National Education Technology Plan - Baker School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

52 Gene Broderson, Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), Washington, DC Majorie Bynum, Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), Arlington, VA Tom Carroll, National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (NCTAF), Washington, DC Julie Copty, Association of American Publishers (AAP), Washington, DC Nzigna Damal-Cathie, American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE), Washington, DC Buffy DeBreaux-Watts, American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence (ABCTE), Washington, DC Norris Dickard, The Benton Foundation, Washington, DC Paul Gardner, Association of Educational Publishers (AEP), Logan Township, NJ Melinda George, State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), Arlington, VA Michael Hill, National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE), Alexandria, VA Alisha Dixon Hyslop, Association for Career and Technical Education (ACTE), Alexandria, VA Allan Jordan, North American Council for Online Learning, (NACOL), Boulder, CO Don Knezek, International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), Washington, DC Keith Krueger, Consortium for School Networking (CoSN), Washington, DC Richard Mainzer, Professional Standards and Practice Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), Arlington, VA Sally McConnell, National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP), Alexandria, VA Sara McPhee, National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium (NASDCTEc), Washington, DC Scott Montgomery, Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), Washington, DC Nancy Reder, National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), Alexandria, VA Margaret Rivera, American Association of Community Colleges, Washington, DC Mark Schneiderman, Software & Information Industry Association, Washington, DC Pat Shea, Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications (WCET), Boulder, CO Irene Spero, NetDay, Irvine, CA
Kendall Starkweather, International Technology Education Association (ITEA), Reston, VA Barbara Stein, National Education Association, Washington, DC Kimberly Tulp, Education Leaders Council (ELC), Washington, DC Julie Walker, American Association of School Librarians (AASL), Chicago, IL Robert Wickenden, Association of Educational Publishers (AEP), Logan Township, NJ Exploring the Digital Generation Research suggests that students today are coming to school with different expectations for their education due in large part to their use of technology in out-of-school settings. Today’s generation of students represents an as of yet untapped impetus for school reform. Stephanie Azzarone, Child’s Play Communications, New York, NY Robbie Blinkoff, Context-Based Research Group, Baltimore, MD Kevin Bryne, Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans, Alexandria, VA Alice Cahn, Coliseum Live Entertainment, New York, NY Sandra Calvert, Georgetown University, Washington, DC David Dwyer, Apex Learning, Bellevue, WA Julie Evans, NetDay, Irvine, CA Peter Grunwald, Grunwald Associates, San Mateo, CA Karen Jaffe, Child Trends, Washington, DC Neil Howe, LifeCourse Associates, Great Falls, VA Robert Kominski, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC Greg Livingston, WonderGroup, Cincinnati, OH Bruce Mehlman, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC Diana Oblinger, Microsoft Corporation, Apex, NC Michelle Poris, Yankelovich Partners, Inc., Norwalk, CT Marc Prensky, games2train, New York, NY Harrison “Lee” Rainie, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC Glenda Revelle, Sesame Workshop, New York, NY Susan Royer, Sesame Workshop, New York, NY Richard Russell, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC William Strauss, LifeCourse Associates, Great Falls, VA Ellen Wartella, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 53
Page 1 and 2:
Toward A New Golden Age In American
Page 3 and 4: Toward A New Golden Age In American
Page 5 and 6: The Impact of No Child Left Behind
Page 7 and 8: Teachers and students are transform
Page 9 and 10: There has been explosive growth in
Page 11 and 12: A Nation on the Move Twenty-one yea
Page 13 and 14: Today’s students, of almost any a
Page 15 and 16: No Child Left Behind created new st
Page 17 and 18: Twenty years of national data show
Page 19 and 20: • 49 percent say they may be inte
Page 21 and 22: These are clearly exciting times fo
Page 23 and 24: like that. We should not have to ca
Page 25 and 26: Success Stories from Schools That A
Page 27 and 28: o language learners to compare achi
Page 29 and 30: Founded in 1997, the state-funded i
Page 31 and 32: makes this effort extraordinary is
Page 33 and 34: New Mexico Two years ago in New Mex
Page 35 and 36: • A number of other states and ot
Page 37 and 38: courses by mail. But through today
Page 39 and 40: The Impact of No Child Left Behind
Page 41 and 42: A National Education Technology Pla
Page 43 and 44: effective use of technology to enha
Page 45 and 46: • Encourage that broadband is ava
Page 47 and 48: Conclusions • There is no dispute
Page 49 and 50: Appendices A. Joint Federal Activit
Page 51 and 52: to strengthen this portfolio, and s
Page 53: APPENDIX B How This Plan Was Develo
Page 57 and 58: Tom Clark, TA Consulting, Springfie
Page 59 and 60: Garret Sern, EDUCAUSE, Washington,
Page 61 and 62: Joe Simpson, Council of Chief State
Page 63 and 64: APPENDIX C Acknowledgements We want
Page 65 and 66: APPENDIX D Endnotes 1 National Comm
Page 67 and 68: 17 Ibid. See http://www.nces.ed.gov
Page 69 and 70: 43 Ibid. 44 Ibid. 45 See State Educ
Page 72: 70 U.S. Department of Education Off
show all

National Education Technology Plan - Baker School District

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?