24.04.2014 Views

A remark on exponential dichotomies

A remark on exponential dichotomies

A remark on exponential dichotomies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

RAÚL NAULIN<br />

and<br />

∫ ∞<br />

|I 2 (t)| ≤ |A| ∞ e α(t−s) |A −1 (s)f(s) − A −1 (t)f(t)|ds<br />

≤ 2α −1 |A| ∞ K<br />

t<br />

sup<br />

s∈[t, ∞)<br />

|A −1 (s)f(s) − A −1 (t)f(t)|.<br />

Since f ∈ B A (∞), it is clear from (8) and (9) that lim t→∞ I i (t) = 0. From<br />

(7) we obtain that lim t→∞ x f (t) = −(A −1 f)(∞). Therefore, the functi<strong>on</strong> pair<br />

(B(∞), B A (∞)) is admissible.<br />

(B) ⇒ (A). Let S be the subspace of C n of values of initial c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of<br />

soluti<strong>on</strong>s of equati<strong>on</strong> (2) bel<strong>on</strong>ging to B(∞), and let U be a supplementary<br />

subspace of S. We have the direct sum C n = S ⊕ U. Then it is easy to prove<br />

that equati<strong>on</strong> (1) has, for any f ∈ B A (∞), a unique soluti<strong>on</strong>, which we denote<br />

by T (f), that bel<strong>on</strong>gs to B(∞) and is such that the initial c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> satisfies<br />

T (f)(0) ∈ U. It is also easy to verify that this corresp<strong>on</strong>dence is linear. Thus,<br />

we define this way a linear map T : B A (∞) → B(∞) such that T (f) satisfies<br />

(1) and T (f)(0) ∈ U. This map has a closed graph (the proof of this asserti<strong>on</strong><br />

is exactly the same as that of Propositi<strong>on</strong> 3.4 in [1]). Therefore, it is bounded,<br />

i.e., there exists a c<strong>on</strong>stant M, such that<br />

(9)<br />

|T (f)| ≤ M|f| A . (10)<br />

Let f ∈ B and for each n = 1, 2, ..., let θ n (t) be a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous functi<strong>on</strong> such that<br />

|θ n | ∞ = 1, θ n (t) = 1 if t ∈ [0, n] and θ n (t) = 0 if t ≥ n + 1. Let {f n } be the<br />

sequence in B A defined by<br />

f n (t) = θ n (t)f(t). (11)<br />

For each functi<strong>on</strong> f n , we c<strong>on</strong>sider the soluti<strong>on</strong> x n = T (f n ) of the equati<strong>on</strong><br />

According to (10), for any index n we have<br />

x ′ (t) = A(t)x(t) + f n (t). (12)<br />

|x n | ∞ ≤ M|f n | A ≤ M|f| A . (13)<br />

From (12) and (13) we obtain that the sequences {x n } and {x ′ n} are bounded<br />

<strong>on</strong> any compact subinterval of J. From the Ascoli-Arzelá theorem, there exists<br />

then a subsequence {x 1 n} of {x n } uniformly c<strong>on</strong>vergent <strong>on</strong> [0, 1] to a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous<br />

functi<strong>on</strong> u 1 <strong>on</strong> the interval [0, 1]. By the same argument, there exists a subsequence<br />

{x 2 n} of {x 1 n} c<strong>on</strong>verging uniformly <strong>on</strong> the interval [0, 2] to a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous<br />

functi<strong>on</strong> u 2 such that u 1 = u 2 <strong>on</strong> [0, 1]. Carrying out this process iteratively,<br />

we obtain, for any natural number N, a subsequence {x N n } of {x N−1<br />

n }, c<strong>on</strong>verging<br />

uniformly to a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous functi<strong>on</strong> u N <strong>on</strong> the interval [0, N], and such that<br />

u N = u N−1 <strong>on</strong> [0, N −1]. Defining u(t) = u N (t) if t ∈ [0, N], we obtain that the<br />

diag<strong>on</strong>al sequence {x n n} c<strong>on</strong>verges uniformly to u <strong>on</strong> each compact subinterval

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!