07 Vauxhall Square, item 6. PDF 626 KB - Lambeth Council
07 Vauxhall Square, item 6. PDF 626 KB - Lambeth Council
07 Vauxhall Square, item 6. PDF 626 KB - Lambeth Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
opportunity area within <strong>Vauxhall</strong>, such development<br />
would be acceptable.<br />
The tall buildings would ruin<br />
the skyline and take away the<br />
sunlight and daylight.<br />
Scale and height of the<br />
building. Damage to the<br />
conservation area and<br />
designated heritage assets.<br />
The proposed parking levels.<br />
The development should be<br />
car free.<br />
The student accommodation<br />
would add to an<br />
overconcentration already<br />
being proposed in the area.<br />
The existing environment is<br />
terrible and the proposed<br />
development should pay for<br />
improvements outside the<br />
site.<br />
The proposed development<br />
would impact on the quality<br />
of open space and in<br />
particular play space.<br />
The height of the towers<br />
would impact on local views.<br />
The height of the towers are<br />
The proposed site is designated as an area for tall<br />
buildings which forms a policy basis within the VNEB<br />
OAPF. In this regard the proposed two towers would<br />
be acceptable. Furthermore, the application has been<br />
independently assessed by Right to Light consulting<br />
and it considers that the application would comply with<br />
the guidance set out within the BRE Daylight and<br />
Sunlight document.<br />
The applicant has received extensive pre-application<br />
advice in relation to the proposed development.<br />
Officers endorse the proposed scale and height of<br />
building being proposed and as such the development<br />
would not impact on conservation areas nor would they<br />
damage designated heritage assets.<br />
The proposed level of parking has been assessed both<br />
by <strong>Lambeth</strong> Transport and TfL. Both consultees raise<br />
no objection to the level of parking being proposed and<br />
as a result would be policy compliant for this scale of<br />
development.<br />
The proposed development would provide extensive<br />
mitigation measure in the form of Section 106<br />
contributions and DIFS. In this regard, officers<br />
consider that these contributions would mitigate against<br />
such impact from occurring and worsening the current<br />
situation.<br />
The proposed development would provide extensive<br />
mitigation measures in the form of Section 106<br />
contributions and payment DIFS. In this regard,<br />
officers consider that these contributions would mitigate<br />
against such impact from occurring and worsening the<br />
current situation.<br />
The proposed development would be a sufficient<br />
amount of open space in excess of local and London<br />
Plan policy standards. Furthermore, the amount of<br />
children playspace would be policy requirement. The<br />
applicant has stated that a contribution would be made<br />
towards playspace being provided within <strong>Vauxhall</strong> Park<br />
for children aged over 12 years. In this instance<br />
officers raise no objection.<br />
VNEB OAPF states that tall buildings should be in the<br />
region of 150m in height which would form part of an<br />
emerging cluster at <strong>Vauxhall</strong>. Key principles include the