28.04.2014 Views

A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ

A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ

A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5 SMR classification (Slope Mass<br />

Rating)<br />

The Slope Mass Rating (SMR) was<br />

presented as a new geomechanical<br />

classification for slopes in rock (Romana,<br />

1985). The classification is obtained from<br />

the RMR-system (Bieniawski, 1989), by<br />

using an adjustment factor depending on the<br />

relation between the slope and joints and<br />

also a factor depending on excavation<br />

method (Edelbro, 2003).<br />

SMR = RMR basic + (F 1 . F 2 . F 3 ) + F 4<br />

Where<br />

F1 depends on parallelism between joints<br />

and the strike of the slope face as:<br />

F1 = (1-sin A)2,<br />

Where A is the angle between the strike of<br />

the slope face and strike of the joint.<br />

F2 depends on the joint dip angle in the<br />

planar modes of failure.<br />

F3 refers to the relationship between the<br />

slope face and joint dips (Bieniawski, 1976).<br />

F4 is the adjustment factor depending on<br />

excavation method of the slope.<br />

The results of classification of rock mass<br />

formations of Kef Essenoun is showing in<br />

the following table:<br />

Table 3. Classification of the rock<br />

formations of Kef Essenoun (RMR system)<br />

Properties Quaternary Limestone Phosphate Marl<br />

Compressive<br />

strength<br />

2 7 4 2<br />

Rock quality<br />

designation 13 13 13 13<br />

(RQD)<br />

Spacing of<br />

discontinuities<br />

20 20 20 20<br />

Condition of<br />

discontinuities<br />

10 10 10 10<br />

Ground water<br />

condition<br />

15 15 15 15<br />

RMR basic 60 65 62 60<br />

Table 4. Classification of the rock<br />

formations of Kef Essenoun (SMR system)<br />

Properties Quaternary Limestone Phosphate Marl<br />

F1 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70<br />

F2 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15<br />

F3 -25 -25 -25 -25<br />

F4 -8 -8 -8 -8<br />

(F 1 .F 2 .F 3 )+ F 4 -10.62 -10.62 -10.62 -10.62<br />

SMR 49.37 54.37 51.37 49.37<br />

SMR classes<br />

(Romana,<br />

1993)<br />

Description: Class III; Normal<br />

Stability: Partially stable<br />

Failures: Planar failure in some joints and many<br />

wedge failures<br />

Support: Systematic<br />

The results of SMR classification prove<br />

that the mine was partially unstable and that<br />

a plane failure will occur on the level of<br />

some joints from where in this case the<br />

failure occurred on the level of the bedding<br />

plane separating the phosphate layer from<br />

the marl layer.<br />

Common for both soil and rock slopes is<br />

the fact that the failure surface cannot<br />

develop at the same instant throughout the<br />

slope. There must be a progressive<br />

mechanism of failure development<br />

eventually leading to the full collapse of the<br />

slope (Sjöberg, 1996).<br />

3.6 Numerical Simulation<br />

The Modeling is carried out by using the<br />

finite element code for soil and rock<br />

analyses PLAXIS. Calculations are carried<br />

out in plane deformation, by using a model<br />

of 300 m out of 500 m. The Mohr-Coulomb<br />

elastoplastic constitutive law is selected.<br />

This law offers the advantage of a low<br />

number of parameters. The finite- element<br />

model is illustrated in Figure 8.<br />

Figure 8. The model geometry<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!