A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ

A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ

28.04.2014 Views

3.5 SMR classification (Slope Mass Rating) The Slope Mass Rating (SMR) was presented as a new geomechanical classification for slopes in rock (Romana, 1985). The classification is obtained from the RMR-system (Bieniawski, 1989), by using an adjustment factor depending on the relation between the slope and joints and also a factor depending on excavation method (Edelbro, 2003). SMR = RMR basic + (F 1 . F 2 . F 3 ) + F 4 Where F1 depends on parallelism between joints and the strike of the slope face as: F1 = (1-sin A)2, Where A is the angle between the strike of the slope face and strike of the joint. F2 depends on the joint dip angle in the planar modes of failure. F3 refers to the relationship between the slope face and joint dips (Bieniawski, 1976). F4 is the adjustment factor depending on excavation method of the slope. The results of classification of rock mass formations of Kef Essenoun is showing in the following table: Table 3. Classification of the rock formations of Kef Essenoun (RMR system) Properties Quaternary Limestone Phosphate Marl Compressive strength 2 7 4 2 Rock quality designation 13 13 13 13 (RQD) Spacing of discontinuities 20 20 20 20 Condition of discontinuities 10 10 10 10 Ground water condition 15 15 15 15 RMR basic 60 65 62 60 Table 4. Classification of the rock formations of Kef Essenoun (SMR system) Properties Quaternary Limestone Phosphate Marl F1 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 F2 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 F3 -25 -25 -25 -25 F4 -8 -8 -8 -8 (F 1 .F 2 .F 3 )+ F 4 -10.62 -10.62 -10.62 -10.62 SMR 49.37 54.37 51.37 49.37 SMR classes (Romana, 1993) Description: Class III; Normal Stability: Partially stable Failures: Planar failure in some joints and many wedge failures Support: Systematic The results of SMR classification prove that the mine was partially unstable and that a plane failure will occur on the level of some joints from where in this case the failure occurred on the level of the bedding plane separating the phosphate layer from the marl layer. Common for both soil and rock slopes is the fact that the failure surface cannot develop at the same instant throughout the slope. There must be a progressive mechanism of failure development eventually leading to the full collapse of the slope (Sjöberg, 1996). 3.6 Numerical Simulation The Modeling is carried out by using the finite element code for soil and rock analyses PLAXIS. Calculations are carried out in plane deformation, by using a model of 300 m out of 500 m. The Mohr-Coulomb elastoplastic constitutive law is selected. This law offers the advantage of a low number of parameters. The finite- element model is illustrated in Figure 8. Figure 8. The model geometry 174

23 rd 3.7 Results and Discussion The volumetric strains are higher than 10 -3 which is the field of the great deformations what confirms than the open pit mine course a risk of instability (Figure 9). valuable for the insurance of the results. The geotechnical study and the intervention of the geotechnician are necessary and even obligatory for the risk prevention in the mining field. Figure 9. Volumetric strains. Failures appear more on the level of the marl’s layer which proves that this layer can’t support the weight of the overlying strata. The maximum values are concentrated especially on the level of the toe of slope. Figure 11. Shear strains REFERENCES Bieniawski, Z. T. (1976). Engineering classification in rock engineering. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Exploration for Rock Engineering, Johannesburg, 97-106. Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 251 p. Coates, D. F. (1981). Rock Mechanics Principles. CANMET, Energy, Mines end Resources. Canada, Monograph 874. pp. 6-1 – 6-70; B-1 – B- 12. Edelbro, C. (2003). Rock mass strength, a review. Technical report. Luleå university of technology, 160 p. Romana, M. (1985). New adjustment ratings for application of Bieniawski classification to slope. In: Proceedings of the international Symposium on the Role of Rock Mechanics, 49-53. Romana, M. (1993). A geomechanical classification for slopes: Slope mass rating. In: Comprehensive Rock Engineering. Principles, Practice & Projects, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3 (Rock Testing and site characterization), 575-600. Sjöberg, J. (1996). Large scale slope stability in open pit mining – a review. Technical report. Luleå university of technology, 229 p. Steffen, O.K.H. & al., (1970). Optimization Open Pit Geometry and Operational Procedure. In Planning Open Pit Mines, Proc. Symposium on the Theoretical Background to the Planning of Open Pit Mines with Special Reference to Slope Stability (Johannesburg, August 29 – September 4, 1970), pp. 9-31. Cape Town: A. A. Belkema. 3.8 Conclusion The alliance of several natural and human factors led to the landslide of Kef Essenoun. In the case of the stable slopes, it is impossible to envisage their lifetime quantitatively. One thus seeks to evaluate qualitatively the probability that the slope becomes unstable. Important progress could be realized in this field, thanks to the analysis of the passed landslides. The empirical approach can only be used on the level of predimensioning or constitute a starting point of a mechanical study. The use of several analysis approaches is very 175

23 rd <br />

3.7 Results and Discussion<br />

The volumetric strains are higher than 10 -3<br />

which is the field of the great deformations<br />

what confirms than the open pit mine course<br />

a risk of instability (Figure 9).<br />

valuable for the insurance of the results. The<br />

geotechnical study and the intervention of<br />

the geotechnician are necessary and even<br />

obligatory for the risk prevention in the<br />

mining field.<br />

Figure 9. Volumetric strains.<br />

Failures appear more on the level of the<br />

marl’s layer which proves that this layer<br />

can’t support the weight of the overlying<br />

strata. The maximum values are concentrated<br />

especially on the level of the toe of slope.<br />

Figure 11. Shear strains<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bieniawski, Z. T. (1976). Engineering classification<br />

in rock engineering. In: Proceedings of the<br />

Symposium on Exploration for Rock<br />

Engineering, Johannesburg, 97-106.<br />

Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass<br />

classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York,<br />

251 p.<br />

Coates, D. F. (1981). Rock Mechanics Principles.<br />

CANMET, Energy, Mines end Resources.<br />

Canada, Monograph 874. pp. 6-1 – 6-70; B-1 – B-<br />

12.<br />

Edelbro, C. (2003). Rock mass strength, a review.<br />

Technical report. Luleå university of technology,<br />

160 p.<br />

Romana, M. (1985). New adjustment ratings for<br />

application of Bieniawski classification to slope.<br />

In: Proceedings of the international Symposium<br />

on the Role of Rock Mechanics, 49-53.<br />

Romana, M. (1993). A geomechanical classification<br />

for slopes: Slope mass rating. In: Comprehensive<br />

Rock Engineering. Principles, Practice &<br />

Projects, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3 (Rock<br />

Testing and site characterization), 575-600.<br />

Sjöberg, J. (1996). Large scale slope stability in open<br />

pit mining – a review. Technical report. Luleå<br />

university of technology, 229 p.<br />

Steffen, O.K.H. & al., (1970). Optimization Open Pit<br />

Geometry and Operational Procedure. In Planning<br />

Open Pit Mines, Proc. Symposium on the<br />

Theoretical Background to the Planning of Open<br />

Pit Mines with Special Reference to Slope<br />

Stability (Johannesburg, August 29 – September<br />

4, 1970), pp. 9-31. Cape Town: A. A. Belkema.<br />

3.8 Conclusion<br />

The alliance of several natural and human<br />

factors led to the landslide of Kef Essenoun.<br />

In the case of the stable slopes, it is<br />

impossible to envisage their lifetime<br />

quantitatively. One thus seeks to evaluate<br />

qualitatively the probability that the slope<br />

becomes unstable. Important progress could<br />

be realized in this field, thanks to the<br />

analysis of the passed landslides.<br />

The empirical approach can only be used on<br />

the level of predimensioning or constitute a<br />

starting point of a mechanical study. The use<br />

of several analysis approaches is very<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!