Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 147<br />
a hyperbolic curve in positive characteristic, while the “local system-theoretic”<br />
copy <strong>of</strong> Z — which, as discussed in (i), also serves as a discrete approximation <strong>of</strong><br />
the [geometric portion <strong>of</strong> the] elliptic curve under consideration — corresponds to<br />
a nilpotent ordinary indigenous bundle over the positive characteristic hyperbolic<br />
curve.<br />
-” and<br />
“F l -”] symmetries <strong>of</strong> ΘNF-, Θ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters may be thought <strong>of</strong> as corresponding,<br />
respectively, to the two real dimensions<br />
(iii) Relative to the analogy discussed in (ii) between the “local system-theoretic”<br />
copy <strong>of</strong> Z <strong>of</strong> (i) and the indigenous bundles that occur in p-adic Teichmüller theory,<br />
it is interesting to note that the two combinatorial dimensions [cf. [AbsTopIII], Remark<br />
5.6.1] corresponding to the additive and multiplicative [i.e., “F ⋊±<br />
l<br />
· z ↦→ z + a, z ↦→ −z + a;<br />
· z ↦→<br />
z · cos(t) − sin(t)<br />
z · sin(t) + cos(t) ,<br />
z · cos(t)+sin(t)<br />
z ↦→<br />
z · sin(t) − cos(t)<br />
—wherea, t ∈ R; z denotes the standard coordinate on H — <strong>of</strong> transformations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the upper half-plane H, i.e., an object that is very closely related to the<br />
canonical indigenous bundles that occur in the classical complex uniformization<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> hyperbolic Riemann surfaces [cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> Remark 4.3.3]. Here,<br />
it is also <strong>of</strong> interest to observe that the above additive symmetry <strong>of</strong> the upper<br />
half-plane is closely related to the coordinate on the upper half-plane determined<br />
by the “classical q-parameter”<br />
q<br />
def<br />
= e 2πiz<br />
— a situation that is reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the close relationship, in the theory <strong>of</strong> the<br />
present series <strong>of</strong> papers, between the F ⋊±<br />
l<br />
-symmetry and the Kummer theory<br />
surrounding the <strong>Hodge</strong>-Arakelov-theoretic evaluation <strong>of</strong> the theta function on the<br />
l-torsion points at bad primes [cf. Remark 6.12.6, (ii); the theory <strong>of</strong> [IUTchII]].<br />
Moreover, the fixed basepoint “V ± ” [cf. Definition 6.1, (v)] with respect to which<br />
one considers l-torsion points in the context <strong>of</strong> the F ⋊±<br />
l<br />
-symmetry is reminiscent <strong>of</strong><br />
the fact that the above additive symmetries <strong>of</strong> the upper half-plane fix the cusp at<br />
infinity. Indeed, taken as a whole, the geometry and coordinate naturally associated<br />
to this additive symmetry <strong>of</strong> the upper half-plane may be thought <strong>of</strong>, at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
“combinatorial prototypes”, as the geometric apparatus associated to a cusp<br />
[i.e., as opposed to a node — cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> [NodNon], Introduction]. By<br />
contrast, the “toral” multiplicative symmetry <strong>of</strong> the upper half-plane recalled<br />
above is closely related to the coordinate on the upper half-plane that determines<br />
a biholomorphic isomorphism with the unit disc<br />
w<br />
def<br />
= z−i<br />
z+i<br />
— a situation that is reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the close relationship, in the theory <strong>of</strong> the<br />
present series <strong>of</strong> papers, between the F l<br />
-symmetry and the Kummer theory<br />
surrounding the number field F mod [cf. Remark 6.12.6, (iii); the theory <strong>of</strong> §5 <strong>of</strong><br />
the present paper]. Moreover, the action <strong>of</strong> F l<br />
on the “collection <strong>of</strong> basepoints<br />
for the l-torsion points” V Bor = F l<br />
· V ±un [cf. Example 4.3, (i)] in the context <strong>of</strong>