Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
54 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI V bad . That is to say, the Θ-approach involves applying the reconstruction algorithm of [AbsTopIII], Theorem 1.9, via the cyclotome M X , which may be identified, via the above tautological isomorphism, with the cyclotome (l · Δ Θ ), which plays a central role in the theory of [EtTh] — cf., especially, the discussion of “cyclotomic rigidity” in [EtTh], Corollary 2.19, (i). (iv) If one thinks of the prime number l as being “large”, then the role played by the covering X in the above discussion of the “Θ-approach” is reminiscent of the role played by the universal covering of a complex elliptic curve by the complex plane in the holomorphic reconstruction theory of [AbsTopIII], §2 [cf., e.g., [AbsTopIII], Propositions 2.5, 2.6]. Remark 3.1.3. Since V bad mod ≠ ∅ [cf. Definition 3.1, (b)], it follows immediately from Definition 3.1, (d), (e), (f), that the data (F/F, X F ,l,C K , V, V bad mod ,ɛ)is, in fact, completely determined by the data (F/F, X F , C K , V, V bad mod ), and that C K is completely determined up to K-isomorphism by the data (F/F, X F , l, V). Finally, we remark that for given data (X F , l, V bad mod ), distinct choices of “V” will not affect the theory in any significant way. Remark 3.1.4. It follows immediately from the definitions that at each v ∈ V bad [which is necessarily prime to l — cf. Definition 3.1, (c)] (respectively, each v ∈ V good ⋂ V non which is prime to l; each v ∈ V good ⋂ V non ), X v (respectively, −→v X ; X v )admitsastable model over the ring of integers of K v . Remark 3.1.5. Notethatsincethe3-torsion points of E F are rational over F , and F is Galois over F mod [cf. Definition 3.1, (b)], it follows [cf., e.g., [IUTchIV], Proposition 1.8, (iv)] that K is Galois over F mod . In addition to working with the field F mod and various extensions of F mod contained in F , we shall also have occasion to work with the algebraic stack S mod def = Spec(O K ) // Gal(K/F mod ) obtained by forming the stack-theoretic quotient [i.e., “//”] of the spectrum of the ring of integers O K of K by the Galois group Gal(K/F mod ). Thus, any finite extension L ⊆ F of F mod in F determines, by forming the integral closure of S mod in L, an algebraic stack S mod,L over S mod . In particular, by considering arithmetic line bundles over such S mod,L , one may associate to any quotient Gal(F/F mod ) ↠ Q a Frobenioid via [the easily verified “stack-theoretic version” of] the construction of [FrdI], Example 6.3. One verifies immediately that an appropriate analogue of [FrdI], Theorem 6.4, holds for such stack-theoretic versions of the Frobenioids constructed in [FrdI], Example 6.3. Also, we observe that upon passing to either the perfection or the realification, such stack-theoretic versions become naturally isomorphic to the non-stack-theoretic versions [i.e., of [FrdI], Example 6.3, as stated]. Remark 3.1.6. In light of the important role played by the various orbicurves constructed in [EtTh], §2, in the present series of papers, we take the opportunity to correct an unfortunate — albeit in fact irrelevant! — error in [EtTh]. In the
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 55 discussion preceding [EtTh], Definition 2.1, one must in fact assume that the integer l is odd in order for the quotient Δ X to be well-defined. Since, ultimately, in [EtTh] [cf. the discussion following [EtTh], Remark 5.7.1], as well as in the present series of papers, this is the only case that is of interest, this oversight does not affect either the present series of papers or the bulk of the remainder of [EtTh]. Indeed, the only places in [EtTh] where the case of even l is used are [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, and the application of [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, in the proof of [EtTh], Proposition 2.12, for the orbicurves “Ċ”. Thus, [EtTh], Remark 2.2.1, must be deleted; in [EtTh], Proposition 2.12, one must in fact exclude the case where the orbicurve under consideration is “Ċ”. On the other hand, this theory involving [EtTh], Proposition 2.12 [cf., especially, [EtTh], Corollaries 2.18, 2.19] is only applied after the discussion following [EtTh], Remark 5.7.1, i.e., which only treats the curves “X”. That is to say, ultimately, in [EtTh], as well as in the present series of papers, one is only interested in the curves “X”, whose treatment only requires the case of odd l. Given initial Θ-data as in Definition 3.1, the theory of Frobenioids given in [FrdI], [FrdII], [EtTh] allows one to construct various associated Frobenioids, as follows. Example 3.2. Frobenioids at Bad Nonarchimedean Primes. Let v ∈ V bad = V ⋂ V(K) bad . Then let us recall the theory of the “Frobenioid-theoretic theta function” discussed in [EtTh], §5: (i) By the theory of [EtTh], the hyperbolic curve X v determines a tempered Frobenioid F v [i.e., the Frobenioid denoted “C” in the discussion at the beginning of [EtTh], §5; cf. also the discussion of Remark 3.2.4 below] over a base category D v [i.e., the category denoted “D” in the discussion at the beginning of [EtTh], §5]. We recall from the theory of [EtTh] that D v may be thought of as the category of connected tempered coverings — i.e., “B temp (X v ) 0 ” in the notation of [EtTh], Example 3.9 — of the hyperbolic curve X v . In the following, we shall write D ⊢ v def = B(K v ) 0 [cf. the notational conventions concerning categories discussed in §0]. Also, we observe that Dv ⊢ may be naturally regarded [by pulling back finite étale coverings via the structure morphism X v → Spec(K v )] as a full subcategory D ⊢ v ⊆D v of D v , and that we have a natural functor D v →Dv ⊢ ,whichisleft-adjoint to the natural inclusion functor Dv ⊢ ↩→ D v [cf. [FrdII], Example 1.3, (ii)]. If (−) isan
- Page 3 and 4: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 5 and 6: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 7 and 8: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 9 and 10: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 11 and 12: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 13 and 14: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 15 and 16: associated to † F ⊩ mod and ‡
- Page 17 and 18: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 19 and 20: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 21 and 22: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 23 and 24: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 25 and 26: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 27 and 28: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 29 and 30: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 31 and 32: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 33 and 34: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 35 and 36: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 37 and 38: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 39 and 40: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 41 and 42: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 43 and 44: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 45 and 46: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 47 and 48: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 49 and 50: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 51 and 52: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 53: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 57 and 58: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 59 and 60: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 61 and 62: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 63 and 64: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 65 and 66: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 67 and 68: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 69 and 70: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 71 and 72: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 73 and 74: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 75 and 76: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 77 and 78: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 79 and 80: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 81 and 82: completely determined by † D. INT
- Page 83 and 84: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 85 and 86: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 87 and 88: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 89 and 90: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 91 and 92: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 93 and 94: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 95 and 96: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 97 and 98: conjugation by which maps φ NF IN
- Page 99 and 100: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 101 and 102: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 103 and 104: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
54 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />
V bad . That is to say, the Θ-approach involves applying the reconstruction algorithm<br />
<strong>of</strong> [AbsTopIII], Theorem 1.9, via the cyclotome M X , which may be identified, via<br />
the above tautological isomorphism, with the cyclotome (l · Δ Θ ), which plays a<br />
central role in the theory <strong>of</strong> [EtTh] — cf., especially, the discussion <strong>of</strong> “cyclotomic<br />
rigidity” in [EtTh], Corollary 2.19, (i).<br />
(iv) If one thinks <strong>of</strong> the prime number l as being “large”, then the role played<br />
by the covering X in the above discussion <strong>of</strong> the “Θ-approach” is reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
role played by the <strong>universal</strong> covering <strong>of</strong> a complex elliptic curve by the complex plane<br />
in the holomorphic reconstruction theory <strong>of</strong> [AbsTopIII], §2 [cf., e.g., [AbsTopIII],<br />
Propositions 2.5, 2.6].<br />
Remark 3.1.3. Since V bad<br />
mod ≠ ∅ [cf. Definition 3.1, (b)], it follows immediately<br />
from Definition 3.1, (d), (e), (f), that the data (F/F, X F ,l,C K , V, V bad<br />
mod ,ɛ)is,<br />
in fact, completely determined by the data (F/F, X F , C K , V, V bad<br />
mod<br />
), and that<br />
C K is completely determined up to K-isomorphism by the data (F/F, X F , l, V).<br />
Finally, we remark that for given data (X F , l, V bad<br />
mod<br />
), distinct choices <strong>of</strong> “V” will<br />
not affect the theory in any significant way.<br />
Remark 3.1.4. It follows immediately from the definitions that at each v ∈ V bad<br />
[which is necessarily prime to l — cf. Definition 3.1, (c)] (respectively, each v ∈<br />
V good ⋂ V non which is prime to l; each v ∈ V good ⋂ V non ), X v<br />
(respectively, −→v X ;<br />
X v )admitsastable model over the ring <strong>of</strong> integers <strong>of</strong> K v .<br />
Remark 3.1.5. Notethatsincethe3-torsion points <strong>of</strong> E F are rational over F ,<br />
and F is Galois over F mod [cf. Definition 3.1, (b)], it follows [cf., e.g., [IUTchIV],<br />
Proposition 1.8, (iv)] that K is Galois over F mod . In addition to working with<br />
the field F mod and various extensions <strong>of</strong> F mod contained in F , we shall also have<br />
occasion to work with the algebraic stack<br />
S mod<br />
def<br />
= Spec(O K ) // Gal(K/F mod )<br />
obtained by forming the stack-theoretic quotient [i.e., “//”] <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ring <strong>of</strong> integers O K <strong>of</strong> K by the Galois group Gal(K/F mod ). Thus, any finite extension<br />
L ⊆ F <strong>of</strong> F mod in F determines, by forming the integral closure <strong>of</strong> S mod in L,<br />
an algebraic stack S mod,L over S mod . In particular, by considering arithmetic line<br />
bundles over such S mod,L , one may associate to any quotient Gal(F/F mod ) ↠ Q<br />
a Frobenioid via [the easily verified “stack-theoretic version” <strong>of</strong>] the construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> [FrdI], Example 6.3. One verifies immediately that an appropriate analogue <strong>of</strong><br />
[FrdI], Theorem 6.4, holds for such stack-theoretic versions <strong>of</strong> the Frobenioids constructed<br />
in [FrdI], Example 6.3. Also, we observe that upon passing to either the<br />
perfection or the realification, such stack-theoretic versions become naturally isomorphic<br />
to the non-stack-theoretic versions [i.e., <strong>of</strong> [FrdI], Example 6.3, as stated].<br />
Remark 3.1.6. In light <strong>of</strong> the important role played by the various orbicurves<br />
constructed in [EtTh], §2, in the present series <strong>of</strong> papers, we take the opportunity<br />
to correct an unfortunate — albeit in fact irrelevant! — error in [EtTh]. In the