29.04.2014 Views

Emerging biotechnologies: full report - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Emerging biotechnologies: full report - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Emerging biotechnologies: full report - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E m e r g i n g b i o t e c h n o l o g i e s<br />

2011-15 delivery plan 7.42<br />

addressing societal challenges 6.36, 7.53<br />

general structure 7.52<br />

public-good research 9.13<br />

biotechnology boom 7.4, 9.5<br />

biotechnology wager 1.1–1.3, 1.34, 4.9, 6.36,<br />

10.4<br />

bioterrorism Box 3.1, 8.10<br />

botulinum toxin 3.9<br />

bricolage 9.35<br />

British Heart Foundati<strong>on</strong> 7.18<br />

British In Vitro Diagnostics Associati<strong>on</strong> 8.25<br />

business see commercial firms; industry<br />

Cabinet minister, proposed new 7.56, 10.17<br />

Cambridge Antibody Technology 7.4, 9.3<br />

cancer medicines 2.21, 2.27, 3.9, 9.51, Box 1.1<br />

Cancer Research UK 7.18<br />

candour, virtue of 4.50–4.51<br />

carb<strong>on</strong> tax 9.70<br />

Cartagena Protocol <strong>on</strong> Biosafety 8.6<br />

cauti<strong>on</strong><br />

in approach to regulati<strong>on</strong> 8.33–8.38, 8.46<br />

virtue of 4.53–4.55, 8.34, 8.38<br />

cells, synthetic 2.20, 2.37, Box 3.2<br />

cellular <str<strong>on</strong>g>biotechnologies</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.5–2.6<br />

change, technological 3.22–3.25<br />

charities<br />

funding of research 6.14, 7.5, 7.18<br />

governance 7.57–7.58<br />

provisi<strong>on</strong> of public goods 4.8<br />

research policy 7.18–7.19<br />

steering directi<strong>on</strong> of research 6.22<br />

Chief Scientific Advisor, UK 6.36, 7.8<br />

chimeric animals 3.19<br />

chlorofluorocarb<strong>on</strong>s (CFCs) Box 1.1, 3.8<br />

choices<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tingent c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s 1.21<br />

framing effects 3.34, 3.37, Box 3.4<br />

rati<strong>on</strong>al 3.21<br />

social 5.59–5.60<br />

Christianity 4.11–4.12<br />

citati<strong>on</strong> impact rankings 7.28<br />

citati<strong>on</strong> rates, UK research 7.24, 7.27–7.28<br />

citizen's juries 5.36, 5.43<br />

civil society groups 5.6, 5.16, 5.19<br />

climate change 1.9, 2.33<br />

clinical trials 4.49, 9.48–9.51, Box 9.3<br />

cl<strong>on</strong>ed embryos 3.20<br />

cl<strong>on</strong>ing, therapeutic 2.6<br />

closures, identifying 4.38–4.40, Box 4.1<br />

collaborative research 6.28, 6.61, 9.47<br />

collective acti<strong>on</strong>/interest<br />

public ethics 4.20–4.22<br />

public goods 4.8<br />

Collingridge dilemma 1.27–1.29, Box 1.2<br />

commercial exploitati<strong>on</strong> 9.1, 9.3<br />

commercial firms<br />

corporate social resp<strong>on</strong>sibility 9.53, 10.20<br />

funding of research 6.13, 7.5<br />

research settings 6.5<br />

steering research directi<strong>on</strong>s 6.27–6.35<br />

see also industry<br />

commercialisati<strong>on</strong> 9<br />

addressing the obstacles 9.45–9.70<br />

crossing the 'valley of death' 9.42–9.43<br />

example of failure 8.13<br />

incentivising 9.55–9.70, 10.21<br />

intellectual property rights limiting 9.17,<br />

9.21–9.41<br />

rates of patents 3.5<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>s 9.53, 9.56, 10.20–10.21<br />

social value and 9.52–9.54, 9.56, 9.71–<br />

9.72, 10.21<br />

'UK is bad at' claim 7.23–7.32<br />

see also intellectual property rights<br />

commercial purpose 9.1<br />

comm<strong>on</strong> good 4.17–4.18<br />

communicable diseases 1.10<br />

communicati<strong>on</strong>, by researchers 5.34, 6.50–<br />

6.54, 10.10<br />

communitarian turn 4.20<br />

competence, technical 4.51, 5.31, 5.53–5.54<br />

competitiveness, framing research policy 7.3<br />

complexity<br />

natural systems 4.13–4.14<br />

normative 4.34–4.37<br />

computati<strong>on</strong>al metaphors 2.37<br />

computers, superintelligent 3.19<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sensus, through public engagement 5.36,<br />

5.43<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sensus c<strong>on</strong>ferences 5.36, 5.43<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sortia 9.49, Box 9.3<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tingency, and its c<strong>on</strong>sequences 1.19–1.33<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tingent c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s 1.20–1.23<br />

c<strong>on</strong>traceptive pill 3.8<br />

Cooksey <str<strong>on</strong>g>report</str<strong>on</strong>g> (2006) 9.42<br />

cooperative research see collaborative<br />

research<br />

corporate social resp<strong>on</strong>sibility 9.53, 10.20<br />

cosmetics 2.28, 3.9<br />

counterfactuals 1.16–1.18<br />

crop impact fund 9.68<br />

crowded-out alternatives 1.26, 1.28, 1.31<br />

crowdsourcing 9.50, Box 9.3<br />

cultivati<strong>on</strong> analysis 2.38, 5.11<br />

Darwinian evoluti<strong>on</strong> 4.12<br />

David, Paul 1.2, 2.33, 3.23<br />

dedicated biotechnology firms (DBFs) 9.10–<br />

9.12<br />

dehumanising c<strong>on</strong>sequences 2.34, 4.16<br />

deliberative mapping 5.36<br />

deliberative polling 5.37<br />

democracy 5.25<br />

Department for Business, Innovati<strong>on</strong> and Skills<br />

(BIS) 7.14, 7.50, 7.52, 7.54, 10.17<br />

I N D E X<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!