07 Vauxhall Square, item 6. PDF 626 KB - Lambeth Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

on the application, which would limit such impact to adjoining neighbours. Lambeth Noise and Pollution team have assessed the submitted information and raise no objection to the methodology being proposed. The noise levels associated with the development would cause disturbance to residents of the listed terrace The proposed development appears visually dull – the towers at Vauxhall Square North and South in particular. Uniform square blocks from bottom to top, poor colour palette and nothing to attract the eye. The current development is just Basingstoke. The design is dull and boring The area needs a good secondary school and a community hub. Multiplexes don’t have the same appeal, more facilities for a covered market – NOT another Paternoster Square – more shops, more trees, more streams and fountains for children to paddle in. The area is already noisy, the proposed development would worsen the current situation. Conditions have been imposed to limit the proposed impact the demolition and construction stage would have on the adjoining terrace buildings. The application has been subject to extensive preapplication discussions and as officers its is considered that the application being proposed would be an acceptable form of development in terms of its overall massing, bulk and design. Furthermore, the proposed scheme would improve the visual interest of the area together with the VNEB area as a whole. In this instance no objection is raised. The application has been subject to extensive preapplication discussions and as officers its is considered that the application being proposed would be an acceptable form of development in terms of its overall massing, bulk and design. Furthermore, the proposed scheme would improve the visual interest of the area together with the VNEB area as a whole. In this instance no objection is raised. The application would be securing Section 106 contributions as part of the development and as such these monies would be used to improve or provide further primary and secondary educational places within the local area. In this instance the development would mitigate against this. The proposed scheme would be a mixed used development and the extent of development and uses which could be achieved are limited. However, officers consider that the uses being provided as part of the development would improve the overall basis as the Vauxhall Square being the ‘heart’ of a shopping retail town. Furthermore, the development would be providing extensive community facilities as part of the development. In this instance no objection is raised. The development site forms part of an opportunity area within the VNEB area, which allows high-density development to be provided on such sites. Although there would be an increase in use in the local area, it is envisaged that these uses would not worsen the current situation and given that the site is an
opportunity area within Vauxhall, such development would be acceptable. The tall buildings would ruin the skyline and take away the sunlight and daylight. Scale and height of the building. Damage to the conservation area and designated heritage assets. The proposed parking levels. The development should be car free. The student accommodation would add to an overconcentration already being proposed in the area. The existing environment is terrible and the proposed development should pay for improvements outside the site. The proposed development would impact on the quality of open space and in particular play space. The height of the towers would impact on local views. The height of the towers are The proposed site is designated as an area for tall buildings which forms a policy basis within the VNEB OAPF. In this regard the proposed two towers would be acceptable. Furthermore, the application has been independently assessed by Right to Light consulting and it considers that the application would comply with the guidance set out within the BRE Daylight and Sunlight document. The applicant has received extensive pre-application advice in relation to the proposed development. Officers endorse the proposed scale and height of building being proposed and as such the development would not impact on conservation areas nor would they damage designated heritage assets. The proposed level of parking has been assessed both by Lambeth Transport and TfL. Both consultees raise no objection to the level of parking being proposed and as a result would be policy compliant for this scale of development. The proposed development would provide extensive mitigation measure in the form of Section 106 contributions and DIFS. In this regard, officers consider that these contributions would mitigate against such impact from occurring and worsening the current situation. The proposed development would provide extensive mitigation measures in the form of Section 106 contributions and payment DIFS. In this regard, officers consider that these contributions would mitigate against such impact from occurring and worsening the current situation. The proposed development would be a sufficient amount of open space in excess of local and London Plan policy standards. Furthermore, the amount of children playspace would be policy requirement. The applicant has stated that a contribution would be made towards playspace being provided within Vauxhall Park for children aged over 12 years. In this instance officers raise no objection. VNEB OAPF states that tall buildings should be in the region of 150m in height which would form part of an emerging cluster at Vauxhall. Key principles include the
Page 2 and 3: Site address Ward Proposal Applicat
Page 4 and 5: • 661_00_07_030 rev. 01 Retained
Page 6 and 7: • 661_00_07_544 rev. 01 Vauxhall
Page 8 and 9: and 30.11.2012 Street Management Ar
Page 10 and 11: Executive Summary This application
Page 12 and 13: 1 Summary of Main Issues 1.1 The ma
Page 14 and 15: 22,732sqm of new office floor space
Page 16 and 17: 4.17 A three-storey linear building
Page 18 and 19: with the road. Planting within Mile
Page 20 and 21: 5.24 London Underground Infrastruct
Page 22 and 23: 5.42 Vauxhall Neighbourhood Housing
Page 24 and 25: orough. How is the policing of this
Page 28 and 29: excessive in terms of the planning
Page 30 and 31: proposed are menial and on this bas
Page 32 and 33: Policy 3.1 Policy 3.2 Policy 3.8 Po
Page 34 and 35: Policy 50 Open Space and Sports Fac
Page 36 and 37: 7.4 Retail 7.5 The application prop
Page 38 and 39: 7.15 Affordable Housing: 7.16 The L
Page 40 and 41: hostel provider have confirmed that
Page 42 and 43: 7.37 Officers consider that both th
Page 44 and 45: 7.53 Policy 50 of the Saved UDP see
Page 46 and 47: 7.64 The likely shadowing on the am
Page 48 and 49: and/ or have a significant impact o
Page 50 and 51: • The credibility of the design:
Page 52 and 53: the Bondway Warehouse and railway v
Page 54 and 55: softening to the building forms, wh
Page 56 and 57: Borough of Wandsworth, the London B
Page 58 and 59: trees to be planted along this road
Page 60 and 61: neighbouring properties: • Test 1
Page 62 and 63: each the guidelines and has an exis
Page 64 and 65: 9.24 The application proposes a ser
Page 66 and 67: condition on the planning permissio
Page 68 and 69: other proposed developments on Wand
Page 70 and 71: 10.12 Car Parking Lambeth Transport
Page 72 and 73: dedicated service yard. Swept paths
Page 74 and 75: • Photovoltaic (PV) modules for e
Page 76 and 77:
Holdings on these floorspace figure
Page 78 and 79:
to be identified in the S106. As no
Page 80 and 81:
provide further regenerative benefi
Page 82 and 83:
details regarding dust mitigation;
Page 84 and 85:
insulation for the residential unit
Page 86 and 87:
19. Prior to the commence of the de
Page 88 and 89:
and the provision of recycling faci
Page 90 and 91:
impact upon the community (Policy S
show all

07 Vauxhall Square, item 6. PDF 626 KB - Lambeth Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?