORE
i
F. WALKER, NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-^__IC_-
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGlVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
1
APB 2 ””
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

' I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YON
--
IN RE: NEW YQRK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT R~FERS TO:
: NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
: (Heitler, J.)
JOAN C. SPARLING, AS EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF OSCAR H. SPARLING, AND
JOAN C. SPARLING, INDIVIDUALLY,
j
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
-
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
-
E
Estate of Oscar H. Sparling
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICk
2571-07568
N0040474-1
"T 152011'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COIJNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
DONALD E. SIERING,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
G%P
Index No. 119379/0 107081/01,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCG~VNEY & UUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
D
N0040478-1

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
EDWARD R. SKELLEY and BARBARA J.
SKELLEY,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
Defendants.
______________________________________II----~-----"---------*--_-
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No(s).: 119379-00
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \ 3 a\ \\
New York, New York
P
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CT
K&L ATESLLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
Att eys for Defendant
700 Broadway
CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APl? 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
-_. COUNTY OF NEW YORK - -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCA1,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, 1.)
THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:
EDWARD R. SKELLEY AND BARBARA J.
SKELLEY,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
i
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDEED,
N0040478-1
EdwardR. Skelley and Barbara J. Skeiley
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway F\b
New York, New York 30003
APR 2 6 2011
APR 152011
couNn
1235-2334
\\pVV VOW
CLERKS OFFICE

SIJPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX
COUNTY OF NEW YO=
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
’THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANTHONY MODAFFERI,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND 0RI)ER
Defendants. \
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LAW
and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERJD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
V I ,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York IO00
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Anthony Modafferi
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
APR T 6 2021
1235-1455d ki’L’ yc:JRf
’ WERK‘S OFFICE
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW Y0R.K COIJNTY
i
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
wis D~CUMENT REFERS TO:
NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, 3.)
CLARA M. LIGAMMARE, INDIVIDUALLY
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
LAWRENCE LIGAMMARE,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
j
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND OIU)ER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Lawrence Liga
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
&PR 2 6 Nil
(212) 558-5500
YORK
OFWE
pK's

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
FRANK LUIS1 and HELEN LUISI,
119382-2000
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York
SO ORDERED, -
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
p\LED
APR 2 6 ZO’’
NJ/34 I76Ovl

SIJPREME COUKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
._ COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW Y ON COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
~-
1’HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et a].,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
GG2
Index No . 1 1 9383/00 102269/01,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND 0-ER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
q/1 ’ ,2011
WAmL
b
Carol M. Ternpesta,bq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell corporation
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway
rk, New York 10003
kpir ‘i‘ 6 21TT1
SO ORDERED, Pi’’ ‘; ’kr2y

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30
_" j (Heitler, J.)
THIS IIOCIJMENTEFERS TO:
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR TI 1E
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC7 et al.,
_- Defendants. i
\
G
Index No.. 19383/00 02269/01,
i
i NO OPPOSITlON
Plaintiffs, \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
f MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., wtth prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
cl( ,201 1
by=ld GL,
2 \-
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, lnc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10-
I
700 Broadway 2011
New York, New York 10003 APf? 2 6

SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASHESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
- j (Heitler, J.)
'l'HJS DOCUMEfiT-REFERS TO -
CARL KROGER AND CAROL ANN KROGER,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
j Index No.: 119383/00
i
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO OWERED,
&-& - (-**
&.
++
?
=.*.&
i> A
Le"*' 9,
\,
rCY*."C
-4 b. O*z, bt&. ...,-T
Attorney for Plaintiffs 1:
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann K
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YOWK
3G-wp
CLERK'S OFFICE'
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
CARL KROGER and CAROL ANN KROGER,
Plaintiff(s j,
-against-
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
* Index No.: 119383-00
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
___r__r_________________________________--------------~~---------
X
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
3 \?Y o\\\,
New York, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
-..-_^.
(212) 536-3900
p
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COIJNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNl'Y
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS J,XTIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, 3.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS To:
i Index No.: 119383/00
CARL KROGER AND CAROL ANN KROGER, i
-.
-against-
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
a//, ,2011
b E-*%, ,#
WB
Carol M. Tempesta, E&,
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
McG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004 York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
p@-uMA Jn- ow7
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway F\LEQ
j@R 2 6 m'
N0040478-1

I Defendants.
S‘CJPREME COUK’L’ OF ‘[TIE S’I’A‘I’E OF NEW Y ORK
___-___ COUNTY OF _-__ NEW
I.-I.
YORK
-+-
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
- I-_--
_-
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
I-
THIS DOCU=~€;FERS TO:
/ Index No.: 119383/00
CARL KROGEIZ AND CAROL ANN KROGER, i
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., el a/+,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
!
WI-IEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
I
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
W[ ,2011
h\ -- u
dosd Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
ger and Carol Ann Krog
WElTZ & LUXENBERG,
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
YORK
COUNW 2571!d$~RKS
N0040474-1
hi ”,( 15 2011
l A

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
--- COUNTY
- OF NEW YORK __.-
IN RE: NEW YORK town
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
.-- ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SALVATORE RANDAZZO AND RHODA
RANDAZZO,
\ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summ r: J
dgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
d{ ,2011
*h-
Dated: New Yo k, New York
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
and Rhoda Rand
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456 m l(212) 558-5500
1 /I
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
LAWRENCE F. CAVES€ and ANNA CAVES€,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
Index Na.: 1
& 8 7 - 2 v
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
AS. &S. INC., et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L,C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
k
Dated: New York New York
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
New York, New York 100 wark, NJ 07102 FltED
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIG
NJ/34 1 736v 1

_IL
SUPREME CO'CJR1' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'TY
i NYCAL
AS BEST0 S LITIGATION
j 1.A.S. Part 30
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
I
ANNA E. RLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUA1,LY
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITlON
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et a/.,
---
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGE& P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of David Blenkensopp
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 FILED
2 6 2011
N0040478-1

c_ -
~
SIJPREME couw OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler? J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: n
Index F; 119388/~633/07
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY
AND PERSONAL REPFESENTATIVE FOR
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSQPP, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., TNC., et a/.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upan notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGWY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of David Blenkensop
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadwav
NK h' YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'
454-9039
I
N004047S- 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
__
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
: NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
-.- ___ _-_.X7-_I -A-
'rm DOCUMENX-FERS
TO:
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUA1,LY
i
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR
j
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,
[ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
1 L"E D
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of David Blenkensopp
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York 10003 kt?R 2 '6 2011
NEW YORK
CLERK'S OFFIE]
324-5661A
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE sxrE OF NEW YORK
__ COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN FCE: NEW Y ~RK CO~JNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
-
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
0
i Index 0.: 119388/00 04633/07
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY !
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, 'Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York. New York
F e y for DeffnJant
ishman Liquida g Corp.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Estate df David Blenkenso
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 ,#q 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456 (212].558-5500
SO ORDERED,
nirw "QRK
W&'N CLERKS QFF~CE'
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 2383-22469 27650
N0040478-1
APR 15 2071

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, as Personal * ~ L I X Y ~ A T
1Y Y LAL
Representative for the Estate of DAVID
* I.A.S. Part 30
BLENKENSOPP and ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, : Shew Klein Heitler)
Individually,
: Index No.: 119388-00
Plainti ff(s),
A.C. & S., TNC., et al.,
-against-
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: 3 \ 3 O\ [\
New York, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) APR 2 6 2011
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue NEW YORK
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY lOOij!$~r\rr( CLERKS OFFICE
SO ORDERED,
Won. Sheny Klein Heitler
APK 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK ~-
IN RE: NEW FORK COUNTY-
j NYCML
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
e
j Index N .: 119390/00 5268/00
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT j
D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC, et al.,
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New ork, New York
2011
L%\*
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
I D
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway ~pFi 2 6 2Ol1
New York, New York 10004
New York, New Y ork 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
pJE.bq YORK
SO ORDERED,
CLEWS oFF\Cf
Y 7, )
couNn
123520654
NOW0478- 1
APR I5 2011

_I
SIJPREME COURT OF TIE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -
IN KE: NEW YORK cowry
: NYCAL,
ASRESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
-
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT KEFERS TO:
---- j Index 0.: 114390/0 25268/00
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT I
D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, ; MOTION AND OWER
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants. 1
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway
N0040478-1

- _-__--- __-- --------
-- / Index 0.: 119390/0 , 125268/00
SlJPREME COURT OF THP: STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN W,: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LTTlGATJON
i I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
._I_I-
T’H 1s DOClJMENT REFERS TO:
BETTY BISHOP, ~DIVIDUA1,LY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT i
D. BISHOP, SR., NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard lndustrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without casts.
Dated: New YQrk, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,
SO ORDERED,
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOU COUNTY
j NYCAL
, ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
-.
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index Np%a5268100
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT j
D. BISHOP, SR.,
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORJZ, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New Y ork, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Shew Klein Heitler
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
p ~YW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
2383-22475AR
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
* NYCAL
BETTY ANN BISHOP, Individually and as Executrix :
Part
for the Estate of ROBERT D. BISHOP SR.,
3o
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s),
: Index No,: 119390-00
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
-against-
Defendants.
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \T a\ \\
rk, New York
-P-l 72
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, n.'
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022~~
IQj'
-,
Hon. Shf?yMn Heitler

"---"*---->-- ~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
: (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 11939YOO
GRACE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !
EXGCU'T'KIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOHN T. j
FOWLER,
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
.b*L
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
r-c 'cs
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of John T. Fowler
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
York, New York ]@&ha hp~ 2 6 IM'
New 700 Broadway
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Won. Sheny Kleinkeitler
N0040478-1

SIJPREME c:Ic)uKr OF u-iE STATE OF NEW Y ORK
I:OUN'I'Y OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NJ:W YOKK COUN'I'Y
AS €3 f

I__
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
d i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 119393/00
TN RE FOWLER: GRACE FOWLER,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF JOHN T. FOWLER,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff’s, MOTION AND ORDER
---.__I
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
- Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
49, , 201 1
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York I0004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of John T. Fowler
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
323&W
~p~3 2 6 20.11
pjE\N Y GffK
CLERKS OFFICE

-.-I
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK
COUNTY
~ OF NEW YORK ~
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlT1C;ATION
--
THlS DOCUMENT FEFERS TO:
DAVID 1. GIANCARLO AND NOREEN K.
GIANCARLO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
- Defendants. !
j J.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.-0725/01
: NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
4 I ,2011
,I*
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
r
I L E D
David J: Giancarlo and Noreen K. Giancarlo
WEITZ&LUXENBERG,P.CF
700 Broadway
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003 APR 2 6 2011
C
N0040474-1.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DAVID J. GIANCARLO and NOREEN K.
GIANCARLO,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
INDEX NO.: 00-1 19393
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
against
ACandS, INC., at al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby
quests summary judgm nt in th
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
New Brunswick, NJ
3 \n \\\
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
4ttorneys for Defendant,

"I_______-"
SlJPRHME COUR1' OF THE STATE OF NI?W YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30
- i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUM-REFEKS TO:
GRACE FOWLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECU'I'RIX FOR 'THE ESTATE OF JOHN T.
FOWLER,
-against-
A. C. & S., JNC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
j Index No.: 119393/00
i
j
NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 321 2, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New Y ork 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of John T. Fowler
WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.
700 Broadway
York, New York 10003
APR 2 6 lo''
couNn
2383-22470K
NEW YORK
CLERKS of
N0040478-1
APR I5 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
_-_ COUNTY _ _ _ OF . . NEW ~ _ Y_ ON ____.-----
> ~
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-~~
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
HARVEY L. FLETTMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEI'TMAN,
-against-
A. C. & $., INC., st al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
1 h d e x ~ ~ & 0 5 8 8 / 0 1
i
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
-1/ \ , 2011
.&\4i&LqZz>
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M. Fleitman
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
Y^
1235-19822
COLlNfl
CLERK'S OFF=
N0040478-1
APR I5 2011

-I-_-
SUPREME COUR'T OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
; I.A.S. Part 30
i
1
(Ikitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No&~&00588/01
IIARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEITMAN,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORF:, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
, 201 1
D
Attorney for Defendant
F'[*rx
Oakfabco, Inc.
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivi
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New Y ork 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
2mt&jI' C W S OFFICE
N0040474-1

.-_ I .-I_.-
ASBESTOS 1,ITlGATION
I
DOCUMENT JXEFERS TO:
THIS
-_d
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEITMAN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
-__---
j 1.A.S. Part 30
i (fkitler, J.)
Index ~ ~ 0 0 5 8 * , 0 I
[ NO OYPOSITlON
Plaintiffs, I SUMMARY JUDGMENT
\ MOTION AND ORJlER
Defendants. -- i
WHEWFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
irea: i ~tw
NeW Y OTK
torney for Defendant
feguard Industrial Equipment
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Harvey L. Fleitrnan and Vivian M. Fleitman
WHTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway e rb '>
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
New York, New York 1
(212) 558-5500
N0040478-1

SIJPREME COURT OF ’THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
INET’NIiW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
-- -
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUME~EFERS TO:
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE
FERNANDEZ,
[ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
\ MOTION AND 0RI)ER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
_ - . ~
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Courter & Company, Inc.
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York. New York 10004
New York, New York 1000
(212) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein?Heftler
---_._
N0040478-1

-_----__I
~~ ____.__I.-___
_ _ ~ . I --A ”
SZJI’KI7,Mk COUR‘I’ OF TJJE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JN RE: NEW YORK cou;”\Jm
LI_^
! NYCAL
ASHESTOS I,ITIGATION
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE
FERNANDEZ,
-against-
A. C. & S., @-IC., et ul.,
; I.A.S. Part 30
I (Heitler, J.)
i Index N o m I 00621 l0 1
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
\ MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. - i
I
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Patterson Pump Co.
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York loop
(2 12) 509-3456
Y
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
E’D
/$pR it 6 le‘‘
N0040478- I
APR 15 2011
i
I

SlJPKEME COURT OF ?'HE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW _-_-
IN RE NEW YOM corm-ry-
~ YORK
_.Ij
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
THIS DOCUMEN'I' REFERS TO:
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEITMAN,
\ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the sme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 s 2 ) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OFNEW YORK
comv -- OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNT
: NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGA'I'JON
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS E:
a
j XndexN .: 119394/0 005W01
HARVEY L. FLEJTMAN AND VIVJAN M.
FLEITMAN ,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
/ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al., I
Defendants.
j
WMEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing
i
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, lishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
I
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New Yak, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2383-22468U
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITlGATlON
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE
FERNANDEZ,
-against-
P1 aint i ffs,
! NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1 MOTION AND OIRXIER
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary ddgment --I
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIW,Y & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York. New York 10004
New York. New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
*
NEW YC13K
1ewBBTy CLERKS OFFICE
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON
This Document Relates to:
MARSHA A. KESSLER, Executrix For the Estate of
TERRY M. KESSLER, and MARSHA A. KESSLER,
Individually,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
INDEX NO.: 00-1 19400
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
against
ACandS, INC., et at.,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
lefendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
New Brunswick, NJ
IUNST &I DOUKAS, LLP
4ttorneys for Defendant,
{ohler Co.
10 Paterson Street - PO Box 480
qew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Marsha A. Kessler, Executrix for the Estate of
Terry M. Kessler, and Marsha A. Kessler,
Individually
700 Broadway
HOAGLAND, LONQO
MORAN. DUNST 8
DOUKAS. LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
NORTH JERSEY
40 PATERSON ST
PO BOX 480
NNVBRUNSWICK. NJ
$0 ORDERED:
SOUTH JERSEY
701 WLTSEY'S MILL RD
SUITE 202
HAMMONTON, NJ
APR 2 6 2011

SI-JPREME COURT OF ‘THE STATE OF NEW YORK
--- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOFEc6N?Y
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Pa1 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS pro:
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KESSLER,
-against-
PI ainti ffs, j NO OPPOSITION
[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Tishman Liquidating Corp.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York IO
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
&RJ 2 6 2Q1?
EW YORK
kERKS OFFICE
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN E,: NEW YOK COUN‘I’Y
: NYCAL
ASBES’I’OS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
-^-_I-
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KESSLER,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Index N ofiZGa0 1 89210 1,
100787/03
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION ANI) ORDER
- Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney far Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
-.
SO ORDERED,
Hon. S%
KXek Heitler

S~JPKEME couii'r 01: m~ STATE OF NEW YORK
- C'OIJNTY ----. OF NEW YORK -_- -_--
1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
\ (Heitler, J.>
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KESSLEK,
100787/03
-against -
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
j
W€IEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard lndustrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attornev for Defend
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
Carl Kroget and Carol Ann Kroger
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
FILED
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 100 3
(212) 509-3456
12) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, __
-
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 2 6 2011
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No.: 120329/00
DONALD VER HAGUE,
- against -
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant ?VEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEJL-
MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
i
I
I
I
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: ,2011
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
Attorneys for Defendant
Weil McLain
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
FILED
APR 2 6 201t
NLUV YLIRK
COUNTY CLERKS 0-
15 2011

SlJYKEME COIJRI' OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-COUNTY - . ~ - OF NEW YORK .-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY-
\ NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, 3.)
- I I . . ~ - -- ~
THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 121197/00
BEVER1,Y J. BENNETT, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
RICHARD FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY \ NO OPPOSITION
.I. BENNETT, INDlVIDUALLY,
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC.? et al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Ti shman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
N0040478-1
Estate of Richard Floyd Bennett
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
2383-4147
p y :PI1
I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEWFORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.>
-
THIS DOCUMENT REFEKS ~ 6:
BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
RICHAm FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY
J. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,
Plaintiffs,
i Index No.: 121197/00
NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORJIEK
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et a).,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, 1nc.
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York. New York 10004
Estate of Richard Floyd Benne
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New Y ork. New York 10003
N0040478-1

~ - I .
I .I-
SUPKEME C:OURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
-_- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
.-
1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTlGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J .)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 121 '197/00
BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
RJCHARD FIBYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY NO OPPOSITION
J . BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
--
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
4 ?, ,2011
L d I i Q ,-%
Carol M. Tempesta, hsq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Estate of Richard Floyd Bennett
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APK 2 %011
New York, New York 10004
ew York 10003
(212) 509-3456 00 NCUir" "'OHki
SO ORDERED,
COUN~ CLERK'S OFFICE
1235-8763
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF TIHE STATE OF NEW YORK
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, 1.)
THIS DOCGMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No. 1 121197/00
BEVERLY J. BENNETT, PERSONAL
KEPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
RICHARD FLOYD BENNETT AND BEVERLY NO OPPOSITION
J. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY,
t SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTlON AND ORDER
Plaintiffs,
- -d
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Go., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yojk, New York
I*.
Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs -. “3 -7-
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Estate of Richard Floy&\e~
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway p~ 2 6
New York, New York 10004
ew Y ork 1 OOd
(212) 509-3456 00
SO ORDERED,
324-5613
N0040478-1

CHARLES 1. HENRY and MARILYN HENRY,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Index No.: r??
21309-200
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plain tvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'
NJ041752vl

I_
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 121686/00
ANTONINO SCLAFANI AND ROSARIA
SCLAFANI,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
--
A. C. & S., INC, et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment eo., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereta,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, be and the same are herepd
px"
prejudice and without costs.
b p 2 ~ 6 201'
Dated: New Yo k, New York
Jfl ,2011
/ ---
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Antonino Sclafani and Rosaria Sclafani
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,
Hon.hhikry Klein Heitler 324-5782
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEi"Y5RK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j X.A.S. Part 30
---- [ (Heitlcr, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT KEFERS TO:
i Index No.: 121686/00
ANTONINO SCLAFANI AND ROSAKIA
SCLAFANI,
/ NO OPPOSITION
-against-
A, (:. & S., INC., et ul.,
Plaintiffs,
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
i
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo k, New York
.(! ,2011
\
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New Yoxk, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Antonino Sclafani and Rosaria Sclafani
W~rrz & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
APR 2 6 '"'
YUBK
12351052 c~~nKs
COUNfl
N004047X-I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATJ: OF NEW YORK
-_ COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEWYXK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
I
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 122053/00
SUZANNE MCINERNEY, INDIVIDUALLY
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
I
JOSEPH JOHN MCINERNEY,
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C:. & S., INC., et al.,
--
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Robert P ,\ 3
)JfOll
Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate if Joseph John McInerney
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
SO ORDERED,
2571 -755
N0040474- I

"-_I_-
I
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAT,
ASBESTOS LI'TIGA'ITION i I.A.S. Part 30
-
i (Heitler, J.)
-,
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO-?
i Index No.: 122053/00
SUZANNE MCINERNEY? INDIVIDUALLY
i
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR 'THE ESTATE OF i
JOSEPH JOHN MCINERNEY,
! NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yprk, New York
A
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq:
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway APR 2 6 2011
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
D
NEW YOKK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
1235-21397

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
". comn OF NEW YORK -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTlGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 122496/00
PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
THOMAS E. RUSSELL,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
411 ,201 1
P-P-FJLf&
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KIJGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 6 2031
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
GW-%V4
I*dfW YORK
CLERKS OFFIE

~ IN
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
comw OF NEW YORK
RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 122496/00
PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
THOMAS E. RUSSELL,
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against -
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (5 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
p""
h- &z, k$.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Thomas E. Russ
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WELT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
APR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
%&i#iY
e-.,
P4E-W VOW
CLERK'S OFFICE'

-I_-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
-- cowry
IN RE: NEFYORK
~ OF NEW YORK
COUNTY
: NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
1 (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 122496/00
PATRICIA A. RUSSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND i
AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF j
THOMAS E. RUSSELL, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCG~VNEY & UUCER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
ork,NewYork 10003 AkH 2 6 2011
t (' 4, \'

__ COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COIJNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-- ---
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANNA MULDER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
MAURITS C. MULDER,
Plaintiffs,
i NYCAL
; ].AX Part 30
i (JIeitler, J.)
Index No.: 123057/00
i
; NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND OKDER
-against-
A. C. & S., MC., et d.,
Defendants.
j
WEIEWFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
OKDERED, that upon notic,e to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate df Maurits C. Mu1
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P. t
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
~pfi 2 6 2021
SO ORDERED, ;!Y.>( I YORK
ccf~~h~~t LERK s OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF I'HE STATE OF NEW YORK
couN'ry OF NEW YORK
---
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFmTO:
-A
ANNA MULDER, INDIVIDIJALLY AND AS
ADMINISTMTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
MAUKITS C. MULDER,
Plaintiffs,
j 1.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
[ Index No.: 123057/00
[
; NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
QRDEKED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Treadwell Corporation
MCCIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10
(212) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
QQl&liY
NFW YORK
CLERK'S OFFICE
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1~ RE: NEW Y~RK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 39
- ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOClJMENT REFERS TO:
i lndex No.: 123088/00
ROBERT C. LOUGHLIN, SR.,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
f SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. 4 !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the sane are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y
Q*[-Q
Robkrt Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGI~NEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
257
APR 2 6 ZO'
n\E')l YORK
cbUNiy -074 CLERKS OFFICE'
N0040474-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No.: 123830/00
PAUL DUNPHEY,
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
- against -
AT: apd S, JNC., (ARMSGTRONG
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-
MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: qFq ,2011
New York, New York
crJ$2---
Jennifer L, Budner, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant F I I.. E D
New York, NY 10003
Weil-McLain
(212) 558-5500
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
APR 2 6 2011
New York, NY 10022
NEW YOHK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFGF
SO ORDERED,
A?\? x 5 2011

SUPREME coum- OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- COUNTY _ - _ OF ~ NEW YORK
IN KE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
PETER AVAKAS AND DOLORES AVARAS,
--
! NYCAL
; I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
i
; lndex No.: 123870/00
i
-against-
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION
/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,
- I
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
~
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
I
!
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
4/l ,2011
L-
Carol M. Ternpesta, bsq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Peter Avaras
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
APR 2 6 2011
J235-4589 NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
N0040478-1

---______I--
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
C:OlJN'I'Y OF NEW YORK _--
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATlON
j 1,A.S. Part 30
L_ --I
-_-
j (Heitler, J.)
'THE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 123870/00
PETER AVARAS AND DOLORES AVARAS,
-against-
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSlTION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Xnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Ygrk, New York
Michele J. Mittleman, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter Cbmpany, Inc.
MCGI~~NEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Peter Avaras
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APR 6 2011
CS@%6S
YCWK
1 ERKS OFFICE"
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
-
THEODORE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIEK,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants. !
j 1.A.S. Part 30
:
0
(Heitler, 3.)
j IndexN .. 124331/0 100757/03
!
i
NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND 0IRI)ER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
TL
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Clyde Frasier
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
NewYork,NewYork 10003
;,yz 2 lj 2011
?\!E%;; "'r&K
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
1235-1699
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY
~ OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YO= COUNTY : NYCAJ,
ASBESTOS 1,lTIGA'I'ION
I I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
'I'HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index 00757/03
TI EODOKE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE i
ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIER,
[ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
- ~
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' coniplaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Clyde Frasier
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
NewYork,NewYork 10003
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
2383-22283
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
-. COUNTY OF NEW YON I-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j 1.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
-I
'rws DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 124332/00
ROSEMARY MICHEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND /
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
GERALD J. MICHEL, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. :
WHEEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all c,o-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED, ": J' :(.,RK
I- CLERK'S OFFICE
N0040474-1
APR 'I, 5 2011

I--
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAl-E OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YmTOETY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LJTlGATION
j 1.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
_"-A
_-
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 124332/00
ROSEMARY MICHEL, INDIVTDUAL1,Y AND
AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
GERALD L. MICHEL, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
4 1 ,2011
Q*LQpJ
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
Fl
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
2571-0747
N0040474-1
W ~ N + I
I\!-
'IC\ YORK
V CLERKS OFFICE'

JYCAL
TWILIA L. BILBY, as Administratrix for the : Index No. 125263/00
Estate of LANE L. BILBY, and TWILIA L.
BILBY, Individually,
: NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, : SUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER
"against-
A.C. & S., INC., ad.,
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,
IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
700 Broadway
264 West 40th Street
New York, New York 10003
New York, New York 10018
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
c13blN~-~ CLERK'S OFFICE'
SO ORDERED:

-_--
COUNTY OF NEW Y ORK -
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
--
I NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heiller. 3.1
- .
TINS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Jndex No.: 11939O/
13 E'T'I'Y BI SHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT
D. BISHOP, SR.,
-against-
A. C. & S., lNc., et af.,
P laj nti ffs ,
j
/ NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
i
n
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Ca., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
NO040478- 1
APR 152011

-
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
.- tN E: NEW YORK coumy
,___ -
AS BES' ['OS L ITIG AT1 ON
_-____-___
13E'I'l-Y BISHOP, JNDIVIDUALIdY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT
D. BISHOP, SK.,
PI ain tiffs,
NY CAL,
I.A.S. Pa11 30
(Heitler, J.)
w
Index No.: 119390/00 125268/0
NO OPPOSITION
SIJMMARY - -. JUDGMENT
MOTlON AND ORDER
n
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
- Defendants. j
WHEREFORE, defendant,, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Sr.
WElTZ & LUXENBERG,
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1 003
FILED
LPR 2 6 Ntl

SUPKEME COURT OF *rm STATE OF NEW YORK
--- COUNTY OFNEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK COTjNy
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'fIGATI ON
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT
D. BISHOP, SK.,
-against-
A. C. & S., TNC., et ul.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 1193901 0, 125268/0
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
("2
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
OFUIERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(21 2) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
,2011 p.,
*y-=-h&* ) p)
L% ic f*
, LtlPb+XWJ
k+az*f#*
f - d fiG2-i t_
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Robert D. Bishop,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
1235-20654
APR 2 6 2011
pdy-\\*j '*iCRK
C;LZHK;'S OFFICE
N0040478-1
p,pR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
- 1 1 ~
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
BETTY BISHOP, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ROBERT
D. BISHOP, SR.,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
i
0
(Heitler, J.)
i lndex No.: 119390/00, 25268/0
j
/ NO OPPOSITION
j
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OR.DER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
($ttomey fordant
ishman Li dating Coy.
MCCIVNEY KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
Y. -\*A.
5-
h w *
>,-
Estate of Robert D. Bishop, Srd::
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. h
700 Broadway
York, New York 10003
/),E. i. 2. 6 2011
:I. ‘id kGRi<
COUNTY CLERKS QFFlCE
2383-22475AR
N0040478-I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
' NYCAL
BETTY ANN BISHOP, Individually and as Executrix :
Part 30
for the Estate of ROBERT D. BISHOP SR.,
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s),
* Index No.: 125268-00
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO, be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \> O\ \ \
NewAork, New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENB
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(2 12) 558-5500
CRANE CO.
599 Lexington Aven FILED
e
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
APR 2 6 2011
'

New
LAWRENCE F. CAVESE and ANNA CAVESE,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Index No.: f i z >
119387-2000
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
I
York, New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz i3 Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100
--
Dennis E. Vega, Esq. ()
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, I. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor
wark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFIS
NJ/34 1736~1

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
THOMAS CARROLL et al.,
Index No.:
-against-
A.C. &S. INC., et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plaintflfs
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
New York, New York 10003 Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
F\LEQ
NJ/341735vl

-I-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YO% COUNTY
! NYCAI,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
0
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 119394/0 100588/0
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEITMAN,
\ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
/ MOTION AND OlRDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgr e t in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
D
Attorney for Defendant
F+['rx
Oakfabco, Inc.
HarveyL. Fleitman and Vivi
MCGIVNEY & KI,UGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NEW VQRK
2E@WiV Ci&WS OFFICE
N0040474-1

_-I--
SlJPREME COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YokTmr'u'
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
- / (Heitler, 3.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEITMAN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
P 1 ain t i ffs ,
0
f Index No.: 119394/ 0, 100588/01
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & ICLUCER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M. Fleitmk
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
1235-1 9822
APR 2 6 20l1
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

I
COIJN'rY OF NEW YOKK ..-
_.-_.L__-___- ---I__--.
1N RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS L,ITlG AT1 ON
j I.A.S. Part 30
...A! (Ilcitler, J.)
- -.
T€€IS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:
WARVEY L. FLEI'TMAN AND VIVIAN M.
ELEITMAN,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
0
; Index No.: 119394/00, I005&8/
NO Ol'POSlTION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. - i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil. Practice Law and Rules 0 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Defend
Harvey L. Fleitman and Vivian M, Fleitman
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 1
(212) 509-3456 , (212) 558-5500

~ c(iuN'rY
L
SUPREME COiURT OF 'IHE STATE OF NEW YORK
OF NEW I YORK _-
_____I
iN RE: NEW YOIX cowry
j NYCAL
AS €3 EST0 S LIT I GATT ON
j I.A.S. Part 30
i
0
(Heitler, J.)
_- --_._I-
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 119394/ 100588/01
HARVEY i, FLEI'I'MAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEITMAN,
[ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs? j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
\ MOTJON AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
j
/
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, hc., be and the shme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(21 2> 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
SO ORDERED,
N0040478-1

SIJPIIEME COURT OF 'THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK .-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL,
ASBESTOS LIT1 G A'1 'I ON j I.A.S. Part 30
\ (Heitlcr, J.)
0
-
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS 'ro:
j Index No.: 119394/00 100585/01
HARVEY L. FLEITMAN AND VIVIAN M.
FLEJTMAN,
-against-
A. C. & S., I'NC., et al.,
PI ai nt i ffs,
[ NO OYPOSlTION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORJZ, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
2383-22468U
N0040478-I

SIJI'REME COUK'I' OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUN'TY OF NEW YORK
.-~I-" - -_ --
~hr RE NEW YORK couwry
: NYCAL,
A SB E S 1'0 S LIT1 GAT1 ON
i I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler,.I.>
0
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS 'TO:
j Index No. : 119394/00 100621 /O
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE
FEKNANDEZ,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORJIER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
I
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
Pattersin pump CO.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
,
---e
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100
2 6 la''
s OFF\CEJ
CLERK
454-8847b1p,.,' \/QRK
coiut\s7v
N0040478-1

SLJ PlERIE COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUN'I'Y
NYCAL
ASBES'I'OS LITIGA'rION
1.A.S. Part 30
(Hei tler, J .)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.:
JOSE F. FERNANDEZ AND ARLENE
FERNANDEZ,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York. New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Jose F. Femandez and Arlene Fernandez
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York. New Yoxk 1000
i
I
N0040478-1

~~
I
SUPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
-,
Index No.:
JOSE F. FEWANDEZ AND ARLENE
FERNANDEZ,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Jose F. Fernandez and Arlene Fernandez
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York. New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 AFR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NEW YG'TK
QWR-rf CLERK'S OFF ICE
N0040478-1

-I
SUPREME COURT OF 'THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-_--I COUNTY OF NEW YORK
I-.-
1N RE: NEW YON COUNT
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCTJMENT REFERS TO:
' Index No.:
DAVID J. GIANCARLO AND NOREEN K.
GIANCAKLO,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
Costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456 APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
N0040474-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
I COUNTY OF NEW YORK -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 101205/01
FLORE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE
j
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT, \ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., DX., et al.,
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
OKDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGimY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
EstateofJames Ashcraft
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
NewYork,NewYork 10003
F 1 L E D
APR 2 6 *'"
b\E'

S[Jl'REMl? CXIIJK'T OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK
C:OINI'Y OF NEW YOKK
c
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYUAL
ASBESTOS 1,JTIGATlON
1 I.A.S. Part 30
- i (Heitler, J.)
THIS IlOClJMEN'T REFERS TOj
Indcx No.: 101205/01
FLORE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS !
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE i
OF JAMES ASEICRAFT,
: NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
_____I^- -
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
~.-- Defendants. [
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice L,aw and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
fi
--
Attorney f 'or Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attornev for Plaintiffs
Estate df James Ashcraft
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway
w York, New York 10003
a:
ApR 2 6 ''"
NOO40478-I APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF T€lE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
’ IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_.
‘THIS DOCIJMENT REFERS TO:
FLOE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants. -
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Hei tler, J .)
Index No.: 101205/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY ,JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORJIER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDEED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
1235e8mlY
NEW YORK
CLERK‘S OFFICE
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

I.
SUPREME COIJK'I'OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY . OF NEW YON
-I__-_I
IN RE: NEW YOIU?EUTTY
! NYCAL,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
----- j (Heitler, J.)
TI IIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 101205/01
FLOW ASWCRAFT, INDIVlDUALLY AND AS i
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE i
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,
[ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, ! MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & $., INC., et al.,
- Defendants. /
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishan Liquidating Corp.,
hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp,, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, -
c
Hon. Sherry Kleir! Heitler
Estate of James Ashcraft
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
N0040474-1

SUPREME COURI’ OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK
- COUNTY OF NEW YOKX
L-
IN RE: NEW YORK COIJNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
I- -
FLOE ASHCRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE
OF JAMES ASHCRAFT,
Plaintiffs,
: NYCAI,
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, I.)
i Index No.: 101 205/01
j
j NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. :
WHEREFOW,, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York. New York
Attorney for Defendant
Patterson Pump Co.
McGI~Y & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
Attorney for Plaintiffs .. -‘ -“I*
Estate of James Ashcraft
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New xork, New York 10003
\v
New York, New York 10004 PPR ’
(212) 509-3456
2 w
SO ORDERED,
N0040478- 1

SUPREME C'OiJK'I: 01; Tk1E STA'J'E OF NEW J'OFK
_, COIIN'I'Y OF NEW YORK --
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
1.A.S. Part 30
-. - - (Heitler, J-)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KESSLER,
Index No.: 1 1 9400100a6->
100787/03
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et a].,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND OFWER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment ,Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO OmERED,
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway
IL I
APA 2 6 2011
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 324-564&@! 'fc'B K
COUNTY CLE8KS aWl&
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
'THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 119400/06-?)
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
1007&7/03
KESSLER,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ MOTION AND ORDER
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456
so ORDERED,
APf8 2 6 2OTF
NEW YORK
2 kLERK'S OFFtCE
N0040478-1

~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOIX
---
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
\ (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS *so:
Index No.: 119400/00,6=>
'TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA 100787/03
KESSLER,
-against-
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
[ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., WC., et al.,
- Defendants. t
WHEREFORJ?, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary juhgrnent 111
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
'
'
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIWEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003

SUPREME coun OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNlY OF NEW YON
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I I.A.Y. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
-A_"-.-
THIS IIOCIJMENT RGKS m:
ROSA M. MATTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH
MATTE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etul.,
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 102 125/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
--
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
q/l ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
N0040478-I
APR 152011

_--I---__-
SUPREME C‘OURI’OFT~IE STATE OFNEWYORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
-_I_cL
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
: NYCAI,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
-A
-
j (Heitler, J.)
1’IJIS DOCUMENT FEFEXS TO:
i Index No.: 11938310&-)
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
107623/06
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, WW prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
.1 I! ,2011
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 100
(2 12) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
*”’
700 Broadway
York 10003 LPR 2 6
SO ORDERED,
N0040474-1

SIJI'REME COURT OF THE S7'ATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
d j (Heitler, J.)
nrIs DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 119383100-
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
107623/06
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZXO,
"-
N RE: NEW YON couN'ry
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plain tiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
4/\ ,2011
Carol M. Ternpesta,\Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 /$#{ ;t t'i 7y-7
p, 1 r: ,' 'I-'.,: J-
CWr+Pise;LERKS OFFICE'
.I\
N0040478-1
APR 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
_1___________________l______l______r____------""----""-----------
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_____________1______"-----------"-------------_-----------~------
This Document Relates To:
CARL KROGER and CAROL ANN KROGER,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
Defendants.
X
X
* NYCAL
1.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
' Index No.: 102314-01
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
' JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated:
3 \3 e/\/
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New Y ork, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue
(2 12) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOU
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
W RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANTHONY MODAFFERI,
4
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1 1 93 80/00 0
102720/
-against-
A. C. & S., INC-, et al.,
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION ANI) ORDER
Defendants. \
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
d/\ ,2011
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 1000
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Anthony Modaffei
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
York, New Y ork 10003
12
c
kLbl

SIJPKEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOEX
COUNTY --. "-- OF NEW YORK
.-
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS 1,11'1GATION I I.A.S. Part 30
" j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 103007/01
EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUE1,NE
DEGANNES,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo&, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New Y ork, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
Eugene Degannes and
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
SO ORDERED,
NOM0478- 1

___A-
WPKEME COURT OF TIE S'I'ATE OF NEW YOKK
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGA'1'ION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
_.-_--
EUGENE DEGANNES ANI1 JACQUELlNE
DEGANNES,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J,)
j Index No.: 103007/01
! NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
; MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
--_-
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment i
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGlWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plainti
Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degannes
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
bpR 2 6 2011
454-9572 NEVJ YORK
'.
N0040478-1
sall

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-- CO‘IJNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITlGATTON
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, 1.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 103007/01
EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUELINE
DEGANNES,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs,
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summar! judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
?/I , 201 1
LdLaL
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degannes
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway ;.
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York I O O e r’ Y*?
(212) 509-3456 I*; A 8. ” I-i
SO ORDERED, 2 6 2011
J 235-2549
NEW yC.IflK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE
N0040478-1

I
SUPREME COIJKI OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY - OF NEW YORK -----
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS rro:
-
EUGENE DEGANNES AND JACQUELINE
DEGANNES,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NYCAI,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 103007/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND OWER
A. C. & S., INC., eta!.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishan Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEW,D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 1000
(21 2) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Eugene Degannes and Jacqueline Degann$
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York IOOF
2383-2637J.
1 L E D
APR 2 6 2011
141-111 YORK
CO~N r't' CLERK'S OFFICE
NOMO474- I

-__I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:
j Index No.: 103611/01
MARY J. MARlEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS [
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM i
C. MARTIN, : NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
~-~
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Y
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sher? Khdn Heitler
%&&i&X7
~ P 2 R 6 2011
b!EW YORK
CLERK'S OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARY MARTIN, Individually and as Proposed
Executrix for the Estate of WILLIAM C. MARTIN,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
INDEX NO.: 01 -1 0361 1
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
against
A. C. AND S., INC., et ai.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
3bove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
:omplaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
lefendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
3ATED:
New York, New York
31 W 11
ESQ.
Y L 7'.
;TEFHAkflEy BAKER, ESQ.
MICHAEL FA~LLI,
iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
WElTZ & LUXENBERG
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),
ittorneys for Defendant,
Mary Martin, Individually and as Proposed
Lohler Co.
Executrix for the Estate of William C. Martin
0 Paterson Street - PO Box 480
700 Broadway
lew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 New York, NY 10,003 ,
10 ORDERED:

-
SUPREME c0uK-r OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAX,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J-)
THIS DOCUMENT EEm-
MARY MAKTTN, INDIVIDUALLY AND
PROPOSED EXEC1JTR.IX FOR THE ESTATE
OF WILLIAM C. MARTIN,
P 1 ain ti ffs ,
: Index No.: 10361 1/01
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,201 1
Rabert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
Estate of William C. Ma
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
(2 I 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
VJEVJ
FF\cE:
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler 2571-0745
N0040474- I

SUPREME COUR7 OF TFIE STATE OF NEW YOICK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK comw
NY C A I,
ASBESTOS LlTlGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ELEANOR F. HAKES, 1NDlVIDUALLY AND
AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF WlLLIAM V. HAKES 111,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et nL,
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 103870/01
NO OPPOSITION
SlJMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
--
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp.,
hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate of William V. Hakes,
WErTz & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York I0003
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
~;EW YORK
zBaup CLERKS OFFICE
N0040474- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOIiK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS PERSONAL R.EPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, 111,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NY CAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Hei tler, J.)
hdex No.: 103870/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
I
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York. New York
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of William V. Hakes, I1
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
123
A@R 2 6 ?OE"
\.lE!Al "ORK
D
#FI=

SUPREME: coum- OF THE sTAm OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOKK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
”-. ---__
i
NYCAL
ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVISUALLY AND
PROPOSED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, 111,
-against-
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
‘rrm DOCUMENT REFERS TO-
i (Hcitler, J.)
j Index No.: 103870/01
i
/ NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-.-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., here by requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York. New York
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of William V. Hakes, I11
WERZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
58-5500 APR 2 6 2Q“
y0FiK
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 454-0460 CLERKS
COUNTY
N0040478-I

~~
SUPREME COURT OF THE S’I‘A‘TE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY f NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
- ~ - -! (Heitler, J.)
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ELEANOR F. HAKES, INDIVISUALLY AND
PROPOSED REPRE,SENTATlVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF WILLIAM V. HAKES, 111,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 103870/01
j
NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
Estate of William V. Hakes,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 ,pR 2 6 2015
N”,W YORK
OFF^^
SO ORDERED, 7
TY c E ~ ~ ~
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
3%!ldv
N0040478-1

. ~ ~ I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
_._- - ~ I
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITlGATION t I.A.S. Part 30
--
i (Heitler, 3.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 103986/01
AMELIA PARKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS I
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF RICHARD i
PARKER;
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE!, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation ,
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 APR ””
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
NEW YORK
CLERK‘S OFF\CE
SO ORDERED,
cowfl
1235-0803
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

FRANK LUIS1 and HELEN LUISI,
Plaintiffs,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein
0
Heitler, J.S.C.
IndexNo.:
104011-2
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as "FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims-against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plain tvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, 1. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
50 ORDERED,
-- '
NJ/34 I760v 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
0
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 119382/0 04033/01
CLARA M. LIGAMMARE, INDIVIDUALLY /
AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF I
LAWRENCE LIGAMMARE, / NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
.S! ,2011
4 MLde
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KUJGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Lawrence Liga
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APE 2 6 2011
t.@JG YORK
GLERti'S OFFtCk
w % o
N0040478-I
k-,: L
6 15Zfi11I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RANDEE KATLIN and WILLIAM L. GOLDMAN, as
Co-Executors for the Estate of REUBEN W.
GOLDMAN,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
INDEX NO.: 01-104560
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
against
A. C. AND S.. INC.. et al.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
DATED: New York, New York
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
HOAGLAFID, LONQO
WAN, WNST 8
DOUKAS, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
NORTH JERSEY
40 PATERSON ST
PO BOX rlao
W BRUNSWICK, NJ
SOUTH mSEY
7M MTSEY'S MILL RD
SUITE 202
HAMONTON, NJ
iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
NNST & DOUKAS, LLP
4ttor neys for Defendant ,
(ohler Co.
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480
\lew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
$0 ORDERED:
PAAN ALVARADO, ESQ.
WElTZ & LUXENBERG
Attorneys far Plaintiff (s),
Randee Katlin and William L. Goldman as
Co-Executors for the Estate of Reuben W.
Goldman
700 Broadway
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

__I----
SIJPREME COURT OF TH&@&TE
"1. OF
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
.-I-~
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS 1,l'I'IGA'TION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS m:
NEW YORK
j NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.>
i IndexNo.: 104561/01
CAROLE S. NICASTRO, AS
ADMMIS'TRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
DENXS F. NICASTRO AND CAROLE S.
! NO OPPOSITION
NICASTRO, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND OFtDER
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. /
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
201 1
n,n
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York. New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Denis F. Nicastro
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
FII
700 Broadway APR 2 6 2011
NEW YWIK
COUNTY CLERKS UFF1Ct
1235- 1909
N0040478-I
I
I

_I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
_7-1_1-._-_L --
m RE: NEW YORK com-ry
ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATION
__I-
THIS DOCUMENT-ERS
TO:
CAROLE S. NICASTRO, AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
DENIS F. NICASTRO AND CAROLE S.
NICASTRO,
-against-
A. C. & S., mC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
-
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 104561/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Fgm-4M-W= “.G :\
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Denis F. Nicastro F 1 L
E
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York,New York 10003 APR 2 6 2011
r , ~ u ~
2571 -0749
p:EW YORK
1 ‘ CLERK‘S ~ OFFICE
N0040474-1

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE S'I'ATE OF NEW YORK
_" COUNJ
____.___
Y OF NEW
- __ YOKK -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCXL
I.A.S. Part 30
--- _- -.
.-
(Heitler, J ->
THE DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ELOISE IIALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
ADMJNISIRATRIX FOK THE ESTATE RUFUS
HALL,
P tainti ffs,
Index No.: 104563/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
-
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
P
f 9 K h. o&b,E~.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
Estate Rufus Hall
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,
F*
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
I L E D
APR 2 6 2011
3 2 W YaRK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'
N0040478-1

SUYRLME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK
."--__-11_
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -__. _-- --
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGA'TION
1.A.S. hrt 30
(Heiller, 3.)
THIS DOCUMENTREFERS TO:
ELOISE HALL, 1NDlVIDUALLY AND AS
ADMlNISTRA'rRIX FOR THE ESTATE RUFUS
HALL,
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et a].,
--
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 1.04563/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
NOTION AND OFWER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above Entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plainti
Estate Rufus Hall
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
NewYork,NewY rk 1 0
F I'Am E 63
COWN~
APR 2.6$ 2011
P4 ?%% R K
GERK'S OFFICE^
330040478-3

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE C)F NEW YORK
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Eleitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 104563/01
ELOISE HALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE RUFUS j
HALL, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, : MOTION ANI) 0XU)ER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC7 et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Estate Rufus Hall
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
Y York 10004 New Y ork, New York 10003
AFR 2 6 2011
Hon. Sherry -Klein Heitler

_I_- Defendants.
_-I___
SlJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK
- COUNTY .- OF NEW YORK
I.I_- -.”-
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
_-
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMEN-FERS TO:
j Index No.: 104563/01
ELOISE HALL, INLIIVIDUALLY AND AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
RUFUS HALL, / NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
\
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Coy., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERE
WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
&R 2 6 2011
New York, New York IO0
1\IE\nJ YOFZK
COuNn CLERKS OFFICE’
2383-22764
N0040474-1

SUPREME COUIIl OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- COUNl’Y OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAI,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j J.A.S. Part 30
.I - d ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATI,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et a/.,
i Index No.: 104696/01
!
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
- --
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, lnc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
q(! ,2011
h
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
e.
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway /hYR z6
New York New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
2571-0751
zag
N0040474-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 104696/01
JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATI,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby r,,-ests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Jdein Heitler
Estate of James V, Rosati
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
-*% -!
%’
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
EW YORK
N004Q478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNlY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION f I.A.S. Part 30
d ! OIeitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS pro:
j Index No.: 104696/01
JOHN J. ROSATI, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF JAMES V. ROSATX,
\ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
/ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. j I
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, Wew York
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq?
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGNNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
P-v Y I ,
Lttome9or P
Estate of James V. Rosati
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
APR 2 6 20''

SUPREME CO1JRT OF 'TIE S'I'ATF OF NEW YORK
ASBES'I'OS LITIGA'X'ION i I.A.S. Part 30
.,- -------
THIS DOCUMENl REFERS TO:
! (Hcitler, J.)
1
j Index No.: 104982/01
ROBERT B. GAGLJARDO AND BARBARA
GAGLIARDO,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGNNEY & KLWGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3454
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
2383-2272
A&?
23 mt
N0040474-1

SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
~- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN KE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j 1.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, 1.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
_-
j Index No.: 104982/01
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BARBARA
GAGLIARDO,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
j
Defendants. - i
WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yo k, New York
d, ,2011
J?yb.dJ&/w>j . J
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
P-
Robert B. Gagliardo and Bar
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
APK 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
CLERK'S OFFICE
N0040478-1

_cI
SlJPKEME COURT OF THE S1’Al’E OF NEW YOKK
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
I (Heitler. J.)
--A‘ I ,
TMJS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 104982/01
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BAmARA i
GAGLIARDO,
NO OPPOSITJON
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et ul,,
--
Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby request
summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGlWY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456 (7.12) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Robert B. Gagliardo and B FiGkiaE D
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICJ$
1122-12564
N0040478-1

~ -._-
SUPREME COlJRT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YORK
COIJNTY OF NEW - YORK ---
IN E: NEW YOKK COUNTY i NYCAL,
AS HESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
r ,
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 104982/01
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BARBARA
f
GAGLIARDO,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs,
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
” .--_
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. - i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary idgmmt in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
rlA~--~,,n+ Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
York, New York

I
SIJPKEME couu OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY ..-- OF "_- NEW YON
-_--
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
A SBES'T'OS LITIGATION i 1.A.S. Part 30
i (Eieitler, J.)
-
.
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
/ Index No.: 104982/01
ROBERT B. GAGLIARDO AND BAEU3ARn
i
GAGE1 AKDO,
! NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs,
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
; MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
-.
A. C. & S., NC., et af.,
Defendants.
I
W€3EREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby
:q1 :sts
I summary judgment-in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules tj 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCG~WJEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Robert B. Gagliardo and Barbara Gagliardo
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New Y ork, New Y ork 1 Ow3 9
(212) 558-5500

SUPREME COUR'T OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK cowry
I_
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
FRANCIS 3. LANGAN AND ELIZABETH M.
LANGAN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
! NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 104997/0 1
i
\ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(21 2) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
bpi{ 2 6 2041
SO ORDERED,
1235-6986 couNn
p$hY \;OM
CLERK'S OFFICE
N0040478-1

SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
comw OF NEW YON
---- ----
IN I=:
NEW YORK COUNT7
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-r HI s DOC~ JMXT-KEFERS TO :
-.
----
JOHN PAUL KEITH AND DOROTHY KEITH,
! NYCAI,
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 105230/01
!
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,
Plain tiffs,
Defendants.
! NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York. New York
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
John Paul Keith and Dorothy Keith
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
FILED
APR 2 6 2 W
NO040478-1

(2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOHN PAUL KEITH and DOROTHY KEITH,
A.C. & S., INC., et a].,
Plaintiff(s),
: NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
-against-
: Index No.: 105230-01
Defendants.
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: '3 \? =\ (\
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003 599LexingtonAvenue APR 2 6 2011
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
--"+_. ~ 12) 536-3900 NEW YORK
r.ouN1~ CLERKS OFF'=
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 15 20111

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
r~
I- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
RE: NEWTOM COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 105252/01
ELIZABETH A. WHITEHEAD, AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
CHARLES E. MEYERS, \ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
-.-
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
F I L E Q
Treadwell Corporation
Estate of Charles E. Meyers
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ&LWXENBERG,P.C.
.1
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2012
SO ORDERED,
123GQW
PIEW YORK
~y CLERK'S aFF6b
N0040478-1
I
I
1

SUPREME COlJKT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i lAS+ Part 30
A j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERST
ELIZABETH A. WHITEHEAD, AS
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
CHARLES E. MEYERS,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
PI ainti ffs,
j Index No.: 105252/01
; NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Yprk, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate of Charles E. Meyers
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
SO ORDERED,
N0040474-1

_I____
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SHARON B. HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
RICHARD L. HARVEY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
-
i index No.: 105477/01
i
i
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
i
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
J! ,2011
1 f!AJ&Q+>
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDEED,
Estate of Richard L. Harvey
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
APR 2 6 2011
FILED
NESJ YORK
&m CLERK'S OFFICE
N0040478- 1

SUPREME c0uR-r OF THE STATE OF NUW YORK
COUNTY ~-~-- OF NEW -- YORK
-. -._--
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
‘THIS DOCUMEN’I’ REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 105477/01
FRANK KOROSECZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR !
FOR THE ESTATE OF ETHEL N. KOROSECZ j
AND FRANK KOROSECZ, INDIVIDUALLY, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER
. 4
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., el ai.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
FWY n.w2, E
F
”i.
ED
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
Estate of Ethel N. Korosec
MCGXVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New Y ork 10004 New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20’’
N0040478- 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
coumy OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
/ (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 105477/01
FRANK KOROSECZ, AS ADMINISTRATOR i
FOR THE ESTATE OF ETHEL N. KOROSECZ j
AND FRANK KOROSECZ, INDIVIDUALLY, NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND OmER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et a].,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
d, ,2011
~ ~~~
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant ~
Tread we1 1 Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WElrz & LUXENBERG, P.C.
I
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 APR 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
p.\T$ YORK
OFFGE
Tu CLERKS
J W M
N0040478-1

This Document Relates To:
NYCAL
1,A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
-
Index No.:%5885/2001 )
106037/200 1
WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES NC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law anc
Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES
INC. f/Wa BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/Wa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
FILED
WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER
RSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.
NEW YORK
110 William Street, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10038-3901
(212) 267-3828
Attorneys for Defendant
SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.
f/Wa BECHTEL CORP.
120 Broadway, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10271 -0079
(212) 238-4800
So Ordered:
.::ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/5 15750/1
APR 13 2011 '

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
This Document Relates To:
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, fMa BECHTEL CORP.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES
INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, fMa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: New York, New York
E D*
WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER
J~NDM~%?QRSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.
1 10 William Street, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10038-390 1
(212) 267-3828
C-S. Kozak
Attorneys for Defendant
SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.
f/k/a BECHTEL COW.
120 Broadway, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10271 -0079
(212) 238-4800
_"_*~,"._,l,.." __. *,.,* I..X,..
SO Ordered:
Hon. Sherry Kl&n Heitler
.::ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/S 15750/1

SlJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- COUNTY OF NEW YORK -
cc_
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITlGATION
f T.A.S. Part 30
-- i (Heitler, J.)
0
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
1 IndexNo.: 119385 0,106463/01
SALVATORE RANDAZZO AND RHODA
RANIIAZZO,
j NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ab,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary Jdgment
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the sake are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
Salvatore Randazzo and Rhoda Rand=>'
MCGWEY & UUGER, P.C. WElTZ&LUXENBERG,P.C. w q f:;i>:
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway I; - $ . ,a i d "
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
New York, New York 10003
/,pi< 2 6 2011
f 0 j, 'I'f-JRK
123515342.
cOUN~-~ C;~EBK:'SFF~CE~
N0040478-1

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RENEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
A i (Heitlex, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANNE M. REILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF
ANTHONY JOHN REILLER,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 106642/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND 0RX)ER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Treadwel I Corporation Estate of Anthony John Reille D
MCF~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERE, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
York,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
F\'IFW VORK
SO ORDERED,
COUNN CLERK'S OFFICE
1235-0923
N0040478-1

SlJYKEME COURT OF THE STAI’E OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
^-
1N RE: NEW YORK C0IhJl.Y
I NYCAI,
ASBESTOS 1,ITIGATlON j X.A.S. Part 30
: (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 1 O6642/01
ANNE M. REILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS i
EXECUTRIX FOR ‘THE ESTATE OF
ANTHONY JOHN REILLER, i NO OPPOSITION
f SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et nl.,
Defendants. [
WHEEFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,201 1
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.c.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York I0004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of Anthony John Rl
WElTZ & LUXENE~ERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 20”
(212) 558-5500
NEW WRK
cauNN CLERKS OFF“‘
I
257 J -0750
N0040474-1 APK 15 2011

S1JYREiME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
- COIJN'I'Y OF NEW YORK
1N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITXGATlON
THIS D O C U ~ FEFERS T
TO:
CAROL ANN KELLY AS EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF LAWRENCE J. KELLY AND
CAROL ANN KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NYCAL
J.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.>
Index No.: 106643/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating C op, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Cop, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
in & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New Y ork, New York 1000 rk,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
NEW YORK
SO ORDERED, COUl" CLERK'S OFFICE
2383-22973
N0040474-1 APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
~-
THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MAURl SAVOLAINEN AND SILJA
S AVOLAINEN,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, 3.)
Index No.: 106962/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., NC., el ol.,
I
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
OKDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporatian, be and the Same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
T'..
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq?
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
, New York 10003
APR 2 6 20''
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
p\EW YORK
4LERK~ OFFICE'
NDO40478-3

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTJGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
6
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
,
i Index No.: 106962/01
MAURI SAVOLAlNEN AND SILJA
SAVOLAlNEN,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs,
SUMMARY JUDGmNT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yor , New York
dl ,2011
FILED
Matth D. Sampar, Esq.
Attorney. Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
Mauri Savolainen and Silja Savolainen
MCGIVNEY & KLUCER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
(212) --. 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
324-579013
N0040478- 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN KI3: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
1
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 1 IW7!YOOfi&>
DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL 106797/06
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
DONALD E. SIERING,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER .
-against-
A. C. & S., XNC., et al.,
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,Ti
Michele J. Mittlehm, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLLJFER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDEmD,
Estate of Donald E. Siering
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
Fl
123GQW
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
1y CLERK'S oFFm
N0040478-1

SUPRfZME COURT OF THE S7ATE OF NEW Y ORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN E: NkW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LTTIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS To:
EDWARD R. SKELLEY AND BARBARA J.
SKELLEY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.>
u
Index No.: 119379/00, 107095/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules fj 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without co’sts.
Dated: New York. New York
Treadwell Corporation
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
EdwardR. Skelley and Barbara J.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
F
APR 2 6 20’’
p;Ey\ YOWL
couN\ITy CLERK’S
1235-2334

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y OM
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
EDWARD R. SKELLEY and BARBARA J.
SKELLEY,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler)
: Index No(s).: 107095-01
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
I
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \3 O\ (\
Newxork, New Pork
?
i
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C,
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
NEW Y0R3'K
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
comm OF NEW YO^
I_---
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
/ NYCAL
i I.A.S. Part 3,
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS Fro:
; Index No.: 1 1937610
ELlZABETH WALTER, INDIVIDUALY AND
AS EXEC. FOR THE ESTATE OF THEODORE i
F. WALKER, \ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., rNC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all.co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLWGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
WEXTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
SO ORDERED,
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUN‘1’Y OF NEW YORK
IN RE-NEW YOKK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j T.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 119378/00,
JOAN C. SPARLING, AS EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF OSCAR H. SPARLING, AND j
JOAN C. SPARLING, INDIVIDUALLY,
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- i MOTION AND ORDER
-
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York. New York
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
M c G ~ & Y KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 APR 2 6 2011
NE’&/ YORK
COUNTY CLERKS 8FFIGt
2571-0756s

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS D~ECENT REFERS m:
i Index No.: 107450/01
KATHY METZGER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE i
ESTATE OF DENNIS M. WHALEN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
i
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Treadwell corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New 700 Broadway York, New York 10003 FILED
APR 2 6 2011
1235-1937 NE\/\J YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOFX CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
__________________________________l__ll_----------"--------------
X
This Document Relates To:
: NYCAL
EDWARD WYANT, SR. and NANCY WYANT, : 1,A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff( s),
: Index No(s).: 107774-01
-against-
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
Defendants.
frr_rr_______________---------------------------------------------
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
apposition thereto,
ORLlERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \>u\ \\
X
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANECO. 1 E D '
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022 APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
pi!: I*+ VURK
rnii~ if CLERK'S OFFICE
15 2011

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, JSC.
DIANA A. JOHNSON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE
OF SIMON 6. MANNING, AND DIANA A. JOHNSON,
INDIVIDUALLY,
Plaintiffs,
Index No,: 108009-2001
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. & S INC. et al. including,
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
-against-
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
D
Attorney for Pluintvfs
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, New York 1003
m -
*-
1 .
I en
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & ArF,!
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
ApR 2 6 20”
SO ORDERED,
APR 15 2011
NJl432746v 1

SUPREME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YO& COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i 1A.S. Part 30
II_ ! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
HARRY T. POWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF GLENNA E. POWERS,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 109019/01
!
j NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Estate of Glenna E. Powers
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P,
SO ORDERED,
N0040478- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
X
GERALDINE 1. REY, as Administratrix for the Estate of JOHN
REY, and GERALDINE 1. REY, Individually,
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
Index No. 109115-2001
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A. C. 81 S. INC., et al., including
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L,L,C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York New York
3/\4 I
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintvfs
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.
Sedgwick, Deter?, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Flo
Newark, NJ 07102

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
cowry OF m w YORK
I_
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
AS BE SI-0 S LI TI GAT1 ON
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS m:
KATHERINE ROMANO, EXECUTRIX FOR
THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY J. ROMANO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
! NYCAL
i l.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
j
Index No.: 110165/Ol
: NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER
-
Defendants. !
WHEREFORX, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
“/[ ,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. ‘
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WHTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100 SILED
APR 2 6 20’’
N004O474- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MADELINE MCGINN, INDIVIDUALLY AND
RICHARD JOHN MAYERICK AND RICHARD
JOHN MAYERICK AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE ESTATE OF
HAROLD MCGINN,
Plain tiffs ,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Index No.: 110438/01
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
4 / ! ,2011
~
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGE& P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York. New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
-
Wm-OMZ-
Attorney far Plaintiffs
EstateofHaroldMcGinn F I L
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
”’
New York, New York 10003 AP
fJ E‘$/ YO n K
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE
1235-19343
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

' NYCAL
BRYAN M. PRICE and LINDA GERACI PRICE, :
Part 30
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
:
Index No. 1 1 1220-0 1
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
NO-OPPOSTTTON SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests suinniary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and WithoLit costs
Datcd: 3 \3 L\ I\
Kirste Alford Kneis, Esq.
K&I, ATESLLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003 599 Lexington Avenue hpR
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022-6030
4 2 -1-2) 536- 3900
SO ORDERED,

I
536.07695/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
NATALE V. GRILLO,
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorab e Sherry K-oin Heitler
Index No. :
121118/01
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
1
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
I
WHEREFORE,
defendant, Unit
d Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
D
I .
\
I
!
DATED :
East Hanover New Jersey
APT? 2 6 2011
:'
WEITZ & LUXENBERG
Attorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,

536.07703/AJM
;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ZOUNTY OF NEW YORK
CN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
rhis document relates to:
(Honorable Sherry K1 in H it1
3ERTWD E. LINDSEY,
: Index No.: *fi->
120575/01
Plaintiff,
: (January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
vs . : Group)
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
2t al., : NO OPPOSITION
Defendants.
:
:
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, e and the
d .', ?- p e,
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wiLhout ed'as.
I , >
I ) Ij 2011
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
"-- "
Honorable Shevy Klein Heitler

536.07703/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)
This document relates to:
RUDOLPH BIBOW,
Index No. :
VS .
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil. Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims aqainst defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
-..
same are hereby dismissed w itEAj
Bzld without costs.
APR 2 6 2011
& FLINN
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
, Box 438
t Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,

536.07706/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW -*,-.---
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
YUKK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
PETER CONNOLLY,
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorab e Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No. : 11233/01
vs .
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO T rial
Group)
LIZTEC CONVEYOR COKPORPITION,
et al.,
Defendants.
NO BPPOSITLON
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, a11 claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and
same are hereby dismi.;sed with prejudice and without
DATED: ‘f./&/,
East Hanover, New Jersey
Attorneys for
700 Broadway
New York, New
SO ORDERED,
Plaintiff
York 10003
@y
& FLINN
Attorneys for Defendant,
United Conveyor Corporat ion
72 Eagle Rock
Avenue, Su .ite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey - 07936
-.1.* -~~~
Honorabl Sh ry Klein Heitler

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
JI h ,2011
e-
Attorney for Plaintiff
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KQNIGSBERG, LLP
800 Third Avenue, 1 1 th Floor
New York, New York 10022
CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP
177 Montague Street
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
APR 2 6 20''
NEV.l '(ORK
c.,u~Ty GLknK'S OFFICE'
00224274.WPD

536.08119/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)
This document relates to:
: Index No.: 113260/01
JOSEPH McCARTHY, Deceased,
Plaintiff,
:
:
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
vs *
: NO OPPOSITION
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
et al. , : AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Coyporation, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with FeiuLcEaQwithout costs.
DATED: 3'&//
ARRITY, GF!AHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
so ORDERED ,
New Jer 'sey 07936

SUPREME COURT QF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
Robert D, Hart
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Gaulds Pumps Inc., be and the sme are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
~~
D ~ - :;kl d ~
Erica V. Cesaro, Esq. Justin Tafe, sq.
I
Attorney far Plaintiff Att ey for Defendant
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP CULLEN & DYKMAN LL
800 Third Avenue, 11 "' Floor
177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10022
Arooklyn, New Yark 11201
I k, E D
itler
COUNTY CLERK'S .. - OFFIC@
00224273. WPD

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
$I,! ,2011
Attorney for Plaintiff
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor
New York, New York 10022
177 Montague Street
SO ORDERED,
00224273.WPD

*
.L
TMc:CC(jpk)
3 0/15/09
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
EDWAR.D MARTINI
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, hc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
,
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New,Ywk, New York
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ~ _ _ I I _ _ . _
Benjhn Darche, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New York, NY
Our File No
S-6783-01
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 2 6 2011

WHEREFORE, defendant Gaulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the abaveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Goulds Pumps Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice: and without costs.
Ericav. Cesaro, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERC, LLP CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor
177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10022 n, New York 11201
SO ORDERED,
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
I
00224271 ,WPU

Carl Inzanti
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KQNIGSBERG, LLP
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor
New York, New York 10022
CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York
?Y 8)
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF/%
0022427 1 .WPD
APR 13 2011

536.07706/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
PETER CONNOLLY,
YORK
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable ,,,erry Klein Heitler)
Index No. :
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
Defendants.
NO OPPOYITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
'equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
'ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor
Corporation, with
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDEFtED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and
am are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
4TED: +)i',/I,
East Hanover, New Jersey
Wtorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
ilew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
;O ORDEMD,

536.07706/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
JOSEPH W. SHRECK,
VS.
Plaintiff,
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al. ,
Defendants.
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry K lein Heitler)
Index No. : 118721/01
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY J UDWNT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEmFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
21vil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Zomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claims and
zrossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
, GAROFALO
4ttorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
Jew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
30 ORDERED,
07936

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
BRYAN M. PRICE and LINDA CTERACI PRICE,
-against-
Plain tiff( s),
' NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 3o
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No. 119477-01
AC. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice
Dated: 3 \3 \\ \\
New York, New York
Attorneys lor Plaintiff(s)
Attorneys for Defendant
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022-6030
,_.._.(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,

536.10562/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
[E W 3RK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
CARMELO A. FICALOR?l,
NY CAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No. :
vs *
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al. ,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEFtEFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with pr
Bhout costs.
DATED : m&-,,a( 7fI 70 I /
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
011

536.10562/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
This document relates to:
: Index NO.:
ANGEL0 T. D'AGOSTINO,
VS .
Plaintiff, : (January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
: Group)
UNITED CON'JEVCIR ZCREOP?TIO?T, : NO C3PPCBITICN
et al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
: AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Jivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
irejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDEWD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
:rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be
jame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutbo
bpi: 2 6 20''
-- %Q#l //dm
JEITZ & LUXENBERG
lttorneys for Plaintiff
'00 Broadway
lew York, New York 10003
GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO
& FLINN
Attorneys for Defendant,
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
+-PR~Q. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
0 ORDERED,
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler

!
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
This Document Relates to:
VlTO CANNIZZARO, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR
THE ESTATE OF VINCENT CANNIZZARO
INDEX NO.: 01-120390
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
against
A.C. & S., INC., ET AL
I
WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the
3bove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
:omplaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against
jefendant, KOHLER CO,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
NEW YORK, New York
iOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
ittorneys for Defendant,
(OHLER CO.
LO Paterson Street - PO Box 480
Jew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
- -,
.* Mviu
EEE?J&N;r
Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),
VlTO CANNIZZARO, as Administrator for the
Estate of VINCENT CANNIZZARO
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
l
HOAQLAND, LONGO
MORAN, DUNST 8
DOUKAS, U P
AUORNEYS AT LAW
NORTH JERSEY
40 PAfERSON ST
PO BOX 480
NEWMUWICK, NJ
SOUTH JERSEY
701 WTSEY'S MILL RD
SmE 202
HRMMONTON. NJ
io ORDERED:
i

536.10564/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF TI E STATE OF TEW
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
RAYMOND J. HICKEY,
3RK
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No. :
vs .
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al. ,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDCMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with e&&&i&ithout
DATED : fl&d w - 4 'z o//
costs.
, GAROFALO
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
SO ORDERED,
A
P.O. Box 438
st Hanover, New Jersey 07936

536.09778/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
JAMES R. FLEMING, Deceased,
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No. :
vs .
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION
et al., : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
: AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with pre
Dhout costs.
, GAROFALO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
New York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,
Honora6r6 S hwy Klein Heitler
APR 152011
,

536.07703/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
RUDOLPH BIBOW,
YORK
NY CAL
TAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No, :
VS .
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO
Group)
Trial
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
2t al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUD(;MENT MOTION
AN13 ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant,
United Conveyor Corporation, ..ereby
n
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
:ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
romplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
rrejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
- -
arne are hereby dismissed wit
without costs.
APR 2 6 2011
URPHY , GAROFALO
& FLINN
00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
ew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
, Box 438
t Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,

536.07703/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
This document relates to:
BERTRAND E. LINDSEY,
: Index No.:
2-y
Plaintiff,
: (January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
VS . : Group)
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATIONf
?t al., : NO OPPOSITION
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
Defendants. : AND ORDER
WHEREFORE:,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
-equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s
‘omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDEFlED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation,
ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wi6hout.’&&?s.
rn
T;z
and the
, I I )
2, ,j zQI~
4ttorneys for Plain
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
\Jew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
_____________________________________ -X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
___________________f_____________f____
X
This Document Relates to:
Thomas J. Sheehan,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index NO.: 120770/01
A.C. Ei
- against -
S., Inc., et al.,
Plaintiff,
NO ciPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Inc., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs’
Complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claims
and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., be
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
Thomas J. Sheehan
Goulds Pumps Inc.
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
So Ordered:
ile No.: 67g-&&
E D
APR 2 6 2011

------------ff-ff-f-_fl------------------
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
..................................... -X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 120770/01
Thomas J. Sheehan,
Plaintiff,
- against - NO OPPOSITION
A.C. & S., Inc., et al.,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests surnrnar
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practic
Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complain
against defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there beinl
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim
and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissel
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
Breoklyn, New York
, 2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Thomas J. Sheehan
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003
So Ordered:
Defendant
Burnham LLC
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn,
UT File NO. : ?lO84-2528
APR 2 6 2011

536.07695/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
NATALE V. GRILLO,
NY CAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No. :
vs *
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
iTCu'iTbZl CSi

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint
against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc.. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Goulds Pumps Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Plaintiff
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP
800 Third Avenue, 1 lth Floor
New York, New York 10022
CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
00223904. WPD

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No.: 01/121697
GEORGE RENZ,
Plaintiff( s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- against - MOTION
AC and S, WC., (ARMSGTRONG
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter ("WEIL-
MCLAN') hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Weil-
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
(%2JjK ,2011
Erica Cesaro, Esq.
Levy Phillips
800 Third Ave. 13th Floor
New York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED,
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
Attorneys for Defendant
Weil-McLain
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100 Go'
New York, NY 10022
(212) 651-7500
itler
p R 2 6 zo'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
GEORGE RENZ, et al.,
Plaintiff's,
: NYCAI,
: I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
-against-
: Index No: 12 1 697-0 1
A.C. &L S., INC., et al.,
Ikfendants.
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTlON AND ORDER
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sectioii 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against CRANE C:O. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEKED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, disniissed with prejudice and without costs.
LEVY 'PHILLIPS & KONIGSBEKG, LLP
Attorneys for Plaiiitiff(s)
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(2 12) 605-6200
SO ORDERED.
Hon.
cl n ,A -I---
CRhE C'O.
599 Lexington Avenue
Ncw York, NY 10022-
(212) 536 -3900

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
lrl_l--llll---------_l------------------
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitlex)
...................................... X
-
This Document Relates to:
Index No.:121697/01
George Renz,
NO-OPPOSITION
Plaintiff,
SUMMARY JUDQMENT
- against -
GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,
et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. , hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs’
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon natice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant QOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismissed with prejudice and without coets.
q A G k l y n , Ne; ;!
4 I1
Erica Cesaro, Esq.
Levy, Philips & Konigsberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Cullen and Dykman, LLP
Attorneys for DefeIIdantApfj 2 2011
George Renz GOULD$ PUMPS, INC.
800 Third Avenue
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York 112d%-bl’i ’YO1
New York, NY 10022 (718) ,855-9000 COUNTYCLERK’SOFFICIi
(212) 605-6333 &d Our Fil.9 NO. :6754-6483
So Ordered: 3
Han . Sher’ry K. HeiCler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
This Document Relates to:
FRANK M. BARBERA AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF FRANK
S. BARBERA
INDEX NO.: 01-121734
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
against
A.C. AND S. INC. ET AL.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
NEW YORK, New York
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
WEITZ & LUXENBERG
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff (s),
Attorneys for Defendant, FRANK M. BARBERA as Personal
Kohler Cob Representative for the Estate of FRANK S.
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480 BARBERA
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903 k, New York, 10003
HOAQLAM), LONGO
MORAN, DUNST 8
DWKAS, LLP
ATTORNEYS dT LAW
NORTH JERSEY
40 PATERSON ST
PO BOX 480
NWVBRUNSWIC11. NJ
SOUTH JERSEY
701 WILTSEY'S MILL RD
SUITE 2M
HAMONTON. NJ
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Sherk Klein '
L E D
APR 2 6 2071
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF\@

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, NY
By:
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
Patterson-Kelley Corn any
Key Towers at Fo$&'lb
40 Fountain Plaza, uite 500
Buffalo, NY 14202
(716)853-8100 APR 'O'
p.\EW YORK
C.u~n CLERK'S OFFICE
APR 15 2011
13409973.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COIJN‘I’Y OF NEW YORK
PATRICK MOONEY and ARLENE W
MOONEY,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
-against-
PI ain t i ffs,
. NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein I Icitler)
: Index No(s): 124089-01
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
’ ,JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
NIGSBERG, L1,P
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
800 Third Avenue
*YL!
i Alford Kneis, Esq.
F\LED
New Y ork, NY 10022 599 Lexington Avenuc 2D77
(212) 60.5-6200 New York, NY 10022-6030 aPR
SO OKDERGD,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
f
hiULcu\ hil~
, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: ??!!
Samuel Goldblatt, Es .
Benjamin R. Dwyer sq.
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
180 Maiden Lane Patterson-Kelley Company
New York, NY 10038
Key Towers at Fountain Plaza
40 Fountain Plaza, S
Buffalo, NY 14202
__,"_^

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORX CITY
........................................ X
IN RE:
NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_I-ll__ll_l---_f____------------------
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD GRABINSKY,
- against -
A,C. & S. TNC,, et al.,
Plaintiff,
X
NY CAL
I.A.S, Part 30
(Judge Hei t ler 1
Index N0.:100373/02
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND QRD ER
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM, LLC, hereby requests summar)
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Lar
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant; BURNNAM, LLC, with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims am
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM, LLC, be dismissed wit1
TLag
prejudice and without costs.
Ne: ;:
GSbLCk\j Qsw2 I
Esq*
Levy Phillips & Konigsberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff
X ICHARW GRABINSKY
800 Third Avenue,llth Floor
New York, New York 10022
So Ordered:
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
BURNKAM, LLC
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York
(718) 855-9000
UT File No. :11084-249ap~ 20,,
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S
CE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
CHARLES CARUSO SR.
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, S.)
Index No. 02- 10046 1
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, su
d herein as Patterson-Kellel
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
By:
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 1003 8
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
Patterson-Kelley
Key Towers at F
&TXAE D
(212) 558-5500 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500
Buffalo, NY 14202 APR 20,,
(716) 853-8100
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
iFd \"ORB.;
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF=*
13409973.1

TMc:CCCjpk)
312311 1
INDEX NO.
1 0 1 08 8/02
ASSIGNED TO:
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
FRANK PERRY
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Jo6dRichmond, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003 5
1
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
York, NY 100
08b E D
SO ORDERED: APR 2 6 2011
Our File No
S-7422-0 1
15 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIe

536.09778/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
This document relates to:
JAMES R. FLEMING, Deceased,
: Index No. :
vs "
Plaintiff ,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION,
et al. ,
Defendants ,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
: AND ORDER
WHEREFOFE,
defenda'nt, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
lomplaint
against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
xejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
:rossclairns against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
;ame are hereby dismissed with pre
IATED : 3 '- ?fN //
APR 2 6 2011
hout costs.
lEITZ & LUXENBERE
GAROFALO
,ttorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
'00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
lew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
0 ORDERED,

536.10564/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sh
This document relates to:
: Index No. :
RAYMOND J. HICKEY,
:y Klein Heitl
vs .
Plaintiff,
: (January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
: Group)
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION
et al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
: AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United ' Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
zrossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with Dwitbout costs *
GARRITY, GFLAHAM, MURPHY , GAROFALO
Zttorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
\Tew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COUK‘I’ OF ‘I’HE STATE OF NEW YORK
COIJN’I’Y OF NEW YORK
’ NYCAL
CAKOL E. ANGELONE, Iiidividually and as
’ I.A.S. Part 30
Executrix ol’the Estate of RUSSELL ANGELONE, : (I-,oll.
Heil,er)
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
* Index No: 104919-02
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
-against-
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
________________________________________-----------------~----~-~
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf’of named defendants CRANE CO.,
CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. and WEINMAN PUMPS, division of Crane Pumps &
Systems, Inc. (“CRANE CO.”), hereby requests summary judgment in thc above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
CKAN E C‘O. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upoii notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross claims against
C‘KANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 605-6200 w York, NY 10022-6030
SO ORDERED,

I NO.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
----------____l--llllr_____________lr_
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
-I--l-t------r-r-ll___l__ll__l___f____
X
This Document Relates To: Index
-
No.: 104919/02
CAROL E. ANGELONE, as Executrix of
the Estate of RUSSELL ANGELONE,
NO-OPP081TION
Plaintiff,
SlJMMARY JUDGMENT
- againet -
GOULDS PUMPS, INC., et al,,
WHEREFOREf defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 83212, dismissing plaintiffs'
Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cros8 claima againet defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
FC??,,
dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
,New York 2011
Erica Cesaro, Esq.
Levy, Philips & Konigsberg Cullen and Dykman, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Ru~sell Anqelone
-
GOULDS PUMPS, INC. APR 2 6 2011
800 Third Avenue
177 Montague Street
New York, NY 10022
Brooklyn, New York 11201 NEW yORt,'
(212) 605-6333
:6754-740
(718) 855-9000 eOUNlY CLERK'S Clr r IGI
So Ordered:
APR 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW Y ON
-7
MOTION ANR ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley
I
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
Dated: New York, NY
Dana Northcraft, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
(212) 558-5500
- ' .VI..>_
By:
Samuel Goldblatt, Es&
Benjamin R. Dwyer Esq.
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
Patterson-Kelle y Com
Key Towers at Founta
40 Fountain Plaza, Sui
Buffalo, NY 14202
..-. . (716) 853-8100 APR 2 6 20"
SO ORDERE pi;i$j y9RK
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler cour\r-iy CLERK'S OFFICE
13381246.1 APR 152011

536.10562/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry K-iin Heitler)
This document relates to:
CARMELO A. FICALORA,
: Index No.: 120388
vs *
Plaintiff,
c
: (January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
: Group)
JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION
st al. , : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
: AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
lomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
!rossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the
lame are hereby dismissed with pr
IATED : lfl&p!, V, 7 0 I /
ast Hanover New Jersey
hout costs.
EITZ & LUXENBERG
ttorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
ew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
P.O. Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
0 ORDERED,

536.10562/AJM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JEW YOR
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This document relates to:
NYCAL
IAS PART 30
(Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)
ANGEL0 T. D’AGOSTINO,
vs .
Plaintiff,
(January 2011 Monthly FIFO Trial
Group)
JTJITEI? CDWJEVOR CORP9FATI@l’?,
zt al. ,
Defendants.
NO BEJPQSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
WHEREFORE,
defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s
*omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with
rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
irossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be
,ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutteo
zp7
e
lATED :
v *‘Y/ ,,, v- - --
EITZ & LUXENBERG
GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO
ttorneys for Plaintiff
& FLINN
00 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,
ew York, New York 10003
United Conveyor Corporation
72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350
**.--.E 0 * Box 438
East Hanover, New Jersey 07936
0 ORDERED,
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler

TMc:CC(jpk)
312311 1
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Y/Jl/l
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
NewYork,NY
SO ORDERED: ApR 2 6 20"
Our File No
S-4640-02

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, S.)
Index No. 02- 1 10269
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
CLINTON McCLOUD
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, su
d herein as Patterson-Kelley
Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant
Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed
without costs.
W YORK

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
PHYLLIS GACH, Individually and as Proposed
Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL GACH,
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
Defendants,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
121985-99
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CMNE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated:
3 \>a\ I\.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
APR 2 6 2071
SO ORDERED,
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler
FbV VOR&
cwcu i Y CLER&S oFF/a

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
___________________-------------------
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
___________________-------------------
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 112375/02
MICHAEL GACH
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff ,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
WHEREFORE,
defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
2 6 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
i Index No.: 114483/02
GRACE CONTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF VITO
CONTI, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ai.,
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfaco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Ywk. New York
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfaco, Inc.
Estate of Vito Conti
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WE~TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
h \EV/ YORK
SO ORDERED,
COUNTY GLERKG’S OFFICE’
2571-0132
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-l_l_----l--l-_--__-------------------
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 118207/02
BERNARD SIKKAS
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. SI S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bernard Sikkas
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003
212-558-5500
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
Attorneys for Defendant
Burnham LLC
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York 11201
(718) 855-9000
rpl.
Our File No. : Eo K
APK 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
I

--
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
--_________________-_________________ -X
This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 118207/02
Jeanette Sikkas, Individually and as
Executrix for the Estate of Bernard
Sikkas,
Plaintiff,
- against -
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A.C. & S., Iric., et al. ,
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
__________________-__________________ -X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without c osF I L E D
Dated:
/y
,2755 w/
Brooklyn, New York
11117 , 2011
Michael Fanelli, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jeanette Sikkas, Individually Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
and as Executrix for the Estate Inc.
of Bernard Sikkas
177 Montague Street
700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201
New York, New York 1000 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 10924-6459
So Ordered:
I 6QR
I t 1,5?0ll

JOAN LEVESQUE as Administratrix for the Estate of JOSEPH
LEVESQUE and JOAN LEVESQUE, Individually,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
42z>
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Index No.:
122034-1998
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 5
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plain tffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 /
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
rn nnnrnrn
1 unucncu,
Hok&rry Klein Heitler
NEW YORK
WUWY CLERKS OFFICE‘
NJ1341759vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
VIVIAN LAWRENCE, as Executrix for the Estate of GEORGE
LAWRENCE, Deceased,
"against-
Plaintiff(s),
X
X
Index No. 126776-2002
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al., including
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP
Attorneys Three Gateway for Foster Center, Wheeler,
12'h F $lLED
or
15 2011
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
COSMA LERUZIC, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER F.
LERUZIC and COSMA LERUZIC, Individually,
Index No.:
121982-1999
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. (sued herein as “FOSTER WHEELER
CORPORATION”) hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
,New York, New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaint~fs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
3
Sedgwick,
Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORPERED,
Hon. SheK Klei’n Heitler
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERKIS OFFICE‘
NJD4I 757vl

SLJPREME COURT OF 'PFIE STATE OF NEW YOK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS L J TlGATl ON
; 1.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
1HIS DOCUMENT R.EFERS TO:
THEODORE FRASIER, EXECUTOR FOR 'THE
ESTATE OF CLYDE FRASIER,
0
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al,,
PI ai n ti ffs,
j Index No.: 124331/00 00757/03
i
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
N0040478-1

SUPREME COUR’r OF ‘I’HE STATE OF NEW YORK
-.-_-
ASBESTOS LlTIGATl ON
‘1”FIiS DOClJMENT REFERS TO:
TI 1EODORE FMSIER, EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF CLYDE FKASIER,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
; I.A.S. Part 30
; (FJeitler, J.)
0
i Index No.: 124331/00, 100757/03
[ NO OPPOSITION
; SUMMARY JUDGMENT
/ MOTION AND OKDER
-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Defendants.
i
WHEFEFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 0
SO ORDERED,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York New York 10003 APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFtCf
2383-22283
N0040478-1

CO1JNTY OF NEW YOKK _-- -"-- IN RE: NEW YOPX COUNTY
\ NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'I'IGRTION I I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
__I
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KES S LEK,
-against -
A. C. & S., INC., et d.,
Plaintiffs,
i
i
j
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment ,Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212,'
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Ir""
4" '.Vrbr*..*uL
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGXWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New Yoxk 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
Frq bj. O(t;? Eq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Carl Kroger and Carol Ann Kroger
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
700 Broadway I
New York, New York 100
APR 2 6 2011
324-564dEP j'c'PIK
COUNTY CLEHW QFFICE'
I
N0040478-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOXENTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATlON j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler. J.1
I ,
THIS DOCUMENT mFEKS TO:
j Index No..
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KESSLER,
-against-
Plaintiffs, j NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED? that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 100 New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
2 @kERK'S UFFlCE
N0040478-1

S~JPREME coum OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOIIK -
IN RE: NEW YOKK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.>
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
TERRY M. KESSLER AND MARSHA
KESSLER,
-
-against -
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
! NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORlDER
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
123@biV
.;ORE<
bEd qKs OFF\CE
Ty C W

*A
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
This Document Relates to:
SAM DONOFRIO
against
INDEX NO.: 03-107991
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. 0. SMTH WATER PRODUCTS CO.. ET AL
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:
New York, New York
3 \\-I \\\
A
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
Kohler Co.
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
WEITZ & LUXENBE-
Attorneys for Plaintiff@),
Sam Donofrio
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
HOAGLAND, LONGO
MORAN. DUNST 8
DQUKAS, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
NORTH JERSEY
40 PATERSON ST
PO BOX 480
NEW BRUNWCK. NJ
SOUTH JERSEY
701 VVILTSEY'S MILL RD
SUITE 202
HAMMONTON, NJ
SO ORDERED:
SHERRY KfEIN HWLER
Ft
APR 2 6 2821

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK ClTv ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon, Sherry Klein Heltler
X
ROBERT DOWNEY and RITA DOWNEY, Index No. 109278-2003
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al., including
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York,Jew York
Joseph W.Jfelluck, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Flo
New York, NY 10036 , NJ 07102
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
NEW YORK
r,OUNn CLERK'S OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCAL
-against-
Plaintifqs),
Index No. 109278/03
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Shew Klein Heitler,
LAS Part 30 ..
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with
prejudice, and there being no apposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
*
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: New Yo , ET w York
BELLUCR & FOX, LLP
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
546 5th Avenue, 4th Floor
264 West 40* Street
New York, New York 10036
New York, New York 10018
(212) 681-1575 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-_________---------I__lf______________
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
......................................
This Document Relates to:
EDWARD L. JEMIOLO
Plaintiff
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 111829/03
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. &
S., INC., et al.,
WHEREFORE,
defendant BURNHAM LLC,
hereby requests summar
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains
defendant BURNHAM LLC,
with prejudice, and there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,
be dismissed wit
prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Edward L. Jemiolo
Burnham LLC
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
212-558-5500
(718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 1108
D

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
This Document Relates to:
ELLA RUTH MONTONEY and DONNA JEAN
WEESE as Executrix of the Estate of OSCAR
FOANE MONTONEY,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS. et al..
INDEX NO.: 03-1 16300
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York lnternatlonal Corporation, hereby requests summary
I
i
iudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
jismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with prejudice,
md there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
jefendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
DATED;
New Brunswick, NJ
1
iOAGLAND, LONGO, M
IUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
4ttorneys for Defendant,
(ork International Corporation
IO Paterson Street - PO Box 480
dew Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
Ella Ruth Montoney and Donna Jean Weese
as Executrix of the Estate of Oscar Foane
io ORDERED:
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler
I 111111111111 1 l 11111l11 l II l
BU-TURF-2

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
FRED ASSOULIN, as Proposed Executor for the Estate of Index No. 103905-2004
SHERRY ASSOULIN and FRED ASSOULIN, Individually,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiff (s)
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
V. ORDER
X
X
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. including
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
1Sedgwick, Dennis E. Vega, Detert, Esq. Moran & Arnold, LLP
Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plointvfs
Attorneys for foster Wheeler, 1. L.C.
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
New York, NY 10003
Newark, NJ 07102
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002
SO ORDERED,
"- -
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
* NYCAL
LAURA FRACCALVIERI, as Administratrix for the : I.A.S, Part 3o
Estate of FRANK FRACCALVIERI,
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff( s) ,
: Index No(s).: 105233-04
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants,
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \30\ \\
New Xork, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
CRANE CO.
599 Lexington venue APK 2 6 2"'
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900 WRK
c:OUN+r( CLERKS OFF'*

-____________-------______________t__l
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
______-------f------___I______________
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 111253/04
MARTIN ZUCKERMAN
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.O.
SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
---------------------------*---*------
X
WHEREFOREl defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C ivil Practice LaLd
and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
SO ORDERED: f3.
I

No.:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
..................................... -X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
..................................... -X
This Document Relates to:
Valerie Zuckerman, as Executrix for the
Estate of Martin Zuckerman,
- against -
Plaintiff,
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 111253/04
NO OPPOSITION
S-Y JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario &
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim:
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
//.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOFK
LILLIAN P, CARPENTER, as Executrix for the
Estate of GERALD CLAYTON CARPENTER,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
: NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No.: 114255-04
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without casts.
Dated: 3 \ >-/ \\
New York, New York
Kirst Alford Kneis, Esq.
K& GATESLLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
At rneys for Defendant
700 Broadway CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED,
APR 152011
?"-Ob'
2 6 2011
r ;-'jb YOHK
rl' CLERKS OFF,^^

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NY CAL
____--l-l--l___-----------------------
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
-_l_____----------lf_______________f_l
X
(Judge Heitler)
This Document Relates to:
CARL LUNDERMAN
Index No.: 115493/04
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDCMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. &
S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar:{
X
I
I
I
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La\$
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint agains-:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Br
Weitz & Luxenberg,
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Carl Lunderman
Burn ham LLC
700 Broadway, Gth Floor 177 Montague Street
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
GLENN WllTlNG AND CONSTANCE WITTING,
Index No.: 115962-2004
-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON et al. including,
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
Belluck & Fox, LLP
Attorney for Plaint#%
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor
NEVd YORK
NJI43274Svl
I

SUPMME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
JOHN COUGHLIN
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, S,)
Index No. 9

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
ADA IRIS OVALLE,
X
X
Index No. 112085-2005
-against-
Pia int iff (s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC. et al., including
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, IIC
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Flo r
New York, NY 10036 A w a r k .
2!5ziic
NJ07102
SO ORDERED,
0 1 E D

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNn OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
RAFFAELE LACALAMITA and COLOMBA LACALAMITA,
X
X
Index No. 114107-2005
-against-
Plaint iff,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
Stephen Novakid;,
-
Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran 81 Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Co
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CIW ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
X
GINGER M. WOOD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
ESTATE OF HENRY L. WOOD,
X
Index No. 101027-2006
-against-
Plaintlffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
-
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, NY 10036 Newark,
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LF
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor
I L E D
NJ 07102
APR 2 6 2011
APR 15 2011
bJFW YORK
~ U N TCLERK‘S V
OFFICEI’

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JOHN COUGHLIN and BARBARA ANN
COUGHLIN,
NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part 30
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s),
: Index No.: 102347-05
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: 3 \30 \ \\
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(2 12) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900 APR 2 6 *01'
SO ORDERED,
prcw YORK
C,OUN ry CLERKS oFF'CE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j 1.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
1
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j IndexNo.. ~ 7 0 8 1 ’ 0,
1
DONNA M. MEDER, PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF
DONALD E. SIERING,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER .
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFOE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwe11 Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
123GQW
APR 2 6 2011
f4EN YORK
1-y CLERK‘S OFFICE

SUI'KEME COIJR'f OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK --
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAJ,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j 1.A.S. Part 3
--_A
I (Heitler, J.)
?'HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
; Index No.: 11
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF GIOVAWI LATTANZIO,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, \ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
! MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
__-___--..--.-
---
A. C. & S., WC., et al.,
($%%32269'0
Defendants.
J
WHEREFORE, defendaqt, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., wfth prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDER.ED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
201 1
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
Estate of Giovanni Lattanz
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100 New York, New York 10003 APR 2
6 2011
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF ‘I’I-jE STATE OF NEW YOKK
.- COUNTY
-. OF NEW YORK -
IN RE: NEW YON couN‘rY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
J.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, 3.)
1’HIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ANN LATTANZIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE
ESTATE OF GIOVANNI LATTANZIO,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
I
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
4/l ,2011
MaA
Carol M. Ternpesta,hEsq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 Ai-‘,< ;r 6
SO ORDERED, p,\rt I ‘ 7; :;I ‘a\
c~~%LERK’s OFFICE
N0040478-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
X
X
PHYLLIS N. SEGAL, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Index No. 113056-2006
ELI J. SEGAL,
-against -
Plaint iff s,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Foster Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
f%&1+30.2011
Bellucf Fox, LLP
Attor ys for Plaintvfs
546 Fifth Avet we, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneysfor Foster Wheeler, LLC
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
APR 2 6 2011

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
DANIEL E. CRANEY and CAROLINE M. CRANEY,
Index No.: 114137-2006
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. INCLUDING GENERAL
ELECTRIC COMPANY,
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
Behck 81 Fox, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, New York 10036
SO ORDERED,
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
FILED ;
APR 2 6 ZMI
waN YORK
INTY CLERKS OFF IS^

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
-__l__-l-----------lf__l_____________l
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
____l_--ll----______------------------
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 114151/05
JOHN R. CATANZARO
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.O.
SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against
defendant BURNHAM LLC,
with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg,
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
John R. Catanzaro
Burnham LLC
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 1108
SO ORDERED:
APR 2 6 2011
NFW ',ORK
?OUN"I^U CLERK'S OFF1

-
-
-
V
TMc:CC('jpk)
1011 5/09
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
BERNAXtD FAMMATEO
WON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JlJJXMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERFD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and moss-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
- I I I - - - - - - -
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New York, NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED: ------.--- I
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
Our File No APR 2 6 2011
S-4 147-06
t!F'$V ':"ORK
LURK!$ ~~~~~

-
3 .
c
Th4c:CCCjpk)
1 Of 1 5/09
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES
w
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 114377/01 and 117394/06
ASSIGNED TO.
____________________----~-~--.-
"-----------""""-----------~.~"-....-~"~~~-
HON. SHERRY nEIN HEITLER
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
EDWARD MARTINI
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,
hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, hc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Eclison Company af New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
- - -- - - - -- ---_I_" I-__ A _ -
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y k, New York
7/f/lI
_ _ - - - __ I
Benjhn Darche, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New Yo& NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
New Ykk,NY 100 3- 598
r!!! 8 1 Gn
Our File No
S-6783-01

i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
________---I___-----_____________
-X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
.....................................
This Document Relates to:
Angeline King, Individually and as
Administratrix for the Estate of John
M. King,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,
-X
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 100678/07
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDMNT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled cas€
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §321;
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario
DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc., with prejudice, and there being r
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all clairr
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Cc
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without cos F s. D
APR 2 6 2011
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Angeline King, Individually and
as Administratrix for the
Estate of John M. King
700 Broadway, 6th Floor
New York, New York 10003
F
C len and Dykman LLP
A torneys for Defendant
Mario .& DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc.
177 Montague Street
Brooklyn, New York 11201
(718) 855-9000
?
i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X NYCAL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
___________________-________________I_
X
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 100678/07
JOHN M. KING
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
WHEREFORE,
defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests summar
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint agains
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims an
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit
prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg,
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
John M. King Burnham LLC
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No. :
SO ORDERED:
--
Hen. Sherry K. Heitler

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
ELIZABETH H. BARNES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF
THE ESTATE OF LE ROY A. BARNES, JR.,
Index No.: 103121-2007
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et at. including,
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Plain tvfs
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, New York 10036
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Flo
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COIJK'L' OF THE STATE OF NEW Y ORK
-_- COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOKK com'ry
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATJ ON
i I.A.S. Part 30
j (IIeitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 119388/00,
. ANNA __ E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY !
AND PERSONAL mPRESENTATIVE FOR
j
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP,
-against-
[ NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, \ MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,
-
Defendants. 1
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Courter & Company, Inc.
MCGIWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Estate of David Blenkensopp ikensopp
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,
YENBERG, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New lew York 10003
I
APR 2 6 2011
N0040478-1

~ COUN‘I’Y
SUPREME COURl’ OF ‘1XE STATE OF NEW YORK
I __-- OF NEW YORK - -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 3U
0
j (HeitIer,.I.)
‘ms
-_i
DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 119388/0 , 104633/07
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY
AND PERSONAL REPFSSENTATIVE FOR
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, ; MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Defendants. ;
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
OTCDEmD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of David Blenkensopp F 1 L ‘’E D
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York 10003 /%pR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
NEW YORK
SO ORDERED,
wn
324-5661A
URKS OFF\@
N0040478-1

I Defendants.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOW
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
I NYCAL
0
ASBESTOS LlTIGATION
: 1.A.S. Part 3
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 119388/0 , 104633/07
ANNA E. BLENRENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY
i
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR
j
THE ESTATE OF DAVlD BLENKENSOPP, : NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, j MOTION AND ORDER
- --
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., etal.,
i
. WHEREFORE,' defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
110 opposition thereto,
' ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
1 Dated: New York, New York
011
A
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 York10003 kp[i 2 6 2011
(2 12) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
!'ti ..2' ':" C) (4 jS*
MJUh TY CLLRKI'S OFFICE'
454-9039
N004047X-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE sm-rE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
- - ~ -
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
- j (IIeitler, J.)
’THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
0
i Index No.: 119388/0 104633/07
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, INDIVIDUALLY
AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR
THE ESTATE OF DAVID BLENKENSOPP, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
.-
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Estate of David BIenkenso
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 York10003 ApR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
NEb ! ,‘t:q$L
COkrNTY CLERK‘S QFFlCE’
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler 2383-22469 27650
N0040478-1
1 5 20 fl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
................................................................. X
This Document Relates To:
ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP, as Personal
Representative for the Estate of DAVID
BLENKENSOPP and ANNA E. BLENKENSOPP,
Individually,
: NYCAL
* I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hen. Sheny Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff( s),
: Index No.: 104633-07
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 3 \ 3 o\ [\
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO, c o u ~ ~
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 536-3900
CLERKS OFFICE
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE
NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
JOEL GARLAND, Index No. 111905-2007
-against-
Plaintiff,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
MAfk1( 30,20 I
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, New York 10036
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Compan
Three Gateway Center, 1Topr
Newark, NJ 07102 *, d”
SO ORDERED,

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated ESdison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintifPs complaint against defendant Consolidated Fdison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEFLED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, dl claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edisan Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 100384925
Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
..................................... -X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Ann Shaw, as Executrix for the Estate
of Nathan Glowatz,
- against -
Plaintiff,
A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al.,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 116794/07
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
..................................... -X
WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6
DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE
and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc. , be dismissed with prejudice and without cos
Dated:
Brooklyn, New York
YlrL / 2011
E,
Michael Fanelli, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ann Shaw, as Executrix for the
Estate of Nathan Glowatz
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
(718) 855-9000
i-
r File No.: 10924-5662
So Ordered: Hon. Sherry K. Heitler AI% d 5 %Ill1
Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.
Inc.
E

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
___________-___---_-_______I__________
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
___l____l_____l____________________I__
X
This Document Relates to:
NATHAN GLOWATZ
- against -
Plaintiff,
NYCAL '
I.A.S. P art 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 116794/07
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant BURNHAM LLC, hereby requests sumrnai
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice LE
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint again:
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with prejudice, and there being r
opposition thereto,
ORDERED,
that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, all claims ar
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC,
prejudice and without costs.
ApR 2 6 'O'
e)
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Nathan Glowatz
Burn ham L LC
700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.: 11084-1451
SO ORDERED:
-

____-ll------__-----___________I______
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
___l-lfll----__-----------------------
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
This Document Relates to:
FELIX M. JUZDOWSKI
Plaintiff,
NYCAL
1.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No.: 116796/07
NO-OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
WHEREFORE,
defendant BURNHAM LLC,
hereby requests summar
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice La
and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint agains
defendant BURNHAM LLC, with
prejudice, and there being n
opposition thereto,
ORDERED,
that upon notice to all co-defendants, a ll claims an
cross claims against defendant BURNHAM LLC, be dismissed wit
prejudice and without costs.
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
Felix M. Juzdowski
Bum ham LLC
700 Broadway, 6t’’ Floor 177 Montague Street
New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York
212-558-5500 (718) 855-9000
Our File No.:

I___-A -
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
JAMES RUDGE and SONIA RUDGE,
Index No.: 102239-2008
Plaintiffs,
-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
I
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al. including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
flAK.Cd 30.20\ I
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor
New York, New York 10036
SO ORDERED,
r)
-
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
-
p R 2 6 2011
FILED
NJD03247vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
~____
.~
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
VICTOR REYNIAK AND SYBILLE REYNIAK, Index No. 102688/2008
X
-against-
Plaintiffs,
BARNSTEAD INTERNATIONAL, et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant General Electric Company hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant General Electric Company with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
General Electric Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without co s.
FILED '5
Dated:
New York, New York
MAW! 30.201 I
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, NY 10036
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12'h Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
A M 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190020/08
RICHARD R. PAUL,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. /
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation f/k/a The Duriron Company, Inc.,
I
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Flowserve Corporation
Richard R. Paul
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 1OOO$=
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
I L E D
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
951-0823 NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE
NO03895 1

.-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
[ (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190020/08
RICHARD R. PAUL,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Aurora Pump Company
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Richard R. Paul
Weitz & Luxenberg,
700Broadway 1 E
New York, New York 10003
1003-0261
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
JOHN 1. VAUGHAN and MARY VAUGHAN, Index No,: 190051-2009
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCEi CO. et al., including
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plointffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 fl
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein. Heitler, J.S.C.
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
FILE
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
CQUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'

NYC
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
WILLIAM D. SAKSEN JR. and ANNA SAKSEN,
Index No.: 190061-2009
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint
against defendant Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York. New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Weitz 81 Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
n I
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.
Sedgwick,
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L.C.
Three Gateway Center, 12' ~ QLED 1
Newark, NJ 07102
(973) 242-0002
APR 2 6 2011
so ORDERED,
NEW YORK
;ml Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
W-Y CLERK'S OFFICE'
NU256 127v 1

GREGORY AUGUSTINOWICZ and RUTH AUGUSTINOWICZ, Index No.: 19009 1-2 009
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et ai., including
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York. NeN Vnrk
Frank Ortiz, Esq. Dennis E. Vega, 0
Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintqfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
r;c)uNly CLERK‘S OFFICE!
NJl267896v I

SUPREME COWRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YO=,
I WCAL

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
JOHN SAKATIS AND MYRNA SAKATIS,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including FOSTER
WHEELER, L.L.C.,
Index No.: 190146-2009
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
SEDGWI
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for P/aint,ffs
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002
Dennis E.
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, L. L. C.
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
ApR 2 6 20’’
NU26795 I v 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
.....................................................................
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
.....................................................................
THOMAS LEAHY AND EVELYN LEAHY,
X
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Index No.: 190162-2009
3 M COMPANY et al. including,
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing'plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Belluck & Fox, LLP
Attorney for Plaintffs
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, New York 100
Stephen Nomidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Electric Company
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
FILED
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Al'l? 15 2011
NJl432735vl

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
FRANCISCO SALDIVAR,
Index No.: 190228-2009
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC et al. including, GENERAL
ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plaintgfs Attorneys for General Electric Y
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor Three Gateway Center, 12'h Flo L
New York, New York 10934, Newark, NJ 07102
APR 2 6 2011
D
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NJ/377998vl

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
KATHRYN THAUT, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RODNEY
THAUT, DECEASED,
Index No.: 190333-2009
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS et al. including,
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ANew York,m York
7
Ked W. Belluck, Esq.
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Belljck & Fox, LLP
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plain tiffs Attorneys for General El tric Company
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor Three Gateway Center, @' l o t E D
New York, New York 10036 Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
~O~~+l"'Y CLERK'S OFFICE
N J/403242v 1

~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~
1-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
...
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
WILLIAM EDWARD TURNER and ZELLA
FARIS ZELLA,
Plaintiff(@,
-against-
Index No. : 190349/2009
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION,
named Individually and as Successor to Farris Valves and/or Sprague Pumps (“CURTISS-
WRIGHT”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff‘s complaint against Defendant Curtiss-
Wright with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Curtiss-Wright be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
CAMBRIDGE
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100
New York, NY 10022

THOMAS WILLIAMS and
KATHLEEN WILLIAMS, his wife,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
LITIGATION (NYCAL)
ASBESTOS MATTER
INDEX NO.: 190350/2009
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.
WHEWFORE, defendant AMEC Construction Management, I C. (“ACMI”), sued
incorrectly herein “individually, as successor to and formerly known as The Morse Diesel
Company and Morse Diesel International, Inc.,” hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
Plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant, ACMI with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and crossclaims against
defendant ACMI be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
8 ,2011
Salvatore G. Gangemi
110 William Street, 26‘h Floor
700 White Plains Road, Suite 338
New Yark, New York 10038
Scarsdale, New York 10583
(212) 267-3091 (914) 725-5800
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendants AMEC

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Judge Heitler)
Index No. : 190350-2009
-against-
Plaintiffs,
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPNAY, et a1 ,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
RE: APRIL 2011 IN-
WHEREFORE, defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC.,
hereby request summary judgement in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a
FISCHBACH & MOORE, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants all claims and cross claims against
defendant EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCXXBACH & MOORE, INC., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Albertson, New York
/+: 1 $ ,2011
%
KUSH SHUKLA, ESQ
Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.
. .
Attorcey fcr PlaLEaff---- - --- -. I
110 William Street - 26" Floor
New York, New York 10038
SO ORDERED,
AHMUTY, DEMERS & McMANUS
- - -?2mrneys fa D M a - __ -
EX-FM, INC. f/k/a FISCHBACH
& MOORE, INC.,
200 I.U. Willets Road
Albertson, New York 1150
FILED
(516) 535-5433
--Our File No.: TFZ 000102 FAQpR 2 6 ZO'

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
NATHANIEL MURRAY,
Index No.: 190036-2010
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
New York, New York 10036
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, UP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC
ee Gateway CentV21 F t
Newark, NJ 07102
E 0
SO ORDERED,
NJh77254vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190052/10
HILLIARD YOUNG AND SHIRLEY YOUNG,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, et al.,
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
; MOTION AND OFtDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
dPPIl- ,2011
Carol Tempesta, Esq. '
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
Hilliard Young and Shirley Young
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. A p 2 ~ 6
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
r,(3W ( I(
209
SO ORDERED,
2082-8993
NO0 17365-2

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler
CARLOS E. SIMMONS,
X
X
Index No. 190062-2010
-against-
Plaintiff (s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC. et al,, including
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
Joseph& Belluck, Esq.
Belluc Fox, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintflfs
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor
New York, NY 10036
Stephen hal6dis, Esq.
Sedgwick, Detert, Mora@& flmpld,
Attorneys for Foster W$@/er$ L&
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
i:;h
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klweitler, J.S.C.

04/08/2011 15:14 FAX
212 986 2255
EARLY STRAUSS
0 002/002
I
/
-against-
I
WHEREFOHF,, Dcfondent F1X)WSERVE CORPORATION SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO
DURAMETntlJC CORPORATION, incomdy sued 8.9 "PLOWSERVE US, INC. (individually
opposition thcrora,
I
ORDEFWD, that upon norice tn all co-dcfmdnstrs, all claims a d
cr0.u~ claim against OcI'mdanr
I)wamelallic be and the mnu arc hmby dismiosed with ptajudiec nnrl withaui coats to ciiher parry
Dated: New Yotk, New York
----I.-_.

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LlTlGATJON NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
FRANK X. HELSTAB AND
MELINDA J. HELSTAB,
-against-
AETNA HEALTH, INC., et. at.
-
Plaintiffs,
X
X
IndexNo. 190157/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
- - - ..
_. __
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant AETNA HEALTH INC. (Individually and as a Successor to ONE LIBERTY
PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.), erroneously sued as Successor to ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.,
(”AETNA HEALTH”), and AETNA INC. (Individually and as a Successor to NYL CARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.
and ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS INC.) erroneously sued as Successor to NYL CARE HEALTH PLANS,
INC. AND ONE LIBERTY PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC. ,(“AETNA INC.”) (collectively and hereinafter “AETNA”)
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant AETNA with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant AETNA be
and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York. New York
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SEDGWICK, DETER, MORXN &-ARNOLD,
LLC
Attorneys for Aetna
Three Gateway Center, 1 Zth Floor
360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor APR 2 6 20”
New York, NY 10017

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN FtE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190166/10
LOUIS DIGILIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
j NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New Y ork, New Y ork 10004
(212) 509-3456
I L E D
Louis Digilio
Weitz&Luxenberg,~.~.F
700 Broadway
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003
(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 2011
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
LOUIS DIGILIO,
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 190166/10
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
: NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
C..
I
and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Flowserve Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
9Attorney Louis Digilio for Plaintiffs FILED
*..a
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
NewYork,NewYork10003 APR 2 6 201’
NEW YORK
CLERKS OFFICE
co,,Nn
951-0882
APR 152Otl1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190166/10
LOUIS DIGILIO,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- [ MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, I
summary
ismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
Louis Digilio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
New York, New York IoOOF 1 L E D
N0038955-1
1122-23705

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190166/10
LOUIS DIGILIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
-- "
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
The Fairbanks Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
1
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Louis Digilio
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
(212) 558-5500
F\LE"
SO ORDERED,
Hon. She&
504-0621
N0038955-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190166/10
LOUIS DIGILIO,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al., I
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
411 ,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Louis Digilio
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
2082-9449
APR 152011 - a
59aV

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
X
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
(Judge Heitler)
X
This Document Relates to:
Index No.:190182/10
Richard W. Duquette and Doris H.
Duquet te ,
Plaintiffs,
- against - NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A.W. Chesterton Co., et al.,
MOTION AND ORDER
_________________I_--------
NYCAL
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Goulds
Pumps Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11
claims and cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps
Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs
I
I
d
Cullen and Dykman LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Richard W. Duquette and Doris Goulds Pumps Inc.
H. Duquette 177 Montague Street
360 Lexington Ave, lyn, New York 11201
New York, NY 10017
le No.: 6754-11018
So Ordered:
/

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
ALEJANDRO BAUTISTA,
Index No.: 190197-2010
-against-
AMERICAN STANDARD et al. including,
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
-ẇ2e-
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Pluintqfs
Attorneys for General Electric Company
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
New York, New York 10036 Newark,NJ07102 I
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry KW Heitler
NJI43273Yvl

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
/ (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190226/10
WILHELM PRANGE AND ROSEMARY
PRANGE,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
NO0389551
454-1 1948
0

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Won. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
WILHELM PFUNGE and ROSEMARY PFUNGE,
Index No.: 190226-2010
-against-
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, et al., including
JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC. hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant JOHNSON & TOWERS, WC. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
JOHNSON & TOWERS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York New York
Attorneys for Pluintfls
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500 n (973) 242-0002
Attorneys for Johnson & Towers, Inc.
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 071 02
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein H>tler, Hztler, J.S.C.
NJl433724v1
15 2011
AF'R 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
SOUIW*Y CLERK'S OFFICE

TMc:CCCjpk)
312811 1
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, NY 100035
on Company of New
York, Inc.
4 Irving Place
w York, NY p Or3t8 E D
SO ORDERED: *PR 2 6 2011
Our File No
S-4 12 1-1 0

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY’ OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No.: 10/190243
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
- against -
Plaintiff( s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,
Defendants.
WHEIREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (‘WEIL-
MCLAN’) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: q/q ,2011
/
i(* Jennifer L. Budner, Esq
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
Weil-McLain
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022
F I L E p
SO ORDERED,
APR 2 6 2011
NEi& YORK
WUNTY CLERK’S

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S, Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs,
Dated: New Y,ork, New York
Robert Da&h, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
Alphonse Maglio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New Y ork, New Y ork 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2571 -0033
NEW YORK
CLERK'S OFFICE'
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No,: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
A. C. & S., TNC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
I
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
,201 1
chd% H- k5USWl'E4t.
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Columbia Boiler
Alphonse Maglio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein'Heitler
APR 2 6 201'
NEW YORK
2SedbNm CLERK'S OFF-
N0038955-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs , ; NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
&a
,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Alphonse Maglio
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 FILED
(212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NEW YORK
COU~ CLERKS OFF-]
2082-9579

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, \ NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New,York, New York
Mattyie‘w w T. Fair1 422+
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
National Boiler Works, Inc.
Alphonse Maglio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003 FILED
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
fi
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
1801-27
N0038955-1
APR 2 6 201’

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
/ NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (j 3212, ismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Courter & Codphny, Inc.
Alphonse Maglio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 100
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, 2k.V
w-
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
-
1122-1277
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
LA.% Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs +
Dated: New Y k, New York
4p ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Aurora Pump Company
Alphonse Maglio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
ApR 2 6 2O’
SO ORDERED,
1003-03&~
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE? NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
/ Index No.: 190243/10
ALPHONSE MAGLIO,
-against-
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. [
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
The Fairbanks Company
Alphonse Maglio
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
/-3
\
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry klein Heitler
504-0633
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
NFLV YORK
W T Y CLERK'S OFFICE]
N0038955-1
APR 15 2011

A.O. SMITHE WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
Defendants.
d., '
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler.
: IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are
+
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants T
By:
David Chandler
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
Lawrence G. Lee
264 West 40' Street FILED
- -
New York. New York 100 18
APR 2 6 2 6
Dated: New York, New York
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'
$0 ORDERED:
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

Plaintiff,
-against-
A.O. SMITHE WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
Defendants.
: NO OPPOSITION
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER
A,, : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,
1 IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP
By:
700 Broadway
264 West 40' Street
New York. New York 10003 New York. New York 10018
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

~ Index
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
EDWARD SCHMID AND CARISTINE
SCHMID,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Plaintiffs,
No.: 190250/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
+.J
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
Edward Schrnid and Caristine
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
2011
APR 2 6
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein &itler
2571-0036

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190250/10
EDWARD SCHMID AND CARISTINE
SCHMID,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., TNC,, et al.,
Defendants. !
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
y/J ,2011
uw
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
C am w. ‘=et*,&-%.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Kentile Floors, Inc.
Edward Schmid and Caristine Schmid
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz 700 Broadway & Luxenberg, P.C. FILED
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 2011
NEW YOHK
SO ORDERED, . COUNT/ CLERKS OFFICE
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2082-9733
N0038955-1

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
' NYCAL
CHRISTINE SCHMTD, as Executrix for the Estate of :
Part 3o
EDWARD F. SCHMID, and CHRISTINE SCHMID, : (Hen. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
BURNHAM, LLC., et al.,
-against-
: Index Na. : 190250- 10
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANI)
ORDER
Defendants.
________________________________________-------------------------
X
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO., on behalf of named defendants Crane Co. and
Pacific Valves, Individually and as a subsidiary of Crane Co. (hereinafter "CRANE CO."),
I
!
i
j
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
(I
!
WEITZ & LUXENB-.~.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500 w-York, NY 10022
Hon. Sheiry KKn Heitler

~ I.A.S.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:
This Document Relates to:
MICHAEL V. MORENO
NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
against
Part 30
1 (Heitler, J.)
I
INDEX NO.: 190262/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
ABEX CORPORATION, ET AL
WHEREFORE, defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Johnston Boiler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED: %Yo&dew York
\ GcL\\
HOAQLAND, LONQO
MORAN. DUNST 8
DOUKAS. LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
NORTH JERSEY
40 PATERSON ST
PO BOX 480
NWBRUNWCK, NJ
SOUTH JERSEY
701 WTSEY'S MILL RD
SUITE 202
HAMMONTON, NJ
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
Johnston Boiler Co.
40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480
New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
SO ORDERED: -
Attor ne ys for Plaint iff (s),
Michael V. Moreno
800 Third Avenue - 13th Floor
New York, NY 10022
SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

__________----_______________l_f________-------------~-----------~-
X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
STEVEN GOOD. as Personal Representative for the
Estate of EDWARD T. GOOD,
NYCAL - IAS Part 30
-against-
PI ain t i ffs,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants.
_____*_r_________f_r_________r__________----------------------------
X
Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler
Index No.: I90263/10
No Opposition Summary
JudPment Motion and Order
WHEREFORE, Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212:
dismissing the plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant SLANT/FIN CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Marchgl2011
1 39h%
Nom J. Golub
WElTZ dL LUXENBERG, P.C.
Marshall Cohway Wright & Bradley, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant Slant/Fin Corporation
700 Broadway
1 16 John Street, qth Floor
New York, New York 10003
New York, New York 10038
(212) 558-5500 (212) 619-4444
FILED

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190269/10
GLENN RITZEL,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the Same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
f-7 ,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
Glenn Ritzel
McGivNEY & UUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New Y ork 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2082-9815
N0038955-1
ApFi 1 5 20 11

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i 1,A.S. Part 30
[ (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
I j Index No.: 190269110
GLENN RITZEL,
"against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yqrk, New York
The Fairbanks Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
n
Glenn Ritzel
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York
(21 2) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, -
Hon. Sherry KleiTHeitler
504-0659
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190270/10
JOSEPH MULLEN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
73, ,2011
Attorney Michele J. for Mittlk'man, Defendant Esq.
1Attorney for Plaintiffs
Treadwell Corporation
Joseph Mullen
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003 F\@
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
N0038955- 1
123523379

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190270/10
JOSEPH MULLEN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., el d.,
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,
summary
ismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
qq ,2011
1Attorney for Plaintiffs
Joseph Mullen
MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New Y ork 10004
New York, New York 100
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
N0038955-1

190270/10
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant BWLP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
OFtDERF,D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BWIP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New Yo New York
44%///
'E.
h~p, 2 6 ZQl'
f Ai
\.:1 l.",$SK
I
auPj
OPPW
Ted Eder, Esq.
&-)UN ry CLERK'S
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MAHONEY, LTD.
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant
New York, NY 10003
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190270/10
JOSEPH MULLEN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
&i?k&
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
The Fairbanks Company
Joseph Mullen
MCGIVNEY & KI,UGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New Y ork, New Y ork 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
504-0658
N0038955-1
APR 15 2011

SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
x
This Document Relates to: Index No. 190288/10
X
AARON RICHMAN
X
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant The Montalvo Corporation (sued herein as “Montalvo
Corporation [The]” ) (hereinafter “Montalvo”) hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Montalvo with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
by dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor
150 Broadway, Suite 600
New York, New York 10036
New York, New York 10038
(212) 681-1575 (212) 791-0285
D
APR 15 2011

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
1,A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 190297/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Pi
Attorney for Defendant
Patterson Pump Co.
Estate of Robert Thater
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York. New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
New York, New York 10003 ' -
LpR 2 6 N'
\
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
454-11953

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190297/10
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE !
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
/-\
Attorney for Defendant
The Fairbanks Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
cw i4+ kps"7,Esp
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Robert Thater
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York I0003
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
-.".",...
y\pN ~o:KoFF\Go'
LE@
SO ORDERED, " c,ouN~
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
504-0648
N0038955-1
D

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs ,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190297/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
d-
Dated: New ork, New Y ork
,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Aurora Pump Company
MCGJVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
k
vf kL
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Robert Thater
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
Fqq, uI/.
FILED
New York, New York 10004 NewYork,NewYork 10003 APR 2 6 2011
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFlCt
1003-0392
N0038955-1
APR 13 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOFX
TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190297/10
ROBERT THATER,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New ork, New York
$7 ,2011
Laura B. Hollman, Esqf
Attorney for Defendant
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Robert Thater
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2047-47s
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190297/10
ROBERT THATER,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fWa The Duriron Company, Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
eachd6
N. %JdJQq,
ts$.
Matthew T. Fairley, E@.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Flowserve Corporation
Estate of Robert Thater
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 APR 2 6 2011
Weitz&Luenberg,~.F I L E D
,.e
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE
951-896
N003895S-I
APR 15 2011

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YOK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190297/10
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,
/ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
/ MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Falk Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintif€s’
complaint against defendant, Falk Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Falk Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York New York
.rJl ,2011
Matthew T. Fairley, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Falk Corporation
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
C h k @- Rmcr, K ,
Attorney for Plaintiffs ’-3
Estate of Robert Thater
WeitzaLuxenLrg, p.c. F 1 L E D
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20”
SO ORDERED,
r4E-N Y QRK
875-0068
N0038955-1
APR I52011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
Index No.: 190297/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants ,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, hc., with prejudice in this
9 .*
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.’
Attorney for Defendant
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Robert Thater
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New Yark, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
**e
2041415
N0038955-1

!I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190297/10
THOMAS THATER, AS EXECUTOR FOR THE i
ESTATE OF ROBERT THATER,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules 0 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition
.,..
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Matthew T. Faid&, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Flowserve Corporation
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Robert Thater
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York. New York 10004 n New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
SO ORDERED,
N0038955- I
Hon. Sherry mein Heitler
951-896

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
THOMAS THATER, as Executor for the Estate of
ROBERT THATER,
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al., :
Defendants.
A-
:
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Index No.: 190297-10
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and Without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway CRANE CO. ApR 2 6 20''
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 b:E,w yoM
OFF\=*
(212) 536-3900 , dry CLERKS
t'X3L.E
SO ORDERED,
APR I5 2011

,&-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
_________11_1_________________t_________-~---*-*----
X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
_________---_I”-_~-_f__________________”~---------------------------
X
This Document Relates To:
: Index No. 19030U10
DONALD B. SISSON and PATRICIA SISSON,
-against-
Plaintiff(s), : NO OPPOSITION
: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
: MOTION AND ORDER
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
: IASPart39
WHEREFORE, defendant Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. (“Crown”) hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 321 2, dismissing plaintiff‘s
complaint against Crown with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Crown be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: N w Yor ,NewYork
3#/3+,/
EARLY & STRAUSS L.L.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FL,EMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON ZAUDERER LLP
n Cork & Seal USA, Inc.
By: ~~
ark Bibro, Esq,
360 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
(212) 986-2233 (212) 412-9500
360951/21108

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
i
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190311/10
ALVIN BICKEL AND MARIAN BICKEL,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
we
Dated: Ne York, New York
q77 ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Patterson Pump CO.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Alvin Bickel and Marian Bickel @%+
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. r,
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
'- -&--'
SO ORDERED,
_*. ~"
-w
Hon. Sherry Kxn Heitler
454-1 2019

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190312/10
DONALD JEFFERY AND CINDY JEFFERY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Yojk, New York
Attorney for Defendant
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (21 2) 558-5500
Donald Jeffery and Cindy Jeffery
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
* FILED i
SO ORDERED, APR 2 6 2011
Hon. Sherry Klein Hkitler
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190314/10
ANGELINA VINTICINQUO AND VINCENT
j
VINTICINQUO,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
I
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGEK, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Angelina Vinticinquo and Vincent Vinticinquo
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
FFICE~
SO ORDERED,
NO03895 5- 1
APR 15 2011
2571-0674

-against-
Plaintiff( s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BW/P, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, Ney Yo&
SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MAHONEY, LTD.
700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant
New York, NY 10003 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190315/10
RICHARD FOLEY AND ANNA FOLEY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
The Fairbanks Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Richard Foley and Anna Foley
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
!
New York, New York 10004 FILED 1
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDEED,
504$@y~
APR 2 6 2011
ww Y9WK
i Y CLERK'S OFFICE'
N0038955-1
APR 16 4011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
. COWTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
I NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S.Part30
I
,(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
I
i Index No.: 190323/10
MANUEL A. CHINEA AND JANET M. CHINEA, I
-against-
Plainti ff(s),
AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.,
..
-. . . - -- - -
Defendant( . s)
- -. . --
I
I
I
I
i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
I
I
I -- - - .. . - -. - .
WHEREFORE, defendant Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and moss claims against
defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
I
. . I
I
,!,.
Dated: New York, New York
ppd r)- ,2011
Robert Darish Esq.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
r i a Ea&/
EARLY & STRAUSS, L.L.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.
Manuel A Chinea and Jan
80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor
360 Lexington Avenue, 20
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York. 10017
(212) 509-3456 (212) 986-2233 6 ~ 6 20;F'f ~ ~ 2
SO ORDERED,
_+^ * "
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler APR 1
tqF.'!JV Yon%
URNS OFF@;
066477
INOM2278- I }

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
JAMES PALUMBO and CONCElTA PALUMBO,
Index No.: 190329-2010
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., Individually and as Successor to
Amtico Floors, et al. including,
GATES CORPORATION,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plaint#fs
Attorneys for The Gates Corporation
700 Broadway Three Gateway Center,
New York, New York 10003
Newark, NJ 07102
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002
SO ORDERED,

THEODORE DENARO and CARMELA DENARO, Index No.: 190331-2010
BMCE INC. et al. including,
GATES CORPORATION,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
(7\ -
David A.h&&!f 1 . Dennis E. Vega, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for The Gates Corporution
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center,
New York, New York 10003
Newark, NJ 07102
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS
LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE
JOSEPHINE GOGEL,
Index No.: 190332/10
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDMENT MOTION AND
ORDER 1
V.
Blwintiff(s),
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendan t(s).
-----______________"11__________________---*-------------------------
WHEREFORE, defendant, MEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, NEEM MANUFACTURING
COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, NEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, be and the same are hereby is
&*Q
bVR
6 TQ'
@$OFF\@
UN-8 GLE
Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.
Braaten & Pascarella, LLC
AttorneyW Plaintiff(s)
Attorneys for Defendant
546 Fifth Ave, 4th Floor Rheem Manufacturing Company
New York, NY 10036 2430 Route 34
(212) 681-1575
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736
(732) 528-8888
SO ORDERED,
Honorable Sherry K. Heitler
fl APR 152011

NYCAL
I.A.S, Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
This Document Relates To:
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Index No.: 190332-10
WHEREFORE, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/Ma BECHTEL COW.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES
INC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
OIRDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
LANDMAN CORSI BALLAIN co &rn%TtOFFICe.
(212) 681-1575
SEQUOIA VENTURES INC.
fMa BECHTEL COW.
120 Broadway, 27th Floor
New York, New York 10271 -0079
(212) 238-4800
So Ordered:
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
,::ODMNPCDOCS/WOCSNYIS I4405/1

.._
This Document Relates to:
WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE
JOSEPHINE GOGEL,
V.
Plaintiff(s),
Index No.: 190332llO
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendant(s).
WHEREFORE, defendant, BIRD INCOWORATED hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendants, BIRD INCORPORATED with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereo,
ORDERED, that
notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
New York, New York 10036
(212) 681-1575
PASCARELLA, LLC
Attorney for Defendant
BIRD INCORPORATED
2430 Route 34, Suite A-18
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736
Judge Sherry Klein Heitler

~ ~~~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates To:
Index No.: 190332/10
WILFRED JOSEPH GOGEL and CATHERINE
JOSEPHINE GOGEL,
V.
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, TRANE US INC. f/k/a AMERICAN STANDARD INC., hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants, TRANE US INC, f/Wa
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereo,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant TRANE US INC. flWa AMERICAN STANDARD INC., be and the sape p
dismissed wiArejudice and without costs.
1
.*aL
-- 4 fb
, r',
New York, New York 10036
(212) 681-1575
Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq.
BRAATEN & PASCARELLA, LLC
Attorney for Defendant
TRANE US INC. W a AMERICAN
STANDARD INC.,
2430 Route 34, Suite A- 18
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736
(732) 528-8888
Judge Sherry Klein Heitler APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190335A 0
SAM GALEN,
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New
Yb
ork, New York
,2011
Laura B. Hollman, E&.
Attorney for Defendant
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Sam Galen
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York
(212)558-5500 L E D ’
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 2 6
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
SAM GALEN,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
: NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
[ (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 190335/10
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. :
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
4/7 ' ,2011
Michele J. MittleKan, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwel I Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
Cbks Y. Fe54~q E S ~
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Sam Galen
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway cr*c
NewYork,New York %bod L E D
i
(212) 558-5500
N0038955- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190335/10
SAM GALEN,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, I
summary
ismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, he., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
New 700 Broadway
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
e3
C h k -fly-- -- FQUS", E+.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Sam Galen
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
York, New York 1000 FILED
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
f'iE\pd YOaK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF~C@
1122-23850
APR 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSEPH GEMELLARO AND CHRISTINE
GEMELLARO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190336/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
417 ,2011
K e e n C@!, Esq.
Attorney tor Defendant
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) . , 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
m /I/
Hon. Sherry Klein HAtler
Joseph Gemellaro and Christine Gemellaro
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New Yg 1 AoL E 0
(212) 558-5500
NELV %3RK
&EFKSOFFLcE)
N003895S-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSEPH GEMELLARO AND CHRISTINE
GEMELLARO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190336/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y,ork, New York
I
yb ,2011
I
-9
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attornev for Defendant
The FaGbanks Company
Joseph Gernellaro and Christine Gemellaro
MCCIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite
c
2300
700 Broadway FILED
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
(212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
SO ORDERED,
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE-
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
N0038955-1
504-0649

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j T.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190337/10
EDWARD C. KELLEY,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
The Fairbanks Company
Edward C. Kelley
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 1000
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
@aih 2 6 20’
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Kle& Heitler
504-0654
V\\E’d cIsRI(’s .ranK OFFIG@
N0038955-1
APR I 5 zow

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190337/10
EDWARD C. KELLEY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. /
WHEREFORE, defendant, Karnak Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in !
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Karnak Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Karnak Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Karnak Corporation
Edward C. Kelley
MCGWNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
New York,New York 10003 F 1 L E
N0038955-1
APR 18 9611

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j LAS, Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190337/10
EDWARD C. KELLEY,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yoyk, New York
Laura B. Hollman, E&.
Attorney for Defendant
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Edward C. Kelley
Weitz & ~uxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
N003895S-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190338/10
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH
GENNOSA,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
“r/7 ,2011
Attorney c for hark%. Plaintiffs
Aurora Pump Company Rosalie Gennosa and Josep Gennosa I
MCGlVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
4-
Fr>k%*D ’!
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APR 2 6 20’’
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 NEW YORK
CLERKIS OFFGE‘
SO ORDERED, h
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
1003-4 16
GoUNn

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH
GENNOSA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190338/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
$7 ,2011
- - -
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Columbia Boiler
Rosalie Gennosa and Josep
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Shewy Klein Heitler
kL kluw, E$%.
2572-20
APR 2 6 ""
c%wJ
pEVJ YOHK
(-J~=RKS O ~ F d

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No,: 190338/10
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH
GENNOSA,
j NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway r
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
.I (212) 558-5500 APR 2 6 20''
SO ORDERED,
N003895S-1
Hon. Sherr-kin
Heitler
-.
2571-0677
I3

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH
GENNOSA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants. !
j Index No.: 190338/10
i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc,, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
C 9Attorney for arks Plaintiffs
M. rwm> EST
National Boiler Works, Inc.
Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
FILED
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
1
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
F.~ZW YORK
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE’
N0038955-1
1801-0030

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT EFERS TO:
ROSALIE GENNOSA AND JOSEPH
GENNOSA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 190338/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
417 ,2011
CkfE M. Lp.S%, E.%.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Rosalie Gennosa and Joseph Gennosa
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, A
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
11223iiwP
LpR 2 6

ROSALIE GENNOSA and JOSEPH
GENNOSA,
-against-
Plaintiff( s),
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
: NYCAL
: I.A.S. Part30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No.: 190338-10
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
and Crane Co., improperly sued as “PACIFIC VALVES, Individually and as a subsidiary of
Crane Co.,” (hereinafter “CRANE CO.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and Without costs.
Dated:
a k
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
for Defendant
ED
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NY-857883 vl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A,S, Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE
GENNOSA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants. !
i Index No.: 190340/10
[ NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
Dated: New York, New York
41-1 7 201 1
I
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Columbia Boiler
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
chsrla M. ~3.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100 FILED,
(212) 558-5500
,Q&NTY
APR 2 6 2011
h'FW YBI-7.K
CLERKS OFFICE'
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
______
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE
GENNOSA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
P1aint i ffs ,
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
Index No,: 190340/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Chk V.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Won. Sherry Klein Heitler
Fe+t~m, E%*
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10 EILED
APR 2 6 2011
hJFllV YORK
ra~bk~ CLERK'S OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190340/10
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE
GENNOSA,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New,York, New York
917 ,2011
Attorney for Defendant I
National Boiler Works, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 1
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 F I L E D
‘
t
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
4pR 2 6 2011
Ff/c~’

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190340/10
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE
GENNOSA,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
\
Attorney
c for G fPlaintiffs
k M.
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway B1"t:
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
A@!'*2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
4! YORK
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler C ERKS OFFICE:'
N0038955-1
APR 132011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No,: 190340/10
JOSEPH GENNOSA AND ROSALIE
GENNOSA,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,2011
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Aurora Pump Company
Joseph Gennosa and Rosalie Gennosa
MCGIVNEY & KLTJGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10 3
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
ARR 2 6 2011
FILED
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherrywn Heitler
b!EW YORK
CLERK’S OFFtE’
N0038955-1
APR 152011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JAMES A. HAZELL AND STEFAN1 HAZELL,
j Index No.: 190341/10
!
-against-
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
c
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
James A. Hazell and Stefani Hazell
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
__-"_frll_______----_--------------------"-------"-~~-------------
This Document Relates To:
: NYCAL
JAMES A. HAZELL and STEFAN1 HAZELL, : I.A.S. Part 30
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s),
: IndexNo.: 190341-10
-against-
: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
CBS CORPORATION, et al.,
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND
: ORDER
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
I
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs
@*; 2: 6 2@It
700 Broadway
CRANE CO.
New York, NY 10003
599 Lexington Avenue
YOBK Of F d
(212) 558-5500 New York, NY 10022 &WS
(212) 536-3900
.-
SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
: (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
BERNARD D'AQUILA AND MARY ANN
D'AQUILA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., el al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 190343/10
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Nork. New York
q7 ' ,2011
Michele J. MittlernLn, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 @ 2
SO ORDERED,
1235-23412
N0038955-1
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190343/10
BERNARD D'AQUILA AND MARY ANN
D'AQUILA,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-againstj
MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New ork, New York
rh ,2011
pn:m;c.-
Chfk H.-FeguSDn,E&t.
@tomey for Attorney for Plaintiffs
ourter & Co
Bernard DAquila and
MCGIVNEY & UGER, P.C. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York I0004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
of e
1122-23791
N003895S-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190344/10
RONALD HANZE AND CAROL HANZE,
Plaintiffs, / NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- / MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., mC., et d.,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YON
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190351/10
ANTHONY CORINO AND ANTOINETTE
CORINO,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
- - E;+-.
R&ert Darish, Esq. qw, -5
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
vE”z€
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Anthony Corino and Antoi
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. D
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
ApR 2 6 lo”
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
CLERKS OFF‘€
couNn
N003895S-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190357/10
GIULIO LOCCISANO,
-against-
A. C, & S,, INC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York New York
41; ,2011
-\
Carol M. Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGWY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Ch/es-t+
kp,, ,b$.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Giulio Loccisano
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 FILED
(212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2082-10351
biFW YORK
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE'

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
1,A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190357/10
GIULIO LOCCISANO,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York New York
411’ ,2011 I.
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Giulio Loccisano
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
454-12065

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190357/10
GIULIO LOCCISANO,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
417 ,2011
OkGedeo Attorney for N. Defendant Okoh, Esq.
The Fairbanks Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
1Attorney for Plaintiffs
Giulio Loccisano
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100
(212) 558-5500
I
SO ORDERED, - -
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190358/10
ARTHUR J, MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
r/7 ,2011
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
n
e
dmh rZ. %o.l, E+.
dmh rZ. %o.l, E+.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
(212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2011
N0038955-1

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 190358/10
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants,
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co,, with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York New York
yI7 , ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Fq~wq ESP
ChGAtS N..
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
(2 12) 558-5500
N0038955-1

SUPEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No,: 190358/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
q7 ,2011
-
-
Roiert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
n
ChdK b.1: k54SD7, E?.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway FILED
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 2o1'
SO ORDERED, \
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2571-0771
N00389SS-I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190358/10
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
/ NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
y/7 ,2011
Attorney Carol M. for Tempesta, Defendant Esq.
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
7Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
New 700 Broadway York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
!LED
~ P R 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
N00389SS-1
zosz-r@
>!€$,I YORK
,,N’py CLERKS OFFid

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190358/10
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
-4--
Dated: New Y rk, New York
,2011
Chd3 M. kpw, ‘s9.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Treadwell Corporation
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 100
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
FILED
SO ORDERED,
Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler
ApR 2 6 20’’
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YON COUNTY \ NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC,, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190358/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Karnak Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Karnak Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Karnak Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
yI, ,2011
b
Attorney for Defendant
Karnak Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur 1. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
N0038955-1
78 1 -0038

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LI'TIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
; Index No.: 190358/10
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
i NO OPPOSITION
Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et ul.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE7 defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
f7 ,2011
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur J. Mediate and
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500 hpR 2 6 2011
454-9409
NO03895 S- 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
ARTHUR J. MEDIATE AND HARRIET
MEDIATE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 190358/10
i
NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants,
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Chad6 &1*
kpm, k>.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Arthur J. Mediate and Harriet Mediate
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10
(212) 558-5500
APR 2 6 20'1
NEN YOHK
myp CLERKS OFFICk
1 9
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
: (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190365/10
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York. New York -
'Michelle D. Grady, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Aurora Pump Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Chd0 H. %UJa7, $.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Raymond E. Wool
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
FILED
LPR 2 6 20''
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
y Klzn Heitler
APR 15 zom
1003-042 1

~ ~~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY ,,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 19036511 0
[ NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
1
Dated: New xqrk, New York
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Raymond E. Wool
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
WeitzkLuxenberg,~.~. I L E D
SO Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York. New York 10004, New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFIa'
1122-23852
N00389SS-1

SUPREME cowr OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190365/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
/, 717 ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Columbia Boiler
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
A
c-hqcps u. PSli807, e$.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 100
(212) 558-5500
I” .
SO ORDERED, -
v-
Hon. Sherry Klei2Heitler
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j
Index No.: 190365AO
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C,
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
j MOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A. C. & S,, INC., et al.,
Defendants. /
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Tnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Oakfabco, Inc.
Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey
MCGIVNEY & KLUGEK, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
2571-772
N0038955-1
APE I 5 7011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
DOUGLAS J. WOOLSEY, AS PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF
RAYMOND E. WOOLSEY, AND EDNA C.
WOOLSEY, INDIVIDUALLY,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190365/10
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Yor , New York
/3n $7 ,2011
Y, ,
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Estate of Raymond E. Woolsey
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
BpR 2 6 2Q"
N0038955-1

WHEREFORE, defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation hereby requests s m q
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Parker Hannifin Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
800 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
21 2.605.6200
SO ORDERED,
Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.
U
McCarter & English, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Parker Hannifin Corporation
245 Park Avm,I D
NewYork,Ne Yo 1
2 12.609.6800
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE'
ME1 11161989v.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JAMES GUCK and JOAN GUCK,
X
NYCAL
Index No. 10/190368
-V-
Plaintiff(s),
A,O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Justice Sherry K. Heitler
I
I
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's
complaint against defendant Hopeman Brothers, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Hopeman Brothers, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
D a t e m r k % r York
, 2011
LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, L.L.P.
DARGER & ERRANTE LLP
SO ORDERED:
+- (21 2) 452-5300

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J,)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190370/10
ARUNKUMAR PATEL,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. [
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
7/77 ,2011
Attorney Carol M. for Ternpesta, Defendant E s F
Kentile Floors, Inc.
Arunkurnar Patel
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 700 Broadway APR 2 6 2011
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S 6FFm
7Attorney for Plaintiffs P I L E I)
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry KleK Heitler
2082- 10382

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MICHAEL C, SACCENTO AND CATHERINE
SACCENTO,
"against-
A, C. & S., INC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i
Index No.: 19037611 0
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
I
I
!
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y k, New York
$ ,2011
Carol M. Teipesta, Esq. "
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3456
Michael C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
NO038955-1
Hon, Shdrry Klein Heitler
2082-1 0384

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YON
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
-
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MICHAEL C. SACCENTO AND CATHERINE
SACCENTO,
-against-
Plaintiffs,
Index No.: 19037611 0
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
417 ,2011
Michele J. Mittlef;;an, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Michaei C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 558-5500
__,_"...
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
1235-23481

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
MICHAEL C. SACCENTO AND CATHERINE
SACCENTO,
"against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
j Index No.: 190376/10
!
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
i
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
Dated: New Yo k, New York
,2011
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNT( CLERKS OFFICE'
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Michael C. Saccento and Catherine Saccento
McGrwY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
NO03 8955- 1
Hon. Sherry Kfein Heitler
1122-23857

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
GEORGIANA TANSOSCH, Individually and as Executrix of
the Estate of CHRISTOPHER T. TANSOSCH, Deceased,
1.
NYCAL
Index No. 190382/20 10
-against-
Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
including SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.,
Defendants.
._
WHEREFORE, defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (incorrectly sued herein as Sears, Roebuck
and Company) (hereinafter “Sears”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
defendant Sears with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Sears be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
March 22,201 1
BELLUCK & FOX, LLP
546 Fifth Avenue, 4“ Floor 150 Broadway, Suite 600
New York, New York 10036
New York, New York 10038
APR 2 6 2u11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant
Christopher Tansosch, et al. Sears, Roebuck and Co. fwv YORK
(212) 681-1575 .TO285 ‘OUNw cLERRs
SO ORDERED,
APR 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190384/10
FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al,,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation Wa The Duriron Company, Inc.,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation
fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation fMa The Duriron Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
L*
”
Matthew Attorney T. for Fakley, Defendant Esq. Attorney c for 6 Plaintiffs bf- FeQltSO,, “SS
Flowserve Corporation
Francis P. McPadden
D !
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz&Luxenberg,P.C.F \ t E
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(2 12) 509-3455
SO ORDERED,
951-894
N0038955- 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
j (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No,: 190384/10
FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,
magainst-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
@k*
Carol M. Tempesta, Esk. ’
Gl+s cl. FegmTJ/Zs&
Dated: New York, New York
,2011
4-l ’
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Francis P. McPadden
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York ]OF I L E D
SO ORDERED,
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
f349tJM34d CLERKS OFFj@
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190384/10
FRANCIS P. MCPADDEN,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. /
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
The Fairbanks Company
Francis P. McPadden
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 100
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
N00389SS-1
AP63 15 2011

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No.: 190384/10
FRANCIS McPADDEN,
- against -
AC and S, Pic., (ARMSGTRONG
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,
Plaintiff(s),
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC,, hereinafter ("WEIL-
MCLAIN") hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-
McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Dated: qhf ,2011
New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
700 Broadway Attorneys forDefendant I E D
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
H
Weil-McLain
850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022 ApR 2 6 2011
"W-Y
IVEW YORK
CLERRS OFFcE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
MARVIN EISENBERG and LORRAINE EISENBERG,
X
X
Index No. 190397-2010
-against-
Plaint iff (s),
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
CARRIER CORPORATION et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC
*
COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewY k, ewYork
Attorneys for Plain tvfs
Attorneys for General Electric Company
546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Flo
Three Gateway Center, 12‘h Floor
New York, NY 10036 -. Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
MARVIN EISENBERG and LORRAINE EISENBERG,
-against-
Plaint iff (s),
CARRIER CORPORATION et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.
X
X
Index No. 190397-2010
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
Attorneys for Plaint$fs
546 Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor
New York, NY 10036
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran 81 Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for General Elec
Three Gateway Center, 12
Newark, NJ 07102
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
8% . . I. -

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THOMAS J. COYNE and SUZANNE COYNE,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA (ALCOA). et al. including,
GATES CORPORATION,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Index No.: 190399-2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
APE\\ 13, tot1
."
Patti Burshtyn, Esq. Dennis E. VegcEsq," - (d
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys far The Gates Corporation
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
(212) 558-5500 -0002 F 1 L E D
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR 2 6 20''
NJ/4343 18v 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190399/10
THOMAS J, COYNE AND SUZANNE COYNE,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
q/7 ,2011
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Tnc.
Thomas J. Coyne and Suz
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. Weitz & Luxenberg, ., P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York I0004
New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456
A~~ 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
couNn CL€RKS OFFICE:
2082- io534

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
JULIO C. CARAY and ROX ANA GARAY, Index NO. 190404-2010
X
X
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al., including
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
Apd 13,201 I
7 -.-
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Weitr & Luxenberg, P.C.
Sedgwick, Detert, Mora
Attorneys far Plaintil'fs
Attorneys for General Ele
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center, 12
New York, NY 10003
Newark, NJ 07102
(212) 558-5500 973) 242-0002 ApR 2 6 20'
SO ORDERED,
--- ~
-II

NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
JULIO C. GARAY and ROX ANA CARAY,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
BORG-WARNER CORPORATION et al. including,
GATES CORPORATION,
Index No.: 190404-2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant THE GATES CORPORATION, sued herein as GATES CORPORATION
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant GATES with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
THE GATES CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
- ..
' -.k>/-d2-
New York, New York
A+il 13, 201 I
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintvfs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
. . (973) 242-0002
Dennis E. V e g a r
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for The Gates Corporation
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
LPR 2 6 ZO'

~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
X
JULIO C. GARAY and ROXANA GARAY,
-against-
Plaintiff(s),
BORC-WARNER CORPORATION et al., including
CATERPILLAR INC.,
Index No. 190404-2010
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant CATERPILLAR INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant CATERPILLAR INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
CATERPILLAR INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
New York, New York
APKll l3,20\ I
.
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.
Stephen Novakidis, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintffs
Attorneys for Caterpillar Inc.
700 Broadway
Three Gateway Center, 12fh Floor
New York, NY 10003
Newark, NJ 07102
(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002
SO ORDERED,
4
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
WRFx
FtLED
rr)UN
LpFl 2 6 zo"
F F d
C@KS O

-against-
Plaintiff,
New York Asbestos
Litigation (NYCAL)
Index No.: 190404/2010
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC,, et al.. ,
WHEREFORE, defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, NC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA,
INC.? with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
&+,I 13 ,2011
LAWN, O'NETL, FUCCI, CEDRONE
& DiSIPIO n
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
By:
Tirnothga cHugqEsq.
Attorneys for Defendant
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 335
Graybar Building
New York, New York 10170
(212) 3 19-6898
Our'File No.: 6087-95
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
SO-ORDERED:

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190411/10
PATRICIA A. FOLEY AND THOMAS FOLEY, j
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,il ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Columbia Boiler
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Patricia A. Foley and Thomas Foley
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
FILED I
(2 12) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler
--..
APR 2 6 2011
N0038955-1

NYCAL
I.A,S. Part 30
('Heitleq I)
April 201 1 In Extremis Group
LUIS ODDO,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Index No. 190414/2010
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY Wa US.
PLYWOOD CORPORATION hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case
pwsuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiff's Complaint against
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY s/h/a U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY &/a U.S. PLYWOOD CORPORATION, be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SO ORDERED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190415/10
LINCOLN CATHERS AND NANCY CATHERS,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
Dated: Ne York, New York
J7 ,2011
I
e,
Chrk-
/- >
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
uEj;)nl E?.
Aurora Pump Company
Lincoln Cathers and Nancy
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
-
PPLED
APR 2 6 2011
NEW YORK
COUNT( CLERK'S OFFICE'
N0038955-1 15 2011
1003-0430

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK -*.
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190416/10
RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA, /
-against-
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being
I ..
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
497 ,2011
Carol M Ternpesta, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Kentile Floors, Inc
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Raymond Carella and Edna Carella
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C,
New 700 Broadway 03
(212) 558-5500
/ APR 2 6 2011
York, New York 1 FILED
+.
so ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NEW YORK
~ N I - CLERKS Y OFFICE'
2082-10554

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
' NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190416/10
RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Co., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Co., with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Patterson Pump Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Lf!7 ,2011
Patterson Pump Co.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
w m WCp-dgyt)E+
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Raymond Carella and Edna Carella
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
FILED .
ApR 2 6 20"
N0038955-1

~
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190416/10
RAYMOND CARELLA AND EDNA CARELLA,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for Defendant
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plainti
Raymond Carella and Edna Carella
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York IOOF \ le E
(212) 558-5500
9636PgU N n
APB 2 6 ‘”’
p$”\’d Y ORK
CLERKS oFFd

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
\ (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190416/10
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,
j
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
ql? 7
Dated: New York, New York
(-LQ-Qh 0.
Michelle D. Grady,Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Aurora Pump Company
Chqrles M. evWGp
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
New 700 Broadway York, New York 1000 FILED
(212) 509-3456
(212) 558-5500
24iikkL
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
YORK
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
APR I5 2011
i o o W
ERKS OFFICE:
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190416/10
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE7 defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, National Boiler Works, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs,
Dated: New York, New York
417 ,2011
Matthew Attorney T. for Fairley, Defendant Esq.
National Boiler Works, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
j
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York IO0
NO03895 5- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190416/10
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Lp ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Columbia Boiler
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York I0003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
N0038955-1
2572-18
APR 1520111

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
LOWELL COOPER AND GRACIE COOPER,
! NYCAL
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
j Index No.: 190416/10
!
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
! SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants. !
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
i
I
i
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
Dated: New York New York
417 ' ,2011
Robert Darish, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Oakfabco, Inc.
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
chla h- k-5
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Lowell Cooper and Gracie Cooper
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
2571-35
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190417/10
DANIEL ZNK AND DOROTHY ZINK,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
i SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
i
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y
'11;
k, New York
,2011
Michelle D. Grady, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Aurora Pump Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Daniel Zink and Dorothy Zink
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
Q
New York, New York I0004 New York, New York 10003 \ E
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
1003-0433
N0038955-1
APR 15 2011

~ MD*"
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190417/10
DANIEL ZINK AND DOROTHY ZINK,
-against-
A. C. & S., NC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
Okwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
The Fairbanks Company
MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
Attorney for
Daniel Zink and Dorothy Zink
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
- NEwYORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE:
LhM Plaintiffs h. hw7, q,
SO ORDERED,
504-0679
N0038955-1 . d

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
[ (Heitler, J*)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
-against-
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler, with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Yo k, New York
q,’7 ,2011
I
Carol M. Tempesta, Esq. ’
Attorney for Defendant
Columbia Boiler
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Volkert J. Peters
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
>
700 Broadway
(212) 558-5500
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
2972-0028
c,Qu@
y\Ed YO@$ @O FF,G@
CLE
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
! (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J, PETERS,
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
j
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
i,p1 ,2011
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Volkert J. Peters
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
New York, New York 10003
(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
FILED
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
1 122-23870
NEW 'I'ORK
c~~~~ CLERKS OFFICE'
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
j I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J,)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
j Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
i MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Aurora Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Aurora Pump Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Aurora Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New ork, New York
42; ,2011
& !Kdb&Q-
Attorney Michelle D. for Grady, Defendant Esq.
3 8
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Aurora Pump Company
Volkert J. Peters
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
1 L E D
New York, New York IOOOF
APR 2 6 2011
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NEW YQRK
COUNT( CLERK'S OFFICE'
1003-0434

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
i I.A.S. Part 30
i (Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
i Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
A, C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION
j SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- j MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
lj97 ,2011
6kwedeo N. Okoh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
The Fairbanks Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, 2
N0038955-1
kg~s, Es
'%A6
Attorney for Plaintiffs 9.
Volkert J. Peters
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
Hon. Sherry Kl& Heitler
ILED
APR 2 6 2011
504-0678
NEW YORK
~ N T CLERK'S Y OFFICE]

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
ql7 ,2011
Michele 1. Mittlekan, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
Treadwell Corporation
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Volkert J. Peters
700 Broadway
New York, New York I0003
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
LpR 2 6 lo"
SO ORDERED,
1235-23500
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants,
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, George A. Fuller Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, George A. Fuller Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
$7 ,2011
kdJ4 ludkh,, -
Michele J. Mittledh, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
George A. Fuller Company
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Volkert J. Peters
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
FILED
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 jpR 2 6 ZO’’
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein\ Heitler
1224-0360
Nf3iv WRK
~ L E R
couNn
N0038955-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 30
(Heitler, J.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
Index No.: 190423/10
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
-against-
A. C. & S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York New York
q?' ,2011
Laura B. Hollman, Esf
Attorney for Defendant
Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
(212) 509-3456
a
\ -. #
CMes N - teesoq ,&.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Volkert J. Peters
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003
(212) 558-5500
-
SO ORDERED,
N0038955-1
963-237

I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
VOLKERT J. PETERS,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
(Hei tler, J .)
Index No.: 190423/10
-against -
A. C. & S., INC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JlJDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Oakfabco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New Y rk, New York
Y f7 ,2011
Attorney for Defendant
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Oakfabco, Inc.
VolkeiJ. Peters
MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.
80 Broad Street-Suite 2300
New York, New York 10004
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
700 Broadway
New York, New York 1000
(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry Klein keitler
N00389SS-1

(fAv(i
zp’
,qPm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
STAN LEY KRAMEISEN,
-against-
ADIENCE INC. et al. including,
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,
Plaintiffs,
NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 30
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
Index No.: 190429-2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
FOSTER WHEELER, L.L.C. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
// jfi[7?tv/-+
Dated/) New York, New York
Ch istoph manelii, Esq.
Wwxenberg, P.C.
Att ey for Plaintffs
700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 ,-.,
n
Sedgwick, Detert, Moran &Arn Id,
Attorneys for foster Whedp.&
Three Gateway Center, 12th Floor
Newark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK‘S OFFICE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS
LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ISAAC RUBIN and SHEI[LA RUBIN,
Index No.: 190008/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
Plaintiff,
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as
successor by Merger to Buffalo PUMPS, Inc., et al,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, TUTHILL COWORATION, solely for
Murray Turbine (“Defendant”), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice’Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against
Defendant TUTHILL CORPORATION solely for Murray Turbine with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Defendant, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withqut
ci
** !eL.
Belluck & Fox, LLP c/ Braaten & Pascarella, LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
546 Fifth Avenue, qth Floor
New York, New York 1003
Attorneys for Defendant
Tuthill Corporation solely for
Murray Turbine
(212) 681-1575 2430 Route 34
Manasquan, New Jersey 08736
(732) 528-8888
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Sherry K. Heitler
APR 152011

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
JOSEPH MARTIN and DORIS MARTIN,
- against -
Plaintiffs,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS and
PIRELLI CABLE CORPORATION, et al.
Index No.: 190043/11
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION
& ORDER
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant PRYSMIAN COMMUNICATIONS CABLES AND
SYSTEMS USA, LLC, incorrectly sued herein as "PIRELLI CABLE CORPORATION"
(hereinafter "PRY SMIAN"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant PRY SMIAN with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant PRYSMIAN be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
v&mL
William T. Miedel, Esq.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC
Attorneys for Defendant
PRYSMIAN COMMUNICATIONS
CABLES AND SYSTEMS U
(212) 681-1575 100 Wall Street
New York, NY 1 P\
SO ORDERED,
RpR 2 6 20''
p\,Evi YOPLK OFF \GE
G@KS
APR 1mfl

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
Joseph Martin and Doris Martin,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
INDEX NO. 190043/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. Smith Water Products , et al.,
Defendants.
!
. ,
WHEREFORE, defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, incorrectly sued herein as
Raytheon Aircraft Company fMa Beech Aircraft Corporation, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (i 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Hawker Beechcraft Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated:
SO ORDERED:
NN50957380. I
Attorneys for Defendant Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation
Thomas M. Crispi
Schiff Hardin LLP
wb
900 Third Avenue
10022
FlL - -
APR 2 6 2011

So Ordered:
--.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
X
ROGER H. CRIEGO,
Plaintiffs( s)
-V-
Index No. 1 9006 1 - 1 1
NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC,, et al.
Defendants.
X
Justice Sherry K. Heitler
WHEREFORE, defendant Linde LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, formerly
known as The BOC Group, Inc. and/or Airco, Inc. (collectively, "BOC") hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
32 12, dismissing Plaintiff's complaint against defendant BOC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BOC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and wFu\cd&,. E D
Dated: New Yo& New York
4#// ,2011
APR 2 6 2011
David Chandler, Ew.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
700 Broadway
New York, NY 10003
(212) 558-5500
ENTER: ,2011
u i n d e CLC
soom
New York, NY 10016
(212) 452-5300
Hon. Sherry KleidWeitler, J.S.C.
APR 15 2011