Witherslack - Preferred Site Assessments (PDF) - Lake District ...
Witherslack - Preferred Site Assessments (PDF) - Lake District ...
Witherslack - Preferred Site Assessments (PDF) - Lake District ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
o Feasible – Yes<br />
o Known Highway Issue – No<br />
o Comment – Acceptable in principle subject to securing a suitable assess<br />
arrangement.<br />
Main reasons for objection<br />
o Concerns over the development of this site, due to its location, and resultant<br />
impacts upon village character and the surrounding countryside.<br />
Other comments received:<br />
o Concern about the cumulative impact of development.<br />
Summary of assessment with regards to HRA/SA<br />
Housing Development:<br />
Significant positive effect on SA objective (++):<br />
SA 3: To provide everyone with a decent home<br />
Significant negative effect on SA objective (--):<br />
SA 2: To improve access to services, facilities, the countryside and open space<br />
SA 5: To improve health and wellbeing<br />
SA 10: To improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions<br />
SA 15: To improve access to jobs<br />
Uncertain but potentially significant effect on SA objective (--? or ++?):<br />
SA 7: To protect and enhance biodiversity (--?)<br />
SA 8: To preserve, enhance and manage landscape quality and character for future<br />
generations (--?)<br />
Minor positive effect on SA objective (+):<br />
None identified.<br />
Minor negative effect on objective (-):<br />
None identified.<br />
Uncertain, potentially minor effect on SA objective (-? or +?):<br />
SA 17: To protect historic assets and their settings (-?)<br />
Uncertain effect on objective (?)<br />
None identified.<br />
Negligible effect on objective (0)<br />
None identified.<br />
Employment Development:<br />
LDNPA does not consider that this site is a reasonable alternative for employment<br />
development.<br />
Summary of Habitats Regulations Assessment Evidence:<br />
The potential scale of development at this site is small (