24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 27<br />

[IUTchIII], these two types <strong>of</strong> arrows fail to commute [cf. [IUTchIII], Remark 1.4.1,<br />

(i)]. This noncommutativity, or “intertwining”, <strong>of</strong> the Θ-link and log-link arrows<br />

<strong>of</strong> the log-theta-lattice may be thought <strong>of</strong> as the analogue, in the context <strong>of</strong> the<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> the present series <strong>of</strong> papers, <strong>of</strong> the well-known “intertwining between the<br />

mixed characteristic extension structure <strong>of</strong> a ring <strong>of</strong> Witt vectors and the Frobenius<br />

morphism in positive characteristic” that appears in the classical p-adic theory. In<br />

particular, taken as a whole, the log-theta-lattice in the theory <strong>of</strong> the present series<br />

<strong>of</strong> papers may be thought <strong>of</strong> as an analogue, for number fields equipped with a<br />

[once-punctured] elliptic curve, <strong>of</strong> the canonical lifting, equipped with a canonical<br />

Frobenius action — hence also the canonical Frobenius lifting over the<br />

ordinary locus <strong>of</strong> the curve — associated to a positive characteristic hyperbolic<br />

curve equipped with a nilpotent ordinary indigenous bundle in p-adic Teichmüller<br />

theory [cf. Fig. I4.1 above; the discussion <strong>of</strong> [IUTchIII], Remarks 3.12.3, 3.12.4].<br />

Finally, we observe that it is <strong>of</strong> particular interest in the context <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

discussion that a theory is developed in [CanLift], §3, that yields an absolute<br />

anabelian reconstruction for the canonical liftings <strong>of</strong> p-adic Teichmüller theory.<br />

That is to say, whereas the original construction <strong>of</strong> such canonical liftings<br />

given in [pOrd], §3, is relatively straightforward, theanabelian reconstruction given<br />

in [CanLift], §3, <strong>of</strong>, for instance, the canonical lifting modulo p 2 <strong>of</strong> the logarithmic<br />

special fiber consists <strong>of</strong> a highly nontrivial anabelian argument. This state <strong>of</strong><br />

affairs is strongly reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the stark contrast between the relatively straightforward<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the log-theta-lattice given in the present series <strong>of</strong> papers and<br />

the description <strong>of</strong> an “alien arithmetic holomorphic structure” given in [IUTchIII],<br />

Corollary 3.11 [cf. the discussion in the earlier portion <strong>of</strong> the present §I4], which<br />

is achieved by applying highly nontrivial results in absolute anabelian geometry —<br />

cf. Fig. I4.1 above. In this context, we observe that the absolute anabelian theory<br />

<strong>of</strong> [AbsTopIII], §1, which plays a central role in the theory surrounding [IUTchIII],<br />

Corollary 3.11, corresponds, in the theory <strong>of</strong> [CanLift], §3, to the absolute anabelian<br />

reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the logarithmic special fiber given in [AbsAnab], §2 [i.e., in essence,<br />

the theory <strong>of</strong> absolute anabelian geometry over finite fields developed in [Tama1]; cf.<br />

also [Cusp], §2]. Moreover, just as the absolute anabelian theory <strong>of</strong> [AbsTopIII], §1,<br />

follows essentially by combining a version <strong>of</strong> “Uchida’s Lemma” [cf. [AbsTopIII],<br />

Proposition 1.3] with the theory <strong>of</strong> Belyi cuspidalization — i.e.,<br />

[AbsTopIII], §1 = Uchida Lem. + Belyi cuspidalization<br />

— the absolute anabelian geometry over finite fields <strong>of</strong> [Tama1], [Cusp], follows<br />

essentially by combining a version <strong>of</strong> “Uchida’s Lemma” with an application [to<br />

the counting <strong>of</strong> rational points] <strong>of</strong> the Lefschetz trace formula for [powers <strong>of</strong>] the<br />

Frobenius morphism on a curve over a finite field — i.e.,<br />

[Tama1], [Cusp] = Uchida Lem. + Lefschetz trace formula for Frob.<br />

— cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> [AbsTopIII], §I5. That is to say, it is perhaps worthy <strong>of</strong><br />

note that in the analogy between the inter-<strong>universal</strong> Teichmüller theory developed<br />

in the present series <strong>of</strong> papers and the p-adic Teichmüller theory <strong>of</strong> [pOrd], [pTeich],<br />

[CanLift], the application <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> Belyi cuspidalization over number fields<br />

and mixed characteristic local fields may be thought <strong>of</strong> as corresponding to the<br />

Lefschetz trace formula for [powers <strong>of</strong>] the Frobenius morphism on a curve over a<br />

finite field, i.e.,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!