Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hon. James J. Lack Abraham M. Lackman Hon. Milton Mollen Richard P. Nathan Hon. Nelson Roman Jay G. Safer Hon. Richard D. Simons Hon. Elaine J. Stack David W. Sussman Hon. John W. Sweeny, Jr. William Treanor Kathryn S. Wylde Judge, New York State Court of Claims, Hauppague, NY (former New York State Senator and Chair, Committee on the Judiciary) President, <strong>Commission</strong> on Independent Colleges and Universities; Albany, NY (former Secretary of the New York State Senate Finance Committee) Counsel, Herrick, Feinstein LLP; New York, NY (former Presiding Justice, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department) Co-Director, The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York; Albany, NY Justice, New York State Supreme Court, Bronx County Partner, Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP; New York, NY Counsel, McMahon & Grow; Rome, NY (former Associate Judge, New York State Court of Appeals) Justice, New York State Supreme Court, Tenth Judicial District, Roslyn, NY Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Business and Legal Affairs, MTV Networks; New York, NY Associate Justice, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, Carmel, NY Dean and Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law; New York, NY President and CEO, Partnership for New York City; New York, NY 4 A Court System for the Future, February 2007
Counsel to the <strong>Commission</strong> Elliot Moskowitz Sarah S. McDonald Josh Plaut Andrew D. Schlichter Heather M. Ward Rebecca Winters Chief Counsel Counsel Counsel Counsel Counsel Counsel A Court System for the Future, February 2007 5
Page 1 and 2: ACOURT SYSTEM FOR THE FUTURE: THE P
Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On July 17, 2006,
Page 5: A. Vincent Buzard Partner, Harris B
Page 9 and 10: More fundamentally, the fragmented
Page 11 and 12: “New York has the most complex an
Page 13 and 14: “For 30 years, New York’s trial
Page 15 and 16: — SECTION ONE — THE CURRENT STR
Page 17 and 18: system grew exponentially. By the t
Page 19 and 20: issue from the Supreme Court or a c
Page 21 and 22: igation, family-related matters or
Page 23 and 24: Article VI of the New York State Co
Page 25 and 26: The Appellate Division was establis
Page 27 and 28: CURRENT STRUCTURE Court of Appeals
Page 29 and 30: state Constitution on November 4, 1
Page 31 and 32: jurisdiction would become Superior
Page 33 and 34: In short, when it comes to the stru
Page 35 and 36: Given this reality, it is in the in
Page 37 and 38: The following is the testimonial of
Page 39 and 40: “Notwithstanding the results of t
Page 41 and 42: for by HRA) because my welfare bene
Page 43 and 44: husband told the judge that I was a
Page 45 and 46: Costs to Individuals, Businesses, M
Page 47 and 48: appear as witnesses), or to family
Page 49 and 50: The Tweed Commission</stron
Page 51 and 52: Court upstate as well as the transf
Page 53 and 54: y the Legislature and were approved
Page 55 and 56: proposed a concurrent resolution to
Page 57 and 58:
efforts), make the case for reform
Page 59 and 60:
Groups representing the indigent al
Page 61 and 62:
Commercial Division of the New York
Page 63 and 64:
safety and facilitate access to spe
Page 65 and 66:
Courts in Hempstead and Syracuse al
Page 67 and 68:
The details of our proposal are ref
Page 69 and 70:
continue to handle such matters whi
Page 71 and 72:
We recognize that some have express
Page 73 and 74:
The diagram below outlines the stru
Page 75 and 76:
Under a “merger in place” plan,
Page 77 and 78:
Judicial District. By contrast, jud
Page 79 and 80:
Today, the Housing Court, as this P
Page 81 and 82:
The issues concerning the Justice C
Page 83 and 84:
five years. 158 Therefore, it is no
Page 85 and 86:
of preservation. The use of citatio
Page 87 and 88:
CURRENT STRUCTURE Court of Appeals
Page 89 and 90:
JSC status, thereby increasing the
Page 91 and 92:
significant authority over our stat
Page 93 and 94:
The Supposed Ease of an Administrat
Page 95 and 96:
Supreme Court Justices hear every y
Page 97 and 98:
a restructuring have already been c
Page 99:
the constitutional amendment is pas
show all

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?