26.04.2014 Views

Bootle - Lake District National Park

Bootle - Lake District National Park

Bootle - Lake District National Park

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Allocations of Land<br />

Preferred Site<br />

Assessments<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong>


<strong>Bootle</strong><br />

Site reference X112 Site area (Ha) 4.36<br />

Site name<br />

Wellbank Camp<br />

Suggested use at Issues and Mixed Use<br />

Options<br />

Key issues identified at Stage 2 Can issue be potentially overcome/mitigated?<br />

through Issues and Options<br />

consultation<br />

No (give reason)<br />

Further<br />

assessment<br />

required (see<br />

Isolated (unsustainable) site<br />

which will be reliant on private car<br />

use. Improved pedestrian and<br />

cycleway links back towards<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> should be secured,<br />

however, unlikely to overcome the<br />

accessibility problems associated<br />

with the location. The access is<br />

not considered to be feasible, and<br />

there are known highway issues.<br />

Concerns over the development<br />

of this site in its totality, due to its<br />

size, location, and resultant<br />

impacts upon the surrounding<br />

countryside. It is noted that the<br />

site contains areas of brownfield<br />

land, and is relatively well<br />

landscaped. Employment use<br />

may be appropriate should<br />

access issues be able to be<br />

resolved. The site is inappropriate<br />

for housing in our view, given its<br />

remoteness.<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

below)<br />

Stage 3<br />

No Yes<br />

Is the site available?<br />

<br />

Site characteristics<br />

This site is a former barracks used by the Ministry of Defence but sold by Defence<br />

Estates in 2002. A large part of the site comprises rough grass. A range of brick<br />

buildings and prefabricated buildings occupy part of the eastern side of the site, and<br />

these buildings are now vacant and in a poor state of repair. One building, a<br />

swimming pool used by the community, occupies the north west corner of the site.<br />

The site occupies a fold in the low lying coastal plain and consequently, except when<br />

viewed from the road to the north, it is not prominent in the landscape. Agricultural<br />

land surrounds this site to the north, south, east, and west, although there are<br />

highways along the southern boundary and part of the northern boundary of this site.<br />

The site is located approximately 700 metres from <strong>Bootle</strong> and 800 metres from<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> Station where the Cumbrian Coastal Railway stops.


This site will be assessed as a mixed use site as this was suggested for the Issues<br />

and Options consultation, and Policy CS06 of our Core Strategy states we will<br />

consider Wellbank Camp as a possible location for mixed use development.<br />

Further<br />

issues/opp<br />

ortunities to<br />

consider<br />

Accessibility<br />

Can issues be overcome/mitigated?<br />

Are there opportunities for enhancement?<br />

Issues and opportunities<br />

Green = no issue<br />

Amber = issues can be<br />

addressed through mitigation<br />

Red = Issue cannot be<br />

satisfactorily addressed<br />

= Opportunity for<br />

enhancement<br />

This site is approximately 700 metres from centre of the<br />

residential area of <strong>Bootle</strong>, and approximately 950 metres to the <br />

services and facilities including convenience store, school, and<br />

public transport. Pedestrian footways and cycleways would be<br />

required as part of any redevelopment proposed to enable<br />

access to <strong>Bootle</strong>, and this would result in a benefit to the local<br />

community. Development of this site would also offer<br />

opportunity to provide pedestrian footways and cycleways to<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> Station in order to link these settlements as this site is<br />

located approximately equidistant between these two locations.<br />

Archaeology<br />

Biodiversity/<br />

Geodiversity<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> Station is located approximately 800 metres from this site<br />

which is a stop for the Cumbrian Coastal Railway. Cumbria<br />

Highways have expressed concerns in relation to the relative<br />

distance and therefore accessibility/sustainability of this site.<br />

The Wellbank Camp site is however recognised in the Core<br />

Strategy (Policy CS06) as of strategic importance to <strong>Bootle</strong> for<br />

redevelopment. Any proposal on this site would be expected to<br />

offer pedestrian/cycle link enhancements between <strong>Bootle</strong> and<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> Station thereby mitigating against current accessibility<br />

concerns, and offering wider community benefits for the local<br />

community.<br />

There is no record of any archaeological designations or<br />

features within this site or in close proximity.<br />

A preliminary desk top assessment of designations has been<br />

undertaken to identify any sites which are located within 250<br />

metres of Special Areas of Conservation, Sites of Special<br />

Scientific Interest, Special Protection Areas, <strong>National</strong> Nature<br />

Reserves, Local Nature Reserves, RAMSAR sties, County<br />

Wildlife Sites, and Regionally Important Geological and<br />

Geomorphological Sites. This site is not located within 250<br />

metres of any of these nature designations so there is unlikely to<br />

be any adverse impact but any proposals that may have a direct<br />

or indirect effect on these features will be expected to give full<br />

consideration of the potential impact.<br />

It is also possible that this site hosts protected habitats and


Contaminate<br />

d land<br />

Flood risk<br />

Health and<br />

Wellbeing<br />

Highways<br />

Historic<br />

environment<br />

Landscape<br />

species which will require further consideration prior to the<br />

submission of any planning application for the development of<br />

the site. Mitigation measures may be required.<br />

This site is previously developed having most recently being<br />

used as barracks for the Ministry of Defence. Although it is<br />

considered unlikely to be contaminated further desk based<br />

investigations may need to be undertaken to establish if there is<br />

potential of contamination of this site given it is a previously<br />

developed site. If found to be contaminated remediation<br />

measures would be required.<br />

This site is in a low risk area. It is located within a Zone 1 Low<br />

Probability which is assessed as having a less than 1 in 1000<br />

annual probability of river flooding in any year. We are not<br />

aware of any reported localized flooding episodes.<br />

Any subsequent application for this site will need to address<br />

surface water run-off in order to comply with CS11 and CS17 of<br />

the Core Strategy.<br />

This site is not currently accessible via a Public Right of Way<br />

and the site is not designated as Important Open Space for<br />

Recreation under Local Plan Policy S1, therefore development<br />

would not result in the loss of recreational opportunities.<br />

Development proposals would be expected to have regard to<br />

the community’s aspiration (within the Parish Plan) to<br />

retaining/redeveloping community facilities (such as a swimming<br />

pool) on the site.<br />

Cumbria Highways commented that this is an ‘isolated<br />

(unsustainable) site which will be reliant on private car use.<br />

Improved pedestrian and cycleway links back towards <strong>Bootle</strong><br />

should be secured, however, unlikely to overcome the<br />

accessibility problems associated with the location. The access<br />

is not considered to be feasible, and there are known highway<br />

issues’.<br />

Whilst the concerns of Cumbria Highways are noted, this site is<br />

of strategic importance to the community of <strong>Bootle</strong>. The principle<br />

of its redevelopment is supported by the adopted Core Strategy,<br />

and the opportunity to provide high quality links between the<br />

site, and <strong>Bootle</strong> and <strong>Bootle</strong> Station offer wider community<br />

benefits which can be secured through the redevelopment of<br />

this site.<br />

This site is not located within 250 metres of a conservation area<br />

or listed buildings.<br />

This area is characterised by the flat to gently undulating<br />

topography of this area of coastal plain, with its regular network<br />

of pastoral fields, which are divided by a mixture of hedgerows,<br />

dry stone walls, kests, and wire fences, which provides stark<br />

contrast with the vast expansive open seascape to the west and<br />

the dramatic rising High Fells to the east.<br />

This site sits comfortably within this landscape but the vacant<br />

and derelict appearance of the buildings within this site makes a


negative contribution to the character of the landscape. Much of<br />

this site does appear have returned back to Greenfield land<br />

particularly in the south west portion of the site.<br />

Neighbour<br />

impact<br />

Planning<br />

history<br />

(including<br />

relevant<br />

appeals)<br />

Settlement<br />

character<br />

Tree and<br />

Woodlands<br />

Utilities<br />

(electricity/g<br />

as)<br />

The site occupies a fold in the low lying coastal plain and is<br />

relatively well screened by the trees along the boundary.<br />

Appropriate redevelopment of this site will enhance the<br />

appearance of this site, as it will result in the<br />

removal/redevelopment of the existing buildings which detract<br />

from the landscape character. The topography of the site and<br />

consideration of the scale and mass of development will ensure<br />

that redevelopment overcomes concerns raised by the Planning<br />

Inspector in reaching his conclusions for the 2004 planning<br />

appeal for a holiday lodge development.<br />

There is a residential dwelling located near the north eastern<br />

boundary of this site but it is located on the opposite side of the<br />

road. It is unlikely that there would be any unacceptable<br />

neighbour amenity issues resulting from an acceptable proposal<br />

including residential and employment uses.<br />

A series of planning applications has been submitted on this site<br />

in the past. Most recently planning permission was refused in<br />

2004 for a holiday lodge development, and an appeal was<br />

subsequently dismissed. The Inspector concluded that the<br />

proposal would be harmful to the landscape of the <strong>National</strong><br />

<strong>Park</strong>, and the benefits of the scheme do not outweigh the harm.<br />

A certificate for lawfulness was refused in 2003 for a<br />

dwellinghouse. However also in 2003 planning permission was<br />

granted for the replacement of a substandard dwelling and this<br />

is an extant permission.<br />

Whilst not immediately adjacent to <strong>Bootle</strong>, the site is only a short<br />

distance from <strong>Bootle</strong>, and accessibility can be significantly<br />

improved. <strong>Bootle</strong> does not have a distinct vernacular or historic<br />

form and this lessens its sensitivity to new development.<br />

The majority of the existing buildings on the site are in a poor<br />

state of repair therefore the redevelopment of this site would<br />

have a positive effect on the settlement and surrounding<br />

landscape.<br />

There are some trees located along the boundary of this site<br />

and occasional individual specimens located within this site. If<br />

developed it may be necessary to remove the existing trees<br />

within the site but this would not lead the loss of any individually<br />

important specimens, nor could it adversely affect the overall<br />

amenity value of the site. Mitigation measures such as root<br />

protection areas may be required for trees located on the<br />

boundary on the site.<br />

Electricity- ENWL has a commitment to provide an electricity<br />

supply to new build development. ENWL determine the cost of<br />

connection and the developer would be expected to contribute<br />

part or all of this cost. Sites closer to sub-stations and existing<br />

developments are likely to result in lower connection


costs. Further information is required to provide a detailed<br />

response.<br />

Utilities<br />

(Sewerage/d<br />

rainage)<br />

Utilities<br />

(water)<br />

Gas- No capacity issues have been identified. It should be<br />

possible to supply sites on an individual basis from the existing<br />

low pressure system. However, to provide a firm response<br />

detailed information is required.<br />

Approximately 14 new dwellings can be accommodated by the<br />

existing waste water network and treatment facilities.<br />

Additionally, the redevelopment of Wellbank Camp should not<br />

create significant problems because the waste treatment plant<br />

will already have capacity for its former use as a Ministry of<br />

Defence base. UU would need further details of a proposal.<br />

There are no water supply issues or constraints in <strong>Bootle</strong>.<br />

Summary of consultation comments<br />

Housing: Support: 0 Object: 1 Don't mind: 0<br />

Employment: Support: 0 Object: 1 Don't mind: 0<br />

Waste Management: Support: 0 Object: 1 Don't mind: 0<br />

Open Space: Support: 0 Object: 0 Don't mind: 1<br />

Concerns over the development of this site in its totality, due to its size, location, and<br />

resultant impacts upon the surrounding countryside. It is noted that the site contains<br />

areas of brownfield land, and is relatively well landscaped. Employment use may be<br />

appropriate should access issues be able to be resolved. The site is inappropriate<br />

for housing given its remoteness.<br />

Isolated (unsustainable) site which will be reliant on private car use. Improved<br />

pedestrian and cycleway links back towards <strong>Bootle</strong> should be secured, however,<br />

unlikely to overcome the accessibility problems associated with the location. The<br />

access is not considered to be feasible, and there are known highway issues.<br />

Summary of assessment with regards to HRA/SA<br />

Housing Development<br />

Significant positive effect on SA objective (++):<br />

SA 3: To provide everyone with a decent home<br />

Significant negative effect on SA objective (--):<br />

SA 2: To improve access to services, facilities, the countryside and open space<br />

SA 5: To improve health and wellbeing<br />

SA 10: To improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions<br />

SA 15: To improve access to jobs<br />

Uncertain but potentially significant effect on SA objective (--? or ++?):<br />

None identified.<br />

Minor positive effect on SA objective (+):<br />

None identified.


Minor negative effect on objective (-):<br />

None identified.<br />

Uncertain, potentially minor effect on SA objective (-? or +?):<br />

SA 7: To protect and enhance biodiversity (-?)<br />

SA 17: To protect historic assets and their settings (-?)<br />

Uncertain effect on objective (?)<br />

SA 8: To preserve, enhance and manage landscape quality and character for future<br />

generations<br />

Negligible effect on objective (0)<br />

None identified.<br />

Employment Development:<br />

Significant positive effect on SA objective (++):<br />

None identified<br />

Significant negative effect on SA objective (--):<br />

None identified<br />

Uncertain but potentially significant effect on SA objective (--? or ++?):<br />

None identified<br />

Minor positive effect on SA objective (+):<br />

SA 5: To improve health and wellbeing<br />

Minor negative effect on objective (-):<br />

None identified<br />

Uncertain, potentially minor effect on SA objective (-? or +?):<br />

SA 7: To protect and enhance biodiversity (-?)<br />

SA 17: To protect historic assets and their settings (-?)<br />

Uncertain effect on objective (?)<br />

SA 8: To preserve, enhance and manage landscape quality and character for future<br />

generations<br />

Negligible effect on objective (0)<br />

SA 10: To improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions<br />

SA 11: To improve water quality and water resources<br />

SA 15: To improve access to jobs<br />

Summary of Habitats Regulations Assessment Evidence:<br />

The potential scale of development at this site is medium (1.0-10.0 ha).<br />

It does not lie within 250m of any European sites.<br />

Summary of assessment findings (i.e. above)<br />

There are few sites which offer such opportunities to seek improvements to the local<br />

area and community than this site does. The site is recognised in the Core Strategy<br />

(Policy CS06) as of strategic importance to <strong>Bootle</strong> for redevelopment. This former<br />

barracks site is currently vacant and the buildings on site are in a poor state of


epair, as a result this site is considered to make a negative contribution to the<br />

character of the landscape. The site occupies a fold in the land so is relatively well<br />

screened and it is considered that further development can be accommodated on<br />

this site subject to appropriate scale, design, and layout.<br />

The site is not located immediately adjacent to <strong>Bootle</strong> as it is approximately 700<br />

metres from the village, and 800 metres in the other direction to <strong>Bootle</strong> Station.<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> does not have a distinct vernacular or historic form so lessens its sensitivity to<br />

new development. Cumbria Highways commented ‘development will be reliant on<br />

private car use. Improved pedestrian and cycleway links back towards <strong>Bootle</strong><br />

should be secured.’ This site offers the opportunity, and would be a requirement of<br />

redevelopment, to improve pedestrian and cycleway links to both <strong>Bootle</strong> and <strong>Bootle</strong><br />

Station as the site is almost equidistant between the two. This improvement would<br />

be to the benefit of the wider community and not just this site. The Parish Plan<br />

highlights the community’s aspiration to retain/redevelop the swimming pool on the<br />

site as part of any scheme as this is seen as a valued community facility.<br />

As a result of the former use it may be necessary to undertake further investigations<br />

to determine if this site contains contaminated land. Redevelopment of the site would<br />

not result in the loss of individually important specimens of trees or affect the overall<br />

amenity value of the site.<br />

In order to redevelop this site to incorporate community facilities and open space it is<br />

assumed that 25% of the site would be developed for housing and 25% would be<br />

developed for employment land. Other uses on the remaining area of the site will be<br />

considered through the submission of a planning application.<br />

No Yes<br />

Is this site selected as a preferred option?<br />

If so, for what use?<br />

<br />

Mixed use – housing,<br />

employment, and open<br />

space (and other uses<br />

which will be assessed<br />

through submission of a<br />

planning application)<br />

Is boundary to be redrawn? (as No New site area (Ha) 4.36<br />

shown on ‘preferred options’ map)<br />

Suggested requirements if allocated<br />

Provision of pedestrian/cycle links between <strong>Bootle</strong> and <strong>Bootle</strong> Station<br />

Provision of open space and community facilities<br />

Site reference X112 Site area (Ha) 4.36<br />

Site name<br />

Wellbank Camp, <strong>Bootle</strong><br />

Suggested use at Issues and Open space amenity<br />

Options<br />

Key issues identified at Stage 2 Possible to overcome or mitigate the issue?<br />

through issues and options<br />

consultation<br />

No (give reason)<br />

Further<br />

assessment<br />

required (see<br />

below)<br />

Potential competing uses.<br />

Yes


Stage 3 – amenity open space<br />

Is there a local deficiency of this type of open space?<br />

Is there a local surplus of this type of open space?<br />

Is the site publicly accessible?<br />

Is the site used for recreation?<br />

Is the site within or well related to a settlement?<br />

Is the site or its use mentioned in the community plan?<br />

If applicable, does the community plan recognise it as<br />

worthy of retention for its current use?<br />

Does the site contribute to the character of the built<br />

environment, landscape, or settlement form?<br />

Has an alternative use or development been suggested?<br />

Description of reasonable alternative use(s):<br />

Housing, employment<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

If a new use is suggested what is the justification or considerations to justify<br />

an alternative use or development?<br />

The site is currently a disused MOD site, owned by a private landowner. There is an<br />

identified need for local housing in <strong>Bootle</strong>, and a need for local employment. The<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> community plan identifies the Wellbank Camp site as having potential for<br />

housing and employment development, and the community would like to retain the<br />

swimming pool currently there. There is an identified deficiency of amenity open<br />

space in <strong>Bootle</strong>, and a gap in provision of public parks.<br />

Site characteristics<br />

Large site with a series of single story buildings, which are now all vacant. The site is<br />

untidy where buildings are located. Quiet location between <strong>Bootle</strong> and <strong>Bootle</strong><br />

Station, with access directly from the road linking <strong>Bootle</strong> with <strong>Bootle</strong> Station. The<br />

road is a narrow country lane. <strong>Bootle</strong> train station is approximately 0.5 miles away.<br />

The site is close enough to walk to services in <strong>Bootle</strong>, but there is currently no<br />

footpath or cycleway access. As the site is privately owned, it is not currently publicly<br />

accessible, apart from limited access to the swimming pool.<br />

Street lighting and some roads are present within the site. Some of site appears to<br />

have gone back to greenfield status. Well screened from the road by trees.<br />

Summary of consultation comments<br />

One comment supporting open space designation. One comment objecting to each<br />

of housing, employment, and waste management allocations. Cumbria County<br />

Council has advised that there is a known highways issue. Objections are based on<br />

the impact of development on the surrounding countryside.<br />

Summary of qualitative assessment with regards to HRA/SA<br />

Housing Development


Significant positive effect on SA objective (++):<br />

SA 3: To provide everyone with a decent home<br />

Significant negative effect on SA objective (--):<br />

SA 2: To improve access to services, facilities, the countryside and open space<br />

SA 5: To improve health and wellbeing<br />

SA 10: To improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions<br />

SA 15: To improve access to jobs<br />

Uncertain but potentially significant effect on SA objective (--? or ++?):<br />

None identified.<br />

Minor positive effect on SA objective (+):<br />

None identified.<br />

Minor negative effect on objective (-):<br />

None identified.<br />

Uncertain, potentially minor effect on SA objective (-? or +?):<br />

SA 7: To protect and enhance biodiversity (-?)<br />

SA 17: To protect historic assets and their settings (-?)<br />

Uncertain effect on objective (?)<br />

SA 8: To preserve, enhance and manage landscape quality and character for future<br />

generations<br />

Negligible effect on objective (0)<br />

None identified.<br />

Employment Development:<br />

Significant positive effect on SA objective (++):<br />

None identified<br />

Significant negative effect on SA objective (--):<br />

None identified<br />

Uncertain but potentially significant effect on SA objective (--? or ++?):<br />

None identified<br />

Minor positive effect on SA objective (+):<br />

SA 5: To improve health and wellbeing<br />

Minor negative effect on objective (-):<br />

None identified<br />

Uncertain, potentially minor effect on SA objective (-? or +?):<br />

SA 7: To protect and enhance biodiversity (-?)<br />

SA 17: To protect historic assets and their settings (-?)<br />

Uncertain effect on objective (?)


SA 8: To preserve, enhance and manage landscape quality and character for future<br />

generations<br />

Negligible effect on objective (0)<br />

SA 10: To improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions<br />

SA 11: To improve water quality and water resources<br />

SA 15: To improve access to jobs<br />

Summary of Habitats Regulations Assessment Evidence:<br />

The potential scale of development at this site is medium (1.0-10.0 ha).<br />

It does not lie within 250m of any European sites.<br />

Summary of assessment findings (i.e. above)<br />

Any housing and/or employment development at Wellbank should include an<br />

element of open space and the designation of the open space areas. There is a<br />

deficiency of amenity open space in <strong>Bootle</strong>, and a gap in provision of public parks.<br />

Development of the overall site should provide publicly available open space,<br />

including informal recreation space (‘kickabout’ areas), and an element of public park<br />

space if future maintenance can be secured.<br />

It would be beneficial to the local community to retain access to a swimming pool on<br />

this site, whether it is in a new building or in the existing building.<br />

Yes No<br />

Should this site be designated as amenity open <br />

space?


Site reference X284 Site area (Ha) 1.93<br />

Site name<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> sports fields<br />

Suggested use at Issues and Open space recreation<br />

Options<br />

Key issues identified at Stage 2 Possible to overcome or mitigate the issue?<br />

through issues and options<br />

consultation<br />

No (give reason)<br />

Further<br />

assessment<br />

required (see<br />

below)<br />

No issues identified<br />

Stage 3 – Recreation open space<br />

Is there a local deficiency of this type of open space?<br />

Is there a local surplus of this type of open space?<br />

Is site still in recreational use?<br />

Is the site or its use mentioned in the community plan?<br />

If applicable does the community plan recognise it as<br />

worthy of retention for its current use?<br />

Does the site contribute to the character of the built<br />

environment, landscape, or settlement form?<br />

Is the site within or well related to a settlement?<br />

Is the site publicly accessible?<br />

Has an alternative use or development been suggested?<br />

Description of reasonable alternative use(s):<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

N/A<br />

No<br />

If a new use is suggested what is the justification or considerations to justify<br />

an alternative use or development?<br />

Site characteristics<br />

Playing fields and <strong>Bootle</strong> and <strong>District</strong> Bowling Club. Flat, good access to main road,<br />

well maintained.<br />

Comments from Sport England (required if an alternative use is pursued)<br />

Summary of consultation comments<br />

No comments received


Summary of assessment with regards to HRA/SA<br />

Summary of assessment findings (i.e. above)<br />

Playing fields and <strong>Bootle</strong> and <strong>District</strong> Bowling Club. Flat, good access to main road,<br />

well maintained.<br />

Should this site be designated as formal recreation<br />

open space?<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No


Site reference X438 Site area (Ha) 0.67<br />

Site name<br />

Field off Church Lane<br />

Suggested use at Issues and Housing<br />

Options<br />

Key issues identified at Stage 2 Can issue be potentially overcome/mitigated?<br />

through Issues and Options<br />

consultation<br />

No (give reason)<br />

Further<br />

assessment<br />

required (see<br />

Acceptable in principle subject to<br />

securing a suitable access<br />

arrangement. The frontage of the<br />

site could be affected by a<br />

proposed footway/cycleway route.<br />

Access is considered to be<br />

feasible and there are no known<br />

highway issues.<br />

Yes<br />

below)<br />

Stage 3<br />

No Yes<br />

Is the site available?<br />

<br />

Site characteristics<br />

This site is an agricultural field located on the northern edge of <strong>Bootle</strong>. The site is<br />

located directly north of Church Lane, to the east of the site is an agricultural field<br />

and the graveyard, and to the north and west is agricultural land. There is no<br />

development on this side of Church Lane but residential dwellings are located on the<br />

opposite side of this road. This site is flat, there is a field gate off Church Lane, and<br />

hedgerows form the boundary of the site fronting the highway.<br />

Further Can issues be overcome/mitigated?<br />

issues/opp Are there opportunities for enhancement?<br />

ortunities to<br />

consider<br />

Issues and opportunities<br />

Green = no issue<br />

Amber = issues can be<br />

addressed through mitigation<br />

Red = Issue cannot be<br />

satisfactorily addressed<br />

= Opportunity for<br />

enhancement<br />

Accessibility This site is located within 600 metres of services and facilities in<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> including the Primary School, convenience store, GP<br />

Surgery and public transport facilities. There is a surfaced<br />

footpath opposite this site on Church Lane therefore this site is<br />

considered to be accessible.<br />

Archaeology There are no records of any archaeological features on this site.<br />

Biodiversity/<br />

Geodiversity<br />

A preliminary desk top assessment of designations has been<br />

undertaken to identify any sites which are located within 250<br />

metres of Special Areas of Conservation, Sites of Special<br />

Scientific Interest, Special Protection Areas, <strong>National</strong> Nature<br />

Reserves, Local Nature Reserves, RAMSAR sties, County<br />

Wildlife Sites, and Regionally Important Geological and


Geomorphological Sites. This site is not located within 250<br />

metres of any of these nature designations so there is unlikely to<br />

be any adverse impact but any proposals that may have a direct<br />

or indirect effect on these features will be expected to give full<br />

consideration of the potential impact.<br />

Contaminate<br />

d land<br />

Flood risk<br />

Health and<br />

Wellbeing<br />

Highways<br />

Historic<br />

environment<br />

Landscape<br />

It is also possible that this site hosts protected habitats and<br />

species which will require further consideration prior to the<br />

submission of any planning application for the development of<br />

the site. Mitigation measures may be required.<br />

This site is an agricultural field and the planning history does not<br />

indicate any alternative uses. Therefore, it is unlikely that there<br />

would be any contamination issues on this site.<br />

This site is in a low risk area. It is located within a Zone 1 Low<br />

Probability which is assessed as having a less than 1 in 1000<br />

annual probability of river flooding in any year. We are not<br />

aware of any reported localized flooding episodes.<br />

Any subsequent application for this site will need to address<br />

surface water run-off in order to comply with CS11 and CS17 of<br />

the Core Strategy.<br />

This site is not currently accessible via a Public Right of Way<br />

and the site is not designated as Important Open Space for<br />

Recreation under Local Plan Policy S1, therefore development<br />

would not result in the loss of recreational opportunities.<br />

Cumbria Highways commented that this site is acceptable in<br />

principle subject to securing a suitable access arrangement.<br />

The frontage of the site could be affected by a proposed<br />

footway/cycleway route. Access is considered to be feasible<br />

and there are no known highway issues.<br />

The site is located within 250 metres of listed buildings. The<br />

closest listed building is St Michael’s Church which is located to<br />

the east of the site on the opposite side of the A595. Although<br />

there are distant views of the church from the site it is<br />

considered that providing any development is of an acceptable<br />

scale there wouldn’t be an unacceptable adverse impact to the<br />

character and setting of this listed building.<br />

This area is characterised by the flat to gently undulating<br />

topography of this area of coastal plain, with its regular network<br />

of pastoral fields, which are divided by a mixture of hedgerows,<br />

dry stone walls, kests, and wire fences, which provides stark<br />

contrast with the vast expansive open seascape to the west and<br />

the dramatic rising High Fells to the east.<br />

This field forms the beginning of open countryside, when<br />

approaching along Church Lane from the west there are views<br />

across to the High Fell to the east, and closer to the site there is<br />

partially obscured views of the Church. However, these views<br />

are seen in the context of relatively modern residential<br />

development on the opposite side of the road.<br />

The site is flat therefore providing the scale of development is


Neighbour<br />

impact<br />

Planning<br />

history<br />

(including<br />

relevant<br />

appeals)<br />

Settlement<br />

character<br />

Tree and<br />

Woodlands<br />

Utilities<br />

(electricity/g<br />

as)<br />

appropriate there would not be a dominating impact on the open<br />

countryside as development could sit comfortably within its<br />

context on the edge of the settlement with further planting.<br />

There are no residential properties adjacent to this site as such<br />

there will be no detrimental impact on the neighbour amenity.<br />

Planning permission was granted in 1993 to move the gateway<br />

of the site.<br />

This site is located on the northern fringe of <strong>Bootle</strong>. Church<br />

Lane marks currently the beginning of open countryside as there<br />

is no development beyond this highway to the north. However,<br />

the presence of the graveyard adjacent to the site means<br />

Church Lane does not give way solely to agricultural land. If this<br />

site was developed it would be located close to existing<br />

residential dwellings, and some development could be seen as<br />

a natural evolution of the settlement. These dwellings opposite<br />

the site do not display characteristics of traditional vernacular<br />

buildings as they are relatively modern, as such development is<br />

considered to be more appropriate in this location than in the<br />

more historical parts of the settlement.<br />

The scale, design, and layout are important considerations to<br />

ensure development does not appear as a sporadic<br />

development in the open countryside. A comprehensive<br />

planting scheme would also be required to help mediate the<br />

transition from built development to open countryside. There is<br />

also a danger that development of this site would set a<br />

precedent for future development to the west of the site further<br />

extending into the open countryside.<br />

There are no trees within this site, although there are some<br />

located in around the boundary of this site which is<br />

predominantly hedgerow. There are two mature oak trees on<br />

the boundary, one on the southern boundary and one on<br />

northern boundary. Both of these have a diameter of<br />

approximately 500mm therefore requiring root protection areas<br />

of a minimum of 6m. This would particularly need to be taken<br />

into account for the access to the site off the southern boundary.<br />

It is not anticipated that development of the site would result in<br />

the loss of trees.<br />

Electricity- ENWL has a commitment to provide an electricity<br />

supply to new build development. ENWL determine the cost of<br />

connection and the developer would be expected to contribute<br />

part or all of this cost. Sites closer to sub-stations and existing<br />

developments are likely to result in lower connection<br />

costs. Further information is required to provide a detailed<br />

response.<br />

Gas- No capacity issues have been identified. It should be<br />

possible to supply sites on an individual basis from the existing<br />

low pressure system. However, to provide a firm response


Utilities<br />

(Sewerage/d<br />

rainage)<br />

Utilities<br />

(water)<br />

detailed information is required.<br />

Approximately 14 new dwellings can be accommodated by the<br />

existing waste water network and treatment facilities.<br />

There are no water supply issues or constraints in <strong>Bootle</strong>.<br />

Summary of consultation comments<br />

Housing: Support: 0 Object: 0 Don't mind: 0<br />

Employment: Support: 0 Object: 0 Don't mind: 0<br />

Waste Management: Support: 0 Object: 0 Don't mind: 0<br />

Open Space: Support: 0 Object: 0 Don't mind: 0<br />

Acceptable in principle subject to securing a suitable access arrangement. The<br />

frontage of the site could be affected by a proposed footway/cycleway route. Access<br />

is considered to be feasible and there are no known highway issues.<br />

Summary of assessment with regards to HRA/SA<br />

Housing Development<br />

Significant positive effect on SA objective (++):<br />

SA 3: To provide everyone with a decent home<br />

SA 15: To improve access to jobs<br />

Significant negative effect on SA objective (--):<br />

None identified.<br />

Uncertain but potentially significant effect on SA objective (--? or ++?):<br />

SA 17: To protect historic assets and their settings (--?)<br />

Minor positive effect on SA objective (+):<br />

None identified.<br />

Minor negative effect on objective (-):<br />

None identified.<br />

Uncertain, potentially minor effect on SA objective (-? or +?):<br />

SA 7: To protect and enhance biodiversity (-?)<br />

Uncertain effect on objective (?)<br />

SA 8: To preserve, enhance and manage landscape quality and character for future<br />

generations<br />

Negligible effect on objective (0)<br />

SA 2: To improve access to services, facilities, the countryside and open space<br />

SA 5: To improve health and wellbeing<br />

SA 10: To improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions<br />

Employment Development<br />

LDNPA does not consider that this site is a reasonable alternative for employment<br />

development.


Summary of Habitats Regulations Assessment Evidence:<br />

The potential scale of development at this site is small (


Site reference X441 Site area (Ha) 0.73<br />

Site name<br />

<strong>Bootle</strong> playing field and playground<br />

Suggested use at Issues and Open space recreation<br />

Options<br />

Key issues identified at Stage 2 Possible to overcome or mitigate the issue?<br />

through issues and options<br />

consultation<br />

No (give reason)<br />

Further<br />

assessment<br />

required (see<br />

below)<br />

No issues identified<br />

Stage 3 – Recreation open space<br />

Is there a local deficiency of this type of open space?<br />

Is there a local surplus of this type of open space?<br />

Is site still in recreational use?<br />

Is the site or its use mentioned in the community plan?<br />

If applicable does the community plan recognise it as<br />

worthy of retention for its current use?<br />

Does the site contribute to the character of the built<br />

environment, landscape, or settlement form?<br />

Is the site within or well related to a settlement?<br />

Is the site publicly accessible?<br />

Has an alternative use or development been suggested?<br />

Description of reasonable alternative use(s):<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

No<br />

N/A<br />

No<br />

If a new use is suggested what is the justification or considerations to justify<br />

an alternative use or development?<br />

Site characteristics<br />

Playground includes informal kickabout area, used by Captain Shaw School. Flat,<br />

well maintained, frequently used.<br />

Comments from Sport England (required if an alternative use is pursued)<br />

Summary of consultation comments<br />

No comments received


Summary of assessment with regards to HRA/SA<br />

Summary of assessment findings (i.e. above)<br />

Playground includes informal kickabout area, used by Captain Shaw School.<br />

Should this site be designated as formal recreation<br />

open space?<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

No

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!