29.04.2014 Views

Emerging biotechnologies: full report - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Emerging biotechnologies: full report - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Emerging biotechnologies: full report - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E m e r g i n g b i o t e c h n o l o g i e s<br />

commercialisati<strong>on</strong> problems 9.36, 9.38–<br />

9.39, 9.41<br />

incentivising 9.60–9.69<br />

type 2 emerging <str<strong>on</strong>g>biotechnologies</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.34, 9.37<br />

commercialisati<strong>on</strong> problems 9.40<br />

incentivising 9.70<br />

type 3 emerging <str<strong>on</strong>g>biotechnologies</str<strong>on</strong>g> 9.34, 9.37<br />

Type I and Type II errors 5.31<br />

UK Genetic Testing Network 8.25<br />

uncertainty 3.1, 3.3–3.12, 3.37–3.38, 10.4<br />

commercialisati<strong>on</strong> problems 9.48–9.51<br />

effects of framing 3.32–3.34<br />

managing 3.26–3.36<br />

public discourse ethics 4.44<br />

public perspectives 5.3<br />

regulatory aspects 8.12–8.14, 8.35<br />

risk and 3.10–3.12<br />

varieties of 3.5–3.9<br />

unc<strong>on</strong>trolled uses 3.9, Box 3.1<br />

Understanding risk (1996, US Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Research <str<strong>on</strong>g>Council</str<strong>on</strong>g>) 5.24<br />

unintended c<strong>on</strong>sequences 1.1, 3.8<br />

United Kingdom (UK)<br />

GM food crops 2.8, 5.22, 8.13, 8.18, 8.29<br />

'good at research, bad at commercialisati<strong>on</strong>'<br />

7.21, 7.23–7.32<br />

health impact fund 9.62–9.63<br />

importance of research impact 6.38–6.42<br />

regulatory systems 8.21–8.25<br />

research and innovati<strong>on</strong> policy 7<br />

research funding 6.7–6.10<br />

research settings 6.5<br />

see also Government, UK<br />

United States (US)<br />

GM crops 2.8, 8.18<br />

importance of research impact 6.38<br />

influences over the media 5.15–5.16<br />

orphan drugs 9.20<br />

patent protecti<strong>on</strong> 9.23–9.24<br />

research funding 6.10<br />

universities 6.5<br />

impact agenda 6.38–6.46<br />

research and profit-seeking 9.10–9.12<br />

unknown unknowns 3.11<br />

upstream public engagement 5.40–5.42<br />

utilitarian ethics 4.24–4.25<br />

utility, research 6.42–6.43<br />

industry 6.27–6.35<br />

procedural narratives 2.36–2.38<br />

see also expectati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

water power Box 3.3<br />

Wellcome Trust 6.14, 7.18, 7.46, 7.58<br />

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute 6.5<br />

winners, technological 1.26<br />

wisdom of repugnance 4.12<br />

World Health Organizati<strong>on</strong> (WHO) 8.25, 9.61<br />

World Wide Web 3.8, 5.11<br />

xenobiology 2.22<br />

xeno-nucleic acid 2.22<br />

xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong> 2.11, 2.42<br />

yuck factor 4.12<br />

vaccinati<strong>on</strong> 4.35, Box 1.1<br />

vaccines, producti<strong>on</strong> of 8.23<br />

'valley of death' 7.24, 9.42–9.43<br />

J. Craig Venter Institute 3.18, Box 3.2<br />

venture capitalism 6.13, 6.22, 7.40, 9.7, 9.43<br />

viral genomes, synthetic 2.20<br />

virtual patients 1.14, 6.12<br />

virtues, procedural 4.43–4.55, 4.57<br />

visi<strong>on</strong>s, biotechnology 1.4, 2.29–2.38, 2.45<br />

ambiguous 3.14–3.16<br />

future 2.34–2.35<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!