Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 55<br />
discussion preceding [EtTh], Definition 2.1, one must in fact assume that the integer<br />
l is odd in order for the quotient Δ X to be well-defined. Since, ultimately, in [EtTh]<br />
[cf. the discussion following [EtTh], Remark 5.7.1], as well as in the present series<br />
<strong>of</strong> papers, this is the only case that is <strong>of</strong> interest, this oversight does not affect<br />
either the present series <strong>of</strong> papers or the bulk <strong>of</strong> the remainder <strong>of</strong> [EtTh]. Indeed,<br />
the only places in [EtTh] where the case <strong>of</strong> even l is used are [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1,<br />
and the application <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, in the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], Proposition<br />
2.12, for the orbicurves “Ċ”. Thus, [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, must be deleted; in<br />
[EtTh], Proposition 2.12, one must in fact exclude the case where the orbicurve<br />
under consideration is “Ċ”. On the other hand, this theory involving [EtTh],<br />
Proposition 2.12 [cf., especially, [EtTh], Corollaries 2.18, 2.19] is only applied after<br />
the discussion following [EtTh], Remark 5.7.1, i.e., which only treats the curves<br />
“X”. That is to say, ultimately, in [EtTh], as well as in the present series <strong>of</strong> papers,<br />
one is only interested in the curves “X”, whose treatment only requires the case <strong>of</strong><br />
odd l.<br />
Given initial Θ-data as in Definition 3.1, the theory <strong>of</strong> Frobenioids given in<br />
[FrdI], [FrdII], [EtTh] allows one to construct various associated Frobenioids, as<br />
follows.<br />
Example 3.2. Frobenioids at Bad Nonarchimedean Primes. Let v ∈<br />
V bad = V ⋂ V(K) bad . Then let us recall the theory <strong>of</strong> the “Frobenioid-theoretic<br />
theta function” discussed in [EtTh], §5:<br />
(i) By the theory <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], the hyperbolic curve X v<br />
determines a tempered<br />
Frobenioid<br />
F v<br />
[i.e., the Frobenioid denoted “C” in the discussion at the beginning <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], §5;<br />
cf. also the discussion <strong>of</strong> Remark 3.2.4 below] over a base category<br />
D v<br />
[i.e., the category denoted “D” in the discussion at the beginning <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], §5].<br />
We recall from the theory <strong>of</strong> [EtTh] that D v may be thought <strong>of</strong> as the category<br />
<strong>of</strong> connected tempered coverings — i.e., “B temp (X v<br />
) 0 ” in the notation <strong>of</strong> [EtTh],<br />
Example 3.9 — <strong>of</strong> the hyperbolic curve X v<br />
. In the following, we shall write<br />
D ⊢ v<br />
def<br />
= B(K v ) 0<br />
[cf. the notational conventions concerning categories discussed in §0]. Also, we<br />
observe that Dv<br />
⊢ may be naturally regarded [by pulling back finite étale coverings<br />
via the structure morphism X v<br />
→ Spec(K v )] as a full subcategory<br />
D ⊢ v ⊆D v<br />
<strong>of</strong> D v , and that we have a natural functor D v →Dv ⊢ ,whichisleft-adjoint to the<br />
natural inclusion functor Dv<br />
⊢ ↩→ D v [cf. [FrdII], Example 1.3, (ii)]. If (−) isan