30.04.2014 Views

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Our Eleven Trial <strong>Courts</strong><br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> has eleven different trial courts. They<br />

are: <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court, which sits in all sixty-two counties<br />

statewide; <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Claims, which likewise sits statewide;<br />

Surrogate’s <strong>Courts</strong> in each county; County <strong>Courts</strong> in each county<br />

outside <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City; Family <strong>Courts</strong> in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City and in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifty-seven counties outside <strong>the</strong> City; a <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City<br />

Civil Court; a <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City Criminal Court; District <strong>Courts</strong> for<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> L<strong>on</strong>g Island; a separate City Court for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixty<strong>on</strong>e<br />

cities outside <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City; and Town and Village Justice<br />

<strong>Courts</strong> in most towns and villages statewide.<br />

“[M]ultiplicity <strong>of</strong> courts is<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> archaic law.”<br />

– Roscoe Pound, 1906<br />

The current structure has its roots in 1846, when Article<br />

VI <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> was adopted. Prior to that<br />

time, <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> judiciary was comprised <strong>of</strong> a loose<br />

c<strong>on</strong>federati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> small courts and judges who traveled around<br />

<strong>the</strong> state, sitting in individual locales for given periods <strong>of</strong> time<br />

during <strong>the</strong> year. Article VI c<strong>on</strong>solidated <strong>the</strong> disparate circuit<br />

court system and o<strong>the</strong>r sundry courts into a Supreme Court and<br />

organized <strong>the</strong> state into eight Judicial Districts. Article VI also<br />

established <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals, created <strong>the</strong> Surrogate’s Court<br />

and c<strong>on</strong>verted various o<strong>the</strong>r courts into a County Court system.<br />

Even with <strong>the</strong>se changes, <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> court<br />

system remained a hodgepodge. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vestigial courts<br />

that dated back to col<strong>on</strong>ial times were still in operati<strong>on</strong> in various<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Prior to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1894,<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> still had <strong>Courts</strong> <strong>of</strong> Oyer and Terminer<br />

(established in 1691 to hear criminal matters) in operati<strong>on</strong> around<br />

<strong>the</strong> state and o<strong>the</strong>r, more parochial courts operating at <strong>the</strong> local<br />

level, including <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>of</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong> Pleas <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City,<br />

<strong>the</strong> City Court <strong>of</strong> Brooklyn and <strong>the</strong> Superior Court <strong>of</strong> Buffalo.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1894 eliminated a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se courts, o<strong>the</strong>r such courts were preserved. At <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> still had a<br />

multiplicity <strong>of</strong> different courts handling cases throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

state, including Children’s <strong>Courts</strong>, Domestic Relati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>Courts</strong>,<br />

District <strong>Courts</strong>, <strong>Courts</strong> <strong>of</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Special</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sessi<strong>on</strong>s and many o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

judicial bodies. Over <strong>the</strong> ensuing fifty years, few changes were<br />

proposed, while <strong>the</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities and caseload <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> court<br />

16<br />

A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!