29.04.2014 Views

Xenotransplantation - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Xenotransplantation - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

Xenotransplantation - Nuffield Council on Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Animal c<strong>on</strong>cerns : principles<br />

Chapter 4<br />

Animal c<strong>on</strong>cerns : principles<br />

4.1 For many people, the principal ethical problem raised by xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong> will<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cern the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between human beings and other animals. As described in<br />

Chapter 3, xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong> is currently at the research stage. The research<br />

involves the use of animals to provide transplant material and also to act as<br />

experimental recipients of transplants. Should xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong> develop into a<br />

successful clinical procedure it will involve the breeding and killing of animals <strong>on</strong> a<br />

large scale in order to provide organs and tissue for transplantati<strong>on</strong>. In additi<strong>on</strong>, the<br />

use of transgenic pigs for xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong> raises questi<strong>on</strong>s about the genetic<br />

modificati<strong>on</strong> of animals to provide organs and tissue.<br />

4.2 The Working Party was charged with examining the ethical issues raised by the use<br />

of animals specifically for xenografting. As a first step, the arguments for and against<br />

the use of animals for medical purposes in general were reviewed. These arguments<br />

are summarised briefly in the first part of the chapter. The chapter then goes <strong>on</strong> to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sider whether, even if the use of animals for medical purposes in general is held<br />

to be ethically acceptable, there are particular c<strong>on</strong>cerns about their use for<br />

xenografting. Two issues are discussed:<br />

<br />

<br />

the ethical acceptability of the use, respectively, of primates, and of animals<br />

other than primates, to supply transplant material;<br />

the ethical issues raised by the use of genetically modified animals to provide<br />

organs for xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The use of animals for medical purposes<br />

4.3 Many would endorse the view that animals have interests, particularly in the<br />

avoidance of suffering, that should be respected, but that in certain limited<br />

circumstances those interests may be outweighed by the interests of human beings<br />

provided that everything possible is d<strong>on</strong>e to minimise distress to the animals. In<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidering the ethical c<strong>on</strong>cerns about the use of animals for xenotransplantati<strong>on</strong>, it<br />

was found necessary to explore this view in more detail. For others hold the opini<strong>on</strong><br />

that all use of animals by human beings for medical purposes is wr<strong>on</strong>g, no matter<br />

how great the benefits. The view that there should be an absolute prohibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />

the use of animals for medical purposes is a minority positi<strong>on</strong> within UK society. It<br />

meets an equally c<strong>on</strong>scientiously held view that, in certain circumstances, it is<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!