24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 3<br />

is assumed to be isomorphic to a subgroup <strong>of</strong> GL 2 (F l )thatcontains SL 2 (F l ), E F<br />

is assumed to have stable reduction at all <strong>of</strong> the nonarchimedean valuations <strong>of</strong> F ,<br />

def<br />

C K = C F × F K is assumed to be a K-core [cf. [CanLift], Remark 2.1.1], V<br />

is assumed to be a collection <strong>of</strong> valuations <strong>of</strong> K such that the natural inclusion<br />

F mod ⊆ F ⊆ K induces a bijection V → ∼ V mod between V and the set V mod <strong>of</strong> all<br />

valuations <strong>of</strong> the number field F mod ,and<br />

V bad<br />

mod<br />

⊆ V mod<br />

is assumed to be some nonempty set <strong>of</strong> nonarchimedean valuations <strong>of</strong> odd residue<br />

characteristic over which E F has bad [i.e., multiplicative] reduction — i.e., roughly<br />

speaking, the subset <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> valuations where E F has bad multiplicative reduction<br />

that will be “<strong>of</strong> interest” to us in the context <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> the present series<br />

<strong>of</strong> papers. Then we shall write V bad def<br />

= V bad<br />

mod × V mod<br />

V ⊆ V, V good def<br />

mod<br />

= V mod \ V bad<br />

mod ,<br />

V good def<br />

= V\V bad . Also, we shall apply the superscripts “non” and “arc” to V, V mod<br />

to denote the subsets <strong>of</strong> nonarchimedean and archimedean valuations, respectively.<br />

This data determines, up to K-isomorphism [cf. Remark 3.1.3], a finite étale<br />

covering C K → C K <strong>of</strong> degree l such that the base-changed covering<br />

X K<br />

def<br />

def<br />

= C K × CF X F → X K = X F × F K<br />

arises from a rank one quotient E K [l] ↠ Q ( ∼ = Z/lZ) <strong>of</strong> the module E K [l]<strong>of</strong>l-torsion<br />

points <strong>of</strong> E K (K) which,atv ∈ V bad , restricts to the quotient arising from coverings<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dual graph <strong>of</strong> the special fiber. Moreover, the above data also determines a<br />

cusp<br />

ɛ<br />

<strong>of</strong> C K which, at v ∈ V bad , corresponds to the canonical generator, upto±1, <strong>of</strong> Q<br />

[i.e., the generator determined by the unique loop <strong>of</strong> the dual graph <strong>of</strong> the special<br />

fiber]. Furthermore, at v ∈ V bad , one obtains a natural finite étale covering <strong>of</strong><br />

degree l<br />

X v<br />

→ X v<br />

def<br />

= X K × K K v (→ C v<br />

def<br />

= C K × K K v )<br />

by extracting l-th roots <strong>of</strong> the theta function; at v ∈ V good , one obtains a natural<br />

finite étale covering <strong>of</strong> degree l<br />

X−→ v<br />

→ X v<br />

def<br />

= X K × K K v (→ C v<br />

def<br />

= C K × K K v )<br />

determined by ɛ. More details on the structure <strong>of</strong> the coverings C K , X K , X v<br />

[for<br />

v ∈ V bad ], −→v X [for v ∈ V good ] may be found in [EtTh], §2, as well as in §1 <strong>of</strong>the<br />

present paper.<br />

In this situation, the objects<br />

l <br />

def<br />

= (l − 1)/2; l ± def<br />

= (l +1)/2; F l<br />

def<br />

= F × l<br />

/{±1}; F⋊±<br />

l<br />

def<br />

= F l ⋊ {±1}

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!