Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 3<br />
is assumed to be isomorphic to a subgroup <strong>of</strong> GL 2 (F l )thatcontains SL 2 (F l ), E F<br />
is assumed to have stable reduction at all <strong>of</strong> the nonarchimedean valuations <strong>of</strong> F ,<br />
def<br />
C K = C F × F K is assumed to be a K-core [cf. [CanLift], Remark 2.1.1], V<br />
is assumed to be a collection <strong>of</strong> valuations <strong>of</strong> K such that the natural inclusion<br />
F mod ⊆ F ⊆ K induces a bijection V → ∼ V mod between V and the set V mod <strong>of</strong> all<br />
valuations <strong>of</strong> the number field F mod ,and<br />
V bad<br />
mod<br />
⊆ V mod<br />
is assumed to be some nonempty set <strong>of</strong> nonarchimedean valuations <strong>of</strong> odd residue<br />
characteristic over which E F has bad [i.e., multiplicative] reduction — i.e., roughly<br />
speaking, the subset <strong>of</strong> the set <strong>of</strong> valuations where E F has bad multiplicative reduction<br />
that will be “<strong>of</strong> interest” to us in the context <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> the present series<br />
<strong>of</strong> papers. Then we shall write V bad def<br />
= V bad<br />
mod × V mod<br />
V ⊆ V, V good def<br />
mod<br />
= V mod \ V bad<br />
mod ,<br />
V good def<br />
= V\V bad . Also, we shall apply the superscripts “non” and “arc” to V, V mod<br />
to denote the subsets <strong>of</strong> nonarchimedean and archimedean valuations, respectively.<br />
This data determines, up to K-isomorphism [cf. Remark 3.1.3], a finite étale<br />
covering C K → C K <strong>of</strong> degree l such that the base-changed covering<br />
X K<br />
def<br />
def<br />
= C K × CF X F → X K = X F × F K<br />
arises from a rank one quotient E K [l] ↠ Q ( ∼ = Z/lZ) <strong>of</strong> the module E K [l]<strong>of</strong>l-torsion<br />
points <strong>of</strong> E K (K) which,atv ∈ V bad , restricts to the quotient arising from coverings<br />
<strong>of</strong> the dual graph <strong>of</strong> the special fiber. Moreover, the above data also determines a<br />
cusp<br />
ɛ<br />
<strong>of</strong> C K which, at v ∈ V bad , corresponds to the canonical generator, upto±1, <strong>of</strong> Q<br />
[i.e., the generator determined by the unique loop <strong>of</strong> the dual graph <strong>of</strong> the special<br />
fiber]. Furthermore, at v ∈ V bad , one obtains a natural finite étale covering <strong>of</strong><br />
degree l<br />
X v<br />
→ X v<br />
def<br />
= X K × K K v (→ C v<br />
def<br />
= C K × K K v )<br />
by extracting l-th roots <strong>of</strong> the theta function; at v ∈ V good , one obtains a natural<br />
finite étale covering <strong>of</strong> degree l<br />
X−→ v<br />
→ X v<br />
def<br />
= X K × K K v (→ C v<br />
def<br />
= C K × K K v )<br />
determined by ɛ. More details on the structure <strong>of</strong> the coverings C K , X K , X v<br />
[for<br />
v ∈ V bad ], −→v X [for v ∈ V good ] may be found in [EtTh], §2, as well as in §1 <strong>of</strong>the<br />
present paper.<br />
In this situation, the objects<br />
l <br />
def<br />
= (l − 1)/2; l ± def<br />
= (l +1)/2; F l<br />
def<br />
= F × l<br />
/{±1}; F⋊±<br />
l<br />
def<br />
= F l ⋊ {±1}