30.04.2014 Views

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The 1986 Proposals<br />

On July 6, 1985, a plan to restructure <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> courts<br />

was announced by John R. Dunne, <strong>the</strong>n Chairman <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Senate<br />

Judiciary Committee, and Warren M. Anders<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong>n Senate<br />

Majority Leader. 103 The major elements <strong>of</strong> this 1985 Senate plan<br />

were as follows: (1) merger <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Claims, County<br />

Court, Surrogate’s Court, Family Court, District <strong>Courts</strong>, and <strong>New</strong><br />

<strong>York</strong> City Criminal and Civil <strong>Courts</strong> into a single Supreme Court;<br />

(2) creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a Surrogate’s Divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court for<br />

counties with more than 200,000 people; and (3) creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Fifth Judicial Department composed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ninth and Tenth<br />

Judicial Districts. 104<br />

Public hearings <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1985 Senate plan were held in <strong>the</strong><br />

fall <strong>of</strong> 1985, and oppositi<strong>on</strong> to certain aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan was<br />

voiced. In particular, <strong>the</strong> Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Justices <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Supreme Court opposed <strong>the</strong> reform proposals. 105<br />

On July 3, 1986 (<strong>the</strong> last day <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1986 legislative<br />

sessi<strong>on</strong>), <strong>the</strong> Assembly and Senate approved a court<br />

reorganizati<strong>on</strong> plan (<strong>the</strong> “Unified Court System Proposal”) that<br />

closely followed <strong>the</strong> 1985 Senate plan. 106 Despite securing first<br />

passage in 1986, however, <strong>the</strong> Unified Court System Proposal<br />

never reached <strong>the</strong> voters <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> for ratificati<strong>on</strong>. It failed to<br />

pass <strong>the</strong> Legislature again when, as required by <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> for<br />

any amendment, it was resubmitted for a sec<strong>on</strong>d vote in 1987. 107<br />

The 1997 Proposals<br />

The most significant restructuring initiative in recent<br />

years was launched <strong>on</strong> March 19, 1997, when Chief Judge<br />

Judith Kaye and Chief Administrative Judge J<strong>on</strong>athan Lippman<br />

103<br />

See Press Release, <strong>State</strong> Senator John R. Dunne, Senate Court Reorganizati<strong>on</strong><br />

Plan Announced (July 8, 1985).<br />

104<br />

See id. at 1-2.<br />

105<br />

See Editorial, Puffed-Up Judges vs. Court Reform, N.Y. TIMES, Oct.<br />

23, 1985, at A22.<br />

106<br />

See Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Major Acti<strong>on</strong>s Taken by <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> Legislature<br />

in 1986, N.Y. TIMES, July 10, 1986, at B4.<br />

107<br />

See Frank Lynn, Court Merger Seen as Dead in Legislature, N.Y.<br />

TIMES, June 8, 1987, at B1.<br />

A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!