A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ
A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ A OPEN PIT MINING AÇIK OCAK MADENCİLİĞİ
140
23 rd An Approach to Determine the Location of an In Pit Crusher in Open Pit Mines M. Rahmanpour, M. Osanloo, N. Adibee Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT Transportation costs have always been a significant part of capital and operating costs of large open pit mines. In pit crushing and conveying system is going to be a significant part of future mining activities. Its cost efficiency and high reliability compared to conventional truck-shovel system makes it more appealing to be utilized in mining industry. In this paper suitable location of an in pit crusher is investigated, and it is formulated as a single hub location problem. In selecting the optimum in pit crusher location, two factors are considered. First, the overall haulage cost as a function of distance is minimized, and second, the selected location is chosen such that it is not located inside the mining area, and crusher site is fixed through a period of at least one year. Application of single hub problem is quite effective in determining the location of the in pit crusher. 1 INTRODUCTION Open pit mining is a large operation of excavation, within which considerable amount of material should be extracted and removed out of the mining train. An open pit mine is consisted of pit or pits (where the ore and waste rock is extracted), mill, waste dumps, and stockpile. The material inside the pit is excavated and loaded to the haulage system and according to material type; they transferred to the predefined location. In recent years, application of in pit crushing and conveying systems is of interest in open pit mines. Apart from choosing a suitable type of crushing and conveying system for the mines, the location of the system should also be optimized to reduce the mine operating costs. A suitable location for an in pit crusher should have the following conditions: a. In pit crushing unit should be in an optimum distance from each working face. b. It would be better if the location of the crusher be fixed at least for a period of one year. This will reduce the number of times that the crushing unit is moved. So, the overall cost of crusher reinstallation will be reduced. The problem of selecting an optimal location for in pit crushing system is studied by a number of authors including Roberstson (1984), Sturgul (1986), and Konak et. al (2007). Optimization of a crusher location and haulage distances are first introduced by Roberstson (1984). Konak et. al (2007) discussed the effects of pit geometry and mine access requirements on optimum crusher location selection that are mainly based on the establishment of minimum haulage distance. They established a trial and error process and applied their method in an aggregate mine. In the present paper the problem of allocating in pit crushers is described as a hub-location problem. Before proceeding to the problem of locating the in pit crusher, different types of haulage systems in surface mines is investigated. 141
- Page 90 and 91: Table 2. Final results of data proc
- Page 93 and 94: 23 rd
- Page 95 and 96: 23 rd
- Page 97 and 98: 23 rd
- Page 99 and 100: 23 rd
- Page 101 and 102: 23 rd
- Page 103 and 104: 23 rd
- Page 105 and 106: 23 rd Ultimate Pit Limit Design on
- Page 107 and 108: 23 rd Figure 1 shows the procedure
- Page 109 and 110: 23 rd Figure 4. UPL of the sample
- Page 111 and 112: 23 rd Efficient Real Time Stabilit
- Page 113 and 114: 23 rd stripping ratio of 2.28:1 to
- Page 115 and 116: 23 rd The broad area coverage make
- Page 117 and 118: 23 rd 4 FINAL REMARKS Slope monito
- Page 119 and 120: 23 rd A Genetic Algorithm for Pit
- Page 121 and 122: 23 rd every ore block and searches
- Page 123 and 124: 23 rd BS. The mathematical model o
- Page 125 and 126: 23 rd producing the new vector x i
- Page 127 and 128: . 23 rd Figure 6. Ultimate pit lim
- Page 129 and 130: 23 rd Selecting the Suitable Haula
- Page 131 and 132: 23 rd Environment Economy Society
- Page 133 and 134: 23 rd shape and depth of deposit,
- Page 135 and 136: 23 rd 6 THE HIERARCHICAL PREFERENC
- Page 137 and 138: 23 rd ranking place Truck & Shovel
- Page 139: 23 rd Noguchi H., Ogawa M., Ishii
- Page 143 and 144: 23 rd material to the nearby dumps
- Page 145 and 146: 23 rd network and allocating spoke
- Page 147 and 148: 23 rd IPC unit, but this is not wi
- Page 149 and 150: 23 rd REFERENCES Alumur, S. A., &
- Page 151 and 152: 23 rd
- Page 153 and 154: 153 23 rd
- Page 155 and 156: 23 rd
- Page 157 and 158: 23 rd
- Page 159 and 160: 23 rd
- Page 161 and 162: 23 rd
- Page 163 and 164: 23 rd
- Page 165 and 166: 23 rd In - Pit Crushing and Convey
- Page 167 and 168: 23 rd According to Lopes, the bigg
- Page 169 and 170: 23 rd trucks because the conveyor
- Page 171 and 172: 23 rd Identification of Causal Rel
- Page 173 and 174: 23 rd Table 1. Geotechnical charac
- Page 175 and 176: 23 rd 3.7 Results and Discussion T
- Page 177 and 178: 23 rd Using Satellite Images (ASTE
- Page 179 and 180: 23 rd largely covered by Quaternar
- Page 181 and 182: 23 rd this figure, the lithology u
- Page 183 and 184: 23 rd Figure 6. ASTER satellite im
- Page 185 and 186: 23 rd mineralization in the sanand
- Page 187 and 188: 23 rd Gas Pollutants and Dust of T
- Page 189 and 190: 23 rd Figure 2. Truck transport th
23 rd <br />
An Approach to Determine the Location of an In Pit Crusher in<br />
Open Pit Mines<br />
M. Rahmanpour, M. Osanloo, N. Adibee<br />
Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran<br />
ABSTRACT Transportation costs have always been a significant part of capital and<br />
operating costs of large open pit mines. In pit crushing and conveying system is going to be a<br />
significant part of future mining activities. Its cost efficiency and high reliability compared to<br />
conventional truck-shovel system makes it more appealing to be utilized in mining industry.<br />
In this paper suitable location of an in pit crusher is investigated, and it is formulated as a<br />
single hub location problem. In selecting the optimum in pit crusher location, two factors are<br />
considered. First, the overall haulage cost as a function of distance is minimized, and second,<br />
the selected location is chosen such that it is not located inside the mining area, and crusher<br />
site is fixed through a period of at least one year. Application of single hub problem is quite<br />
effective in determining the location of the in pit crusher.<br />
1 INTRODUCTION<br />
Open pit mining is a large operation of<br />
excavation, within which considerable<br />
amount of material should be extracted and<br />
removed out of the mining train. An open pit<br />
mine is consisted of pit or pits (where the ore<br />
and waste rock is extracted), mill, waste<br />
dumps, and stockpile. The material inside<br />
the pit is excavated and loaded to the<br />
haulage system and according to material<br />
type; they transferred to the predefined<br />
location.<br />
In recent years, application of in pit<br />
crushing and conveying systems is of<br />
interest in open pit mines. Apart from<br />
choosing a suitable type of crushing and<br />
conveying system for the mines, the location<br />
of the system should also be optimized to<br />
reduce the mine operating costs. A suitable<br />
location for an in pit crusher should have the<br />
following conditions:<br />
a. In pit crushing unit should be in an<br />
optimum distance from each working<br />
face.<br />
b. It would be better if the location of the<br />
crusher be fixed at least for a period of<br />
one year. This will reduce the number<br />
of times that the crushing unit is<br />
moved. So, the overall cost of crusher<br />
reinstallation will be reduced.<br />
The problem of selecting an optimal<br />
location for in pit crushing system is studied<br />
by a number of authors including Roberstson<br />
(1984), Sturgul (1986), and Konak et. al<br />
(2007). Optimization of a crusher location<br />
and haulage distances are first introduced by<br />
Roberstson (1984). Konak et. al (2007)<br />
discussed the effects of pit geometry and<br />
mine access requirements on optimum<br />
crusher location selection that are mainly<br />
based on the establishment of minimum<br />
haulage distance. They established a trial<br />
and error process and applied their method<br />
in an aggregate mine.<br />
In the present paper the problem of<br />
allocating in pit crushers is described as a<br />
hub-location problem. Before proceeding to<br />
the problem of locating the in pit crusher,<br />
different types of haulage systems in surface<br />
mines is investigated.<br />
141