Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

30.04.2014 Views

— SECTION FIVE — RECENT ADMINISTRATIVE INITIATIVES In the absence of structural reform, OCA has over the past ten years developed a number of initiatives that have attempted to ameliorate the structural inefficiencies of the court system by way of administrative fiat. These include the introduction of the Commercial Division, a separate unit within the Supreme Court that specializes in addressing complex business disputes; the Integrated Domestic Violence Courts, which attempt to bring together the separate cases that can arise out of a single family in crisis; and Community Courts, which look more holistically at the related criminal, housing, and family problems that can face litigants in a particular community. These innovations and others have met with tremendous success, and have garnered widespread attention inside and outside of the state. Many of these initiatives have helped realize the types of savings and efficiencies that could be brought about by a true consolidation of the trial court system. At the same time, these successes – while significant – have not been brought to a statewide scale. To achieve such scale, it is clear that reform must be more fundamental, and not the result of administrative action. That said, these initiatives clearly foretell the benefits of a consolidated system. For this reason, several of these successes are described below. The Commercial Division Prior to 1995, many New York businesses tried to avoid New York’s state courts because the courts were viewed as inefficient, slow and costly, especially as compared to other, more modern state systems. Indeed, this perception was so widespread that New York had developed a reputation as a state whose legal system was hostile to business interests. 122 In 1995, the 122 Symposium, Refinement or Reinvention: The State of Reform in New (...continued) A Court System for the Future, February 2007 61

Commercial Division of the New York State Supreme Court was created under the leadership of Chief Judge Kaye in order to concentrate and improve business litigation in one Division of the state court system. The Commercial Division was the result of the combined efforts of a broad coalition of lawyers, judges, and businesses. In particular, the Business Council of New York State, Inc., a statewide coalition of business organizations, was closely involved in the creation of the Commercial Division. The Division is a forum for resolution of complicated commercial disputes, which typically require greater expertise across the broad and complex expanse of commercial law. Within this more specialized forum, cases are monitored and managed, and deadlines are set and enforced, to ensure that cases progress and that backlogs do not develop in one court versus another. 123 In a restructured system, “[t]here would be improved case management, more uniform procedures, fewer squabbles over jurisdiction and an end to cases to be resolved in more than one court.” – Albany Bobbled Court Restructuring, Buffalo News, Aug. 15, 1998 On November 6, 1995, the Commercial Division officially opened its doors in New York and Monroe Counties. In the ensuing eleven years, the Division has expanded to Albany, Erie, Kings, Nassau, Queens, Suffolk and Westchester Counties, and throughout the Seventh Judicial District. 124 New York’s commercial courts handle well over 6,500 cases each year. 125 The Commercial Division has been an unmitigated success in New York State. For example, the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association has described the Commercial Division as “a case study in successful judicial administration.” 126 At the time the Division (...continued) York, 69 ALB. L. REV. 831 (2006) (Chief Judge Kaye noting that “in the early 1990s, New York courts were so overburdened that the business community and commercial bar often turned to Federal courts and alternative private forums”). 123 New York State Unified Court System, A Brief History of the Commercial Division, available at http://www.nycourts.gov/comdiv/Brief_ History_of_CD.htm. 124 New York State Unified Court System, The Commercial Division of the State of New York, General Information, available at http://www.nycourts.gov/ comdiv/general_information.htm. 125 Claude Solnik, In N.Y. State Supreme Court, It’s All Business, LONG ISLAND BUS. NEWS, Sept. 22, 2006. 126 A Case Study in Successful Judicial Administration: Commercial Division, New York State Supreme Court, N.Y. LITIGATOR, Aug. 1997, at 24. 62 A Court System for the Future, February 2007

— SECTION FIVE —<br />

RECENT ADMINISTRATIVE INITIATIVES<br />

In <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> structural reform, OCA has over <strong>the</strong><br />

past ten years developed a number <strong>of</strong> initiatives that have<br />

attempted to ameliorate <strong>the</strong> structural inefficiencies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> court<br />

system by way <strong>of</strong> administrative fiat. These include <strong>the</strong><br />

introducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong>, a separate unit within<br />

<strong>the</strong> Supreme Court that specializes in addressing complex<br />

business disputes; <strong>the</strong> Integrated Domestic Violence <strong>Courts</strong>,<br />

which attempt to bring toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> separate cases that can arise<br />

out <strong>of</strong> a single family in crisis; and Community <strong>Courts</strong>, which<br />

look more holistically at <strong>the</strong> related criminal, housing,<br />

and family problems that can face litigants in a particular<br />

community. These innovati<strong>on</strong>s and o<strong>the</strong>rs have met with<br />

tremendous success, and have garnered widespread attenti<strong>on</strong><br />

inside and outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se initiatives have helped realize <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong><br />

savings and efficiencies that could be brought about by a true<br />

c<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial court system. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

successes – while significant – have not been brought to a<br />

statewide scale. To achieve such scale, it is clear that reform<br />

must be more fundamental, and not <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />

acti<strong>on</strong>. That said, <strong>the</strong>se initiatives clearly foretell <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

a c<strong>on</strong>solidated system. For this reas<strong>on</strong>, several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se successes<br />

are described below.<br />

The Commercial Divisi<strong>on</strong><br />

Prior to 1995, many <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> businesses tried to avoid<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>’s state courts because <strong>the</strong> courts were viewed as<br />

inefficient, slow and costly, especially as compared to o<strong>the</strong>r, more<br />

modern state systems. Indeed, this percepti<strong>on</strong> was so widespread<br />

that <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> had developed a reputati<strong>on</strong> as a state whose legal<br />

system was hostile to business interests. 122 In 1995, <strong>the</strong><br />

122<br />

Symposium, Refinement or Reinventi<strong>on</strong>: The <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> Reform in <strong>New</strong><br />

(...c<strong>on</strong>tinued)<br />

A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!