National Education Technology Plan - Baker School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Leadership for System-Wide Rethinking Influencing and empowering school leaders to make sound decisions is critical to leveraging the opportunities offered by technology. Susan Cates, ThinkEquity Partners, San Francisco, CA Sue Collins, KCH Strategies & Apex Learning, Mercer Island, WA Chris Dede, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA JoLynne DeMary, Virginia Department of Education, Richmond, VA Sylvia Diaz, Miami-Dade Public County Schools, Miami, FL Daniel Duke, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA David Dwyer, Apex Learning, Bellevue, WA Mark Edwards, Henrico County Public Schools, Richmond, VA Julie Evans, NetDay, Irvine, CA Janice Fletcher, Georgia’s Leadership Institute for School Improvement, Atlanta, GA Gordon Freedman, Knowledge Base, Carmel, CA Mike Hill, National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE), Alexandria, VA Sally Johnstone, WCET, Boulder, CO Marina Leight, Center for Digital Education, Folsom, CA Christine Master, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Miami, FL Linda Roberts, Darnestown, MD David Thornburg, Thornburg Center, Lake Barrington, IL Norma Thornburg, Thornburg Center, Lake Barrington, IL Kimberly Tulp, Education Leaders Council, Washington, DC Carla Wade, Oregon Department of Education, Salem, OR Chris Walsh, KIPP National, San Francisco, CA Vicki Wilson, Henrico County Public Schools, Richmond, VA Virtual School and E-Learning Opportunities Online courses and supplemental services are proliferating and offer increased high-quality choices for students and parents. State and local policies may be inhibiting their growth and adoption. 54 Jim Benitez, Aventa Learning, Seattle, WA Cliff Blackerby, Texas Region IV, Houston, TX Linda Cavalluzzo, The CNA Corporation, Alexandria, VA
Tom Clark, TA Consulting, Springfield, IL Sue Collins, KCH Strategies, Mercer Island, WA Barbara Dreyer, Connections Academy, Baltimore, MD Anita Givens, Texas Education Agency, Austin, TX Marina Leight, Center for Digital Government, Folsom, CA Dane Linn, National Governors Association, Washington, DC Keith Oelrich, KC Distance Learning, Portland, OR Liz Pape, Virtual High School, Maynard, MA Linda Pittenger, Kentucky Virtual High School, Frankfort, KY Randy Rhine, Montana State University-Billings, Billings, MT Ray Rose, The Concord Consortium, Concord, MA Art Sheekey, CNA Corporation, Alexandria, VA Burck Smith, Smarthinking, Washington, DC Tim Stroud, North American Council for Online Learning, Washington, DC Bill Thomas, Southern Regional Education Board, Atlanta, GA Robert Tinker, Concord Consortium, Concord, MA Gil Valdez, Learning Point Associates, Naperville, IL Julie Young, Florida Virtual School, Orlando, FL Charles Zogby, K12 Inc., McLean, VA Technology’s Role in Teacher Quality The definition of a high-quality teaching force must shift with the times – and along with it, colleges of education and professional development providers need to seek out new, innovative ways to train and support educators. Steven Bossert, Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC), Newark, DE Edward Clifton, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS), Arlington, VA Bobb Darnell, Forest View Educational Center, Arlington Heights, IL Kathleen Fulton, National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (NCTAF), Washington, DC Ronald Gallimore, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, Los Angeles, CA Cathy Gunn, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), Naperville, IL Marianne Handler, National-Louis University, Wheeling, IL Sharnell Jackson, Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, IL Cheryl Lani Juárez, Miami Museum of Science and Planetarium, Miami, FL Jim Konantz, California Virtual Academies, Oakland, CA 55
Page 1 and 2:
Toward A New Golden Age In American
Page 3 and 4:
Toward A New Golden Age In American
Page 5 and 6: The Impact of No Child Left Behind
Page 7 and 8: Teachers and students are transform
Page 9 and 10: There has been explosive growth in
Page 11 and 12: A Nation on the Move Twenty-one yea
Page 13 and 14: Today’s students, of almost any a
Page 15 and 16: No Child Left Behind created new st
Page 17 and 18: Twenty years of national data show
Page 19 and 20: • 49 percent say they may be inte
Page 21 and 22: These are clearly exciting times fo
Page 23 and 24: like that. We should not have to ca
Page 25 and 26: Success Stories from Schools That A
Page 27 and 28: o language learners to compare achi
Page 29 and 30: Founded in 1997, the state-funded i
Page 31 and 32: makes this effort extraordinary is
Page 33 and 34: New Mexico Two years ago in New Mex
Page 35 and 36: • A number of other states and ot
Page 37 and 38: courses by mail. But through today
Page 39 and 40: The Impact of No Child Left Behind
Page 41 and 42: A National Education Technology Pla
Page 43 and 44: effective use of technology to enha
Page 45 and 46: • Encourage that broadband is ava
Page 47 and 48: Conclusions • There is no dispute
Page 49 and 50: Appendices A. Joint Federal Activit
Page 51 and 52: to strengthen this portfolio, and s
Page 53 and 54: APPENDIX B How This Plan Was Develo
Page 55: Kendall Starkweather, International
Page 59 and 60: Garret Sern, EDUCAUSE, Washington,
Page 61 and 62: Joe Simpson, Council of Chief State
Page 63 and 64: APPENDIX C Acknowledgements We want
Page 65 and 66: APPENDIX D Endnotes 1 National Comm
Page 67 and 68: 17 Ibid. See http://www.nces.ed.gov
Page 69 and 70: 43 Ibid. 44 Ibid. 45 See State Educ
Page 72: 70 U.S. Department of Education Off
show all

National Education Technology Plan - Baker School District

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?