24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

Section 0: Notations and Conventions<br />

Monoids and Categories:<br />

We shall use the notation and terminology concerning monoids and categories<br />

<strong>of</strong> [FrdI], §0.<br />

We shall refer to an isomorphic copy <strong>of</strong> some object as an isomorph <strong>of</strong> the<br />

object.<br />

If C and D are categories, then we shall refer to as an isomorphism C→Dany<br />

isomorphism class <strong>of</strong> equivalences <strong>of</strong> categories C→D. [Note that this termniology<br />

differs from the standard terminology <strong>of</strong> category theory, but will be natural in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> the present series <strong>of</strong> papers.] Thus, from the point <strong>of</strong> view<br />

<strong>of</strong> “coarsifications <strong>of</strong> 2-categories <strong>of</strong> 1-categories” [cf. [FrdI], Appendix, Definition<br />

A.1, (ii)], an “isomorphism C→D” is precisely an “isomorphism in the usual sense”<br />

<strong>of</strong> the [1-]category constituted by the coarsification <strong>of</strong> the 2-category <strong>of</strong> all small<br />

1-categories relative to a suitable universe with respect to which C and D are small.<br />

Let C be a category; A, B ∈ Ob(C). Then we define a poly-morphism A → B<br />

to be a collection <strong>of</strong> morphisms A → B [i.e., a subset <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> morphisms<br />

A → B]; if all <strong>of</strong> the morphisms in the collection are isomorphisms, then we shall<br />

refer to the poly-morphism as a poly-isomorphism; if A = B, then we shall refer<br />

to a poly-isomorphism A → ∼ B as a poly-automorphism. We define the full<br />

poly-isomorphism A → ∼ B to be the poly-morphism given by the collection <strong>of</strong> all<br />

isomorphisms A → ∼ B. The composite <strong>of</strong> a poly-morphism {f i : A → B} i∈I with a<br />

poly-morphism {g j : B → C} j∈J is defined to be the poly-morphism given by the<br />

set [i.e., where “multiplicities” are ignored] {g j ◦ f i : A → C} (i,j)∈I×J .<br />

Let C be a category. We define a capsule <strong>of</strong> objects <strong>of</strong> C to be a finite collection<br />

{A j } j∈J [i.e., where J is a finite index set] <strong>of</strong> objects A j <strong>of</strong> C; if|J| denotes the<br />

cardinality <strong>of</strong> J, then we shall refer to a capsule with index set J as a |J|-capsule;<br />

also, we shall write π 0 ({A j } j∈J ) def<br />

= J. Amorphism <strong>of</strong> capsules <strong>of</strong> objects <strong>of</strong> C<br />

{A j } j∈J →{A ′ j ′} j ′ ∈J ′<br />

is defined to consist <strong>of</strong> an injection ι : J↩→ J ′ , together with, for each j ∈ J, a<br />

morphism A j → A ′ ι(j)<br />

<strong>of</strong> objects <strong>of</strong> C. Thus, the capsules <strong>of</strong> objects <strong>of</strong> C form a<br />

category Capsule(C). A capsule-full poly-morphism<br />

{A j } j∈J<br />

∼<br />

→{A<br />

′<br />

j ′} j′ ∈J ′<br />

between two objects <strong>of</strong> Capsule(C) is defined to be the poly-morphism associated<br />

to some [fixed] injection ι : J ↩→ J ′ which consists <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong><br />

∼<br />

Capsule(C) given by collections <strong>of</strong> [arbitrary] isomorphisms A j → A<br />

′<br />

ι(j)<br />

,forj ∈<br />

J. A capsule-full poly-isomorphism is a capsule-full poly-morphism for which the<br />

associated injection between index sets is a bijection.<br />

If X is a connected noetherian algebraic stack which is generically scheme-like,<br />

then we shall write<br />

B(X)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!