A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ
A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ
3.5 SMR classification (Slope Mass Rating) The Slope Mass Rating (SMR) was presented as a new geomechanical classification for slopes in rock (Romana, 1985). The classification is obtained from the RMR-system (Bieniawski, 1989), by using an adjustment factor depending on the relation between the slope and joints and also a factor depending on excavation method (Edelbro, 2003). SMR = RMR basic + (F 1 . F 2 . F 3 ) + F 4 Where F1 depends on parallelism between joints and the strike of the slope face as: F1 = (1-sin A)2, Where A is the angle between the strike of the slope face and strike of the joint. F2 depends on the joint dip angle in the planar modes of failure. F3 refers to the relationship between the slope face and joint dips (Bieniawski, 1976). F4 is the adjustment factor depending on excavation method of the slope. The results of classification of rock mass formations of Kef Essenoun is showing in the following table: Table 3. Classification of the rock formations of Kef Essenoun (RMR system) Properties Quaternary Limestone Phosphate Marl Compressive strength 2 7 4 2 Rock quality designation 13 13 13 13 (RQD) Spacing of discontinuities 20 20 20 20 Condition of discontinuities 10 10 10 10 Ground water condition 15 15 15 15 RMR basic 60 65 62 60 Table 4. Classification of the rock formations of Kef Essenoun (SMR system) Properties Quaternary Limestone Phosphate Marl F1 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 F2 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 F3 -25 -25 -25 -25 F4 -8 -8 -8 -8 (F 1 .F 2 .F 3 )+ F 4 -10.62 -10.62 -10.62 -10.62 SMR 49.37 54.37 51.37 49.37 SMR classes (Romana, 1993) Description: Class III; Normal Stability: Partially stable Failures: Planar failure in some joints and many wedge failures Support: Systematic The results of SMR classification prove that the mine was partially unstable and that a plane failure will occur on the level of some joints from where in this case the failure occurred on the level of the bedding plane separating the phosphate layer from the marl layer. Common for both soil and rock slopes is the fact that the failure surface cannot develop at the same instant throughout the slope. There must be a progressive mechanism of failure development eventually leading to the full collapse of the slope (Sjöberg, 1996). 3.6 Numerical Simulation The Modeling is carried out by using the finite element code for soil and rock analyses PLAXIS. Calculations are carried out in plane deformation, by using a model of 300 m out of 500 m. The Mohr-Coulomb elastoplastic constitutive law is selected. This law offers the advantage of a low number of parameters. The finite- element model is illustrated in Figure 8. Figure 8. The model geometry 174
23 rd 3.7 Results and Discussion The volumetric strains are higher than 10 -3 which is the field of the great deformations what confirms than the open pit mine course a risk of instability (Figure 9). valuable for the insurance of the results. The geotechnical study and the intervention of the geotechnician are necessary and even obligatory for the risk prevention in the mining field. Figure 9. Volumetric strains. Failures appear more on the level of the marl’s layer which proves that this layer can’t support the weight of the overlying strata. The maximum values are concentrated especially on the level of the toe of slope. Figure 11. Shear strains REFERENCES Bieniawski, Z. T. (1976). Engineering classification in rock engineering. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Exploration for Rock Engineering, Johannesburg, 97-106. Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 251 p. Coates, D. F. (1981). Rock Mechanics Principles. CANMET, Energy, Mines end Resources. Canada, Monograph 874. pp. 6-1 – 6-70; B-1 – B- 12. Edelbro, C. (2003). Rock mass strength, a review. Technical report. Luleå university of technology, 160 p. Romana, M. (1985). New adjustment ratings for application of Bieniawski classification to slope. In: Proceedings of the international Symposium on the Role of Rock Mechanics, 49-53. Romana, M. (1993). A geomechanical classification for slopes: Slope mass rating. In: Comprehensive Rock Engineering. Principles, Practice & Projects, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3 (Rock Testing and site characterization), 575-600. Sjöberg, J. (1996). Large scale slope stability in open pit mining – a review. Technical report. Luleå university of technology, 229 p. Steffen, O.K.H. & al., (1970). Optimization Open Pit Geometry and Operational Procedure. In Planning Open Pit Mines, Proc. Symposium on the Theoretical Background to the Planning of Open Pit Mines with Special Reference to Slope Stability (Johannesburg, August 29 – September 4, 1970), pp. 9-31. Cape Town: A. A. Belkema. 3.8 Conclusion The alliance of several natural and human factors led to the landslide of Kef Essenoun. In the case of the stable slopes, it is impossible to envisage their lifetime quantitatively. One thus seeks to evaluate qualitatively the probability that the slope becomes unstable. Important progress could be realized in this field, thanks to the analysis of the passed landslides. The empirical approach can only be used on the level of predimensioning or constitute a starting point of a mechanical study. The use of several analysis approaches is very 175
- Page 123 and 124: 23 rd BS. The mathematical model o
- Page 125 and 126: 23 rd producing the new vector x i
- Page 127 and 128: . 23 rd Figure 6. Ultimate pit lim
- Page 129 and 130: 23 rd Selecting the Suitable Haula
- Page 131 and 132: 23 rd Environment Economy Society
- Page 133 and 134: 23 rd shape and depth of deposit,
- Page 135 and 136: 23 rd 6 THE HIERARCHICAL PREFERENC
- Page 137 and 138: 23 rd ranking place Truck & Shovel
- Page 139 and 140: 23 rd Noguchi H., Ogawa M., Ishii
- Page 141 and 142: 23 rd An Approach to Determine the
- Page 143 and 144: 23 rd material to the nearby dumps
- Page 145 and 146: 23 rd network and allocating spoke
- Page 147 and 148: 23 rd IPC unit, but this is not wi
- Page 149 and 150: 23 rd REFERENCES Alumur, S. A., &
- Page 151 and 152: 23 rd
- Page 153 and 154: 153 23 rd
- Page 155 and 156: 23 rd
- Page 157 and 158: 23 rd
- Page 159 and 160: 23 rd
- Page 161 and 162: 23 rd
- Page 163 and 164: 23 rd
- Page 165 and 166: 23 rd In - Pit Crushing and Convey
- Page 167 and 168: 23 rd According to Lopes, the bigg
- Page 169 and 170: 23 rd trucks because the conveyor
- Page 171 and 172: 23 rd Identification of Causal Rel
- Page 173: 23 rd Table 1. Geotechnical charac
- Page 177 and 178: 23 rd Using Satellite Images (ASTE
- Page 179 and 180: 23 rd largely covered by Quaternar
- Page 181 and 182: 23 rd this figure, the lithology u
- Page 183 and 184: 23 rd Figure 6. ASTER satellite im
- Page 185 and 186: 23 rd mineralization in the sanand
- Page 187 and 188: 23 rd Gas Pollutants and Dust of T
- Page 189 and 190: 23 rd Figure 2. Truck transport th
- Page 191 and 192: 23 rd Table 4. Determined values o
- Page 193 and 194: 23 rd 4 DISCUSSION The results of
- Page 195 and 196: 23 rd Surface Mining Statistics in
- Page 197 and 198: 23 rd Dinogetia (Garvan). The chal
- Page 199 and 200: 23 rd Table 1. The surface mining
- Page 201 and 202: 23 rd pits along the Crisu Negru,
- Page 203 and 204: 23 rd Voda, Nisipari, Rasova, Sili
- Page 205 and 206: 23 rd 5.2 Magmatic rocks exploitat
- Page 207 and 208: 23 rd mountains) and north Dobroge
- Page 209 and 210: 23 rd Ponor quarry), sulphur (Nego
- Page 211 and 212: 23 rd
- Page 213 and 214: 23 rd
- Page 215 and 216: 23 rd
- Page 217 and 218: 23 rd
- Page 219 and 220: 23 rd
- Page 221 and 222: 23 rd
- Page 223 and 224: 23 rd
23 rd <br />
3.7 Results and Discussion<br />
The volumetric strains are higher than 10 -3<br />
which is the field of the great deformations<br />
what confirms than the open pit mine course<br />
a risk of instability (Figure 9).<br />
valuable for the insurance of the results. The<br />
geotechnical study and the intervention of<br />
the geotechnician are necessary and even<br />
obligatory for the risk prevention in the<br />
mining field.<br />
Figure 9. Volumetric strains.<br />
Failures appear more on the level of the<br />
marl’s layer which proves that this layer<br />
can’t support the weight of the overlying<br />
strata. The maximum values are concentrated<br />
especially on the level of the toe of slope.<br />
Figure 11. Shear strains<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Bieniawski, Z. T. (1976). Engineering classification<br />
in rock engineering. In: Proceedings of the<br />
Symposium on Exploration for Rock<br />
Engineering, Johannesburg, 97-106.<br />
Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering rock mass<br />
classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York,<br />
251 p.<br />
Coates, D. F. (1981). Rock Mechanics Principles.<br />
CANMET, Energy, Mines end Resources.<br />
Canada, Monograph 874. pp. 6-1 – 6-70; B-1 – B-<br />
12.<br />
Edelbro, C. (2003). Rock mass strength, a review.<br />
Technical report. Luleå university of technology,<br />
160 p.<br />
Romana, M. (1985). New adjustment ratings for<br />
application of Bieniawski classification to slope.<br />
In: Proceedings of the international Symposium<br />
on the Role of Rock Mechanics, 49-53.<br />
Romana, M. (1993). A geomechanical classification<br />
for slopes: Slope mass rating. In: Comprehensive<br />
Rock Engineering. Principles, Practice &<br />
Projects, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3 (Rock<br />
Testing and site characterization), 575-600.<br />
Sjöberg, J. (1996). Large scale slope stability in open<br />
pit mining – a review. Technical report. Luleå<br />
university of technology, 229 p.<br />
Steffen, O.K.H. & al., (1970). Optimization Open Pit<br />
Geometry and Operational Procedure. In Planning<br />
Open Pit Mines, Proc. Symposium on the<br />
Theoretical Background to the Planning of Open<br />
Pit Mines with Special Reference to Slope<br />
Stability (Johannesburg, August 29 – September<br />
4, 1970), pp. 9-31. Cape Town: A. A. Belkema.<br />
3.8 Conclusion<br />
The alliance of several natural and human<br />
factors led to the landslide of Kef Essenoun.<br />
In the case of the stable slopes, it is<br />
impossible to envisage their lifetime<br />
quantitatively. One thus seeks to evaluate<br />
qualitatively the probability that the slope<br />
becomes unstable. Important progress could<br />
be realized in this field, thanks to the<br />
analysis of the passed landslides.<br />
The empirical approach can only be used on<br />
the level of predimensioning or constitute a<br />
starting point of a mechanical study. The use<br />
of several analysis approaches is very<br />
175