30.04.2014 Views

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

Special Commission on the Future of the New York State Courts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“<strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> has <strong>the</strong> most complex<br />

and costly court system in<br />

<strong>the</strong> country, a system that too<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten fails to provide justice<br />

while imposing an undue burden<br />

<strong>on</strong> taxpayers.”<br />

– Gov. Eliot Spitzer,<br />

January 2007<br />

We believe that it is finally time for change. There is<br />

simply no reas<strong>on</strong> why <strong>the</strong> people and businesses <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong><br />

<strong>State</strong> should have to suffer any l<strong>on</strong>ger with <strong>the</strong> most backward<br />

and inefficient court structure in <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>. In recent m<strong>on</strong>ths,<br />

<strong>the</strong> groundswell <strong>of</strong> support for court reform has grown str<strong>on</strong>ger,<br />

with Governor Eliot Spitzer announcing in his first <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>State</strong> Address his intenti<strong>on</strong> to introduce a c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

amendment “to c<strong>on</strong>solidate and integrate our balkanized courts.”<br />

Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong> reform process should begin<br />

immediately, and this Report provides a blueprint for that reform.<br />

As set forth more fully in <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Report, we call for:<br />

• A c<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state’s major trial courts into a simple<br />

two-tier structure with a single Supreme Court and a<br />

statewide network <strong>of</strong> District <strong>Courts</strong>.<br />

• The merger into <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current Court<br />

<strong>of</strong> Claims, <strong>the</strong> County <strong>Courts</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Family <strong>Courts</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

Surrogate’s <strong>Courts</strong>.<br />

• The creati<strong>on</strong> within <strong>the</strong> newly merged Supreme Court <strong>of</strong><br />

six distinct, but not jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>ally separate, Divisi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

Family, Commercial, <strong>State</strong> Claims, Criminal, Probate,<br />

and a General Divisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

“A streamlined, two-tier court<br />

system will eliminate many <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> shortcomings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />

system, permit <strong>the</strong> allocati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

resources where <strong>the</strong>y are most<br />

needed, reduce <strong>the</strong> overlapping<br />

and c<strong>on</strong>flicting jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial courts, and<br />

vastly improve <strong>the</strong> administrati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> justice.”<br />

– The Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bar <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong><br />

<strong>York</strong>, Council <strong>on</strong> Judicial<br />

Administrati<strong>on</strong><br />

(1998)<br />

• The merger into <strong>the</strong> District Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current Civil and<br />

Criminal <strong>Courts</strong> in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City, <strong>the</strong> Nassau and Suffolk<br />

District <strong>Courts</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> sixty-<strong>on</strong>e City <strong>Courts</strong> outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City. (This new court would have<br />

jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> over misdemeanors, housing cases, and civil<br />

claims involving $50,000 or less.)<br />

• The creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a Fifth Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Appellate Divisi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> expansi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pool <strong>of</strong> judges who are<br />

eligible for <strong>the</strong> Appellate Divisi<strong>on</strong> to include all those<br />

who sit in <strong>the</strong> newly c<strong>on</strong>solidated Supreme Court.<br />

• The eliminati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al ceiling <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> Supreme Court judgeships that can be created by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Legislature.<br />

These proposals are discussed in much greater detail in<br />

<strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> this Report, which also includes, as an appendix, a<br />

draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al amendment that would be needed to<br />

implement <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

10<br />

A Court System for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Future</strong>, February 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!