24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 55<br />

discussion preceding [EtTh], Definition 2.1, one must in fact assume that the integer<br />

l is odd in order for the quotient Δ X to be well-defined. Since, ultimately, in [EtTh]<br />

[cf. the discussion following [EtTh], Remark 5.7.1], as well as in the present series<br />

<strong>of</strong> papers, this is the only case that is <strong>of</strong> interest, this oversight does not affect<br />

either the present series <strong>of</strong> papers or the bulk <strong>of</strong> the remainder <strong>of</strong> [EtTh]. Indeed,<br />

the only places in [EtTh] where the case <strong>of</strong> even l is used are [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1,<br />

and the application <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, in the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], Proposition<br />

2.12, for the orbicurves “Ċ”. Thus, [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, must be deleted; in<br />

[EtTh], Proposition 2.12, one must in fact exclude the case where the orbicurve<br />

under consideration is “Ċ”. On the other hand, this theory involving [EtTh],<br />

Proposition 2.12 [cf., especially, [EtTh], Corollaries 2.18, 2.19] is only applied after<br />

the discussion following [EtTh], Remark 5.7.1, i.e., which only treats the curves<br />

“X”. That is to say, ultimately, in [EtTh], as well as in the present series <strong>of</strong> papers,<br />

one is only interested in the curves “X”, whose treatment only requires the case <strong>of</strong><br />

odd l.<br />

Given initial Θ-data as in Definition 3.1, the theory <strong>of</strong> Frobenioids given in<br />

[FrdI], [FrdII], [EtTh] allows one to construct various associated Frobenioids, as<br />

follows.<br />

Example 3.2. Frobenioids at Bad Nonarchimedean Primes. Let v ∈<br />

V bad = V ⋂ V(K) bad . Then let us recall the theory <strong>of</strong> the “Frobenioid-theoretic<br />

theta function” discussed in [EtTh], §5:<br />

(i) By the theory <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], the hyperbolic curve X v<br />

determines a tempered<br />

Frobenioid<br />

F v<br />

[i.e., the Frobenioid denoted “C” in the discussion at the beginning <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], §5;<br />

cf. also the discussion <strong>of</strong> Remark 3.2.4 below] over a base category<br />

D v<br />

[i.e., the category denoted “D” in the discussion at the beginning <strong>of</strong> [EtTh], §5].<br />

We recall from the theory <strong>of</strong> [EtTh] that D v may be thought <strong>of</strong> as the category<br />

<strong>of</strong> connected tempered coverings — i.e., “B temp (X v<br />

) 0 ” in the notation <strong>of</strong> [EtTh],<br />

Example 3.9 — <strong>of</strong> the hyperbolic curve X v<br />

. In the following, we shall write<br />

D ⊢ v<br />

def<br />

= B(K v ) 0<br />

[cf. the notational conventions concerning categories discussed in §0]. Also, we<br />

observe that Dv<br />

⊢ may be naturally regarded [by pulling back finite étale coverings<br />

via the structure morphism X v<br />

→ Spec(K v )] as a full subcategory<br />

D ⊢ v ⊆D v<br />

<strong>of</strong> D v , and that we have a natural functor D v →Dv ⊢ ,whichisleft-adjoint to the<br />

natural inclusion functor Dv<br />

⊢ ↩→ D v [cf. [FrdII], Example 1.3, (ii)]. If (−) isan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!