29.04.2014 Views

Genetic screening: ethical issues - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Genetic screening: ethical issues - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Genetic screening: ethical issues - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.19 It is a criminal offence for a data user knowingly or recklessly to<br />

disclose informati<strong>on</strong> to a third party. The aggrieved individual<br />

could also refer the matter to the Data Protecti<strong>on</strong> Registrar who is<br />

empowered to issue an enforcement notice to the data user<br />

directing him or her to comply with the data protecti<strong>on</strong> principles.<br />

The Registrar may ultimately issue a de-registrati<strong>on</strong> notice to a<br />

data user who violates the data protecti<strong>on</strong> principles. There is no<br />

provisi<strong>on</strong> in the Act for compensating a data subject who is a<br />

victim of the unauthorised disclosure of informati<strong>on</strong> by the data<br />

user. There may, however, be a right to damages for any loss<br />

suffered, arising under the general law of tort. A data subject is,<br />

in c<strong>on</strong>trast, expressly entitled to compensati<strong>on</strong> for damage or<br />

distress caused by the disclosure of the data without the authority<br />

of the data user.<br />

47<br />

Professi<strong>on</strong>al codes of c<strong>on</strong>duct<br />

5.20 Apart from the comm<strong>on</strong> law and statute, the c<strong>on</strong>fidentiality of<br />

medical records in general and genetic informati<strong>on</strong> in particular is<br />

protected by professi<strong>on</strong>al rules of c<strong>on</strong>duct governing at least some<br />

health professi<strong>on</strong>als. The General Medical <str<strong>on</strong>g>Council</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s guidance<br />

states that:<br />

“Patients are entitled to expect that the informati<strong>on</strong> about<br />

themselves or others which a doctor learns during the<br />

course of a medical c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>, investigati<strong>on</strong> or treatment,<br />

will remain c<strong>on</strong>fidential.”<br />

The General Medical <str<strong>on</strong>g>Council</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s guidance also states, however, that<br />

a doctor’s duty of c<strong>on</strong>fidentiality is not absolute and may be<br />

overridden in the public interest. This appears to reflect (but may<br />

not be identical with) the legal obligati<strong>on</strong>s already c<strong>on</strong>sidered.<br />

5.21 C<strong>on</strong>cern has been expressed that professi<strong>on</strong>al obligati<strong>on</strong>s of this<br />

nature do not govern every<strong>on</strong>e employed in the health service who<br />

may come into c<strong>on</strong>tact with c<strong>on</strong>fidential genetic informati<strong>on</strong>. This<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cern is misplaced. There are professi<strong>on</strong>al codes, similar to<br />

those laid down for doctors, for disciplines such as nursing, from<br />

whom the majority of genetic counsellors are drawn. Other health<br />

service staff are likely to be employed under a c<strong>on</strong>tract of service<br />

which either expressly or by implicati<strong>on</strong> prohibits the disclosure to<br />

unauthorised pers<strong>on</strong>s of c<strong>on</strong>fidential medical (including genetic)<br />

informati<strong>on</strong>. Breach of any such c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> could lead to the<br />

dismissal of the employee resp<strong>on</strong>sible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!