Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts
Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts
— SECTION FIVE — RECENT ADMINISTRATIVE INITIATIVES In the absence of structural reform, OCA has over the past ten years developed a number of initiatives that have attempted to ameliorate the structural inefficiencies of the court system by way of administrative fiat. These include the introduction of the Commercial Division, a separate unit within the Supreme Court that specializes in addressing complex business disputes; the Integrated Domestic Violence Courts, which attempt to bring together the separate cases that can arise out of a single family in crisis; and Community Courts, which look more holistically at the related criminal, housing, and family problems that can face litigants in a particular community. These innovations and others have met with tremendous success, and have garnered widespread attention inside and outside of the state. Many of these initiatives have helped realize the types of savings and efficiencies that could be brought about by a true consolidation of the trial court system. At the same time, these successes – while significant – have not been brought to a statewide scale. To achieve such scale, it is clear that reform must be more fundamental, and not the result of administrative action. That said, these initiatives clearly foretell the benefits of a consolidated system. For this reason, several of these successes are described below. The Commercial Division Prior to 1995, many New York businesses tried to avoid New York’s state courts because the courts were viewed as inefficient, slow and costly, especially as compared to other, more modern state systems. Indeed, this perception was so widespread that New York had developed a reputation as a state whose legal system was hostile to business interests. 122 In 1995, the 122 Symposium, Refinement or Reinvention: The State of Reform in New (...continued) A Court System for the Future, February 2007 61
Commercial Division of the New York State Supreme Court was created under the leadership of Chief Judge Kaye in order to concentrate and improve business litigation in one Division of the state court system. The Commercial Division was the result of the combined efforts of a broad coalition of lawyers, judges, and businesses. In particular, the Business Council of New York State, Inc., a statewide coalition of business organizations, was closely involved in the creation of the Commercial Division. The Division is a forum for resolution of complicated commercial disputes, which typically require greater expertise across the broad and complex expanse of commercial law. Within this more specialized forum, cases are monitored and managed, and deadlines are set and enforced, to ensure that cases progress and that backlogs do not develop in one court versus another. 123 In a restructured system, “[t]here would be improved case management, more uniform procedures, fewer squabbles over jurisdiction and an end to cases to be resolved in more than one court.” – Albany Bobbled Court Restructuring, Buffalo News, Aug. 15, 1998 On November 6, 1995, the Commercial Division officially opened its doors in New York and Monroe Counties. In the ensuing eleven years, the Division has expanded to Albany, Erie, Kings, Nassau, Queens, Suffolk and Westchester Counties, and throughout the Seventh Judicial District. 124 New York’s commercial courts handle well over 6,500 cases each year. 125 The Commercial Division has been an unmitigated success in New York State. For example, the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association has described the Commercial Division as “a case study in successful judicial administration.” 126 At the time the Division (...continued) York, 69 ALB. L. REV. 831 (2006) (Chief Judge Kaye noting that “in the early 1990s, New York courts were so overburdened that the business community and commercial bar often turned to Federal courts and alternative private forums”). 123 New York State Unified Court System, A Brief History of the Commercial Division, available at http://www.nycourts.gov/comdiv/Brief_ History_of_CD.htm. 124 New York State Unified Court System, The Commercial Division of the State of New York, General Information, available at http://www.nycourts.gov/ comdiv/general_information.htm. 125 Claude Solnik, In N.Y. State Supreme Court, It’s All Business, LONG ISLAND BUS. NEWS, Sept. 22, 2006. 126 A Case Study in Successful Judicial Administration: Commercial Division, New York State Supreme Court, N.Y. LITIGATOR, Aug. 1997, at 24. 62 A Court System for the Future, February 2007
- Page 9 and 10: More fundamentally, the fragmented
- Page 11 and 12: “New York has the most complex an
- Page 13 and 14: “For 30 years, New York’s trial
- Page 15 and 16: — SECTION ONE — THE CURRENT STR
- Page 17 and 18: system grew exponentially. By the t
- Page 19 and 20: issue from the Supreme Court or a c
- Page 21 and 22: igation, family-related matters or
- Page 23 and 24: Article VI of the New York State Co
- Page 25 and 26: The Appellate Division was establis
- Page 27 and 28: CURRENT STRUCTURE Court of Appeals
- Page 29 and 30: state Constitution on November 4, 1
- Page 31 and 32: jurisdiction would become Superior
- Page 33 and 34: In short, when it comes to the stru
- Page 35 and 36: Given this reality, it is in the in
- Page 37 and 38: The following is the testimonial of
- Page 39 and 40: “Notwithstanding the results of t
- Page 41 and 42: for by HRA) because my welfare bene
- Page 43 and 44: husband told the judge that I was a
- Page 45 and 46: Costs to Individuals, Businesses, M
- Page 47 and 48: appear as witnesses), or to family
- Page 49 and 50: The Tweed Commission</stron
- Page 51 and 52: Court upstate as well as the transf
- Page 53 and 54: y the Legislature and were approved
- Page 55 and 56: proposed a concurrent resolution to
- Page 57 and 58: efforts), make the case for reform
- Page 59: Groups representing the indigent al
- Page 63 and 64: safety and facilitate access to spe
- Page 65 and 66: Courts in Hempstead and Syracuse al
- Page 67 and 68: The details of our proposal are ref
- Page 69 and 70: continue to handle such matters whi
- Page 71 and 72: We recognize that some have express
- Page 73 and 74: The diagram below outlines the stru
- Page 75 and 76: Under a “merger in place” plan,
- Page 77 and 78: Judicial District. By contrast, jud
- Page 79 and 80: Today, the Housing Court, as this P
- Page 81 and 82: The issues concerning the Justice C
- Page 83 and 84: five years. 158 Therefore, it is no
- Page 85 and 86: of preservation. The use of citatio
- Page 87 and 88: CURRENT STRUCTURE Court of Appeals
- Page 89 and 90: JSC status, thereby increasing the
- Page 91 and 92: significant authority over our stat
- Page 93 and 94: The Supposed Ease of an Administrat
- Page 95 and 96: Supreme Court Justices hear every y
- Page 97 and 98: a restructuring have already been c
- Page 99: the constitutional amendment is pas
Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Supreme Court was<br />
created under <strong>the</strong> leadership <strong>of</strong> Chief Judge Kaye in order to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrate and improve business litigati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>on</strong>e Divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> state court system.<br />
The Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong> was <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combined<br />
efforts <strong>of</strong> a broad coaliti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> lawyers, judges, and businesses.<br />
In particular, <strong>the</strong> Business Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong>, Inc., a<br />
statewide coaliti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> business organizati<strong>on</strong>s, was closely<br />
involved in <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong>. The<br />
Divisi<strong>on</strong> is a forum for resoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> complicated commercial<br />
disputes, which typically require greater expertise across <strong>the</strong><br />
broad and complex expanse <strong>of</strong> commercial law. Within this more<br />
specialized forum, cases are m<strong>on</strong>itored and managed, and<br />
deadlines are set and enforced, to ensure that cases progress and<br />
that backlogs do not develop in <strong>on</strong>e court versus ano<strong>the</strong>r. 123<br />
In a restructured system,<br />
“[t]here would be improved<br />
case management, more uniform<br />
procedures, fewer squabbles<br />
over jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> and an<br />
end to cases to be resolved in<br />
more than <strong>on</strong>e court.”<br />
– Albany Bobbled Court<br />
Restructuring, Buffalo<br />
<strong>New</strong>s, Aug. 15, 1998<br />
On November 6, 1995, <strong>the</strong> Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong>ficially opened its doors in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> and M<strong>on</strong>roe Counties. In<br />
<strong>the</strong> ensuing eleven years, <strong>the</strong> Divisi<strong>on</strong> has expanded to Albany,<br />
Erie, Kings, Nassau, Queens, Suffolk and Westchester Counties,<br />
and throughout <strong>the</strong> Seventh Judicial District. 124 <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>’s<br />
commercial courts handle well over 6,500 cases each year. 125<br />
The Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong> has been an unmitigated<br />
success in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong>. For example, <strong>the</strong> Commercial and<br />
Federal Litigati<strong>on</strong> Secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Bar Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
has described <strong>the</strong> Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong> as “a case study in<br />
successful judicial administrati<strong>on</strong>.” 126 At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> Divisi<strong>on</strong><br />
(...c<strong>on</strong>tinued)<br />
<strong>York</strong>, 69 ALB. L. REV. 831 (2006) (Chief Judge Kaye noting that “in <strong>the</strong> early<br />
1990s, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> courts were so overburdened that <strong>the</strong> business community and<br />
commercial bar <strong>of</strong>ten turned to Federal courts and alternative private forums”).<br />
123<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Unified Court System, A Brief History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong>, available at http://www.nycourts.gov/comdiv/Brief_<br />
History_<strong>of</strong>_CD.htm.<br />
124<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Unified Court System, The Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>, General Informati<strong>on</strong>, available at http://www.nycourts.gov/<br />
comdiv/general_informati<strong>on</strong>.htm.<br />
125<br />
Claude Solnik, In N.Y. <strong>State</strong> Supreme Court, It’s All Business, LONG<br />
ISLAND BUS. NEWS, Sept. 22, 2006.<br />
126<br />
A Case Study in Successful Judicial Administrati<strong>on</strong>: Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Supreme Court, N.Y. LITIGATOR, Aug. 1997, at 24.<br />
62<br />
A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007