30.04.2014 Views

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The diagram below outlines <strong>the</strong> structure we have<br />

proposed for a new Supreme Court, District Court and Fifth<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Appellate Divisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

PROPOSED STRUCTURE<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

Appellate Divisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Supreme Court<br />

(Five Departments)<br />

civil<br />

criminal<br />

Appellate Terms <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Supreme Court<br />

(First and Sec<strong>on</strong>d<br />

Departments)<br />

Supreme Court<br />

District Court<br />

Note: Town and Village <strong>Courts</strong> and direct appeals excluded.<br />

The C<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>of</strong> “Merger in Place”<br />

Perhaps no issue has proven more divisive in our state<br />

than <strong>the</strong> method by which judges are selected. The debate<br />

between whe<strong>the</strong>r judges should be popularly elected or whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong>y should be appointed (<strong>of</strong>ten referred to as “merit selecti<strong>on</strong>”<br />

by supporters) has raged for many decades and has operated in<br />

<strong>the</strong> background, and sometimes <strong>the</strong> foreground, <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

prior proposals to restructure our courts.<br />

This issue has attracted particular attenti<strong>on</strong> in recent years<br />

in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s issued by a commissi<strong>on</strong> chaired<br />

by John Feerick, former Dean <strong>of</strong> Fordham University School <strong>of</strong><br />

Law, and <strong>the</strong> affirmance by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong><br />

Sec<strong>on</strong>d Circuit <strong>of</strong> Judge John Glees<strong>on</strong>’s January 2006 decisi<strong>on</strong><br />

holding unc<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>the</strong> current system <strong>of</strong> judicial electi<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

74<br />

A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!