Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />
for □ ∈{X v , C v , X v , C v , −→v X , −→v C },wehaveacomplex archimedean topological field<br />
[i.e., a “CAF” — cf. §0]<br />
A □<br />
[cf. [AbsTopIII], Definition 4.1, (i)] which may be algorithmically constructed from<br />
def<br />
□; writeA □ = A □ \{0}. Next, let us write<br />
and<br />
D v<br />
def<br />
= X −→v<br />
C v<br />
for the archimedean Frobenioid as in [FrdII], Example 3.3, (ii) [i.e., “C” <strong>of</strong>loc. cit.],<br />
wherewetakethebase category [i.e., “D” <strong>of</strong>loc. cit.] to be the one-morphism<br />
category determined by Spec(K v ). Thus, the linear morphisms among the pseudoterminal<br />
objects <strong>of</strong> C determine unique isomorphisms [cf. [FrdI], Definition 1.3,<br />
(iii), (c)] among the respective topological monoids “O ⊲ (−)”—wherewerecall<br />
[cf. [FrdI], Theorem 3.4, (iii); [FrdII], Theorem 3.6, (i), (vii)] that these topological<br />
monoids may be reconstructed category-theoretically from C. In particular, it makes<br />
sense to write “O ⊲ (C v )”, “O × (C v ) ⊆O ⊲ (C v )”. Moreover, we observe that, by<br />
construction, there is a natural isomorphism<br />
O ⊲ (C v ) →O ∼ K ⊲ v<br />
<strong>of</strong> topological monoids. Thus, one may also think <strong>of</strong> C v as a “Frobenioid-theoretic<br />
representation” <strong>of</strong> the topological monoid OK ⊲ v<br />
[cf. [AbsTopIII], Remark 4.1.1].<br />
∼<br />
Observe that there is a natural topological isomorphism K v → ADv ,whichmaybe<br />
restricted to OK ⊲ v<br />
to obtain an inclusion <strong>of</strong> topological monoids<br />
κ v : O ⊲ (C v ) ↩→ A Dv<br />
— which we shall refer to as the Kummer structure on C v [cf. Remark 3.4.2 below].<br />
Write<br />
def<br />
F v<br />
=(C v , D v ,κ v )<br />
[cf. Example 3.2, (i); Example 3.3, (i)].<br />
(ii) Next, recall the category TM ⊢ <strong>of</strong> “split topological monoids” <strong>of</strong> [AbsTopIII],<br />
Definition 5.6, (i) — i.e., the category whose objects (C, −→ C ) consist <strong>of</strong> a topological<br />
monoid C isomorphic to OC<br />
⊲ and a topological submonoid −→ C ⊆ C [necessarily<br />
isomorphic to R ≥0 ] such that the natural inclusions C × ↩→ C [where C × ,<br />
which is necessarily isomorphic to S 1 , denotes the topological submonoid <strong>of</strong> invertible<br />
elements], −→ C ↩→ C determine an isomorphism C × × −→ C → ∼ C <strong>of</strong> topological<br />
monoids, and whose morphisms (C 1 , −→ C 1 ) → (C 2 , −→ C 2 ) are isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> topological<br />
monoids C 1 → C2 that induce isomorphisms −→ ∼ −→<br />
∼<br />
C 1 → C 2 . Note that the<br />
CAF’s K v , A Dv determine, in a natural way, objects <strong>of</strong> TM ⊢ .Write<br />
τ ⊢ v