30.04.2014 Views

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

limited restructuring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial courts in additi<strong>on</strong> to $40 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

in increased funding for civil legal services, increases to <strong>the</strong><br />

statewide assigned counsel rates, and new screening procedures<br />

for judicial appointees. 110 A series <strong>of</strong> joint public hearings was<br />

held around <strong>the</strong> state by <strong>the</strong> Senate and Assembly between<br />

October 1997 and January 1998. 111 The 1998 legislative sessi<strong>on</strong><br />

closed <strong>on</strong> June 18, 1998, however, without a vote in ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

chamber <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed c<strong>on</strong>current resoluti<strong>on</strong>s. 112<br />

According to c<strong>on</strong>temporaneous news coverage, <strong>the</strong><br />

Legislature failed to act despite <strong>the</strong> fact that Chief Judge Kaye’s<br />

proposals had enjoyed support from “dozens <strong>of</strong> good government<br />

groups and editorial writers across <strong>the</strong> state, as well as Gov.<br />

George Pataki, Attorney General Dennis Vacco and key members<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Senate. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> Assembly issued a news release<br />

. . . in which it endorsed most <strong>of</strong> Kaye’s proposals.” 113<br />

Finally, in 2002, Chief Judge Kaye announced a modified<br />

versi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> her 1997 court reform proposal. The 2002 proposal<br />

incorporated all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1997 proposal but did<br />

not provide for <strong>the</strong> merger <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Surrogate’s Court into <strong>the</strong><br />

Supreme Court. In additi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> plan provided for mandatory<br />

transfer to <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> most criminal acti<strong>on</strong>s or<br />

proceedings involving domestic violence or o<strong>the</strong>r family<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenses. No legislative acti<strong>on</strong> was taken <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2002 versi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Chief Judge’s plan.<br />

* * * *<br />

In short, <strong>the</strong> historical record is littered with failed<br />

proposals for court reform. As we see it, however, <strong>the</strong> human<br />

and financial costs that are being borne by our state and its<br />

people, as well as <strong>the</strong> successes that have now been achieved in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r states (states which, too, had a l<strong>on</strong>g history <strong>of</strong> unsuccessful<br />

110<br />

See N.Y. ASSEMBLY JUDICIARY COMM., JUDICIAL REFORM, INTEGRITY<br />

AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 5-7 (1997).<br />

111<br />

See John Caher, Momentum Builds for Court Reform, ALBANY TIMES<br />

UNION, Sept. 23, 1997, at A1.<br />

112<br />

See Richard Perez-Peña, The Highlights: Most Major Issues Are Left<br />

Unresolved, N.Y. TIMES, June 19, 1998, at B5.<br />

113<br />

See John Caher, Kaye Upbeat <strong>on</strong> Prospects for Reform <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Courts</strong>, ALBANY TIMES UNION, June 23, 1998, at B2.<br />

A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!